CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05672563Updated Jan 5, 2023

Cesarean Scar Evaluation Using Saline Infusion Sonography in Women With Previous Pregnancy in Scar

An interventional study of Saline infusion sonography for evaluation of cesarean scar in Uterus; Scar, sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-05.

Sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Evaluation of cesarean scar using saline-infused sonography in women with history of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Read the detailed description

Over the past few decades, cesarean delivery rates worldwide have risen considerably. The surgery may lead to deficient uterine scar healing, thinning of the myometrium and formation of cesarean scar defects or uterine scar niche. The prevalence of clinically relevant cesarean scar defects is unclear and has been reported between 20-88%, it is identified by using transvaginal ultrasound or saline-infused sonography in non-pregnant patients. Women may be asymptomatic or present a wide gynecologic sequela including cesarean scar pregnancy, abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, infertility, and increased risk of complications during gynecologic procedures such as uterine evacuation and insertion of intrauterine device.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is defined as an early pregnancy implantation in the scar from a prior cesarean delivery. This pregnancy is implanted in a fibrous scar tissue and may lead to substantial risk for severe maternal morbidity such as adherent placenta, second or third trimester uterine dehiscence or rupture, severe maternal bleeding, and adherence to adjacent tissues. The prevalence of scar pregnancy is reported to be between 1:1800-2500 pregnancies, with increasing diagnosis in the last decade due to increasing use of transvaginal ultrasound early in pregnancy and possible increased physician awareness of this condition.

The ultrasound criteria for CSP have been redefined recently, and now propose transvaginal ultrasound as the imaging technique of choice at this early stage. In 2022, the Niche Task-force convened a Delphi consensus to develop a standardized sonographic evaluation and reporting system for a CSP in the first trimester. According to this consensus, CSPs were classified into three subgroups, Subgroup A in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded towards the uterine cavity, subgroup B in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium, and subgroup C in which the gestational was partially located outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus. This sonographic classification has yet to be validated clinically.

In the present report the investigators aim to evaluate the uterine cavity and potential cesarean scar defects or niche in women with history of CSP using saline infused sonography. In the second stage of the research, we will classify the past cesarean pregnancies according to the new Delphi criteria and examine correlation between the different CSP subgroups and presence of cesarean scar defects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterus; Scar

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cicatrix

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 39 across 251 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 258 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • women with history of cesarean scar pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ongoing pregnancy
  • vaginal bleeding
  • active or suspected inflammation of genital tract including pelvic inflammatory disease
  • women engaged in unprotected intercourse
  • presence of intra-uterine device contraception
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    women with previous CSP

    experimental: women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy that are invited to our unit for sonographic evaluation.

    Drug: Saline infusion sonography for evaluation of cesarean scar

Interventions

  • DrugSaline infusion sonography for evaluation of cesarean scar

    The intervention included the usage of balloon-less GIS catheter with a soft tapered tip inserted into the endocervical canal, with no use of a tenaculum or a cervical dilatator. Normal saline is slowly introduced into the uterine cavity via the catheter until achieving satisfactory distension and visualization of the uterine cavity using trans-vaginal ultra-sonographic imaging.

    Also known as: Saline infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Uterine niche

    Number of participants who underwent saline infused sonography and have evidence of cesarean scar defects/ uterine niche.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26849801 ↗
  • Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049. PubMed 29536581 ↗
  • Feldman N, Maymon R, Jauniaux E, Manoach D, Mor M, Marczak E, Melcer Y. Prospective Evaluation of the Ultrasound Signs Proposed for the Description of Uterine Niche in Nonpregnant Women. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Apr;41(4):917-923. doi: 10.1002/jum.15776. Epub 2021 Jul 1. PubMed 34196967 ↗
  • Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):562-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 14. PubMed 23680518 ↗
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org; Miller R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):B2-B14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Jan 21. Erratum In: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.036. PubMed 31972162 ↗
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, D'Antonio F, Kaelin Agten A. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019 Dec;46(4):797-811. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2019.07.009. PubMed 31677755 ↗
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Maymon R, Arslan AA, Patil N, Popiolek D, Mittal KR. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):383-95. doi: 10.1002/uog.13282. PubMed 24357257 ↗
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Horwitz G, D'Antonio F, Monteagudo A, Bornstein E, Chervenak J, Messina L, Morlando M, Cali G. Recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;58(1):121-126. doi: 10.1002/uog.23577. PubMed 33411387 ↗
  • Cali G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Forlani F, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Monteagudo A, Kaelin Agten A, Flacco ME, Khalil A, Buca D, Manzoli L, Liberati M, D'Antonio F. Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):450-459. doi: 10.1002/uog.21939. Erratum In: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):892. doi: 10.1002/uog.22062. PubMed 31788885 ↗
  • Jordans IPM, Verberkt C, De Leeuw RA, Bilardo CM, Van Den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Kaelin Agten A, Mashiach R, Naji O, Pajkrt E, Timmerman D, Vikhareva O, Van Der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):437-449. doi: 10.1002/uog.24815. PubMed 34779085 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05672563
Lead sponsor
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 5, 2023

Study contacts

Yaakov Melcer, professor
Contact
ymeltcer@gmail.com
+972-524551310
Maya Nimrodi, Doctor
Contact
mayadvir1@gmail.com
+972-524775855
Yaakov Melcer, Professor
principal investigator · Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion