ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05602844Updated Sep 25, 2023

Clinical Trial on Patient-Specific-Instrumentation Assisted Lapidus Fusion for Hallux Valgus

An interventional study of PSI Lapidus and Conventional Lapidus in Hallux Valgus, Bunion and Patient Spe, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-25.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RCT to compare the effectiveness of PSI assisted Lapidus surgery vs conventional Lapidus surgery in hallux valgus.

Read the detailed description

Hallux valgus (HV) affects up to 30% of the population. Lapidus surgery, a combination of 1st tarsal-metatarsal joint arthrodesis is one of the most common surgical options for HV. Despite its popularity, the current method alone is not without complications. This will be the world's first Lapidus arthrodesis surgery utilising patient-specific instruments (PSI) as an assistive tool. We hypothesise that PSI will enhance surgical precision, accelerate fusion rates, decrease non-unions, and reduce the need to use bone grafts.

Methods and analysis:

This is a single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing the outcome of the 3D-Printed PSI Assisted Lapidus Fusion (n=27) vs Conventional Lapidus Fusion (n=27) for HV deformity. Both groups will receive indentical post-operative rehabilitation of protected weight bearing and splinting. Outcomes measured will include foot function scores, radiological alignment and arthrodesis site assessment with X-ray and High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative-Computed Tomography, and foot pressure analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hallux Valgus
  • Bunion
  • Patient Spe
03

In context

Hallux Valgus

157 studies on the registry are indexed under Hallux Valgus; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 58 across 119 interventional studies indexed under Hallux Valgus.

Browse Hallux Valgus studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic Hallux Valgus
  • hallux valgus angle >20
  • 1,2 Inter-metatarsal angle >9

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals with (1) disabilities (both physical and mental) which may impair the adherence of the rehabilitation, (2) revision HV surgery, (3) concomitantly undergone additional procedures on the same foot (e.g. claw toe surgery), (4) the use of medications that may influence bone turnover (e.g. chemotherapy, osteoporotic medications) in recent 3 months, (5) medical comorbidity leading to for surgery, (6) the inability to understand written Chinese/English, (7) who are mentally/physically unable to consent will be excluded.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PSI Lapidus

    Design of PSI, 3D printing of PSI, PSI-assisted Lapidus Surgery.

    Procedure: PSI Lapidus

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Lapidus

    Lapidus Surgery: exposure of the 1TMTJ via a 3-5cm medial longitudinal skin incision and capsulotomy. Freehand creation of the fusion surface with fluoroscopic assistance. Fixation of the Lapidus arthrodesis will be performed with two 3.5mm headless compression screws.

    Procedure: Conventional Lapidus

Interventions

  • ProcedurePSI Lapidus

    Design of PSI: DICOM files will be imported into the Model Intestinal Microflora in Computer Simulation (MIMICS 21.0) 3D image processing software (Materialize, Belgium) for 3D rendering. The segmented bone images will be used for design of the computer-aided modelling (CAM) surgical jigs. 3D printing of PSI jig. PSI-assisted Lapidus Surgery.

  • ProcedureConventional Lapidus

    exposure of the 1TMTJ via a 3-5cm medial longitudinal skin incision and capsulotomy. Freehand creation of the fusion surface with fluoroscopic assistance. Fixation of the Lapidus arthrodesis will be performed with two 3.5mm headless compression screws

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Foot Function

    The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a reliable and validated patient-reported questionnaire widely used in clinical settings. It consists of five subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, ability to perform sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. The score of each part is re-coded into a 0-100 scale, with 100 representing no symptoms. (16) The FAOS is a commonly used outcome assessment tool in hallux valgus trials and is reliable and valid by many researchers.

    Time frame: 0 week

  2. Foot Function

    The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a reliable and validated patient-reported questionnaire widely used in clinical settings. It consists of five subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, ability to perform sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. The score of each part is re-coded into a 0-100 scale, with 100 representing no symptoms. (16) The FAOS is a commonly used outcome assessment tool in hallux valgus trials and is reliable and valid by many researchers.

    Time frame: 12 week

  3. Foot Function

    The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a reliable and validated patient-reported questionnaire widely used in clinical settings. It consists of five subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, ability to perform sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. The score of each part is re-coded into a 0-100 scale, with 100 representing no symptoms. (16) The FAOS is a commonly used outcome assessment tool in hallux valgus trials and is reliable and valid by many researchers.

    Time frame: 26 week

  4. Foot Function

    The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a reliable and validated patient-reported questionnaire widely used in clinical settings. It consists of five subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, ability to perform sports and recreational activities, and quality of life. The score of each part is re-coded into a 0-100 scale, with 100 representing no symptoms. (16) The FAOS is a commonly used outcome assessment tool in hallux valgus trials and is reliable and valid by many researchers.

    Time frame: 52 week

  5. Time to Radiological Fusion

    Dorsal-plantar and lateral X-rays of the foot will be taken to look for evidence of trabeculations crossing the fusion site. A successful union will be declared if trabeculation extends more than one-half the length of the fusion site.

    Time frame: 2 week

  6. Time to Radiological Fusion

    Dorsal-plantar and lateral X-rays of the foot will be taken to look for evidence of trabeculations crossing the fusion site. A successful union will be declared if trabeculation extends more than one-half the length of the fusion site.

    Time frame: 6 week

  7. Time to Radiological Fusion

    Dorsal-plantar and lateral X-rays of the foot will be taken to look for evidence of trabeculations crossing the fusion site. A successful union will be declared if trabeculation extends more than one-half the length of the fusion site.

    Time frame: 12 week

  8. Time to Radiological Fusion

    Dorsal-plantar and lateral X-rays of the foot will be taken to look for evidence of trabeculations crossing the fusion site. A successful union will be declared if trabeculation extends more than one-half the length of the fusion site.

    Time frame: 26 week

  9. Time to Radiological Fusion

    Dorsal-plantar and lateral X-rays of the foot will be taken to look for evidence of trabeculations crossing the fusion site. A successful union will be declared if trabeculation extends more than one-half the length of the fusion site.

    Time frame: 52 week

  10. High-resolution peripheral quantitive-Computed Tomography

    HR pQCT allows us to visualize the bony micro-architecture at the Lapidus fusion site and is a more accurate assessment of bone growth compared to X-rays. A rectangular region of interest (ROI) will be established at the fusion surface, inner callus, and external callus area. The volumetric changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in each region will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 6 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Deformity severity

    Radiology can provide an objective outcome measurement, the 1,2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) will be measured using dorsal-planar weight-bearing X-rays of the foot. The IMA is defined by drawing an angle from lines bisecting the 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal shaft. A normal IMA is \<9°, while the more severe the deformity, the larger the angle. The HVA is defined by drawing an angle from the bisecting lines of the 1st proximal phalanx shaft and the 1st metatarsal shaft. A normal HVA is \<20° with a larger angle signifying a more severe deformity.

    Time frame: 0 week

  2. Deformity severity

    Radiology can provide an objective outcome measurement, the 1,2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) will be measured using dorsal-planar weight-bearing X-rays of the foot. The IMA is defined by drawing an angle from lines bisecting the 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal shaft. A normal IMA is \<9°, while the more severe the deformity, the larger the angle. The HVA is defined by drawing an angle from the bisecting lines of the 1st proximal phalanx shaft and the 1st metatarsal shaft. A normal HVA is \<20° with a larger angle signifying a more severe deformity.

    Time frame: 12 week

  3. Deformity severity

    Radiology can provide an objective outcome measurement, the 1,2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) will be measured using dorsal-planar weight-bearing X-rays of the foot. The IMA is defined by drawing an angle from lines bisecting the 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal shaft. A normal IMA is \<9°, while the more severe the deformity, the larger the angle. The HVA is defined by drawing an angle from the bisecting lines of the 1st proximal phalanx shaft and the 1st metatarsal shaft. A normal HVA is \<20° with a larger angle signifying a more severe deformity.

    Time frame: 26 week

  4. Deformity severity

    Radiology can provide an objective outcome measurement, the 1,2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and hallux valgus angle (HVA) will be measured using dorsal-planar weight-bearing X-rays of the foot. The IMA is defined by drawing an angle from lines bisecting the 1st metatarsal and 2nd metatarsal shaft. A normal IMA is \<9°, while the more severe the deformity, the larger the angle. The HVA is defined by drawing an angle from the bisecting lines of the 1st proximal phalanx shaft and the 1st metatarsal shaft. A normal HVA is \<20° with a larger angle signifying a more severe deformity.

    Time frame: 52 week

  5. Delayed union rate

    Delayed union was defined as greater than 50% lucency on either the AP and lateral radiographs or broken hardware at the fusion site 12 weeks post-surgery. If lucency, sclerosis, or lack of trabeculation extended more than one-half the length of the fusion site on either the dorsal-plantar or lateral radiograph, a radiographic delayed-union was declared

    Time frame: 12 week

  6. Non-union rate

    Non-union was defined as greater than 50% lucency on either the AP and lateral radiographs or broken hardware at the fusion site at 26 weeks post-surgery. If lucency, sclerosis, or lack of trabeculation extended more than one-half the length of the fusion site on either the dorsal-plantar or lateral radiograph, a radiographic non-union was declared

    Time frame: 26 week

  7. Plantar pressure distribution

    The Tekscan Matscan (Tekscan Inc., Boston MA) system will be used to measure the plantar pressure at different anatomical regions during the gait cycle

    Time frame: 0 week

  8. Plantar pressure distribution

    The Tekscan Matscan (Tekscan Inc., Boston MA) system will be used to measure the plantar pressure at different anatomical regions during the gait cycle

    Time frame: 26 week

  9. Plantar pressure distribution

    The Tekscan Matscan (Tekscan Inc., Boston MA) system will be used to measure the plantar pressure at different anatomical regions during the gait cycle

    Time frame: 52 week

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Not shared

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05602844
Responsible party
Samuel KK Ling (Clinical Assistant Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2023

Study contacts

Samuel Ling
principal investigator · CUHK

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion