An interventional study of Survey in Thoracic Injury, sponsored by University Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-21.
Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The goal of this Delphi study is to identify the crucial steps and the errors in Chest Tube Insertion (CTI). These steps and errors will be used for the development of a new assessment tool based on international consensus.
84 studies on the registry are indexed under Thoracic Injuries; 23 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 71 across 50 interventional studies indexed under Thoracic Injuries.
Browse Thoracic Injuries studies →University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 345 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants were asked to complete three rounds of surveys. These surveys collected information on which steps and errors can occur during CTI, and which of these should be included in an assessment tool.
Other: Survey
Surveys were distributed using REDCap, and participants were asked to complete these within 5 weeks of receiving the invitation.
Steps and errors presented in round 1
The number of experts who propose a certain step or error
Time frame: one year
Number of steps and errors passing round 2
The number of experts who agree on the inclusion of each step or error in the assessment tool on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree).
Time frame: one year
Inclusion of steps with their descriptive anchors
The number of experts who agree on the inclusion of each step with their descriptive anchors in the assessment tool on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree).
Time frame: one year
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Ghent