ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05677256Updated Sep 3, 2026Results posted

A Study to Evaluate Pharyngeal Immunity to Poliovirus Type-2

A Phase 4 interventional study of nOPV2 in Poliomyelitis, sponsored by Fidec Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 5 Weeks to 8 Weeks, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by Fidec Corporation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
501
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Weeks to 8 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will compare the poliovirus type-2 pharyngeal mucosal excretion in the first week, and at 2 and 4 weeks following the administration of a challenge novel OPV2 (nOPV2) dose at 18 weeks of age in 2 parallel groups of infants

Read the detailed description

In the light of the switch from OPV to IPV and the continued presence of cVDPV2 in many countries, it is important to understand and quantify the impact of IPV on pharyngeal mucosal immunity, to inform whether and to what extent the mucosal and humoral immune response following IPV could reduce transmission and spread.

This study will assess the effect of vaccination with IPV in parallel with poliovirus type-2 naïve infants (infants having received bOPV) on the pharyngeal and fecal shedding and the induction of immunity following type-2 poliovirus challenge. This understanding would provide critical information on the potential use of IPV in specific settings to interrupt transmission / reduce spread. The results from this study may potentially have important consequences on public health policy in countries which use IPV for infant priming, as they will help to show the extent to which a type-2 mucosal immunity gap remains following a primary series of IPV.

02

Conditions studied

  • Poliomyelitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Poliomyelitis

274 studies on the registry are indexed under Poliomyelitis; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 501 is close to the median of 476 across 249 interventional studies indexed under Poliomyelitis.

Browse Poliomyelitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fidec Corporation is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Weeks to 8 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Infants aged 6 to 8 weeks with birth weight >2,500 g.
  2. Healthy infants without obvious medical conditions like immunodeficiency diseases, severe congenital malformations, severe neurological diseases or any other disease that require high doses of or immunotherapies that preclude the subject from participating in the study as established by the medical history and physical examination.
  3. Written obtained from both parents or legal guardian(s) as per country regulations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants who have received previous vaccination against poliomyelitis.
  2. Any confirmed or suspected or known immunodeficient condition including infection in the potential participant or any member of the subject's household.
  3. Family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  4. Major congenital defects or serious uncontrolled chronic illness (neurologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, or endocrine).
  5. Known allergy to any component of the study vaccines or to any antibiotics that share molecular composition with a component of the study vaccines.
  6. Uncontrolled coagulopathy or blood disorder contraindicating intramuscular injections (of IPV)
  7. Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products since birth or planned administration during the study period.
  8. Acute severe febrile illness on the day of vaccination deemed by the Investigator to be a for vaccination (the child can be included at a later time if within age window and all inclusion criteria are met.).
  9. Subject who, in the opinion of the Investigator, is unlikely to comply with the protocol or is inappropriate to be included in the study for the safety or the benefit-risk ratio of the subject.
  10. Infants from multiple births or born prematurely (\< 37 weeks of gestation).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
501 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IPV-primed Group

    Approximately 250 subjects to receive 3 doses of IPV administered at approx. 6, 10, 14 weeks of age and an nOPV2-002 challenge at approx. 18 weeks of age.

    Biological: nOPV2

  • Active comparator
    bOPV-primed Group

    Approximately 250 subjects to receive 3 doses of bOPV administered at approx. 6, 10, 14 weeks of age and an nOPV2-002 challenge at approx. 18 weeks of age.

    Biological: nOPV2

Interventions

  • BiologicalnOPV2

    Vaccination

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Shedding Detectable Levels of Poliovirus Type-2 by RT PCR.

    To compare the presence of poliovirus type-2 in pharyngeal samples detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) in the first week, and at D14 and D28 in both groups.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pharyngeal Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Poliovirus Type-2.

    To assess and compare the pharyngeal NAbs poliovirus type-2 activity on D0, D14 and D28 in both groups.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Seroprotection Rate to Poliovirus Type-2 on D0, D28 and D56 in Both Groups.

    To assess the humoral immunogenicity to poliovirus type-2 at D0, 4 and 8 weeks following administration of a challenge dose of nOPV2 in both groups. Seroprotection is defined as neutralizing type-2 poliovirus antibody specific titers ≥1:8.

    Time frame: 2 months

  3. Number of Participants That Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Important Medical Events (IMEs)

    To assess the number of subjects experiencing SAEs and IMEs following administration of IPV, bOPV and nOPV2 throughout the whole study period.

    Time frame: 5 months

  4. Pharyngeal Poliovirus Type-2-specific Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Concentrations

    To asses and compare the pharyngeal mucosal immunoglobulin class-specific immune response to poliovirus type-2 at Day 0, 2 and 4 weeks following administration of a challenge dose of nOPV2 in both groups.This is measured in geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in nasal samples on D0, D14 and D28 in both groups.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Results

Posted Sep 3, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
Started250250
Completed238232
Not completed1218

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Shedding Detectable Levels of Poliovirus Type-2 by RT PCR.

To compare the presence of poliovirus type-2 in pharyngeal samples detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) in the first week, and at D14 and D28 in both groups.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Shedding Detectable Levels of Poliovirus Type-2 by RT PCR.
ParticipantsIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
Number of Participants Shedding Detectable Levels of Poliovirus Type-2 by RT PCR.46
SecondaryPharyngeal Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Poliovirus Type-2.

To assess and compare the pharyngeal NAbs poliovirus type-2 activity on D0, D14 and D28 in both groups.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Geometric mean · mcg/ml
Pharyngeal Neutralizing Antibodies (NAbs) to Poliovirus Type-2.
mcg/mlIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
Day 02.07 (1.48 to 2.91)0.07 (0.00 to 5.24)
Day 147.54 (5.12 to 11.09)0.63 (0.32 to 1.25)
Day 287.72 (5.39 to 11.05)0.82 (0.46 to 1.47)
SecondarySeroprotection Rate to Poliovirus Type-2 on D0, D28 and D56 in Both Groups.

To assess the humoral immunogenicity to poliovirus type-2 at D0, 4 and 8 weeks following administration of a challenge dose of nOPV2 in both groups. Seroprotection is defined as neutralizing type-2 poliovirus antibody specific titers ≥1:8.

Time frame:
2 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Seroprotection Rate to Poliovirus Type-2 on D0, D28 and D56 in Both Groups.
percentage of participantsIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
Day 099.1 (96.9 to 99.9)20.6 (15.6 to 26.5)
Day 2899.1 (96.9 to 99.9)73.6 (67.3 to 79.2)
Day 5697.8 (94.9 to 99.3)68.8 (62.2 to 74.8)
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Important Medical Events (IMEs)

To assess the number of subjects experiencing SAEs and IMEs following administration of IPV, bOPV and nOPV2 throughout the whole study period.

Time frame:
5 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Important Medical Events (IMEs)
ParticipantsIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
Number of Participants That Experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Important Medical Events (IMEs)52
SecondaryPharyngeal Poliovirus Type-2-specific Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Concentrations

To asses and compare the pharyngeal mucosal immunoglobulin class-specific immune response to poliovirus type-2 at Day 0, 2 and 4 weeks following administration of a challenge dose of nOPV2 in both groups.This is measured in geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in nasal samples on D0, D14 and D28 in both groups.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Geometric mean · mcg/ml
Pharyngeal Poliovirus Type-2-specific Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Concentrations
mcg/mlIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
D0857.66 (756.53 to 972.32)919.34 (797.95 to 1059.20)
D14886.20 (783.75 to 1002.04)888.07 (774.03 to 1018.90)
D28769.36 (674.75 to 877.24)849.08 (752.85 to 957.61)

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IPV-primed Group0/250 (0%)5/250 (2%)0/250 (0%)
bOPV-primed Group0/250 (0%)2/250 (0.8%)0/250 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed Group
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/2500/250
GastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders1/2500/250
Pneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/2501/250
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/2500/250
Febrile convulsionNervous system disorders0/2501/250

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)IPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed GroupTotal
<=18 years250250500
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed GroupTotal
Female134120254
Male116130246
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)IPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian250250500
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)IPV-primed GroupbOPV-primed GroupTotal
Bangladesh250250500
08

Study locations

1 site
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research
    Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zaman K, Bandyopadhyay AS, Gast C, Goswami DR, Hoque M, Raqib R, Hossain L, Haque W, Islam A, Rashid HO, Rahman M, Aguirre G, Brickley EB, Godin A, Weiner JA, Burke RM, Ackerman ME, Sifontes G, Mainou BA, Wright PF, Ruttimann R. Effect of inactivated poliovirus vaccine on nasal mucosal immunity and pharyngeal shedding following novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 challenge: A randomized, open-label trial. J Infect Dis. 2026 Aug 18:jiag423. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiag423. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42610930 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in Feb 2024, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2026, 2 years 6 months after primary completion.

Of 30 phase 4 interventional studies under Poliomyelitis, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 25. This study's 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2022
First posted
Jan 10, 2023
StartActual
Nov 9, 2023
Primary completionActual
Feb 20, 2024
CompletionActual
Aug 25, 2024
Results first posted
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05677256
Lead sponsor
Fidec Corporation
Collaborators
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 10, 2023
Start date
Nov 9, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2024
Completion
Aug 25, 2024
Results posted
Sep 3, 2026
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion