CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05682547Updated Jul 25, 2025

Diquafosol vs Hyaluronic Acid for Diabetic Dry Eye

An interventional study of 3% Diquafosol tetrasodium and 0.1% hyaluronate in Diabetic Eye Problems, sponsored by He Eye Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-25.

Sponsored by He Eye Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diquafosol ophthalmic solution (DQS) stimulates P2Y2 receptors on the ocular surface, which enhances mucin secretion from goblet cells. Therefore, tear film stability and hydration of the ocular surface can be achieved independent from lacrimal glands function. While it has been observed that 0.1 percent hyaluronate (HA) in artificial tears promotes corneal re-epithelium and improves corneal healing.This prospective, open label pilot study will include 60 eyes of 30 diabetic patients diagnosed with DED and will be randomly assigned to either DQS (n=30 eyes) or ATD group (n=30 eyes). Participants in the DQS group will receive 3% Diquafosol ophthalmic solution, while HA group will receive 0.1% Sodium hyaluronate artificial tears. The dosage for both drugs will be one drop, six times per day for 4 weeks. Tear film lipid layer (TFLL), non-invasive breakup time (NITBUT), corneoconjunctival staining score (CS), meibum gland (MG), conjunctival hyperemia (RS score), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) will be assessed and compared at baseline, day-14, and day-28.

Read the detailed description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a prevalent chronic metabolic illness that causes relative insulin insufficiency in target organs owing to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance [1]. Shift to sedentary lifestyle, ageing population and obesity has significantly contributed to the global rise in the prevalence of T2DM [2]. In 2019 the prevalence of diabetes was documented to be 9.3% (463 million people) and in 2030 it is estimated to rise to 10.2% (578 million) and T2DM accounts for approximately 90% of all diabetic occurrence[3]. Negative alterations to the tear film, corneal epithelium, corneal endothelium, and corneal nerves have been observed in 47-64% of patients with diabetes[4] [5]. Ocular surface manifestation of signs and symptoms secondary to DM has been termed as diabetic keratopathy (DK). DK has been documented to increase central corneal thickness[6], decrease in endothelial cell density[7], leads of superficial punctate keratitis[8], delay and impede wound repair[9], and decrease in corneal sensitivity due to neuropathy[10]. Additionally, DM patients have also been noted to have compromised tear quantity and quality[11][12] due to conjunctival goblet cell loss as documented on cytologic analysis [13]. Goblet cells secrete mucin, which stabilizes the tear film, minimizes tear evaporation, and reduces mechanical friction. Goblet cell loss in animal models suggests that it disrupts the ocular surface's immune tolerance [14] and increased expression of inflammatory cytokines in the conjunctiva[15]. 0.1% hyaluronate (HA) used in artificial tears have been reported to promote corneal re-epithelium and improve corneal healing[16].

Additionally, HA has been reported to decrease the rate of tear evaporation and enhance the stability of tear film [17]. Diquafosol tetrasodium is a dinucleotide polyphosphate which a purinoceptor agonist, when administered to the ocular surface, it binds to P2Y2 receptors and stimulates mucin and tear secretion[18-20]. The corneal epithelium, conjunctival epithelium, lacrimal gland ductal epithelium, meibomian gland sebaceous cells, and meibomian gland ductal cells all express the P2Y2 receptor. [21,22]. Subsequently, enhanced secretion of mucin and tear secretion due to Diquafosol tetrasodium ophthalmic solution (DQS) stabilize the tear film, minimizes tear evaporation, and reduces mechanical friction thereby protecting the corneal epithelium [23]. Various reports have concluded that that 3% DQS is effective in the treatment of dry eye disease [24-26] and Current [19] findings suggest that DQS improves corneal epithelial damage in T2DM rat model.

However, the effect of DQS on the tear film of T2DM humans has not been previously assessed. Therefore, the purpose s to assess subjective and objective diabetic dry eye findings after using 3% DQS or 0.1% HA topical eye drops.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Eye Problems

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dry eye
  • Diquafosol
  • Hyaluronate
  • Diabetic dry eye
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 191 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is above the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

He Eye Hospital is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Clinical diagnosed and confirmed with type 2 diabetes for one year or more
  • Able and willing to comply with the treatment/follow-up schedule
  • Bilateral signs and symptoms of dry eye disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with systemic immune-mediated illnesses, such as secondary Sjögren's syndrome or graft-versus-host disease
  • Patients using topical medication(s) for the treatment of ocular disorders such as glaucoma or allergic conjunctivitis were excluded from the study.
  • Previous ocular surgery or trauma
  • 1-month history of blepharal and periorbital skin disease or allergies
  • Severe dry eyes with corneal epithelial defect
  • Limbic keratitis
  • Pterygium
  • Corneal neovascularization
  • Glaucoma
  • Breastfeeding
  • Rheumatic immune systemic diseases
  • Herpes zoster infection
  • Pregnant women
  • Allergic to fluorescein
  • Contact lens wearers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DQS group

    Participants in DQS group will be administered one drop of 3% DQS (Diquas, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) six times per day for 8 weeks.

    Drug: 3% Diquafosol tetrasodium

  • Active comparator
    HA group

    Participants in HA group will be administered one drop of 0.1% Sodium hyaluronate artificial tears (preservative free) six times per day for 8 weeks

    Drug: 0.1% hyaluronate

Interventions

  • Drug3% Diquafosol tetrasodium

    3% Diquafosol tetrasodium eye drops will be used to assess its usefulness in diabetic dry eye symptoms

    Also known as: Diquas

  • Drug0.1% hyaluronate

    0.1% hyaluronate eye drops will be used to assess its usefulness in diabetic dry eye symptoms and compared to 3% Diquafosol tetrasodium eye drops.

    Also known as: Artificial tears

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Non-invasive tear break-up time

    Non-invasive initial tear film breaking time will be assessed using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer. Three sequentially readings will be captured, and the median value will be included in the final analysis. The median value will be recorded. * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score)

    Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score) will be assessed by keratograph image (Oculus, Germany) of 1156\*873 pixels, redness score (RS) (accurate to 0.1 U) was displayed on the computer screen that ranged from 0.0 to 4.0. * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  2. Quality of meibum grade

    Meibum quality will be assessed under a slit-lamp: Five meibomian gland in the middle parts of the eyelid will be assessed using a scale of 0 to 3 for each gland (0 represented clear meibum; 1 represented cloudy meibum; 2 represented cloudy and granular meibum; and 3 represented thick, toothpaste like consistency meibum). * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  3. Expressibility of meibum grade

    Meibum expressibility will be assessed under a slit-lamp: Eight meibomian glands in the middle part will be evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 denoted that all glands expressible; 1 denoted that 3 to 4 glands expressible; 2 denoted those 1 to 2 glands expressible; and 3 denoted that no glands were expressible). The overall score was computed using the mean scores of these eight glands. * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  4. Conjunctivocorneal epithelial staining grade

    Conjunctivocorneal epithelial staining will be assessed under a slit-lamp: Conjunctivocorneal epithelial staining will be assess corneal and conjunctival epithelium damage. Double vital staining approach with two microliters of a preservative-free solution containing 1% lissamine green and 1% sodium fluorescein will be instilled in the conjunctival sac. The eye will be sectioned into three equal pieces (temporal conjunctiva, cornea, and nasal conjunctiva). Each region receives a maximum staining score of three points and a minimum of zero points. The combined scores from all three parts were then recorded on a scale ranging from 0 (normal) to 9 (severe). * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  5. Tear Film Lipid Layer

    Tear Film Lipid Layer interferometry will be assessed using DR-1 (Kowa, Nagoya, Japan). * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  6. OSDI Score

    Chinese translated, and validated OSDI (Allergan Inc, Irvine, USA) version will beused to assess and quantify DE symptom. The 12 items of the questionnaire can be tabulated into a score that ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (severe symptoms) points * Changes at week-4, and week-8 will be compare with baseline measurements. * Comparison between groups at baseline, week-4, and week-8 will also be examined.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  7. Tear meniscus height (TMH)

    Tear meniscus height using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  8. Corneal Sensitivity Score

    Corneal Sensitivity Score measured with Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (in mm filament length)

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

  9. Corneal nerves and immune/inflammatory cells change

    HRT III RCM, (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany) will be used to record corneal nerves and immune/inflammatory cells change.

    Time frame: Day-0 (baseline), week-4, and week-8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • He Eye Hospital
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2239-2251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2. Epub 2017 Feb 10. PubMed 28190580 ↗
  • Weisman A, Fazli GS, Johns A, Booth GL. Evolving Trends in the Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes: A Review. Can J Cardiol. 2018 May;34(5):552-564. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 13. PubMed 29731019 ↗
  • Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D, Williams R; IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PubMed 31518657 ↗
  • Abdelkader H, Patel DV, McGhee CNj, Alany RG. New therapeutic approaches in the treatment of diabetic keratopathy: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;39(3):259-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02435.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4. PubMed 20973888 ↗
  • Vieira-Potter VJ, Karamichos D, Lee DJ. Ocular Complications of Diabetes and Therapeutic Approaches. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3801570. doi: 10.1155/2016/3801570. Epub 2016 Mar 28. PubMed 27119078 ↗
  • El-Agamy A, Alsubaie S. Corneal endothelium and central corneal thickness changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 2;11:481-486. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S126217. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28280298 ↗
  • Lee JS, Oum BS, Choi HY, Lee JE, Cho BM. Differences in corneal thickness and corneal endothelium related to duration in diabetes. Eye (Lond). 2006 Mar;20(3):315-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701868. PubMed 15832184 ↗
  • Inoue K, Okugawa K, Amano S, Oshika T, Takamura E, Egami F, Umizu G, Aikawa K, Kato S. Blinking and superficial punctate keratopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eye (Lond). 2005 Apr;19(4):418-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701497. PubMed 15286669 ↗
  • Shih KC, Lam KS, Tong L. A systematic review on the impact of diabetes mellitus on the ocular surface. Nutr Diabetes. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e251. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2017.4. PubMed 28319106 ↗
  • Murphy PJ, Patel S, Kong N, Ryder RE, Marshall J. Noninvasive assessment of corneal sensitivity in young and elderly diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1737-42. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0689. PubMed 15161834 ↗
  • Dogru M, Katakami C, Inoue M. Tear function and ocular surface changes in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology. 2001 Mar;108(3):586-92. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00599-6. PubMed 11237914 ↗
  • Sagdik HM, Ugurbas SH, Can M, Tetikoglu M, Ugurbas E, Ugurbas SC, Alpay A, Ucar F. Tear film osmolarity in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmic Res. 2013;50(1):1-5. doi: 10.1159/000345770. Epub 2013 Feb 22. PubMed 23445780 ↗
  • Barbosa FL, Xiao Y, Bian F, Coursey TG, Ko BY, Clevers H, de Paiva CS, Pflugfelder SC. Goblet Cells Contribute to Ocular Surface Immune Tolerance-Implications for Dry Eye Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May 5;18(5):978. doi: 10.3390/ijms18050978. PubMed 28475124 ↗
  • Marko CK, Menon BB, Chen G, Whitsett JA, Clevers H, Gipson IK. Spdef null mice lack conjunctival goblet cells and provide a model of dry eye. Am J Pathol. 2013 Jul;183(1):35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 May 10. PubMed 23665202 ↗
  • Park Y, Song JS, Choi CY, Yoon KC, Lee HK, Kim HS. A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Mar;33(2):66-72. doi: 10.1089/jop.2016.0086. Epub 2016 Dec 8. PubMed 27929721 ↗
  • Jeon HS, Hyon JY. The Efficacy of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution in Non-Sjogren and Sjogren Syndrome Dry Eye Patients Unresponsive to Artificial Tear. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;32(7):463-8. doi: 10.1089/jop.2015.0081. Epub 2016 Jun 13. PubMed 27294831 ↗
  • Jumblatt JE, Jumblatt MM. Regulation of ocular mucin secretion by P2Y2 nucleotide receptors in rabbit and human conjunctiva. Exp Eye Res. 1998 Sep;67(3):341-6. doi: 10.1006/exer.1998.0520. PubMed 9778415 ↗
  • Dota A, Sakamoto A, Nagano T, Murakami T, Matsugi T. Effect of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Airflow-Induced Ocular Surface Disorder in Diabetic Rats. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 1;14:1019-1024. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S242764. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32280196 ↗
  • Kulkarni AA, Trousdale MD, Stevenson D, Gukasyan HJ, Shiue MH, Kim KJ, Read RW, Lee VH. Nucleotide-induced restoration of conjunctival chloride and fluid secretion in adenovirus type 5-infected pigmented rabbit eyes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Jun;305(3):1206-11. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.049221. Epub 2003 Mar 20. PubMed 12649304 ↗
  • Cowlen MS, Zhang VZ, Warnock L, Moyer CF, Peterson WM, Yerxa BR. Localization of ocular P2Y2 receptor gene expression by in situ hybridization. Exp Eye Res. 2003 Jul;77(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00068-x. PubMed 12823990 ↗
  • Tanioka H, Kuriki Y, Sakamoto A, Katsuta O, Kawazu K, Nakamura M. Expression of the P2Y(2) receptor on the rat ocular surface during a 1-year rearing period. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;58(6):515-21. doi: 10.1007/s10384-014-0342-4. Epub 2014 Sep 2. PubMed 25179431 ↗
  • Yuko, T.S.; NAKAMURA, M. Stimulatory Effect of Diquafosol Tetrasodium on the Expression of Membrane-Binding Mucin Genes in Cultured Human Corneal Epithelial Cells. Journal of the eye 2011, 28, 425-429.
  • Kaido M, Kawashima M, Shigeno Y, Yamada Y, Tsubota K. Randomized Controlled Study to Investigate the Effect of Topical Diquafosol Tetrasodium on Corneal Sensitivity in Short Tear Break-Up Time Dry Eye. Adv Ther. 2018 May;35(5):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0685-1. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 29671255 ↗
  • Ji YW, Kim HM, Ryu SY, Oh JW, Yeo A, Choi CY, Kim MJ, Song JS, Kim HS, Seo KY, Kim KP, Lee HK. Changes in Human Tear Proteome Following Topical Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Cyclosporine A Versus Diquafosol Tetrasodium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Dec 2;60(15):5035-5044. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27872. PubMed 31800960 ↗
  • Amano S, Inoue K. Effect of topical 3% diquafosol sodium on eyes with dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 14;11:1677-1682. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S148167. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29075094 ↗
  • Ohashi Y, Munesue M, Shimazaki J, Takamura E, Yokoi N, Watanabe H, Nomura A, Shimada F. Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Diquafosol for the Treatment of Dry Eye in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):707-717. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01188-x. Epub 2019 Dec 13. PubMed 31834617 ↗
  • Chen J, Zhang Y, Yu S, Zhang Q, He W, Qin G, He X. The Impact of 3% Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Tear Film and Corneal Nerve Density in Patients with Diabetes and Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Oct;14(10):2527-2541. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01223-x. Epub 2025 Aug 21. PubMed 40839332 ↗
  • Chen J, Chen Y, Qin G, Li L, Li M, Cheng Y, Zhuang S, Li Z, Zhang Q, Wu Y, Yang L, Moutari S, Moore JE, Xu L, He W, Yu S, Pazo EE, He X. A protocol for a single center, randomized, controlled trial comparing the clinical efficacy of 3% diquafosol and 0.1% hyaluronic acid in diabetic patients with dry eye disease. Trials. 2023 Dec 12;24(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07818-8. PubMed 38087329 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study's findings will be shared regardless of the effect's direction. All possible beneficiaries of the research, including patients, carers, family, doctors, advisory boards, and medical boards, will receive trial data. Publications in high-impact, open-access medical journals and talks at national and international medical conferences will serve this purpose.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05682547
Lead sponsor
He Eye Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 12, 2023
Start date
Dec 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Jul 25, 2025

Study contacts

Emmanuel Eric Pazo
study chair · He Eye Hospital, Shenyang, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion