ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05639231INTOMOBUpdated Aug 12, 2025

An INtervention TO Improve MOBility of Older Hospitalized Patients

An interventional study of INTOMOB intervention in Hospital Mobility, Mobility Limitation and Life-Space, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Completed at 4 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-12.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
383
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Low mobility during an acute care hospitalization is very frequent, particularly among older patients, and associated with adverse outcomes, such as persistent functional decline, institutionalization and death. However, increasing hospital mobility remains challenging because of the multiple existing barriers.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effect of a multilevel intervention to increase hospital mobility, which addresses modifiable barriers and facilitators and does not require unavailable additional resources.

This study aims to answer whether this intervention can improve mobility and patient-relevant outcomes such as life-space mobility and functional status.

The multilevel intervention will target:

  1. The patients, who will receive an information booklet, a customizable diary, an exercise booklet and an iPad with access to the videos of the exercise booklet.
  2. The healthcare professionals (nursing staff and physicians) who will complete an e-learning, receive an oral presentation on the intervention, and receive a "mobility checklist" that reminds them of what they should assess daily regarding mobility.
  3. The hospital environment, where posters will be hung in the wards, including walking itineraries, on topics of interest to older adults.

In a first phase, the intervention will be pilot-tested in one ward of each hospital. The intervention will then be adapted based on patient and healthcare professional feedback.

In a second phase, the intervention will be tested in a cluster randomized controlled trial, and compared to standard of care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hospital Mobility
  • Mobility Limitation
  • Life-Space
  • Functional Status
  • Hospital-Acquired Condition
  • Muscle Atrophy or Weakness
  • Sarcopenia
  • Iatrogenic Disease

Keywords

  • Hospital mobility
  • Life-Space
  • Functional status
  • Hospital-Acquired disability
  • Exercise
  • Movement
  • Ambulation
03

In context

Mobility Limitation

381 studies on the registry are indexed under Mobility Limitation; 108 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 383 is above the median of 46 across 316 interventional studies indexed under Mobility Limitation.

Browse Mobility Limitation studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admission to a general internal medicine (GIM) ward of a participating hospital
  • Age ≥60 years
  • Being ambulatory during the 2 weeks before admission (self-report)
  • Living in the community (not in a nursing home or another institution) for at least the last 30 days prior to admission
  • Ability to understand French or German
  • Planned length of stay at least 3 days after enrollment
  • For the pilot-study only: Possibility to start the study within 48 hours after admission to the GIM ward

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Medical to walk (e.g., wound not allowing loading weight)
  • Wheelchair-bound
  • End-of-life
  • Severe psychiatric disorder (severe depression, schizophrenia, psychosis)
  • Delirium (according to the Confusion Assessment Method [CAM])

Additional exclusion criterion for the pilot-study only:

- Dementia (defined as Mini-Cog \<3)

Additional exclusion criteria for the RCT only:

  • Cognitive impairment making impossible to use study material (=implement the intervention) and to understand and sign , based on clinical judgement, except if a proxy can be actively involved in the study and provides consent
  • Severe visual impairment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
383 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    INTOMOB intervention

    The intervention will be multilevel, targeting the patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and environment, as described under "Intervention description".

    Behavioral: INTOMOB intervention

  • No intervention
    Control

    Control procedure in the randomized trial: * Patients will receive standard of care, including physiotherapy if prescribed by the hospital physician and usual mobility recommendations and support by the HCPs. * HCPs will neither complete the e-learning, nor receive the checklist and the oral presentation. * The environment will not be modified in regards to mobility. Already existing information on this topic (e.g., small posters hanging in patient rooms) will not be removed, since it corresponds to current standard of care in some hospitals. In the pilot study, there will be no control procedure, since the objective is to assess experience and feasibility of the intervention, not its effects.

Interventions

  • BehavioralINTOMOB intervention

    The intervention will be multilevel, targeting the patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and environment: PATIENTS: * Information booklet on the importance/benefits of mobility, consequences of low mobility, how to be more active (with concrete information). * Customizable diary to document mobility goals, results, difficulties and needs. * Exercise booklet with explanations \& pictures of mobility exercises (supine, sitting, standing). * iPad 10.2'' with videos of the exercises. HCPs (physicians \& nursing staff): * E-learning on the consequences of low mobility, barriers/facilitators to hospital mobility; recommendations, documentation, communication \& interdisciplinary collaboration regarding mobility; implementation. * Oral presentation on the intervention. * Checklist to remind HCPs to address mobility. ENVIRONMENT: * Posters in the wards about mobility and other topics of interest to older adults. * Walking itineraries in the wards.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Life-space level

    Measured by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (range 0-120, with maximum being a higher score = better outcome). For patients institutionalized, assessment through the Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings. Both scales can be merged since the scoring is similar. Assessment by telephone interview of the participant/relatives.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Life-space level

    Measured by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment (or Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings for institutionalized patients) by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  2. Activities of Daily Living

    Measured by the Barthel Index by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  3. Activities of Daily Living

    Measured by the Barthel Index by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  4. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    Measured by the Lawton Index by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  5. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    Measured by the Lawton Index by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  6. Quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  7. Quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  8. Depression

    Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  9. Depression

    Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  10. Pressure ulcer

    Evaluated according to the NPUAP/EPUAP classification, based on nurse report and electronic health record

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  11. Delirium during hospitalization (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

    Measured by the Confusion Assessment Method

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  12. Mobility at discharge

    Measured by the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI); assessment conducted by the study team

    Time frame: Discharge (maximum 1 day before)

  13. Lower-limb muscle strength

    Measured by lower-limb manual testing according to the method by Hislop and Montgomery; assessment conducted by the study team

    Time frame: Discharge (maximum 1 day before)

  14. Hand-grip muscle strength

    Measured by JAMAR (for the pilot study) and SAEHAN (for the RCT) hand dynamometer; assessment conducted by the study team

    Time frame: Discharge (maximum 1 day before)

  15. Step count during hospitalization (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

    Measured by a StepWatch ankle accelerometer or a GENEActiv wrist accelerometer (the choice of the device will be defined after the pilot study during which both accelerometers will be tested)

    Time frame: Discharge (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

  16. Level of activity during hospitalization (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

    Measured by GENEActiv wrist accelerometer (only if this accelerometer is chosen after the pilot study)

    Time frame: Discharge (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

  17. Fear of / concerns about falling

    Measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  18. Fear of / concerns about falling

    Measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  19. Fear of / concerns about falling

    Measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale - International by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  20. Fall-risk increasing drugs

    Including loop diuretic, beta blocker, cardiac glycoside (digitalis, digoxin), statin, antipsychotic (neuroleptic), tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, other antidepressant, benzodiazepine, opioid, antiepileptic. Assessed through the electronic health record

    Time frame: Discharge (discharge letter) (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

  21. Fall-risk increasing drugs during hospitalization

    Including loop diuretic, beta blocker, cardiac glycoside (digitalis, digoxin), statin, antipsychotic (neuroleptic), tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, other antidepressant, benzodiazepine, opioid, antiepileptic. Assessed through the electronic health record

    Time frame: Discharge (discharge letter) (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)]

  22. Fall-risk increasing drugs

    Including loop diuretic, beta blocker, cardiac glycoside (digitalis, digoxin), statin, antipsychotic (neuroleptic), tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, other antidepressant, benzodiazepine, opioid, antiepileptic. Assessed by telephone interview of the participant

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  23. Fall-risk increasing drugs

    Including loop diuretic, beta blocker, cardiac glycoside (digitalis, digoxin), statin, antipsychotic (neuroleptic), tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, other antidepressant, benzodiazepine, opioid, antiepileptic. Assessed by telephone interview of the participant

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  24. Number of patients with fall(s) during hospitalization (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

    Based on nurse report and electronic health record data

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  25. Number of falls per patient during hospitalization (hospitalization duration expected to be 3 to 20 days on average)

    Based on nurse report and electronic health record data

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  26. Number of patients with fall(s) within 30 days after discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on a diary the participants/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  27. Number of falls per patient within 30 days after discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on a diary the participants/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  28. Number of patients with fall(s) within 180 days after discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on a diary the participants/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  29. Number of falls per patient within 180 days after discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on a diary the participants/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  30. Number of patients with new institutionalization at discharge

    According to nurses / electronic health record / self-report by participant/relatives

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  31. Number of patients with new institutionalization within 30 days of discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  32. Number of patients with new institutionalization within 180 days of discharge

    Assessed by telephone interview of the participant/relatives

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  33. Number of patients with emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  34. Number of emergency room visits per patient within 30 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  35. Number of patients with emergency room visits within 180 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  36. Number of emergency room visits per patient within 180 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  37. Number of patients with readmission within 30 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  38. Number of readmissions per patient within 30 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  39. Number of patients with readmission within 180 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  40. Number of readmissions per patient within 180 days of discharge

    Assessed based on electronic health record and by telephone interview of the participant/relatives, based on the diary the participant/relatives will be asked to complete.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  41. Experience of the intervention

    Assessed through qualitative and quantitative questions by interview of the participants/relatives (on the ward or by telephone). For the intervention group only. Will be done at the end of the assessment to preserve outcome assessor blinding.

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  42. Satisfaction with hospitalization

    Measured by the satisfaction questionnaire adapted and simplified

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  43. Perspectives on hospital mobility

    Quantitative questions (Likert-scale answers) based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model (simplification of a survey used in the preparation phase of this study to assess perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on hospital mobility).

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  44. Location at follow-up

    Assessed by telephone interview of patient/relatives.

    Time frame: Day 30 (+/-5) after enrollment

  45. Location at follow-up

    Assessed by telephone interview of patient/relatives.

    Time frame: Day 180 (+/-5) after enrollment

  46. Discharge destination

    Assessed based on electronic health records

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

Other outcomes

  1. Healthcare professional experience of the intervention and perspectives on hospital mobility

    Semi-structured interview and survey (in the intervention group only)

    Time frame: After cluster closure (on average 1 to 10 months, maximum 15 months)

  2. Patient opinion on comfort and practicability of the StepWatch and GENEActiv accelerometers

    Outcome of the pilot study only. Assessment through semi-structured interview

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

  3. Patient opinion on comfort and practicability of the ActiGraph accelerometer

    Outcome of the randomized trial only. Assessment through semi-structured interview

    Time frame: Discharge (-1 to +2 days after discharge)

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Kantonsspital Baden
    Baden, Canton of Aargau 5404, Switzerland
  • HFR-Fribourg - hôpital cantonal
    Villars-sur-Glâne, Canton of Fribourg 1752, Switzerland
  • Spital Tiefenau, InselGruppe AG
    Bern, 3004, Switzerland
  • Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, InselGruppe AG
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mooser B, Bergsma D, Liechti FD, Baumgartner C, Gentizon J, Mean M, Wertli MM, Mancinetti M, Schmidt-Leuenberger J, Aubert CE. Impact of an INtervention to increase MOBility in older hospitalized medical patients (INTOMOB): Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04285-3. PubMed 37907858 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form will be published. Other data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: After study completion

Access criteria: Upon reasonable request

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05639231
Collaborators
Swiss National Science Foundation, Hôpital Fribourgeois, Kantonsspital Baden
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2022
Start date
Dec 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2025
Completion
Jul 18, 2025
Last update
Aug 12, 2025

Study contacts

Carole E Aubert, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion