CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05619796Updated Dec 7, 2023

Assessment of Clinical & Radiographic Efficiency of Manual & Pediatric Rotary Systems in Primary Root Canal Preparation

An interventional study of pulpectomy procedure and Post-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Manual; Rotation, Obturation and Post Operative Pain, sponsored by Tanta University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 7 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-07.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Manual files used for the pulpectomy of primary teeth have some disadvantages such as time wastage and the occurrence of iatrogenic errors compared to rotary systems.

Little studies have been done to clinically evaluate the Kedo-S Square \& Fanta AF™ Baby rotary systems in relation to the quality of obturation, instrumentation time and postoperative pain in root canal preparation of primary molars using CBCT.

Read the detailed description

Biomechanical preparation is one of the most important steps of primary teeth pulpectomy, which are primarily targeted during canal debridement . Conventionally, hand files were used for cleaning and shaping in primary teeth with some disadvantages such as time wastage and the occurrence of iatrogenic errors such as zipping, lateral perforations, apical obstruction, and canal transportation.

The use of rotary instruments for primary tooth instrumentation is faster, affordable, and yields consistent, reliable results. Numerous rotary endodontic systems designed primarily for application in permanent teeth, have been suggested for primary teeth root canal preparation. Since the primary teeth have a ribbon-shaped anatomy and shorter, thinner curved roots than permanent teeth, the use of these files in pulpectomy of primary teeth could produce lateral perforations. As a result, there was a great need for the development of a unique pediatric rotary file system.

The Kedo-S Square rotary system is a single file system specifically designed for paediatric use. It consists of two files, one for anterior primary teeth (A1) and one for posterior primary teeth (P1) also, Fanta AF™-Baby rotary system, another specifically generated paediatric rotary file, was produced using Ni-Ti controlled memory (CM)-Wire technology.

A good root canal treatment in primary teeth is dependent on the quality of biomechanical preparation, the type of obturating material used with as few voids as possible, and the achievement of a good hermetic seal. Also, treatment time is an important aspect as reduced chairside time increases children's cooperation for dental treatment, reduces anxiety, and making the treatment protocol optimal. Another factor affecting the success of primary teeth pulpectomy is the postoperative pain which may be due to extrusion of foreign particles into peri-radicular tissues accordingly, causing inflammation and releasing inflammatory mediators.

02

Conditions studied

  • Manual; Rotation
  • Obturation
  • Post Operative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cone-beam computed tomography
  • kedo-S square
  • Fanta AF™ Baby
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 304 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy cooperative children
  • non-vital posterior teeth with sufficient coronal structure
  • intact 2/3rd root structure
  • no mobility or external pathological root resorption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncooperative children
  • children with systemic illness
  • non-restorable primary molars
  • primary molars with sever mobility, or pathological root resorption
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    group 1: Kedo-S Square rotary files

    Primary root canals(n=20) were instrumented using rotary P1 Kedo-S Square files (Reeganz Dental Care Pvt. Ltd. India) at 300 rpm and 2.2N cm torque. The rotary files were used with an Endo-Mate DT endodontic motor (NSK, Tokyo, Japan) and EDTA gel 17% (Meta Biomed Co. Ltd, Chungbuk, Korea) was used before instrumentation.

    Procedure: pulpectomy procedure · Radiation: Post-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography · Other: Post-operative pain assessment

  • Experimental
    group II: Fanta AFTM-Baby rotary system

    Primary root canals(n=20) were instrumented using Fanta AFTM-Baby rotary system (Shanghai Fanta Dental Materials, SUNGO Certification Company Limited, London, England) at 350 rpm and 2 N cm torque. Four files were used sequentially in the following order; open file #17/0.08, #20/0.04 yellow, #25/0.04 red and #30/0.04 blue. The rotary files were used with an Endo-Mate DT endodontic motor (NSK, Tokyo, Japan) and EDTA gel 17% (Meta Biomed Co. Ltd, Chungbuk, Korea) was used before instrumentation.

    Procedure: pulpectomy procedure · Radiation: Post-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography · Other: Post-operative pain assessment

  • Active comparator
    group III: manual K-files

    Primary root canals(n=20) were instrumented using No.15 till 35 size manual K-files (Mani, Inc, Japan) using the quarter-turn-pull technique.

    Procedure: pulpectomy procedure · Radiation: Post-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography · Other: Post-operative pain assessment

Interventions

  • Procedurepulpectomy procedure

    single visit pulpectomy was performed under strict aseptic conditions by a single operator. Peri-operative evaluation was done using intraoral digital senso. The teeth were anesthetized with 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin \& isolated using rubber dam. caries was removed using no. 330 round carbide burs in high-speed contra angle headpiece. Access opening was gained \& the roof of the pulp chamber was removed. Working length was determined by apex locator, then confirmed by periapical radiograph. Working length will be determined 1 mm shorter than apex. mechanical preparation was done using the tested files according to each group. Then, canals were irrigated with 1% sodium hypochlorite between each file followed by irrigation with normal saline. The root canals were dried using paper points \& root canals were filled with Metapex. Intermediate restorative material was placed, and the tooth was restored with a preformed stainless-steel crown in the same appointment.

  • RadiationPost-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography

    post-operative CBCT image was taken after completing the procedure with fixed exposure parameters (120 Kv, 5mA and 0.125mm voxel size) using smallest field of view (8D, 8Hcm) to improve spatial resolution. The CBCT images were obtained by using 3D module of On Demand Dental software (version 1.0 (build 1.0.10.7462),× 64 Edition, copyright 2004-2017 Cybermed, Korea and license key 670094709). The Immediate post-operative CBCT was taken to evaluate the quality of root canal filling by two trained pediatric dentists, blinded to instrumentation technique .

    Also known as: Obturation Quality Assessment

  • OtherPost-operative pain assessment

    The parents of the children were given a questionnaire to record the intensity of postoperative pain at six, twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight hours after the pulpectomy procedure. A nursing officer who was blind to the study groups, had trained all parents on how to record the postoperative pain. The four-point pain intensity scale was used to record postoperative pain (figure 5). This scale categorizes pain as follows: (1) no pain; (2) slight pain; (3) moderate pain; and (4) severe pain. To ensure standardization, the same parent was asked to record the child's pain intensity at all time intervals. To reduce the possibility of the parents failing to record the pain at a given time, the investigator also recorded findings via telephonic conversation with the parents. The children returned to the department two days after the pulpectomy procedure with their completed questionnaire form.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Root canal preparation using Manual and Pediatric Rotary File Systems during pulpectomy of primary teeth

    by evaluation of the obturation quality using immediate post-operative CBCT which is assessed by two trained pediatric dentists, blinded to instrumentation technique . The quality of obturation was assessed by evaluating the length of the Metapex filling according to Coll and Sadrian criteria : * Under filling (Score 1): Canal filled with metapex more than 2 mm short of the apex. * Optimal filling (Score 2): Canal filling ending at the radiographic apex or up to 2 mm short of apex. * Overfilling (Score 3): Any canal showing filling outside the root apex.

    Time frame: 2 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain after primary teeth pulpectomy using Manual and Pediatric Rotary File Systems

    using four-point pain intensity scale. This scale categorizes pain as follows: (1) no pain; (2) slight pain; (3) moderate pain; and (4) severe pain. The parents of the children were given a questionnaire to record the intensity of postoperative pain at six, twelve, twenty-four and forty-eight hours after the pulpectomy procedure. A nursing officer who was blind to the study groups, had trained all parents on how to record the postoperative pain. To ensure standardization, the same parent was asked to record the child's pain intensity at all time intervals. To reduce the possibility of the parents failing to record the pain at a given time, the investigator also recorded findings via telephonic conversation with the parents.

    Time frame: 2 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tanta University
    Tanta, Gharbia 6624033, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):77-8. PubMed 10730297 ↗
  • Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L. Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12. PubMed 30003514 ↗
  • Mohamed RH, Abdelrahman AM, Sharaf AA. Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 18;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02021-0. PubMed 35042489 ↗
  • Abd El Fatah YAM, Khattab NMA, Gomaa YF, Elheeny AAH. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of primary root canals transportation and dentin loss after instrumentation with two-pediatric rotary files. BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02245-8. PubMed 35641977 ↗
  • Elheeny AAH, Abdelmotelb MA. Postoperative pain after primary molar pulpectomy using rotary or reciprocating single files: A superior, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Nov;32(6):819-827. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12959. Epub 2022 May 5. PubMed 35152509 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05619796
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Shaimaa Shaban Mohamed El-desouky (Lecturer of Pediatric dentistry, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2022
Start date
Sep 4, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 4, 2023
Completion
Jul 30, 2023
Last update
Dec 7, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion