CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05615324Updated Jul 16, 2025

SAFIR Family Talk - Investigating the Effect of The Family Talk Intervention

An interventional study of Family Talk Preventive Intervention in Mental Disorder, Family and Child, sponsored by Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 7 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2020, registered Oct 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effect of the Family Talk Preventive Intervention compared to service as usual for families where a parent has mental illness. Participants are the parent with a mental illness receiving treatment from a secondary mental health service within the last two years from inclusion, their youngest child aged 7-17 years and the other parent of this child. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is Family Talk superior to service as usual regarding improving?

  • The child's level of functioning
  • The parent's sense of competence
  • Family functioning Participants will undergo interviews and fill out questionnaires. Half will be randomized to Family Talk and receive a manualized, family-based intervention of approximately 8 conversations with a trained, Family Talk interventionist. The other half will be randomized to service as usual which is normally two conversations with a professional in the mental health sector. The researchers will compare the two groups on child's level of functioning, parental sense of competence and family functioning.
Read the detailed description

Children of parents with mental illness are at increased risk for mental illness themselves and therefore interventions aimed at mitigating this risk are important. The Family Talk Preventive Intervention was developed by William Beardslee in the 1980's for families with parental depression but has been widely used to treat families with other mental health conditions as well. Nevertheless, only few high-quality clinical trials exist, and the results are inconclusive.

The objective of this clinical trial is to test the effect of Family Talk Preventive Intervention compared to service as usual for families where a parent has mental illness and receiving treatment from a secondary mental health service within the last two years from inclusion. Participants are the parent with a mental illness, their youngest child aged 7-17 years and the other parent of this child. The hypothesis is that Family Talk will be superior to service as usual in improving the child's level of functioning, the parent's sense of competence and family functioning at 4 moths follow-up.

Participants will undergo interviews and fill out questionnaires at baseline, four- and twelve months follow-up assessments. Half of the families will be randomized to Family Talk and receive a manualized, family-based intervention of approximately 8 conversations with a trained, Family Talk interventionist. The other half will be randomized to service as usual which is normally two conversations with a professional in the mental health sector. The researchers will compare the two groups on child's level of functioning, parental sense of competence and family functioning and other measures including child's quality of life, communication in the family and parental personal recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Disorder
  • Family
  • Child
  • Parenting
  • Resilience
  • Prevention

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parental mental illness
  • COPMI
  • Intervention
  • Family Talk
  • Mental Illness
  • Beardslee
03

In context

Mental Disorders

2,107 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 416 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 94 across 1,574 interventional studies indexed under Mental Disorders.

Browse Mental Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • At least one parent must have been in contact with the secondary health care system due to a mental health condition within the last two years before inclusion.
  • The parent should have at least one child aged 7-17 years at the time of inclusion.
  • The other parent of this child may or may not have a mental health condition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Not speaking Danish or English.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Family Talk

    families will receive a manualized, family-based intervention Family Talk of approximately 8 sessions with a trained, Family Talk interventionist.

    Behavioral: Family Talk Preventive Intervention

  • No intervention
    Service as usual

    Families in this arm will not receive any intervention from the research team but they may receive other services. It is likely that many will receive two sessions of talk intervention concerning parental mental health and child well-being from professionals in the mental health sector where the parent is treated.

Interventions

  • BehavioralFamily Talk Preventive Intervention

    This is a clinician facilitated, psychoeducational preventive intervention that includes on average 8 sessions designed to improve family communication and understanding of parental mental illness, improve interpersonal relationships, and promote child resilience and utilization of social support. An important tool throughout the intervention is the logbook which the clinician uses for taking notes with each family. The logbook prescribes the planned topics to be covered in each session and the contents of the sessions are noted in the logbook by the clinicians.

    Also known as: Beardslee's Family Intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)

    A clinician rated measurement to asses general functioning in children. Information is obtained from both the child and the parents. Scale from 1-100. High score indicates better the functioning.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  2. Change in Family Assessment Device (FAD) (Parent-rated)

    A 60 item parent report questionnaire assessing each individual's perception of his or her family functioning. The FAD is based on a comprehensive sociological theory about different functions of a family. Scale from 1-4. Low score represents better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  3. Change in Parenting Sense of Competency (PSOC)

    A 16 item parent report questionnaire assessing overall parenting sense of competence. Each item rated on a 6-point Likert scale. Total scale from 16-96. A higher score indicates a higher parenting sense of competency.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Beck's Youth Inventories (BYI-II)

    A 99 item self report measure consisting of 5 subscales to assess symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, Anger, Disruptive behaviour and Self-concept in children. Higher scores are associated with negative affect.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  2. Change in Parent-Child Communication (Child-rated)

    Questionnaire assessing communication between the child and the mentally ill parent. A 10 item questionnaire for children ages 8-12 and a 19 item questionnaire for children ages 13-17. Each item rated on a 6-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates better communication.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  3. Change in Response to parents' mood

    A 4-questions multiple-choice questionnaire administered to the child assessing the child's reaction to the parents' mood.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  4. Change in parental recovery (Brief INSPIRE-O)

    A 5 item self-report questionnaire completed by the parents assessing personal recovery. Each item rated on a score from 0-100. A higher score indicates better recovery.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Child-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    A 25 item self-report questionnaire assessing developmental, behavioural and emotional problems completed by children aged 11-17. Items are rated on a three-point Likert scale (0= not true, 1= somewhat true, 2= certainly true).

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  2. Change in Parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    A 25 item questionnaire assessing developmental, behavioural and emotional problems in children completed by the Primary-Caregiver as a respondent. Items are rated on a three-point Likert scale (0= not true, 1= somewhat true, 2= certainly true).

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  3. Change in children's Quality of Life (Kidsscreen-27)

    A 27 item self-report questionnaire assessing health related Quality of Life completed by the child. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  4. Change in Child and Youth Resilience Measurement (CYRM)

    A 12 item self-report questionnaire assessing resiliency in children across a number of areas including personal skills, peer support, social skills, physical and psychological caregiving, educational and cultural. Items are rated on a 3- or 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating greater resiliency.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  5. Change in Guilt and Shame Questionnaire (GSQ-AMPI)

    A 10 item self-report questionnaire completed by the child assessing feelings of guilt and shame in children of parents with mental illness. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate higher feelings of guilt or shame.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  6. Change in Personal and Social Performance (PSP)

    An interviewer-rated scale assessing the Parents personal and social functioning over four domains such as social activities, relationships, self-care and aggressive behavior. The PSP provides a global score on a scale from 1-100, with lower scores indicating lower social functioning.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  7. Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF-S)

    An interviewer-rated scale assessing the Parents Level of Psychiatric Symptoms. GAF-S provides a score from 1-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  8. Change in Parent-Child Communication (Parent-rated)

    A 19 or 20 item questionnaire completed by the parents assessing communication between the parent and the child. Each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates better communication.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  9. Family Talk Evaluation Questionnaire (Child-rated)

    A 9 item self report questionnaire only administered to children from the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention group to assess their experience of the intervention.

    Time frame: Assessment at 4 months after baseline where the families have completed the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention.

  10. Family Talk Evaluation Questionnaire (Parent-rated)

    A 68 item self report questionnaire only administered to parents from the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention group. The questionnaire assess the parents experience of the intervention across a number of areas including the therapeutic alliance, client satisfaction and negative effects of the intervention. Each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at 4 months after baseline where the families have completed the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention.

  11. Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)

    A 12 item questionnaire only administered to parents from the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention group to assess key aspects of the therapeutic alliance. Each item are rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Scale from 12-84. A higher score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at 4 months after baseline where the families have completed the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention.

  12. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    A 8 item questionnaire only administered to parents from the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention group to assess the parents' experiences with different objectives in the intervention. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Scale from 8-32. A higher score indicates greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessment at 4 months after baseline where the families have completed the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention.

  13. Negative effects of the intervention assessed with the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NeQ)

    A 21 item questionnaire only administered to parents from the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention group to investigate negative effects of the intervention. Each item is answered by "yes" or "no", where "yes" indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at 4 months after baseline where the families have completed the SAFIR Family Talk Intervention.

  14. Change in child's number of days absent from school

    Number of days the child was absent from school within the last 3 months. Low number represent better outcome. Information will be obtained from registry and parents' report.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  15. Change in The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) (Children self-report)

    A 60 item self-report only administered to children ages 12-17 assessing family functioning. Scale from 1-4. Low score represents better outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

  16. Change in Children of Parents with Mental Illness Questionnaire (COPMI-Q)

    A 16 item questionnaire assessing the child's concerns regarding the mentally ill parent and thoughts on mental illness. Each item is rated on a 3-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates a more positive outcome.

    Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 4 months and 12 months after baseline.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mental Health Services in the Capital Region
    Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nielsen SS, Mikkelsen LJ, Quaade N, Gladstone TRG, Beardslee WR, Bonnemose K, Rosenberg NK, Hjorthoj C, Thorup AAE, Nordentoft M, Ranning A. A study protocol for the randomized controlled trial SAFIR FAMILY TALK: a selective primary preventive intervention vs. service as usual for children of parents with mental illness. Trials. 2023 Apr 22;24(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07256-6. PubMed 37087437 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 11, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05615324
Lead sponsor
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
Collaborators
TrygFonden, Denmark, Sektion for Tværsektoriel forskning - Region Hovedstaden
Responsible party
Anne Ranning (Assistant Professor, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Oct 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Study contacts

Anne Ranning, PhD
principal investigator · Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion