An interventional study of iTBS to dmPFC and Sham iTBS in Cocaine Use Disorder, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-31.
Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of active intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) on electroencephalogram (EEG) measures of reward sensitivity and cue reactivity and cocaine craving in cocaine users
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.
Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: iTBS to dmPFC · Device: Sham iTBS
Device: iTBS to dmPFC · Device: Sham iTBS
TMS will be delivered with a MagVenture Mag Pro R30 with the Cool-B70 A/P coil with active liquid cooling and active/sham sides. Approximately 25% of the nasion-inion distance, or Talairah coordinates X 0 Y+60 Z+60 will be measured.The first session will begin with the acquisition of the resting motor threshold (rMT; lowest stimulus intensity that elicits a visible twitch on 50% of the trials) on the contralateral hand. iTBS (triplet 50 Hz bursts, repeated at 5 Hz, 2 sec on and 8 sec off; 600 pulses per session) will be delivered at 110% of the rMT and will last about 3 minutes. Each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 minute interval between sessions.
Sham TMS will be delivered with the sham side of the MagVenture Cool B70 A/P coil. The software will be pre-programmed by a staff member that will not be involved in data analysis or collection for blinding purposes. The sham stimulation will match the number of pulses and length of time as the active condition and each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 min interval between sessions.
Amplitude of the Reward Potential (RewP) in Microvolts in Response to Feedback on the Doors Task as Assessed by EEG
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity. The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it. After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down. The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS session)
Amplitude of the Reward Potential (RewP) in Microvolts in Response to Feedback on the Doors Task as Assessed by EEG
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity. The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it. After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up (win) or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down (loss). The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
Time frame: Immediately after iTBS session
Amplitude of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) in Microvolts in Response to Visual Stimuli on the Picture Viewing Task as Assessed by EEG
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus. During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images. The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
Time frame: Baseline (before iTBS session)
Amplitude of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) in Microvolts in Response to Visual Stimuli on the Picture Viewing Task as Assessed by EEG
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus. During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images. The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
Time frame: Immediately after iTBS session
Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS)
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
Time frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS)
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
Time frame: Immediately after iTBS session
Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
Time frame: Immediately after iTBS session
Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
Cognitive Function as Assessed by the The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: Immediately after iTBS session
| Milestone | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 3 | 3 |
| Received intervention | 3 | 2 |
| Completed | 3 | 2 |
| Not completed | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Excluded after randomization due to high blood pressure | 0 | 1 |
| Milestone | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 3 | 2 |
| Received intervention | 3 | 2 |
| Completed | 3 | 2 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity. The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it. After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down. The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
| microvolts | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| RewP Amplitude with Win | -1.09 ± 1.95 | 0.61 ± 1.80 |
| RewP Amplitude with Loss | -0.23 ± 2.15 | 0.12 ± 1.75 |
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity. The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it. After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up (win) or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down (loss). The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
| microvolts | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| RewP Amplitude with Win | -1.10 ± 1.54 | 0.21 ± 1.76 |
| RewP Amplitude with Loss | -1.30 ± 1.05 | 0.02 ± 1.37 |
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus. During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images. The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
| microvolts | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| LPP Amplitude with Pleasant Images | 1.10 ± 1.40 | 0.37 ± 1.85 |
| LPP Amplitude with Unpleasant Images | 1.01 ± 2.04 | 0.40 ± 2.55 |
| LPP Amplitude with Cocaine Images | .61 ± 1.49 | 0.46 ± 1.81 |
| LPP Amplitude with Neutral Images | -0.35 ± 1.51 | -0.95 ± 2.23 |
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus. During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images. The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
| microvolts | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| LPP Amplitude with Pleasant Images | .66 ± 1.48 | .19 ± 1.78 |
| LPP Amplitude with Unpleasant Images | 1.11 ± 1.73 | .78 ± 1.67 |
| LPP Amplitude with Cocaine Images | 1.02 ± 1.31 | .43 ± .43 |
| LPP Amplitude with Neutral Images | -0.28 ± 1.21 | -0.0000929 ± 1.39 |
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS) | 41 ± 39.08 | 31.2 ± 38.55 |
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS) | 33.8 ± 37.81 | 18 ± 26.39 |
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 0.4 |
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | 2 ± 3.52 | 1.6 ± 1.74 |
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | 23 ± 4.05 | 22.8 ± 4.96 |
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
| score on a scale | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Function as Assessed by the The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | 22.4 ± 3.01 | 25 ± 2.76 |
Collected over from baseline until study completion (i.e., 2 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| iTBS to dmPFC | 0/5 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | 2/5 (40%) |
| Sham iTBS | 0/5 (0%) | 0/5 (0%) | 1/5 (20%) |
| Event | iTBS to dmPFC | Sham iTBS |
|---|---|---|
| Scalp DiscomfortGeneral disorders | 2/5 | 1/5 |
| HeadacheGeneral disorders | 2/5 | 0/5 |
| Neck PainGeneral disorders | 1/5 | 0/5 |
| Muscle SpasmGeneral disorders | 1/5 | 0/5 |
| Light-HeadedGeneral disorders | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| TinglingGeneral disorders | 0/5 | 1/5 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 51.7 ± 9.9 | 37.0 ± 6.0 | 45.8 ± 11.16 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| White | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| More than one race | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Years of Education(years) | iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS | Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 12 ± 0 | 10.5 ± 1.5 | 11.4 ± 1.2 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston