ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05691205PEEP-LuTXUpdated Apr 2, 2025

Identifying Optimal PEEP After Lung Transplantation

An interventional study of PEEP in Lung Transplant; Complications and Primary Graft Dysfunction, sponsored by Policlinico Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by Policlinico Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lung Transplantation (LuTX) is the curative treatment for selected patients with end-stage lung disease. Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), a specific form of respiratory failure occurring within the first 72 hours after graft reperfusion, represents the most common complication after LuTX.

Actual recommendation regarding management of mechanical ventilation of the lung graft immediately after LuTX are based only on opinion experts and not on clinical trials. Optimization of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure might contribute to both prevention and treatment of PGD.

In this interventional single-center non-pharmacological study (with medical device), in the immediate postoperative period of patients who are undergone LuTX, we will evaluate the effects of varying levels of PEEP upon: - lung and chest wall mechanics, - intrapulmonary shunt fraction; - distribution of ventilation and perfusion; - gas exchange.

The final aim is to find the optimal level of PEEP in this patient's cohort

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Transplant; Complications
  • Primary Graft Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Lung Transplantation
  • Primary Graft Dysfunction
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
  • Electrical Impedance Tomography
03

In context

Primary Graft Dysfunction

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Primary Graft Dysfunction; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is close to the median of 47 across 11 interventional studies indexed under Primary Graft Dysfunction.

Browse Primary Graft Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Policlinico Hospital is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recipient of LUTX
  • Age > 18 years
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Already undergone LUTX
  • Major hemodynamic instability along the 24 hours following LUTX: systolic arterial pressure \< 90 mmHg and/or heart rate > 120 beat/min and/or high dose vasopressor requirement (norepinephrine > 0.3 mcg/kg/min and/or epinephrine > 0.2 mcg/kg/min and/or dobutamine > 8mcg/kg/min)
  • Documented post-LUTX endobronchial plasma leak requiring high levels of PEEP > 15 cmH2O
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEEP-LuTX

    Within 48h after LuTX we will evaluate the effects of three levels of PEEP (14\>10\>6 cmH2O) upon: - lung and chest wall mechanics, - intrapulmonary shunt fraction; - distribution of ventilation and perfusion; - gas exchange.

    Other: PEEP

Interventions

  • OtherPEEP

    After a recruitment maneuver three levels of PEEP (14\>10\>6cmH2O) will be tested

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lung Compliance

    Identifying the level of PEEP associated to the best compliance

    Time frame: Measurements at three PEEP levels during a decremental PEEP trial

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lung collapse&overdistension

    Identifying the level of PEEP associated to the lowest collapse\&overdistension according to Electrical Impedance Tomography

    Time frame: Measurements at three PEEP levels during a decremental PEEP trial

  2. Lung perfusion

    Identifying the level of PEEP associated to the most homogeneous distribution of lung perfusion according to Electrical Impedance Tomography

    Time frame: Measurements at three PEEP levels during a decremental PEEP trial

  3. Intrapulmonary shunt

    Identifying the level of PEEP associated to the lowest intrapulmonary shunt level

    Time frame: Measurements at three PEEP levels during a decremental PEEP trial

  4. Dead space

    Identifying the level of PEEP associated to the lowest dead space fraction

    Time frame: Measurements at three PEEP levels during a decremental PEEP trial

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milan, 20122, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Diamond JM, Lee JC, Kawut SM, Shah RJ, Localio AR, Bellamy SL, Lederer DJ, Cantu E, Kohl BA, Lama VN, Bhorade SM, Crespo M, Demissie E, Sonett J, Wille K, Orens J, Shah AS, Weinacker A, Arcasoy S, Shah PD, Wilkes DS, Ware LB, Palmer SM, Christie JD; Lung Transplant Outcomes Group. Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar 1;187(5):527-34. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1865OC. Epub 2013 Jan 10. PubMed 23306540 ↗
  • Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2095-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638. Epub 2008 Nov 11. PubMed 19001507 ↗
  • Costa EL, Borges JB, Melo A, Suarez-Sipmann F, Toufen C Jr, Bohm SH, Amato MB. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1132-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1447-y. Epub 2009 Mar 3. PubMed 19255741 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Deidentified data will be shared with other researchers upon explicit request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 23 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 11, 2023
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
StartActual
Jan 31, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Mar 15, 2025
Last update
Apr 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05691205
Lead sponsor
Policlinico Hospital
Responsible party
Giacomo Grasselli (Professor, Policlinico Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
Start date
Jan 31, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Mar 15, 2025
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion