An observational study in Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-28.
Sponsored by Ege University · Observational
This 6-month follow-up study was conducted to investigate the effect of AHCLS on the energy and macronutrient intake of children, adolescents, and young adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). All participants with T1D on an AHCLS (MiniMed 780GTM) receiving care at the Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Clinic of Ege University (Izmir, Turkey) were eligible for the study. The children and adolescents with T1D with at least 3 days of food diary available before AHCLS and at 3rd and 6th months at AHCLS were included in the study
In all participants, height was measured to the nearest centimeter using a rigid stadiometer. Weight was measured unclothed to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated balance scale. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the weight (kg)/height (m²) equation. Standard deviation scores (SDS) for weight, height, and BMI were calculated according to age and gender using reference values for Turkish children and adolescents (1). For young adults, a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/ m² is considered normal weight Participants recorded all food and beverage (including dressings) consumed and the servings reported by weight, before and after (3rd, 6th month) switching to MiniMed 780GTM. Before entering data in the nutrient analysis program, the research team dietician reviewed all completed diet records and asked for supplementary information if needed. The analysis included 1076 snacks and meals (750 meals, 326 snacks) dietary records. Total energy intake (kcal), fat (energy %), protein (energy %), carbohydrate (energy %), saturated fatty acids (energy %), cholesterol (mg), and dietary fiber (g/1000 kcal) intake were calculated using the Ebispro for Windows,; Turkish Version (BeBiS 8.2) (Stuttgart, Germany).
HbA1c was measured by turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (Roche Cobas c513 analyzer using the Tina quant® HbA1c Gen. 3 assay, Germany). MiniMed 780GTM data uploaded to CareLinkTM personal software during the follow-up by individuals who provided constent for their data to be aggregated were analyzed (CareLink; https://carelink.medtronic.eu). Time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dl), time below range (TBR: 70 mg/dl), time above range (TAR: >180 mg/dl), coefficient of variation (CV), glucose management indicator (GMI), sensor usage, time spent in AHCL and mean sensor glucose values were evaluated. Active insulin time was 2,5 hours and the target blood glucose value as 100 mg/dl in all patients at the initiation of AHCL and changed when necessary.
Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of significance was defined as p\<0.05. Categorical variables were represented as counts and percentage values. Normal distribution was tested for quantitative variables. Continuous variables with normal or skewed distribution were presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). Group differences were investigated using the independent t-test for normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney test for skewed data, and the chi-square tests used for categorical variables. Repeated values differences were investigated using One Way Anova for normally distributed data and the Friedman test for skewed data.
3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 120 across 748 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →Ege University is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes on an advanced hybrid closed-loop system pump therapy (MiniMed 780G™,Medtronic, Northridge, CA USA) ) receiving care at the Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Clinic of Ege University (Izmir, Turkey)
Use an advanced hybrid closed-loop system pump therapy (MiniMed 780G™, Medtronic, Northridge, CA USA)
Exclusion Criteria:
No with major medical problems as
Macronutrient intake distribution
At the beginning of the follow-up, the macronutrient distribution of the participant diets will be evaluated for compliance with national and international guidelines.
Time frame: Day1
Macronutrient intake distribution
In the third month of the follow-up, the compliance of the macronutrient distribution of the participant's diets with national and international guidelines and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 3rd month
Macronutrient intake distribution
In the 6th month of the follow-up, the compliance of the macronutrient distribution of the participant's diets with national and international guidelines and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 6th month
HbA1c
As a metabolic control parameter of the beginning of follow-up period
Time frame: Day 1
HbA1c
As a metabolic control parameter at the 3rd month of the follow-up and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 3rd month
HbA1c
As a metabolic control parameter at the 6th month of the follow-up and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 6th month
Time in range (Time in range is the amount of time you spend in the target blood glucose range)
As a metabolic control parameter of beginning of the follow-up period
Time frame: Day1
Time in range(Time in range is the amount of time you spend in the target blood glucose range)
As a metabolic control parameter at the 3rd month of the follow-up and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 3rd month
Time in range(Time in range is the amount of time you spend in the target blood glucose range)
As a metabolic control parameter at the 6th month of the follow-up and the change from the beginning of the follow-up will be evaluated.
Time frame: 6th month
Body mass index (kg/m2)
As a follow-up weight related issues parameter
Time frame: Day1
Body mass index(kg/m2)
As a follow-up weight related issues parameter
Time frame: 3rd month
Body mass index(kg/m2)
As a follow-up weight related issues parameter
Time frame: 6th month
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ege University