ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06056440VirtendonRehabUpdated May 10, 2024

Efficacy of a Physical Rehabilitation Program Using Virtual Reality in Patients With Chronic Tendinopathy (Virtendon-Rehab)

An interventional study of Virtual reality and Control group in Tendinopathy, Patellar Tendinopathy and Tendinopathy, Elbow, sponsored by University of Cadiz. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-10.

Primary conditionElbow TendinopathyRegistry: TendinopathyReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Tendinopathy — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Elbow Tendinopathy
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Elbow Tendinopathy, a narrower term within Tendinopathy.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Cadiz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic tendinopathies (CT) have a high prevalence (30% of musculoskeletal injuries), causing pain, decreased physical activity and functionality, as well as limitations in daily life. Virtual reality (VR) fosters patient recovery through playful activities that promote competitiveness, stimulates motivation and continuous attention, allows individualizing the exercise program, objectively assessing the execution of the treatment and monitoring the patient's evolution. Therefore, the VIRTENDON-REHAB project aims to conduct a low-risk randomized controlled clinical trial to analyze the efficacy of a VR-based physical rehabilitation program in a population diagnosed with CT on pain, functionality, range of motion, strength, muscle activation pattern, kinesiophobia, quality of life, adherence to treatment and patient satisfaction with the use of the system, compared to a control group. Likewise, the aim is to characterize the clinical profile of this population and to know the relationships between the previous variables. Measurements will be taken at the beginning of the intervention, at the end (12 weeks) and 3 months after the end of the intervention. A descriptive analysis will be performed, inter- and intra-group differences will be analyzed by means of t-Student, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U and mixed ANOVA tests. Cohen's d will be used to determine the effect size. Relationships between variables will be analyzed using structural equations. The results obtained will allow improving knowledge on the management of CT using VR, as well as improving clinical care and reducing healthcare costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tendinopathy
  • Patellar Tendinopathy
  • Tendinopathy, Elbow
  • Tendinopathy Rotator Cuff
  • Achilles Tendinopathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • virtual reality
  • chronic tendinopathy
  • physical therapy
03

In context

Elbow Tendinopathy Reclassified

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Elbow Tendinopathy; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 40 across 23 interventional studies indexed under Elbow Tendinopathy.

Browse Elbow Tendinopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cadiz is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Compared within Elbow Tendinopathy, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Tendinopathy. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy (shoulder rotator cuff tendinopathy, epicondylitis/epicondylitis, patellar tendinopathy, achilles tendinopathy).
  • Duration of symptoms: greater than 6 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People who have any pathology that prevents them from performing physical exercise.
  • Persons who have undergone surgery.
  • Persons who have an illness that may be a to the proposed procedure.
  • Persons who have received exercise therapy in the last 3 months.
  • Persons who have received injections in the last 3 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VR group

    The VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried through the Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. This VR intervention will be performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program.

    Procedure: Virtual reality

  • Other
    Control group

    Other: Control group

Interventions

  • ProcedureVirtual reality

    The VR intervention program for the experimental group will be carried out with a frequency of 3 sessions/week, duration of approximately 45 minutes, and for a total of 12 weeks, being performed in addition to the patient's usual treatment program. The Oculus Quest 2 device (which consists of VR glasses and different accessories) will be used, in conjunction with software specifically designed for physical rehabilitation of upper and lower limbs: Dynamics VR. Specifically, the specific functional rehabilitation program will be used, which comprises exercises that are easy to perform, with a playful component, and which encourage the patient's continuous attention to the task performed, acting as a distractor phenomenon in the face of restrictive movement factors such as fear of pain or movement. This software offers the possibility of adjusting the number of repetitions and characteristics of the exercises, thus allowing an individualized physical rehabilitation

  • OtherControl group

    The control group will only receive their usual treatment program for the 12-week duration of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability (Shoulder And Pain Disability Index)

    Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  2. Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Patellar)

    Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  3. Disability (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles)

    Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  4. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Longitudinal change from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of motion (Goniometer)

    Longitudinal change

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  2. Strength (Dynamometer)

    Longitudinal change

    Time frame: Fom Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  3. Kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale Questionnaire)

    Longitudinal change from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  4. Quality of Life (36-item Short Form Survey)

    Longitudinal change from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 24 Weeks Follow-up

  5. Adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale)

    The original English version of the EARS is a 16-item, self-reported questionnaire, which assessadherence of prescribed exercises \[6\]. The EARS consist of 3 sections. Section 'A' is about prescribedexercise questionnaire. This section consists of 5 questions, which are related to way of doing activitiesand exercise that people often do to improve their physical quality of life. Section 'B' is about exerciseadherence behavior, so called exercise adherence rating scale. This section consists of 6 items, which isan actual measure to identify exercise adherence. This evaluates whether individuals do their exercise asper recommendation or not. Section 'C' is about reasons for adherence/non-adherence of exercises. Thissection consists of 10 items, which assesses factors that hinders and facilitates the exercises. Higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

  6. User satisfaction (Consumer Report Effectiveness Scale)

    Global satisfaction with the treatment received. 3-item scale scoring from 0 to 300. Higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy
    Cadiz, 11009, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaux JF, Forthomme B, Goff CL, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Current opinions on tendinopathy. J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Jun 1;10(2):238-53. PubMed 24149868 ↗
  • Mallows A, Debenham J, Walker T, Littlewood C. Association of psychological variables and outcome in tendinopathy: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017 May;51(9):743-748. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096154. Epub 2016 Nov 16. PubMed 27852585 ↗
  • Chen KB, Sesto ME, Ponto K, Leonard J, Mason A, Vanderheiden G, Williams J, Radwin RG. Use of Virtual Reality Feedback for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain and Kinesiophobia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Aug;25(8):1240-1248. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2621886. Epub 2016 Oct 26. PubMed 27810828 ↗
  • Dominguez-Tellez P, Moral-Munoz JA, Salazar A, Casado-Fernandez E, Lucena-Anton D. Game-Based Virtual Reality Interventions to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function and Quality of Life After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):1-10. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0043. PubMed 32027185 ↗
  • Almekinders LC, Almekinders SV. Outcome in the treatment of chronic overuse sports injuries: a retrospective study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 Mar;19(3):157-61. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.19.3.157. PubMed 8156067 ↗
  • Cook JL, Purdam CR. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):409-16. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.051193. Epub 2008 Sep 23. PubMed 18812414 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06056440
Lead sponsor
University of Cadiz
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2023
Start date
Nov 28, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 10, 2024

Study contacts

David Lucena Anton, PhD
Contact
david.lucena@uca.es
956015699 ext. +34

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion