ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05684471Updated May 8, 2024

SFIB vs Anterior QLB in Total Hip Arthroplasty

An interventional study of Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia iliaca Block and Ultrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pain, sponsored by Samsun University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-08.

Sponsored by Samsun University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a facial plane block defined to provide analgesia from T7-L3 dermatomes. There are articles reporting that it is an effective analgesic method in hip surgeries. Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) also blocks components of the lumbar plexus and provides effective analgesia in hip surgeries. The investigators aim to compare the effectiveness of QLB and SIFIB in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative pain management
  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block
  • Anterior QLB
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is close to the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Samsun University is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II-III
  • Scheduled for total hip artroplasty surgery under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not want to participate in the study
  • Patients with cognitive dysfunction who cannot evaluate the NRS score and cannot use PCA
  • Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients with a contraindication to spinal and regional anesthesia
  • Presence of multiple fractures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia iliaca Block

    Patients randomized to receive suprainguinal fascia iliaca block

    Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia iliaca Block

  • Active comparator
    Ultrasound Guided Anterior quadratus lumborum block

    Patients randomized to receive anterior quadratus lumborum block

    Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia iliaca Block

    Patients in this group will be administered SFIB with 50 mL of local anesthetic solution (Bupivacaine %0.25) under ultrasound guidance after the surgery is completed.

  • ProcedureUltrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block

    Patients in this group will be administered anterior QLB with 40 mL of local anesthetic (Bupivacaine %0.25) under ultrasound guidance after the surgery is completed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative opioid comsumption

    Morphine consumptions for both group will be recorded

    Time frame: up to 24 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric rating scale for postoperative pain intensity

    Changes in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and on movement will be recorded at intervals. (3-6-12-18-24th hour) NRS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults. The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

  2. Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)

    The impact of surgical and anesthetic interventions on perioperative quality of life and ability to resume routine life activities will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) tool. The QoR-15 scale is a patient-based outcome measure in the form of a 15-item validated questionnaire.

    Time frame: at 24th hour

  3. Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis).

    Quadriceps motor function will be tested with the patient supine and with the hip and knee flexed at 45º and 90º, respectively. The subject will be asked to extend the knee first against gravity and then against resistance. Quadriceps strength will be graded according to a 3-point scale: normal strength = 0 point (extension against resistance); paresis = 1 point (extension against gravity but not against resistance); and paralysis = 2 points (no extension).

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Samsun University
    Samsun, 55090, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • James M, Bentley RA, Womack J, Goodman BA. Safety profile and outcome after ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca catheters for hip fracture: a single-centre propensity-matched historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;69(9):1139-1150. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02279-0. Epub 2022 Jul 12. PubMed 35819630 ↗
  • Wang Q, Hu J, Zhang W, Zeng Y, Yang J, Kang P. Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Apr;37(4):763-769. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 11. PubMed 35026362 ↗
  • Shamim R, Prasad G, Bais PS, Priya V, Singh TK, Ambasta S, Philips AK. Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Hip and Femur Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis. Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):525-530. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_9_21. Epub 2021 Mar 22. PubMed 34092870 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05684471
Lead sponsor
Samsun University
Responsible party
Serkan Tulgar (Principal Investigator, Samsun University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 13, 2023
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
May 7, 2024
Completion
May 7, 2024
Last update
May 8, 2024

Study contacts

Serkan Tulgar
principal investigator · Samsun Üniversitesi tıp fakültesi, Samsun Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion