A Phase 2 interventional study of Active repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smoking, sponsored by Kent State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-08.
Sponsored by Kent State University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objective of this study is to examine the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on a regulation of craving task (ROC task) and evaluate the feasibility of targeting rTMS via fMRI based neuronavigation. Specifically, we will examine BOLD activation within the DLPFC when control over craving is exerted in order to identify if 1) the task produces reliable activations in an area capable of being targeted by a standard figure-8 coil and 2) examine if the coordinates of the area are distinct from the area targeted via anatomical neuronavigation alone. Last, we will examine if rTMS, compared to sham, is capable of improving cognitive control over craving measured at outcome. The current pilot study will examine these aims in a sample of tobacco dependent adults (N=16) (with final sample size dependent on availability of funds).
The study will include functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline as well as demographic, psychological, and tobacco use assessments. Following initial assessment, participants will undergo one active rTMS session (20 Hz rTMS, 900 pulses per session, applied to left DLPFC). The outcome session will include assessments repeated from baseline.
The current proposal will examine the following aims. Aim 1: To test the potential for active rTMS to improve cognitive control of craving. Hypothesis: Active rTMS (compared to sham rTMS) will result in significant improvement in control over craving assessed by self-reported craving during the ROC task as well as in terms of activity in prefrontal regions associated with cognitive control during the ROC task.
Aim 2 (feasibility): To examine the feasibility of using fMRI BOLD activation in the DLPFC during the ROC task to target rTMS. BOLD activations during successful control over craving trials will be examined in terms of their reliability within participant and their feasibility as a target for rTMS delivered via standard figure 8 coil (capable of inducing synaptic firing 1.5-3.0 cm beneath the scalp). Additionally, the coordinates for the target identified via BOLD activation during the ROC task will be compared to the coordinates for the target identified by using standard neuronavigation to the DLPFC via anatomical fMRI, in order to determine if these areas are distinct in terms of the direct effect of the stimulation field (approximately 5 cm2).
1,509 studies on the registry are indexed under Smoking; 193 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 115 across 1,164 interventional studies indexed under Smoking.
Browse Smoking studies →Kent State University is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
rTMS will be delivered with a MagPro R-30 magnetic stimulator (MagVenture, Farum, Denmark) Cool-B65 A/P (Active/Placebo). Participants will receive 900 pulses of 20 Hz rTMS per session at 110% of the Motor threshold (MT) (45 20-pulse trains of 1 second duration with an inter-train interval of 20 seconds). MT will be established to determine the intensity of stimulation for each participant, as recommended by safety guidelines. MT will be defined as the amount of energy required to induce a visible twitch in contralateral hand in at least 50% of stimulations. The target stimulation site will be the left DLPFC, specifically: located 6 cm anterior of the MT site identified with assistance from the neuro-navigation system to ensure that the target is located in the middle of the frontal gyrus, in the lateral part of Brodmann Area (BA) 9, near the border of BA 46.
Device: Active repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham rTMS will appear identical to active treatment, with the exception that the sham side of the coil will be used resulting in no stimulation being applied to the participant, while providing a sensation of stimulation.
Device: Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Active stimulation
Sham stimulation
Regulation of Craving Task
Self report ratings of cue induced craving for smoking after instruction. Specifically, differences in craving following positive vs. negative instructions will be compared between active stimulation and sham stimulation groups at the final outcome session, accounting for baseline values (similar to methods detailed in (Kober, Kross, Mischel, Hart, \& Ochsner, 2010). Kober, H., Kross, E. F., Mischel, W., Hart, C. L., \& Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Regulation of craving by cognitive strategies in cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 106(1), 52-55. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.017
Time frame: Assessed during the baseline session and repeated at the outcome session (following stimulation), occurring on average less than one month apart. Primary outcome measure are the ratings collected at the final outcome session.
Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU - Brief)
Self report assessment smoking urges will be compared between active stimulation and sham stimulation groups at the final outcome session, accounting for baseline values.
Time frame: Assessed during the baseline session and repeated at the outcome session (following stimulation), occurring on average less than one month apart. Primary outcome measure are the ratings collected at the final outcome session.
Plan to share: No — NO IPD will be shared.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kent State University