CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT0562582813EVALUpdated Jul 29, 2025

Evaluation of the Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Fall Prevention Program on Fall Risk Factors

An interventional study of Cognitive-motor Physical Activity and Multifactorial Physical Activity in Accidental Falls, Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by EZUS-LYON 1. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-29.

Sponsored by EZUS-LYON 1 · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
176
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare in community dwelling elderly people the effects of two physical activity programs to prevent accident falls : "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program and "VIVIFRAIL" program, on several risks factors such as executive functions and functional capacities.

Participants will perform a 1 hour physical activity session during 10 weeks and effects will be measured using a multidimensional test battery. "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program contains cognitive-motor exercises where participants have to perform two tasks simultaneously such as answering math questions while walking whereas "VIVIFRAIL" program contains multifactorial exercises such as walking, balance training and resistance training in single-task condition.

The main question it aims to answer is :

  • Does physical activity enriched with simultaneous cognitive exercises enhances the effects ?
Read the detailed description

Falls in the elderly are a problem of increasing importance in our aging societies. Among the multiple intrinsic risk factors, if the age-induced decline of functional and locomotor capacities are recognized risk factors, impaired executive functioning is another equally important one. Thus, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) - characterized by an early deficit in executive functioning but not pathological - turns out to be an independent and significant risk factor. In order to reduce the impact of this problem and thus promote "well aging", it is essential to develop effective preventive approaches on all of these risk factors. Of these, cognitive-motor fall prevention programs - based on simultaneous cognitive and motor tasks - are the most effective in reducing the rate of falls. However, since 2017, the French Rugby League Federation has been proposing such an innovative program called "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" consisting of 10 one-hour sessions per week and including a majority of cognitive-motor exercises. In addition, this program also includes exercises for learning the "play the ball", a specific skill of rugby league that consist of shooting the ball with the heel and making a step forward which is close to the stepping strategy to avoid falling. Initially intended for community dwelling elderly people and non-fallers presenting a usual aging (average age = 67.6 +/- 3 years), it turns out that this program welcomes three different profiles of elderly people that we find in the literature: (1) young-aged, active people with no deficits in functional and cognitive abilities; (2) older people with optimal cognitive aging but less active (3) older people with MCI. As the effects of regular Physical Activity (PA) depend on the initial level of each individual, it could be that the effects of the "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" program on both functional abilities and executive functions depend on the profile of the elderly. In order to answer the main question the effects of the "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program will be compared to an active comparator : the "VIVIFRAIL" program which is a international multifactorial program to prevent falls based on walking, balance and resistance training single task exercises.

02

Conditions studied

  • Accidental Falls
  • Aging
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Dual-Task
  • Physical Activity
  • Prevention
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 176 is above the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

EZUS-LYON 1 is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Older people living at home
  • Able to walk without technical assistance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a proven major neurocognitive disorder (MOCA score \< 18)
  • Patients with severe depression (Geriatric Depression Scale score > 10)
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35
  • Diagnosed and known neurological or neurodegenerative pathology
  • Having declared more than 3 falls in the pas year
  • Presence of a motor disorder
  • Contraindication to the practice of a physical or sporting activity
  • Participation in another protocol for the prevention of falls or loss of autonomy in the last 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
176 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE

    Cognitive-motor 10 weeks program

    Behavioral: Cognitive-motor Physical Activity

  • Active comparator
    VIVIFRAIL

    Multifactorial 10 weeks program

    Behavioral: Multifactorial Physical Activity

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive-motor Physical Activity

    Physical activity program that consist of 1 sessions per week during 10 weeks (from Week 2 to Week 11). Each session includes a 10 minutes warm up with light walking, 45 minutes of cognitive-motor exercises where participants have to perform two tasks consequently (for example, walking while answering math questions or throwing a ball while reverse walking) and 5 minutes of stretching exercises.

  • BehavioralMultifactorial Physical Activity

    Physical activity program that consist of 1 sessions per week during 10 weeks (from Week 2 to Week 11). Each session includes a 10 minutes warm up with light walking, 45 minutes of multifactorial exercises that consists of high speed walking, resistance training and balance training in single task condition and 5 minutes of stretching exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Trail Making Test part A and B scores at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will be asked to perform the Trail Making Test part A and B (Reitan, 1958) following the instructions of the evaluator. It consist of connecting by making pencil lines 25 encircled numbers randomly arranged on a page in proper order (part A) and 25 encircled numbers and letters in alternating order (part B). A sample page including only 8 circles is made for training just before each 25 circle test page. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Execution time will be measured in seconds.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  2. Change of Stroop Test Victoria version scores at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will be asked to perform the Stroop Test Victoria version (Bayard, 2011) following the instructions of the evaluator. It consist of three pages each containing 6 lines of 4 items and each page includes an additional line for training. In the page 1 participant has to tell the color of 4 dots printed in color ink in left to right order and line by line ; in the page two 4 neutral words are printed in color ink and participants has to tell the color of the ink in the same order ; in page three 4 color words are printed in color ink and participants has to tell the color of the ink in the same order. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Execution time in second and errors will be measured.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  3. Change of walking speed at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will perform a 6 meters gait measurement where they have to walk at self pace on a 10 meters corridor and time in second will be measured on 6 meters using photoelectric sensors. The first 2 meters are for reaching the pace and last 2 meters are to stop. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Spontaneous gait speed will be measured in meters per second.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Choice Stepping Reaction Time at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will perform a Choice Stepping Reaction Task (Lord SR \& Fitzpatrick, 2001) : Participants stand on a nonslip black platform that contained four rectangular panels, one in the front one in the back and one to the side of each foot (up, down, left and right). A computer generates a stimuli (an arrow) indicating the direction of the target the participant has to step on as fast as possible. Choice Stepping Reaction Time that consist of time between the presentation of stimuli and the foot lift will be measured in second. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12).

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  2. Change of 30 second sit to stand test score at Week 12 after intervention

    This test is a part of the Senior Fitness Test assessment (Fournier et al., 2012). Participants will perform the 30 second sit to stand test, which consist of repetitively standing up from a chair as fast as possible during 30 seconds. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Number of repetition will be measured.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  3. Change of 2 minutes step in place test at Week 12 after intervention

    This test is a part of the Senior Fitness Test assessment (Fournier et al., 2012). Participants will perform the 2 minutes step in place test which consist of alternatively lifting the knees to an height given by the evaluator as fast as possible during 2 minutes. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Number of repetitions (corresponding of each knee lift) will be measured.

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  4. Change of one leg standing position time at Week 12 after intervention

    This test is a part of the Senior Fitness Test assessment (Fournier et al., 2012). Participants will be asked to stay on one leg standing position and the maximal time they managed to maintain the position will be measured in seconds. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12).

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  5. Change of dual-task walking speed at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will perform a 6 meters gait measurement where they have to walk at self pace on a 10 meters corridor and time in second will be measured on 6 meters using photoelectric sensors. The first 2 meters are for reaching the pace and last 2 meters are to stop. Participants have to walk doing the following cognitive tasks. An arithmetic task : Participants have to continuously substract 7 to a 3 digit number given by the evaluator giving results orally. Percentage of error in the cognitive task will be measured and spontaneous gait speed in meters per second will be measured. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12).

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  6. Change in the walking trail making test outcomes at Week 12 after intervention

    Participants will perform the "Walking Trail Making Test" (WTMT) Task (Alexander et al., 2005 ; Perrochon et al., 2014) on a 10 meters corridor and time in second will be measured on 6 meters using photoelectric sensors. The first 2 meters are for reaching the pace and last 2 meters are to stop. The WTMT contains three experimental conditions : WTMT-N in which participants have to step on numbers from 1 to 20 in ascending order ; WTMT-A in which participants have to step on the same numbers avoiding numeric distractors ; WTMT-B in which participants have to step alternatively on numbers and letters following ascending order and alphabetic order avoiding numeric and alphabetic distractors. Percentage of error and execution time in seconds will be measured. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12)

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 12

  7. Change in fall rate at Week 36 after intervention

    Fall rate will be measured using a 6 month follow up. Participants will be asked to fill in an online weekly report indicates whether they had falls or not during the past week.

    Time frame: From Week 12 to Week 36

  8. Global cognition score at Week 1

    Participants will be asked to perform the different steps of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment following the instructions of the evaluator. This test evaluates multiple cognitive functions such as executive functions, memory, attention leading to a score between 0 (worse score) and 30 (best score). A score between 0 and 20 indicates a major cognitive impairment, a score between 20 and 25 indicates a mild cognitive impairment and and score superior to 25 indicates normal cognitive functioning. Measurement will take place one week before the first session (Week 1).

    Time frame: Week 1

  9. Fall Risk score at Week 1

    Fall Risk will be measured using a 7 items questionnaire (Bongue et al., 2011) leading to a score between 0 (best score) and 12 (worst score). A score between 0 and 3 indicates a low risk of falling, a score between 4 and 7 indicates a moderate risk of falling and a score superior to 7 indicates a high risk of falling. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1).

    Time frame: Week 1

  10. Common physical activity at Week 1

    Using a self-reported questionnaire named "Physical Activity Questionnaire for the Elderly ", participants will be asked to register all the physical activities they had on the past week and the time allowed to each activity (De Souto-Barretto et al., 2011). The amount of physical activity will be measured in Metabolic Equivalent Task per minutes per week. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1).

    Time frame: Week 1

  11. Sedentary behaviors at Week 1

    Using a self-reported questionnaire named "Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire" (Golubic et al., 2014), participants will be asked to register all the sedentary behaviors they have usually each day and the time allowed to each behavior. The amount sedentary behavior will be measured in hour per day. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1).

    Time frame: Week 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR7424
    Villeurbanne, Rhône 69100, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bayard S, Erkes J, Moroni C; College des Psychologues Cliniciens specialises en Neuropsychologie du Languedoc Roussillon (CPCN Languedoc Roussillon). Victoria Stroop Test: normative data in a sample group of older people and the study of their clinical applications in the assessment of inhibition in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;26(7):653-61. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr053. Epub 2011 Aug 26. PubMed 21873625 ↗
  • REITAN RM. The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955 Oct;19(5):393-4. doi: 10.1037/h0044509. No abstract available. PubMed 13263471 ↗
  • Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Oct;56(10):M627-32. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.10.m627. PubMed 11584035 ↗
  • Bongue B, Dupre C, Beauchet O, Rossat A, Fantino B, Colvez A. A screening tool with five risk factors was developed for fall-risk prediction in community-dwelling elderly. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1152-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Apr 3. PubMed 21463927 ↗
  • Fournier J, Vuillemin A, Le Cren F. Mesure de la condition physique chez les personnes âgées. Evaluation de la condition physique des seniors : adaptation française de la batterie américaine " Senior Fitness Test ". Science & Sport. 2012; 27 : 254-259.
  • De Souto Barreto, P., Ferrandez, A. M., & Saliba-Serre, B. Questionnaire d'activité physique pour les personnes âgées (QAPPA): validation d'un nouvel instrument de mesure en langue française. Science and Sports. 2011; 26(1): 11-18.
  • Golubic R, May AM, Benjaminsen Borch K, Overvad K, Charles MA, Diaz MJ, Amiano P, Palli D, Valanou E, Vigl M, Franks PW, Wareham N, Ekelund U, Brage S. Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092829. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24667343 ↗
  • Perrochon A, Kemoun G. The Walking Trail-Making Test is an early detection tool for mild cognitive impairment. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:111-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S53645. Epub 2014 Jan 7. PubMed 24426778 ↗
  • Alexander NB, Ashton-Miller JA, Giordani B, Guire K, Schultz AB. Age differences in timed accurate stepping with increasing cognitive and visual demand: a walking trail making test. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Dec;60(12):1558-62. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.12.1558. PubMed 16424288 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05625828
Lead sponsor
EZUS-LYON 1
Collaborators
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Centre Hospitalier de Roanne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2022
Start date
Sep 13, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 24, 2025
Completion
Oct 24, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2025

Study contacts

Xavier Fabre, MD
study director · Centre Hospitalier de Roanne
Pascal Chabaud, PhD
study director · Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR7424
Rafael Mauti, MSc
principal investigator · Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Biologie de la motricité, UR7424

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion