CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05610761Updated Nov 9, 2022

Efficacy of Core Stabilization Exercises in Women With Stress and Mixed Urinary Incontinence

An interventional study of Core stabilization exercises with Kegel exercises and Kegel exercises in Stress Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Istanbul University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-09.

Sponsored by Istanbul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Nov 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of core stabilization exercises added to traditional Kegel exercises on incontinence and quality of life in women with stress and stress dominant mixed urinary incontinence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • stress urinary incontinence
  • incontinence rehabilitation
  • incontinence exercises
  • core stabilization exercises
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women between the ages of 18 - 55
  2. Diagnosis of stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence
  3. Pelvic floor muscle strength ≥ 3
  4. BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2
  5. ≥ 1 complaint of urinary incontinence in the last month

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy and postpartum first 6 weeks
  2. Other types of incontinence and stress type 3 incontinence
  3. Urinary tract infection
  4. Pelvic organ prolapse advanced stage (Stage ≥ 2)
  5. History of pelvic surgery or pelvic tumor
  6. Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence
  7. History of serious systemic or neurological disease (Severe cardiovascular disease, advanced COPD, CVO and/or Cancer, Parkinson's etc.)
  8. Severe low back and/or pelvic pain
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Core Stabilization Exercises with Kegel Exercises

    Behavioral: Core stabilization exercises with Kegel exercises

  • Active comparator
    Kegel Exercises

    Behavioral: Kegel exercises

Interventions

  • BehavioralCore stabilization exercises with Kegel exercises

    Core stabilization exercise program consists of two phases: teaching the basic movement (contraction of the Transversus abdominis and other muscles with diaphragmatic breathing) and incremental exercises added to the basic movement. The basic movement will be studied before each exercise and then the specified exercises will be added. The physiatrist will teach the exercise program to the patients. The first 6 of the 12 exercises classified according to the degree of difficulty will be performed for 5 weeks, and the next 5 weeks will be moved to the other 6 exercises. The exercises will be performed at least 3 days a week, with 10 repetitions of each movement, and the program will last for 10 weeks. Compliance with the exercise program will be questioned over the phone, and patients will be evaluated with a follow-up form before the study, at the 10th week, and at the 20th week. In addition, the Kegel exercise program specified in the other group will be applied.

  • BehavioralKegel exercises

    Kegel Exercises The exercise will start as 2 sets of 10 repetitions in the morning and evening, and after getting used to it, it will be increased to 3 sets of 10 repetitions per day. The patient, lying on his back with his knees bent, feet slightly apart from each other, will try to lift the breech, urinary tract opening and vagina on the pelvic floor by counting to 5, and should not tighten your abdominal and leg muscles, and should not hold your breath while doing this exercise. In this way, he will count up to 5 while contracting, then he will relax by counting to 10 (after getting used to it, the holding time will be increased to 10 seconds).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Vaginal Pressure Measurement with Perineometer

    The periometer is a manometer attached to a vaginal pressure probe that evaluates pelvic floor muscle (PTC) contraction with an objective result in cmH2O. Normal vaginal pressure value is 30-60 cm H2O. The probe is advanced 3-5 cm towards the vagina and the patient is asked to contract the perineal muscles. 3 separate measurements are made and a score is created by taking the average of these measurements.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  2. Change in Incontinence Severity Index (ISI)

    ISI is a simple questionnaire consisting of questioning the frequency and amount of urine leakage, and the score consists of multiplying the answers given to these two groups of questions. Incontinence severity according to scores; mild (score 1-2), moderate (score 3-6), severe (score 8-9), and very severe (score 12).

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Muscle Strength Examination with Digital Palpation

    Patients lie in the supine position, knees straight and legs abducted. The physiatrist inserts two distal phalanxes and one finger into the introitus vagina and tells the patient how to contract correctly, and is asked to hold the fingers firmly. Modified Oxford Scale is used for scoring. Muscle strength 0: No contraction. 1: Contraction is minimal, can hold fingers for \<1 second. 2: Contraction is weak, fingers are not elevated and can hold for 1-3 seconds. 3: With the contraction, the doctor's fingers elevate up to the posterior vaginal wall, can hold for 4-6 seconds, repeat 3 times. 4: Doctor's fingers elevate the posterior vaginal wall, there is a feeling of intense pressure on the fingers, can hold for 7-9 seconds, repeat 3 times. 5: He can do strong contractions for 10 seconds, repeat ≥4 times.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  2. Change in Pad Test (24 hours)

    The pad test is one of the objective tests that shows the presence and degree of UI. The purpose of pad tests is to determine the amount of incontinence by measuring pad weight. In these tests, the weight of the pad is weighed before and after a certain time interval (1 hour, 24 hours or 48 hours). In the 24-hour pad test, the pads that the patient leaks for 24 hours are collected and weighed on a sensitive scale, using a precision scale and pads whose weight is known beforehand. The amount of urine leakage is determined by subtracting the weight of the pads used from the score. Scoring; Defined as \<1 g definitely dry, 2-10 g mild moderate urinary incontinence, 10-50 g severe urinary incontinence, \> 50 g very severe urinary incontinence

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  3. Change in Bladder Diary (3 days)

    Bladder diaries provide information about parameters such as fluid intake and excretion amount of the patient, urinary incontinence and frequency of urination in 24-hour periods. The patient is given 3 forms of 24 hours. He is asked to write down the information including the quality and quantity of all the liquids he has taken for 3 days, the frequency of urination during the day and night, the frequency of urinary incontinence and the triggering event on these forms, together with the hours.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  4. Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7)

    Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) assess symptom distress and the impact on daily life of urinary incontinence. The patient is asked 7 different questions about how much urinary incontinence affects him in social life. Indicate the degree of being affected in 7 subjects: doing housework, aerobic activities such as walking, swimming, exercise, entertainment activities (such as movies), traveling for more than 30 minutes by car, participation in social activities outside the home, mental health (nervousness, depression), and feelings of frustration. required. 0 is not affected at all, 1 is slightly affected, 2 is moderately affected, and 3 is very affected.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  5. Change in Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)

    Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) assess symptom distress and the impact on daily life of urinary incontinence. UDI-6 consists of 6 items: Frequent urination, leakage related to feeling of urgency, leakage related to activity, coughing, or sneezing small amounts of leakage (drops), difficulty emptying the bladder, and pain or discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. They are asked to score how much these items affect the quality of life. 0 is not affected at all, 1 is slightly affected, 2 is moderately affected, and 3 is very affected.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

  6. Change in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)

    The King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) is another comprehensive patient statement-based scoring used to evaluate the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (before intervention), immediately after intervention, 10 weeks after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Istanbul, Fatih 34093, Turkey
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05610761
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University
Responsible party
Merve Dikici Yağlı (Principal Investigator, Istanbul University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2022
Start date
Jul 8, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 8, 2020
Completion
Aug 15, 2020
Last update
Nov 9, 2022

Study contacts

Merve Dikici Yağlı, MD
principal investigator · Istanbul University
Ayşe Karan, Professor
principal investigator · Istanbul University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion