CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05655832Updated Jan 15, 2026Results posted

A Study to Investigate the Association of Real-world Sensor-derived Biometric Data With Clinical Parameters and Patient-reported Outcomes for Monitoring Disease Activity in Patients With COPD

An interventional study of Vivalink wearable device in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Completed at 11 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-15.

Sponsored by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this multicenter, prospective cohort study is to investigate the correlation of real-world sensor-derived biometric data obtained via a wearable device with clinical parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for monitoring disease activity and predicting exacerbations for participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The cohort of participants with COPD will be followed for 3 months. A calibration cohort with non-COPD participants will be included and followed for 2 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is close to the median of 70 across 2,926 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For participants with COPD:

  • Participants ≥40 and ≤80 years at baseline
  • Diagnosis of COPD stage II to IV
  • History of moderate or severe exacerbations (≥2 moderate exacerbations or ≥1 severe exacerbations in any 12-month time window during last 3 years prior to inclusion and ≥1 moderate or severe exacerbations in the last 12 months prior to inclusion, considering that the last 12 months may reflect lower exacerbation rate due to Covid-19 measures)

For participants in the calibration cohort:

  • Participants ≥40 and ≤80 years at baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For participants with COPD:

  • Clinically relevant and/or serious concurrent medical conditions including, but not limited to visual problems, severe mental illness or cognitive impairment, musculoskeletal or movement disorders, cardiac disease (e.g., heart failure, arrythmia [esp. atrial fibrillation and conduction blocks]), lung cancer (currently treated) that in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with participant's ability to participate in the study or draw meaningful conclusions from the study
  • Participants with a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillators, or other implanted electronic devices
  • Participants with known allergies or sensitivity to silicon or hydrogel
  • Less than 6 weeks since previous moderate/severe exacerbation

For participants in the calibration cohort:

  • Participants with a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillators, or other implanted electronic devices
  • Participants with known allergies or sensitivity to silicon or hydrogel
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary disease including, but not limited to COPD, asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, with impact on the lung function and exercise capacity
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    COPD cohort

    Device: Vivalink wearable device

  • Experimental
    Calibration participants cohort

    Device: Vivalink wearable device

Interventions

  • DeviceVivalink wearable device

    a CE marked device modified to add a temperature measurement algorithm in addition to ECG and respiratory rate measurements

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Physical Activity

    An activity flag is extracted from the accelerometer by Vivalink, by using a predefined threshold for adult movement. For stair climbing, first periodic movement was determined, by using frequency analysis on specific time windows, and generating a ratio to the total spectrum indicating periodic activity over a certain threshold.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  2. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate

    Heart rate is provided by Vivalink.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  3. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, ln(RMSSD))

    Heart rate variability reflecting differences in time intervals between 2 R-waves in the ECG (milliseconds) SDRR (Standard Deviation of Intervals between Heartbeats), SDNN (Standard Deviation of Intervals between Heartbeats, after removing abnormal Beats), SDNNI (Mean of the Standard Deviations of all the NN intervals for each 5 min Segment of a 24-h HRV Recording), and RMSSD (Mean of the Standard Deviations of all the NN intervals for each 5 min Segment of a 24-hour HRV Recording) and In(RMSDD)

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  4. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (pNN50)

    pNN50 is the percentage of adjacent NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 milliseconds.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  5. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (Stress Index)

    Baevsky's Stress Index is a heart rate variability (HRV) measure used to assess autonomic nervous system activity and physiological stress, especially in monitoring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. It is calculated as: amplitude of the mode (AMo) divided by two times the mode (Mo) multiplied by the difference between the maximum and minimum RR intervals (MxDMn). AMo is the percentage of RR intervals at the most frequent value, Mo is the most common RR interval, and MxDMn is the range of RR intervals. The index typically ranges from 50 to over 900. Lower values (50-150) indicate low stress and better autonomic balance, while higher values (above 500) reflect increased stress and sympathetic activity. Values above 900 are considered very high stress. This is a single composite score with no subscales; higher scores represent worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  6. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF and HF)

    Applying a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) or autoregressive (AR) modeling one can separate Heart rate variability (HRV) into its component ultra-low-frequency (ULF), very low frequency (VLF), Low-Frequency power (LF), and High-Frequency power (HF) rhythms that operate within different frequency ranges. Given in absolute values of power (milliseconds squared). LF power, low frequency power (0.04-0.15 Hz). HF power, high frequency power (0.15-0.40 Hz). LF/HF Ratio, spectral HRV index computed as (LF/HF).

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  7. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF/HF)

    Applying a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) or autoregressive (AR) modeling one can separate Heart rate variability (HRV) into its component ultra-low-frequency (ULF), very low frequency (VLF), Low-Frequency power (LF), and High-Frequency power (HF) rhythms that operate within different frequency ranges. Given in absolute values of power (milliseconds squared). LF power, low frequency power (0.04-0.15 Hz). HF power, high frequency power (0.15-0.40 Hz). LF/HF Ratio, spectral HRV index computed as (LF/HF).

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  8. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Temperature

    Temperature is provided by Vivalink. The value for temperature is derived by Vivalink from the display temperature and then calibrated using initial calibration values, in an IP protected process. The sensor temperature is considered only as a relative value to evaluate changes in the temperature, and not as an objective human body temperature value, meaning no thresholds relative to normal human body temperature are considered, and it will not be used as a marker for fever or hypothermia.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  9. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Respiratory Rate

    Respiration rate is provided by Vivalink.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  10. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Cough Frequency

    Cough Frequency was provided by vivalink.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  11. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Sleep Patterns

    The basis of the sleep pattern calculations is the self-reported bedtimes. With the same technique as the cough frequency prediction, inactivity signals can be predicted from the labeled data to improve the bedtime accuracy, and the changes in accelerometer (step detection algorithms) can be used to quantify the number of clear breaks in the sleep (standing up, strong cough, etc.).

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  12. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Resting Heart Rate

    Resting Heart Rate is provided by Vivalink.

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  13. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Inspiration vs Expiration Time Ratio

    Using the breathing signal one can determine the inspiration and expiration peaks. The difference between said peaks in milliseconds can be used to determine the ratio of inspiration (distance from lower point to next peak) vs expiration (distance from peak to next lower point).

    Time frame: Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  14. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Frequency of Additional Medication

    Count of the number of times the use of additional medication as a log activity is reported per day.

    Time frame: Day 0(Basseline) and Day 8 to Day 14

  15. Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Accuracy

    Accuracy was calculated as (True Positives + True Negatives) / Total Population. True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. True Negatives (TN) are events correctly predicted as non-exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Accuracy scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  16. Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Precision

    Precision was calculated as True Positives / (True Positives + False Positives). True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. False Positives (FP) are events incorrectly predicted as exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Precision scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  17. Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Recall

    Recall was calculated as True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives). True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. False Negatives (FN) are events incorrectly predicted as non-exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Recall scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  18. Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Specificity

    Specificity was calculated as True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives). True Negatives (TN) are events correctly predicted as non-exacerbations. False Positives (FP) are events incorrectly predicted as exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Specificity scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Participants Health Status and Symptoms at Baseline and Study End

    Participants health status and symptoms at baseline (Day 0) and study end will be measured as the summary score across items of the CAT questionnaire that consists of 8-items in which participants can choose a score from 0 to 5, for each visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  2. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1) at Baseline and Study End

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  3. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FVC) at Baseline and Study End

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  4. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1/FVC) at Baseline and Study End

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  5. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (White Blood Cells Count)

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  6. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Erythrocytes Count)

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  7. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Oxygen (pO2))

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  8. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO2))

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  9. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (O2 Saturation)

    Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months

  10. Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Number, Date of Onset, and Duration of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Exacerbations

    Exacerbations are classified as mild if they are treated with short-acting bronchodilators only, moderate if they are treated additionally with antibiotics or oral corticosteroids, or severe if the patient visits the emergency room or requires hospitalization because of an exacerbation.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

  11. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Heart Rate and Resting Heart Rate) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Heart Rate and Resting Heart Rate). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period)

  12. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Respiration Rate) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Respiration Rate). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  13. Association Between Sensor Parameters (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, In(RMSSD)) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, In(RMSSD)). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  14. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Stress Index, LF/HF) and CAT Score

    During the observation period, participants completed the CAT questionnaire daily via a digital app. Stress Index, based on heart rate variability (HRV), assessed autonomic activity and physiological stress. It was calculated as AMo/(2 \* Mo \* MxDMn), where AMo is the % of RR intervals at the most frequent value, Mo is the most common RR interval, and MxDMn is the RR interval range. Stress Index values range from 50-900; lower values (50-150) indicate low stress and better autonomic balance, while higher values (\>500) reflect increased stress and sympathetic activity. LF power reflects sympathetic activity; HF power reflects parasympathetic activity. Linear mixed models assessed associations between CAT score and each sensor parameters. Fixed effect estimates represent change in CAT score per unit change in each parameter. Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI".

    Time frame: 7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  15. Association Between Sensor Parameters (pNN50) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (pNN50). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  16. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Temperature) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Temperature). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  17. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Physical Activity) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Physical activity). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  18. Association Between Sensor Parameters (Sleep Pattern) and CAT Score

    During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Sleep pattern). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

    Time frame: 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)

  19. Predicting the CAT Score by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates

    Patients' health status and symptoms at baseline (Day 0) were measured using the CAT questionnaire, an 8-item tool with scores ranging from 0 to 5 per item. CAT scores were collected daily via a digital application during the observation period. Various machine learning algorithms were evaluated for predictive performance using metrics including accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve. R² (coefficient of determination) was computed for CAT score prediction models, defined as R² = 1 - (SS\_res / SS\_tot), where SS\_res is the residual sum of squares and SS\_tot is the total sum of squares. R² values range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better model fit.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 15, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The number of moderate or severe exacerbations documented during the observation period was very low.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCalibration CohortCOPD Cohort
Started1067
Completed1064
Not completed03
Withdrew: Not mentioned01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Protocol non-compliance01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Physical Activity

An activity flag is extracted from the accelerometer by Vivalink, by using a predefined threshold for adult movement. For stair climbing, first periodic movement was determined, by using frequency analysis on specific time windows, and generating a ratio to the total spectrum indicating periodic activity over a certain threshold.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Physical Activity
minutesCOPD Cohort
Day 041.98 ± 22.89
Day 8 to Day 1458.93 ± 33.026
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate

Heart rate is provided by Vivalink.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate
beats per minuteCOPD Cohort
Day 086.4 ± 7.953
Day 8 to Day 1481.26 ± 9.237
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, ln(RMSSD))

Heart rate variability reflecting differences in time intervals between 2 R-waves in the ECG (milliseconds) SDRR (Standard Deviation of Intervals between Heartbeats), SDNN (Standard Deviation of Intervals between Heartbeats, after removing abnormal Beats), SDNNI (Mean of the Standard Deviations of all the NN intervals for each 5 min Segment of a 24-h HRV Recording), and RMSSD (Mean of the Standard Deviations of all the NN intervals for each 5 min Segment of a 24-hour HRV Recording) and In(RMSDD)

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, ln(RMSSD))
millisecondsCOPD Cohort
SDRR: Day 026.83 ± 11.37
SDRR: Day 8-1423.34 ± 10.867
SDNN: Day 058.71 ± 47.79
SDNN: Day 8-1452.82 ± 39.419
SDNNI: Day 069.51 ± 63.18
SDNNI: Day 8-1463.18 ± 33.537
RMSSD: Day 055.37 ± 59.658
RMSSD: Day 8-1453.73 ± 73.024
In (RMSSD): Day 03.59 ± 0.883
In (RMSSD): Day 8-143.51 ± 0.813
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (pNN50)

pNN50 is the percentage of adjacent NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 milliseconds.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (pNN50)
percentageCOPD Cohort
Day 00.12 ± 0.198
Day 8-140.11 ± 0.197
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (Stress Index)

Baevsky's Stress Index is a heart rate variability (HRV) measure used to assess autonomic nervous system activity and physiological stress, especially in monitoring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. It is calculated as: amplitude of the mode (AMo) divided by two times the mode (Mo) multiplied by the difference between the maximum and minimum RR intervals (MxDMn). AMo is the percentage of RR intervals at the most frequent value, Mo is the most common RR interval, and MxDMn is the range of RR intervals. The index typically ranges from 50 to over 900. Lower values (50-150) indicate low stress and better autonomic balance, while higher values (above 500) reflect increased stress and sympathetic activity. Values above 900 are considered very high stress. This is a single composite score with no subscales; higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (Stress Index)
ratioCOPD Cohort
Day 0108.43 ± 94.236
Day 8-1499.86 ± 81.076
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF and HF)

Applying a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) or autoregressive (AR) modeling one can separate Heart rate variability (HRV) into its component ultra-low-frequency (ULF), very low frequency (VLF), Low-Frequency power (LF), and High-Frequency power (HF) rhythms that operate within different frequency ranges. Given in absolute values of power (milliseconds squared). LF power, low frequency power (0.04-0.15 Hz). HF power, high frequency power (0.15-0.40 Hz). LF/HF Ratio, spectral HRV index computed as (LF/HF).

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · hertz
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF and HF)
hertzCOPD Cohort
LF: Day 0320.32 ± 456.411
LF: Day 8-14287.19 ± 399.897
HF: Day 0646.3 ± 1234.891
HF: Day 8-14612.6 ± 1542.947
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF/HF)

Applying a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) or autoregressive (AR) modeling one can separate Heart rate variability (HRV) into its component ultra-low-frequency (ULF), very low frequency (VLF), Low-Frequency power (LF), and High-Frequency power (HF) rhythms that operate within different frequency ranges. Given in absolute values of power (milliseconds squared). LF power, low frequency power (0.04-0.15 Hz). HF power, high frequency power (0.15-0.40 Hz). LF/HF Ratio, spectral HRV index computed as (LF/HF).

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Heart Rate Variability (LF/HF)
ratioCOPD Cohort
LF/HF: Day 01.38 ± 1.211
LF/HF: Day 8-141.51 ± 1.204
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Temperature

Temperature is provided by Vivalink. The value for temperature is derived by Vivalink from the display temperature and then calibrated using initial calibration values, in an IP protected process. The sensor temperature is considered only as a relative value to evaluate changes in the temperature, and not as an objective human body temperature value, meaning no thresholds relative to normal human body temperature are considered, and it will not be used as a marker for fever or hypothermia.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · celsius
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Temperature
celsiusCOPD Cohort
Day 036.77 ± 1.155
Day 8 to 1437.14 ± 1.239
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Respiratory Rate

Respiration rate is provided by Vivalink.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · breaths per minute
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Respiratory Rate
breaths per minuteCOPD Cohort
Day 021.42 ± 1.903
Day 8 to Day 1420.92 ± 2.247
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Cough Frequency

Cough Frequency was provided by vivalink.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · count per day
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Cough Frequency
count per dayCOPD Cohort
Day 056.82 ± 48.46
Day 8 to Day 1472.46 ± 58.62
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Sleep Patterns

The basis of the sleep pattern calculations is the self-reported bedtimes. With the same technique as the cough frequency prediction, inactivity signals can be predicted from the labeled data to improve the bedtime accuracy, and the changes in accelerometer (step detection algorithms) can be used to quantify the number of clear breaks in the sleep (standing up, strong cough, etc.).

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Sleep Patterns
hoursCOPD Cohort
Day 08.7 ± 1.892
Day 8 to Day 148.48 ± 1.491
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Resting Heart Rate

Resting Heart Rate is provided by Vivalink.

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Resting Heart Rate
beats per minuteCOPD Cohort
Day 085.02 ± 8.003
Day 8 to Day 1479.9 ± 9.126
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Inspiration vs Expiration Time Ratio

Using the breathing signal one can determine the inspiration and expiration peaks. The difference between said peaks in milliseconds can be used to determine the ratio of inspiration (distance from lower point to next peak) vs expiration (distance from peak to next lower point).

Time frame:
Day 0(Baseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Inspiration vs Expiration Time Ratio
ratioCOPD Cohort
Day 00.96 ± 0.078
Day 8 to Day 140.98 ± 0.068
PrimaryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Frequency of Additional Medication

Count of the number of times the use of additional medication as a log activity is reported per day.

Time frame:
Day 0(Basseline) and Day 8 to Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · count per day
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations of Sensor-collected Parameters During Observation Period - Frequency of Additional Medication
count per dayCOPD Cohort
Day 00.37 ± 0.714
Day 8 to Day 140.82 ± 0.859
PrimaryPrediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Accuracy

Accuracy was calculated as (True Positives + True Negatives) / Total Population. True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. True Negatives (TN) are events correctly predicted as non-exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Accuracy scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of predictability
Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Accuracy
percentage of predictabilityCOPD Cohort
70-300.56
Random0.56
PrimaryPrediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Precision

Precision was calculated as True Positives / (True Positives + False Positives). True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. False Positives (FP) are events incorrectly predicted as exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Precision scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of predictability
Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Precision
percentage of predictabilityCOPD Cohort
70-300.53
Random0.62
PrimaryPrediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Recall

Recall was calculated as True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives). True Positives (TP) are events correctly predicted as exacerbations. False Negatives (FN) are events incorrectly predicted as non-exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Recall scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of predictability
Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Recall
percentage of predictabilityCOPD Cohort
70-300.63
Random0.46
PrimaryPrediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Specificity

Specificity was calculated as True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives). True Negatives (TN) are events correctly predicted as non-exacerbations. False Positives (FP) are events incorrectly predicted as exacerbations. Total Population refers to the total number of events evaluated. Specificity scores reflect XGBoost algorithm performance using random and time-based 70/30 data splits. The values were calculated in form of percentage where 100% is the ideal scenario for perfect predictability.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of predictability
Prediction of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates - Specificity
percentage of predictabilityCOPD Cohort
70-300.53
Random0.63
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Participants Health Status and Symptoms at Baseline and Study End

Participants health status and symptoms at baseline (Day 0) and study end will be measured as the summary score across items of the CAT questionnaire that consists of 8-items in which participants can choose a score from 0 to 5, for each visit.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Participants Health Status and Symptoms at Baseline and Study End
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.19 (-0.07 to 0.43)
End of Study: Heart Rate0.45 (0.16 to 1.67)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.19 (-0.07 to 0.43)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate0.46 (0.16 to 0.68)
Baseline: Temperature0.07 (-0.19 to 0.32)
End of Study: Temperature0.02 (-0.31 to 0.33)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)0.12 (-0.14 to 0.36)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)-0.13 (-0.43 to 0.2)
Baseline: Respiration Rate0.21 (-0.05 to 0.44)
End of Study: Respiration Rate0.3 (-0.02 to 0.57)
Baseline: SDRR0.04 (-0.22 to 0.3)
End of Study: SDRR0.39 (0.08 to 0.63)
Baseline: SDNN-0.06 (-0.31 to 0.21)
End of Study: SDNN0.38 (0.07 to 0.63)
Baseline: SDNNI0.02 (-0.24 to 0.28)
End of Study: SDNNI0.41 (0.09 to 0.65)
Baseline: RMSSD-0.04 (-0.29 to 0.22)
End of Study: RMSSD0.42 (0.12 to 0.66)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)0.04 (-0.22 to 0.29)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)0.44 (0.14 to 0.67)
Baseline: pNN50-0.06 (-0.31 to 0.2)
End of Study: pNN500.4 (0.09 to 0.64)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.01 (-0.27 to 0.25)
End of Study: Stress Index-0.21 (-0.5 to 0.12)
Baseline: LF-0.28 (-0.5 to -0.03)
End of Study: LF0.15 (-0.19 to 0.45)
Baseline: HF-0.09 (-0.34 to 0.17)
End of Study: HF0.18 (-0.16 to 0.47)
Baseline: LF/HF-0.12 (-0.36 to 0.15)
End of Study: LF/ HF-0.34 (-0.6 to -0.01)
Baseline: Physical Activity-0.11 (-0.36 to 0.15)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.11 (-0.42 to 0.22)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)0.06 (-0.2 to 0.31)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)0.11 (-0.22 to 0.42)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.04 (-0.3 to 0.22)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.21 (-0.5 to 0.12)
Baseline: Cough Frequency-0.2 (-0.43 to 0.06)
End of Study: Cough Frequency-0.21 (-0.5 to 0.12)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.06 (-0.2 to 0.31)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.27 (-0.06 to 0.55)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1) at Baseline and Study End

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1) at Baseline and Study End
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.07 (-0.23 to 0.35)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.36 (-0.62 to -0.01)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.08 (-0.22 to 0.36)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.32 (-0.6 to 0.03)
Baseline: Temperature-0.29 (-0.54 to -0.01)
End of Study: Temperature-0.12 (-0.45 to 0.23)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)-0.18 (-0.45 to 0.11)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)0.1 (-0.25 to 0.43)
Baseline: Respiration Rate-0.25 (-0.5 to 0.04)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.24 (-0.54 to 0.11)
Baseline: SDRR-0.28 (-0.53 to 0.01)
End of Study: SDRR-0.31 (-0.6 to 0.04)
Baseline: SDNN0.15 (-0.14 to 0.42)
End of Study: SDNN-0.17 (-0.49 to 0.19)
Baseline: SDNNI-0.02 (-0.31 to 0.27)
End of Study: SDNNI-0.25 (-0.55 to 0.11)
Baseline: RMSSD0.08 (-0.21 to 0.36)
End of Study: RMSSD-0.19 (-0.5 to 0.17)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)0.02 (-0.27 to 0.3)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)-0.17 (-0.49 to 0.19)
Baseline: pNN500.05 (-0.24 to 0.33)
End of Study: pNN50-0.16 (-0.48 to 0.2)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.04 (-0.32 to 0.25)
End of Study: Stress Index-0.09 (-0.42 to 0.27)
Baseline: LF0.35 (0.07 to 0.58)
End of Study: LF-0.11 (-0.44 to 0.25)
Baseline: HF0.18 (-0.11 to 0.45)
End of Study: HF-0.14 (-0.46 to 0.22)
Baseline: LF/HF0.14 (-0.15 to 0.41)
End of Study: LF/ HF0.04 (-0.32 to 0.38)
Baseline: Physical Activity0.11 (-0.18 to 0.39)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.03 (-0.37 to 0.32)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.09 (-0.37 to 0.2)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.24 (-0.54 to 0.11)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.29 (0 to 0.53)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.13 (-0.23 to 0.46)
Baseline: Cough Frequency0.18 (-0.11 to 0.45)
End of Study: Cough Frequency-0.05 (-0.39 to 0.3)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.02 (-0.27 to 0.3)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.2 (-0.51 to 0.15)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FVC) at Baseline and Study End

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FVC) at Baseline and Study End
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.11 (-0.18 to 0.38)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.15 (-0.47 to 0.21)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.13 (-0.16 to 0.4)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.11 (-0.44 to 0.24)
Baseline: Temperature-0.21 (-0.47 to 0.08)
End of Study: Temperature-0.28 (-0.57 to 0.07)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)-0.32 (-0.55 to -0.03)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)-0.1 (-0.43 to 0.25)
Baseline: Respiration Rate-0.28 (-0.52 to 0.01)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.09 (-0.42 to 0.26)
Baseline: SDRR-0.2 (-0.46 to 0.09)
End of Study: SDRR-0.04 (-0.38 to 0.31)
Baseline: SDNN0.16 (-0.13 to 0.43)
End of Study: SDNN0.09 (-0.27 to 0.43)
Baseline: SDNNI0.03 (-0.26 to 0.31)
End of Study: SDNNI0.04 (-0.31 to 0.38)
Baseline: RMSSD0.1 (-0.19 to 0.38)
End of Study: RMSSD0.19 (-0.17 to 0.5)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)0.04 (-0.25 to 0.32)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)0.03 (-0.32 to 0.38)
Baseline: pNN500.07 (-0.22 to 0.35)
End of Study: pNN500.21 (-0.15 to 0.52)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.09 (-0.36 to 0.21)
End of Study: Stress Index0.25 (-0.11 to 0.55)
Baseline: LF0.31 (0.02 to 0.55)
End of Study: LF0.29 (-0.06 to 0.58)
Baseline: HF0.15 (-0.14 to 0.42)
End of Study: HF0.32 (-0.04 to 0.6)
Baseline: LF/HF0.25 (-0.04 to 0.5)
End of Study: LF/ HF0.04 (-0.32 to 0.38)
Baseline: Physical Activity0.02 (-0.27 to 0.3)
End of Study: Physical Activity0.11 (-0.24 to 0.44)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.07 (-0.35 to 0.22)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)0.09 (-0.26 to 0.42)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.22 (-0.07 to 0.48)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.02 (-0.33 to 0.36)
Baseline: Cough Frequency0.16 (-0.13 to 0.43)
End of Study: Cough Frequency-0.16 (-0.47 to 0.2)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.12 (-0.17 to 0.4)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.06 (-0.28 to 0.4)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1/FVC) at Baseline and Study End

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Lung Function (FEV1/FVC) at Baseline and Study End
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate-0.07 (-0.35 to 0.22)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.3 (-0.59 to 0.04)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate-0.08 (-0.36 to 0.21)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.29 (-0.58 to 0.05)
Baseline: Temperature-0.16 (-0.43 to 0.14)
End of Study: Temperature0.15 (-0.2 to 0.47)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)0.07 (-0.22 to 0.35)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)0.28 (-0.07 to 0.57)
Baseline: Respiration Rate0 (-0.29 to 0.28)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.22 (-0.52 to 0.14)
Baseline: SDRR-0.27 (-0.51 to 0.02)
End of Study: SDRR-0.42 (-0.67 to -0.08)
Baseline: SDNN-0.08 (-0.36 to 0.21)
End of Study: SDNN-0.28 (-0.57 to 0.08)
Baseline: SDNNI-0.17 (-0.44 to 0.12)
End of Study: SDNNI-0.35 (-0.63 to -0.01)
Baseline: RMSSD-0.09 (-0.37 to 0.2)
End of Study: RMSSD-0.36 (-0.63 to -0.01)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)-0.13 (-0.4 to 0.16)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)-0.23 (-0.53 to 0.13)
Baseline: pNN50-0.09 (-0.37 to 0.2)
End of Study: pNN50-0.33 (-0.61 to 0.02)
Baseline: Stress Index0.09 (-0.2 to 0.37)
End of Study: Stress Index-0.31 (-0.59 to 0.05)
Baseline: LF0.07 (-0.22 to 0.35)
End of Study: LF-0.31 (-0.59 to 0.05)
Baseline: HF0.02 (-0.27 to 0.31)
End of Study: HF-0.36 (-0.63 to -0.01)
Baseline: LF/HF-0.06 (-0.34 to 0.23)
End of Study: LF/ HF0.03 (-0.33 to 0.37)
Baseline: Physical Activity0.2 (-0.09 to 0.46)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.15 (-0.47 to 0.2)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.02 (-0.31 to 0.26)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.37 (-0.64 to -0.03)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.2 (-0.09 to 0.46)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.17 (-0.19 to 0.49)
Baseline: Cough Frequency-0.02 (-0.31 to 0.27)
End of Study: Cough Frequency0.1 (-0.25 to 0.43)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.18 (-0.44 to 0.12)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.29 (-0.57 to 0.06)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (White Blood Cells Count)

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (White Blood Cells Count)
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.2 (-0.25 to 0.58)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.07 (-0.5 to 0.39)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.21 (-0.24 to 0.59)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.04 (-0.47 to 0.41)
Baseline: Temperature0.19 (-0.26 to 0.58)
End of Study: Temperature0.34 (-0.12 to 0.68)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)-0.29 (-0.64 to 0.16)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)0.38 (-0.08 to 0.7)
Baseline: Respiration Rate0.42 (-0.02 to 0.72)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.06 (-0.49 to 0.4)
Baseline: SDRR0.12 (-0.33 to 0.53)
End of Study: SDRR-0.01 (-0.46 to 0.44)
Baseline: SDNN0.22 (-0.24 to 0.59)
End of Study: SDNN0.21 (-0.27 to 0.61)
Baseline: SDNNI0.28 (-0.17 to 0.63)
End of Study: SDNNI0.12 (-0.35 to 0.55)
Baseline: RMSSD0.31 (-0.14 to 0.65)
End of Study: RMSSD0.25 (-0.23 to 0.63)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)0.25 (-0.2 to 0.62)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)0.32 (-0.16 to 0.68)
Baseline: pNN500.4 (-0.04 to 0.71)
End of Study: pNN500.34 (-0.14 to 0.69)
Baseline: Stress Index0.02 (-0.42 to 0.45)
End of Study: Stress Index-0.23 (-0.62 to 0.25)
Baseline: LF-0.1 (-0.51 to 0.35)
End of Study: LF0.37 (-0.1 to 0.71)
Baseline: HF-0.1 (-0.51 to 0.35)
End of Study: HF0.42 (-0.04 to 0.74)
Baseline: LF/HF-0.07 (-0.49 to 0.37)
End of Study: LF/ HF-0.3 (-0.66 to 0.18)
Baseline: Physical Activity-0.41 (-0.72 to 0.02)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.19 (-0.59 to 0.27)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.36 (-0.68 to 0.09)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)0.13 (-0.33 to 0.54)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.17 (-0.56 to 0.28)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.05 (-0.49 to 0.41)
Baseline: Cough Frequency0.02 (-0.41 to 0.45)
End of Study: Cough Frequency0.26 (-0.21 to 0.63)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.27 (-0.63 to 0.19)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.31 (-0.66 to 0.15)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Erythrocytes Count)

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Erythrocytes Count)
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.01 (-0.43 to 0.44)
End of Study: Heart Rate0.11 (-0.35 to 0.53)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.02 (-0.41 to 0.45)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate0.1 (-0.36 to 0.52)
Baseline: Temperature0.48 (0.06 to 0.75)
End of Study: Temperature0.21 (-0.25 to 0.6)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)0.08 (-0.36 to 0.5)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)0.02 (-0.43 to 0.46)
Baseline: Respiration Rate-0.23 (-0.6 to 0.23)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.14 (-0.55 to 0.32)
Baseline: SDRR0.11 (-0.34 to 0.51)
End of Study: SDRR0.39 (-0.08 to 0.72)
Baseline: SDNN0.17 (-0.29 to 0.56)
End of Study: SDNN0.41 (-0.05 to 0.73)
Baseline: SDNNI0.24 (-0.21 to 0.61)
End of Study: SDNNI0.43 (-0.02 to 0.74)
Baseline: RMSSD0.13 (-0.32 to 0.53)
End of Study: RMSSD0.25 (-0.23 to 0.63)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)0.04 (-0.4 to 0.46)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)0.28 (-0.2 to 0.65)
Baseline: pNN500.08 (-0.37 to 0.49)
End of Study: pNN500.41 (-0.05 to 0.73)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.11 (-0.52 to 0.34)
End of Study: Stress Index-0.32 (-0.67 to 0.16)
Baseline: LF0.08 (-0.36 to 0.49)
End of Study: LF0.3 (-0.18 to 0.66)
Baseline: HF0.24 (-0.22 to 0.61)
End of Study: HF0.13 (-0.34 to 0.55)
Baseline: LF/HF0.25 (-0.2 to 0.62)
End of Study: LF/ HF0.16 (-0.32 to 0.57)
Baseline: Physical Activity-0.26 (-0.62 to 0.2)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.05 (-0.48 to 0.4)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.16 (-0.55 to 0.3)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)0.13 (-0.33 to 0.54)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.34 (-0.68 to 0.1)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.21 (-0.61 to 0.27)
Baseline: Cough Frequency-0.53 (-0.78 to -0.13)
End of Study: Cough Frequency-0.06 (-0.49 to 0.4)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.24 (-0.21 to 0.61)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.4 (0 to 0.74)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Oxygen (pO2))

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Oxygen (pO2))
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate-0.39 (-0.68 to 0.01)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.3 (-0.65 to 0.15)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate-0.41 (-0.69 to -0.01)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.3 (-0.65 to 0.15)
Baseline: Temperature-0.3 (-0.62 to 0.11)
End of Study: Temperature-0.24 (-0.61 to 0.22)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)0.02 (-0.38 to 0.41)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)-0.07 (-0.49 to 0.37)
Baseline: Respiration Rate-0.54 (-0.77 to -0.19)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.3 (-0.65 to 0.15)
Baseline: SDRR-0.32 (-0.64 to 0.09)
End of Study: SDRR-0.27 (-0.64 to 0.21)
Baseline: SDNN-0.13 (-0.5 to 0.29)
End of Study: SDNN-0.15 (-0.56 to 0.33)
Baseline: SDNNI-0.2 (-0.56 to 0.22)
End of Study: SDNNI-0.22 (-0.61 to 0.26)
Baseline: RMSSD-0.16 (-0.53 to 0.26)
End of Study: RMSSD-0.08 (-0.51 to 0.39)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)-0.24 (-0.52 to 0.18)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)-0.27 (-0.64 to 0.21)
Baseline: pNN50-0.14 (-0.52 to 0.28)
End of Study: pNN50-0.26 (-0.64 to 0.22)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.27 (-0.61 to 0.15)
End of Study: Stress Index0.37 (-0.1 to 0.71)
Baseline: LF-0.04 (-0.44 to 0.37)
End of Study: LF-0.35 (-0.7 to 0.12)
Baseline: HF-0.09 (-0.48 to 0.32)
End of Study: HF-0.17 (-0.58 to 0.31)
Baseline: LF/HF0.2 (-0.22 to 0.56)
End of Study: LF/ HF-0.17 (-0.58 to 0.31)
Baseline: Physical Activity0.47 (0.09 to 0.73)
End of Study: Physical Activity-0.05 (-0.47 to 0.39)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)0.24 (-0.18 to 0.58)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.17 (-0.56 to 0.28)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.34 (-0.08 to 0.65)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.28 (-0.2 to 0.65)
Baseline: Cough Frequency0.16 (-0.25 to 0.52)
End of Study: Cough Frequency0.24 (-0.21 to 0.61)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.03 (-0.37 to 0.42)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.28 (-0.63 to 0.17)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO2))

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO2))
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate0.16 (-0.25 to 0.52)
End of Study: Heart Rate0.32 (-0.13 to 0.66)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate0.18 (-0.23 to 0.54)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate0.3 (-0.16 to 0.64)
Baseline: Temperature0.13 (-0.28 to 0.5)
End of Study: Temperature-0.26 (-0.62 to 0.2)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)0.54 (0.18 to 0.77)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)-0.55 (-0.8 to -0.16)
Baseline: Respiration Rate0.09 (-0.31 to 0.47)
End of Study: Respiration Rate0.15 (-0.3 to 0.55)
Baseline: SDRR-0.04 (-0.43 to 0.37)
End of Study: SDRR0.14 (-0.33 to 0.56)
Baseline: SDNN-0.13 (-0.51 to 0.29)
End of Study: SDNN-0.12 (-0.55 to 0.35)
Baseline: SDNNI-0.16 (-0.53 to 0.26)
End of Study: SDNNI-0.04 (-0.49 to 0.42)
Baseline: RMSSD-0.14 (-0.51 to 0.28)
End of Study: RMSSD-0.32 (-0.67 to 0.16)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)-0.21 (-0.56 to 0.21)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)-0.29 (-0.66 to 0.19)
Baseline: pNN50-0.14 (-0.52 to 0.28)
End of Study: pNN50-0.14 (-0.56 to 0.34)
Baseline: Stress Index0.45 (0.06 to 0.72)
End of Study: Stress Index0.14 (-0.34 to 0.56)
Baseline: LF-0.24 (-0.58 to 0.18)
End of Study: LF-0.4 (-0.72 to 0.07)
Baseline: HF-0.1 (-0.48 to 0.32)
End of Study: HF-0.5 (-0.78 to -0.06)
Baseline: LF/HF-0.04 (-0.43 to 0.37)
End of Study: LF/ HF0.23 (-0.25 to 0.62)
Baseline: Physical Activity-0.41 (-0.69 to -0.02)
End of Study: Physical Activity0.01 (-0.42 to 0.44)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.13 (-0.5 to 0.28)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)0.2 (-0.26 to 0.58)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.3 (-0.63 to 0.11)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio-0.27 (-0.65 to 0.21)
Baseline: Cough Frequency-0.27 (-0.6 to 0.14)
End of Study: Cough Frequency0.15 (-0.3 to 0.54)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)0 (-0.4 to 0.39)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)0.32 (-0.13 to 0.66)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (O2 Saturation)

Lung function was assessed using plethysmography and lab values including Complete Blood Count with differential, Blood Gas Analysis, procalcitonin and CRP will be assessed as per standard practice at baseline (Day 0) and at study end

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) and at 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Questionnaire: Lung Function and Lab Values at Baseline and Study End (O2 Saturation)
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Baseline: Heart Rate-0.33 (-0.64 to 0.09)
End of Study: Heart Rate-0.32 (-0.66 to 0.13)
Baseline: Resting Heart Rate-0.35 (-0.66 to 0.06)
End of Study: Resting Heart Rate-0.33 (-0.67 to 0.12)
Baseline: Temperature-0.29 (-0.62 to 0.13)
End of Study: Temperature0.03 (-0.41 to 0.45)
Baseline: Temperature (normalized)-0.28 (-0.61 to 0.14)
End of Study: Temperature (normalized)0.04 (-0.4 to 0.46)
Baseline: Respiration Rate-0.28 (-0.61 to 0.14)
End of Study: Respiration Rate-0.28 (-0.64 to 0.17)
Baseline: SDRR-0.46 (-0.73 to -0.06)
End of Study: SDRR-0.37 (-0.7 to 0.11)
Baseline: SDNN-0.13 (-0.51 to 0.3)
End of Study: SDNN-0.35 (-0.69 to 0.13)
Baseline: SDNNI-0.22 (-0.58 to 0.21)
End of Study: SDNNI-0.39 (-0.72 to 0.08)
Baseline: RMSSD-0.11 (-0.5 to 0.32)
End of Study: RMSSD-0.3 (-0.66 to 0.18)
Baseline: In (RMSSD)-0.22 (-0.58 to 0.22)
End of Study: In (RMSSD)-0.36 (-0.7 to 0.11)
Baseline: pNN50-0.03 (-0.43 to 0.39)
End of Study: pNN50-0.3 (-0.66 to 0.18)
Baseline: Stress Index-0.36 (-0.68 to 0.06)
End of Study: Stress Index0.13 (-0.34 to 0.55)
Baseline: LF0.1 (-0.32 to 0.49)
End of Study: LF-0.11 (-0.54 to 0.36)
Baseline: HF-0.1 (-0.49 to 0.33)
End of Study: HF-0.16 (-0.57 to 0.32)
Baseline: LF/HF0.29 (-0.14 to 0.63)
End of Study: LF/ HF-0.02 (-0.47 to 0.44)
Baseline: Physical Activity0.44 (0.04 to 0.72)
End of Study: Physical Activity0.1 (-0.34 to 0.51)
Baseline: Physical Activity (normalized)0.17 (-0.25 to 0.53)
End of Study: Physical Activity (normalized)-0.07 (-0.48 to 0.38)
Baseline: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.45 (0.04 to 0.73)
End of Study: In- vs. Expiration Time Ratio0.41 (-0.06 to 0.73)
Baseline: Cough Frequency0.04 (-0.37 to 0.44)
End of Study: Cough Frequency0.28 (-0.17 to 0.64)
Baseline: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.11 (-0.5 to 0.3)
End of Study: Cough Frequency (normalized)-0.32 (-0.66 to 0.13)
SecondaryCorrelation of Sensor-Collected Data With Number, Date of Onset, and Duration of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Exacerbations

Exacerbations are classified as mild if they are treated with short-acting bronchodilators only, moderate if they are treated additionally with antibiotics or oral corticosteroids, or severe if the patient visits the emergency room or requires hospitalization because of an exacerbation.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Number, Date of Onset, and Duration of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Exacerbations
correlation coefficientCOPD Cohort
Correlation of Sensor-Collected Data With Number, Date of Onset, and Duration of Mild, Moderate, and Severe ExacerbationsNA
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Heart Rate and Resting Heart Rate) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Heart Rate and Resting Heart Rate). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/beats per minute
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Heart Rate and Resting Heart Rate) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/beats per minuteCOPD Cohort
7days<S/M E:Heart Rate0.039 (0.016 to 0.063)
7days<S/M E:Resting Heart Rate0.039 (0.015 to 0.063)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Respiration Rate) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Respiration Rate). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/ breaths per minute
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Respiration Rate) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/ breaths per minuteCOPD Cohort
7days<S/M E:Respiration Rate0.370 (0.161 to 0.580)
14days<S/M E:RespirationRate0.789 (0.389 to 1.188)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, In(RMSSD)) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, In(RMSSD)). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/millimeter
Association Between Sensor Parameters (SDRR, SDNN, SDNNI, RMSSD, In(RMSSD)) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/millimeterCOPD Cohort
7days<S/M E:SDRR0.030 (0.010 to 0.051)
7days<S/M E:SDNN0.010 (0.003 to 0.0171)
14days<S/M E:SDNN0.029 (0.010 to 0.048)
7days<S/M E:SDNNI0.011 (0.003 to 0.018)
14days<S/M E:SDNNI0.045 (0.021 to 0.069)
7days<S/M E:RMSSD0.006 (0.003 to 0.010)
14days<S/M E:RMSSD0.016 (0.004 to 0.027)
7days<S/M E:In (RMSSD)0.576 (0.204 to 0.948)
14days<S/M E:In(RMSSD)1.893 (1.006 to 2.781)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Stress Index, LF/HF) and CAT Score

During the observation period, participants completed the CAT questionnaire daily via a digital app. Stress Index, based on heart rate variability (HRV), assessed autonomic activity and physiological stress. It was calculated as AMo/(2 \* Mo \* MxDMn), where AMo is the % of RR intervals at the most frequent value, Mo is the most common RR interval, and MxDMn is the RR interval range. Stress Index values range from 50-900; lower values (50-150) indicate low stress and better autonomic balance, while higher values (\>500) reflect increased stress and sympathetic activity. LF power reflects sympathetic activity; HF power reflects parasympathetic activity. Linear mixed models assessed associations between CAT score and each sensor parameters. Fixed effect estimates represent change in CAT score per unit change in each parameter. Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI".

Time frame:
7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · fixed effect estimate
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Stress Index, LF/HF) and CAT Score
fixed effect estimateCOPD Cohort
7days<S/M E:Stress Index0.003 (0.000 to 0.007)
14days<S/M E:StressIndex-0.006 (-0.011 to -0.000)
7days<S/M E:LF/HF-0.441 (-0.703 to -0.179)
14days<S/M E:LF/HF-0.963 (-1.762 to -0.164)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (pNN50) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (pNN50). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
7 days before Severe/Moderate Excarbations(S/M E) (7-day window period) and 14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/percent of heartbeats
Association Between Sensor Parameters (pNN50) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/percent of heartbeatsCOPD Cohort
7days<S/M E:pNN502.259 (0.956 to 3.561)
14days<S/M E:pNN505.483 (0.723 to 10.242)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Temperature) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Temperature). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/degree Celsius
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Temperature) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/degree CelsiusCOPD Cohort
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Temperature) and CAT Score0.943 (0.047 to 1.839)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Physical Activity) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Physical activity). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/minute
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Physical Activity) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/minuteCOPD Cohort
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Physical Activity) and CAT Score-0.016 (-0.031 to -0.000)
SecondaryAssociation Between Sensor Parameters (Sleep Pattern) and CAT Score

During the observation period the CAT score was obtained via a digital application daily. The daily CAT questionnaire summary score was computed. The fixed effect estimate represents the change in CAT score per unit change in the corresponding parameter. Linear mixed models were performed to assess the association between the CAT score and each sensor parameter (Sleep pattern). Data was calculated through linear mixed model; reported as "fixed effect estimate" with measure type as "number" and measure dispersion as "95% CI."

Time frame:
14 days before S/M E (1 day window period)
Reported as:
Number · scores on a scale/hours per day
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Sleep Pattern) and CAT Score
scores on a scale/hours per dayCOPD Cohort
Association Between Sensor Parameters (Sleep Pattern) and CAT Score-0.292 (-0.571 to -0.014)
SecondaryPredicting the CAT Score by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates

Patients' health status and symptoms at baseline (Day 0) were measured using the CAT questionnaire, an 8-item tool with scores ranging from 0 to 5 per item. CAT scores were collected daily via a digital application during the observation period. Various machine learning algorithms were evaluated for predictive performance using metrics including accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve. R² (coefficient of determination) was computed for CAT score prediction models, defined as R² = 1 - (SS\_res / SS\_tot), where SS\_res is the residual sum of squares and SS\_tot is the total sum of squares. R² values range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better model fit.

Time frame:
Up to 3 months
Reported as:
Number · coefficient of determination (R^2)
Predicting the CAT Score by Building a Statistical Model Employing Sensor-Derived Data and Demographic and Medical Covariates
coefficient of determination (R^2)COPD Cohort
Time-Split Model82.7
XGBoost regressor model82.6

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Calibration Cohort0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)
COPD Cohort0/67 (0%)3/67 (4.5%)3/67 (4.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCalibration CohortCOPD Cohort
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/672/67
Deep Vein ThrombosisVascular disorders0/671/67
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCalibration CohortCOPD Cohort
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/672/67
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/671/67

Baseline characteristics

Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population consisted of the following analysis sets: COPD analysis set: all eligible participants with COPD \& Calibration analysis set: all eligible participants with non-COPD

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Calibration CohortCOPD CohortTotal
Median52 (43.75 to 58.75)67 (61 to 71.5)66 (59 to 71)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Calibration CohortCOPD CohortTotal
Female83745
Male23032
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Calibration CohortCOPD CohortTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White106777
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Praxis an der Oper
    Berlin, Germany
  • Lungenzentrum Darmstadt GmbH
    Darmstadt, Germany
  • Städtische Kliniken Darmstadt
    Darmstadt, Germany
  • Lungenzentrum Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • ZERO Praxen
    Mannheim, Germany
  • Pneumologisches Studienzentrum München-West
    München, Germany
  • Pneumologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Saarbrücken
    Saarbrücken, Germany
  • RespiRatio / Lungenpraxis
    Schleswig, Germany
  • Pneumologische Praxis Wiesbaden
    Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Lungenpraxis Dr. Franz / Dr. Weber
    Witten, Germany
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 1, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 10, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and the European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website http://bit.ly/IPD21

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05655832
Lead sponsor
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2022
Start date
Dec 5, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2023
Completion
Oct 31, 2023
Results posted
Jan 15, 2026
Last update
Jan 15, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Responsible
study director · Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion