CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05627102EPTEUpdated Jun 12, 2023

Structural and Functional Changes in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy Thtough Percutaneous Electrolysis and Neuromodulation Combined Therapy. A Single-blinded Randomized clínical Trial.

An interventional study of Experimental Group and Conventional group in Supraspinatus Tendinitis, sponsored by University of Cadiz. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-12.

Sponsored by University of Cadiz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy show a big impact, however, there is a lack of awareness about the options of the physiotherapist treatment. It is necessary to do studies about effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneous electrolysis and neuromodulation. This technique enables treatment of the tendinopathies. To analyze the effectiveness of therapeutic percutaneou electrolysis and neuromodulation in the treatment of supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Single center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design. A specialist physician will be diagnosed the supraspinatus muscle tendinopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive treatmen for 4 weeks: percutaneou electrolysis and neuromodulation associated with eccentric exercises or conventional treatment of Physiotherapy with the same eccentric exercises. Both interventions were performed under ultrasound guidance with a portable ultrasound (General Electric LogicE). Data will be collected by a blinded evaluator.

Read the detailed description

Eccentric exercises of the supraspinatus muscle were performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Participants were asked to perform the exercise program on an individual basis twice every day for 4 weeks. The eccentric program consisted of 3 exercises, focusing on the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and scapular muscles. Participants were asked to do a normal abduction (concentric phase) and a slow return to the initial position (eccentric phase) included first the concentric phase, and the eccentric phase was slowly conducted. The exercise program was taught by a physiotherapist in the first session and monitored in the subsequent sessions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Supraspinatus Tendinitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tendinopathy
  • electrolysis
  • exercise
  • dry needling
  • physiotherapy
03

In context

Tendinopathy

413 studies on the registry are indexed under Tendinopathy; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 339 interventional studies indexed under Tendinopathy.

Browse Tendinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cadiz is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with supraspinatus tendinopathies that do not improve with conventional physiotherapy or pharmacological therapy protocols.
  • Subjects who are in an active state of pain, who present painful symptoms in a sensitive and painful area of the tendon of insertion of the supraspinatus muscle in the humerus.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have received surgery intervention in the same shoulder, or have suffered fractures or dislocations in the same shoulder.
  • Individuals have received the proposed treatment in one month´s period previously.
  • Individuals who suffering from cervical radiculopathies, fibromialgia síndrome, cardiac patients with pacemakers, cancer, infectious processes, or generalized lymphedema.
  • Pregnant women can not receive this treatment intervention.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Percutaneous Electrolysis and neuromodulation.

    The intervention for this group consisted of Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis and neuromodulation. Patient received once week for four weeks associated with eccentric exercises device at home.

    Other: Experimental Group

  • Active comparator
    Conventional group

    The multimodal physical therapy program includes 10 sessions of: ultrasound pulsatil therapy (US) for 10 minutes , transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes ans associated with eccentric exercises device at home.

    Other: Conventional group

Interventions

  • OtherExperimental Group

    Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis an neuromodulation associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

  • OtherConventional group

    Ultrasound pulsatil therapy (US), transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes and associated with eccentric exercises devices at home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The intensity of shoulder pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. The intensity of shoulder pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).

    Time frame: Four weeks

  2. The intensity of shoulder pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).

    Time frame: Twelve weeks

  3. The intensity of shoulder pain

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of shoulder pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the shoulder area. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the NPRS in patients with shoulder pain was 1.1 points (Mintken, Glynn, and Cleland 2009).

    Time frame: twenty four weeks

  4. Electromyographic activity

    Electromyography (EMG) measures and records the electrical activity of a muscle.

    Time frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.

  5. Strength of The rotator cuff

    The use of the hand dynamometer to measure the strength of shoulder movements

    Time frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks .

  6. Questionnaire DASH.

    Functionality in the arm.

    Time frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.

  7. Scale SPADI.

    Functionality in the arm.

    Time frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.

  8. Assessment of structural changes in the tendon by ultrasound evaluation

    Assessment of possible structural changes in the tendon by ultrasound evaluation of thickening, hypoechogenicity, and hypervascularity.

    Time frame: Baseline, four, twelve weeks and twenty four weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Manuel Rodríguez Huguet
    Cadiz, Cádiz 11008, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23. PubMed 18812414 ↗
  • McCreesh K, Lewis J. Continuum model of tendon pathology - where are we now? Int J Exp Pathol. 2013 Aug;94(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/iep.12029. PubMed 23837792 ↗
  • Khan KM, Cook JL, Maffulli N, Kannus P. Where is the pain coming from in tendinopathy? It may be biochemical, not only structural, in origin. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):81-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.81. No abstract available. Erratum In: Br J Sports Med 2000 Aug;34(4):318. PubMed 10786860 ↗
  • Valera-Garrido F, Minaya-Munoz F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis in chronic lateral epicondylitis: short-term and long-term results. Acupunct Med. 2014 Dec;32(6):446-54. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010619. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PubMed 25122629 ↗
  • Arias-Buria JL, Truyols-Dominguez S, Valero-Alcaide R, Salom-Moreno J, Atin-Arratibel MA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrolysis and Eccentric Exercises for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:315219. doi: 10.1155/2015/315219. Epub 2015 Nov 15. PubMed 26649058 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Rodriguez-Huguet P, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Lomas-Vega R. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):1837. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061837. PubMed 32545583 ↗
  • Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):236-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052175. Epub 2008 Sep 18. PubMed 18801774 ↗
  • Osborne JD, Gowda AL, Wiater B, Wiater JM. Rotator cuff rehabilitation: current theories and practice. Phys Sportsmed. 2016;44(1):85-92. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1108883. Epub 2015 Nov 7. PubMed 26548634 ↗
  • Garcia Bermejo P, De La Cruz Torres B, Naranjo Orellana J, Albornoz Cabello M. Autonomic Responses to Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis: Effect of Needle Puncture or Electrical Current? J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0339. Epub 2017 Jan 30. PubMed 28135129 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Huguet M, Gongora-Rodriguez J, Lomas-Vega R, Martin-Valero R, Diaz-Fernandez A, Obrero-Gaitan E, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D. Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2068. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072068. PubMed 32630241 ↗
  • Littlewood C, Ashton J, Chance-Larsen K, May S, Sturrock B. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5. PubMed 22507359 ↗
  • Dejaco B, Habets B, van Loon C, van Grinsven S, van Cingel R. Eccentric versus conventional exercise therapy in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, single blinded, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4223-x. Epub 2016 Jun 28. PubMed 27351548 ↗
  • Heron SR, Woby SR, Thompson DP. Comparison of three types of exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy/shoulder impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 21. PubMed 27884499 ↗
  • Kinsella R, Cowan SM, Watson L, Pizzari T. A comparison of isometric, isotonic concentric and isotonic eccentric exercises in the physiotherapy management of subacromial pain syndrome/rotator cuff tendinopathy: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 14;3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0190-3. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29163981 ↗
  • Lin ML, Chiu HW, Shih ZM, Lee PY, Li PZ, Guo CH, Luo YJ, Lin SC, Lin KY, Hsu YM, Pang A, Pang W. Two Transcutaneous Stimulation Techniques in Shoulder Pain: Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency (TPRF) versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): A Comparative Pilot Study. Pain Res Manag. 2019 Feb 4;2019:2823401. doi: 10.1155/2019/2823401. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30863472 ↗
  • Gunay Ucurum S, Kaya DO, Kayali Y, Askin A, Tekindal MA. Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jul;52(4):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 25. PubMed 29703659 ↗
  • Desmeules F, Boudreault J, Roy JS, Dionne C, Fremont P, MacDermid JC. The efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Aug;16(3):276-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25824429 ↗
  • Balci TO, Turk AC, Sahin F, Kotevoglu N, Kuran B. Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in treatment of adhesive capsulitis: A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(5):955-961. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150482. PubMed 30040706 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05627102
Lead sponsor
University of Cadiz
Responsible party
Manuel Rodriguez Huguet (degree Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2022
Start date
Oct 15, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2022
Completion
Sep 30, 2022
Last update
Jun 12, 2023

Study contacts

manuel manuel, Physiotherapy
study director · University of Cádiz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion