CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05595395ERIUpdated Oct 25, 2023

The Enteral Resuscitation In Intensive Care Pilot- Study

An interventional study of Enteral Dose Form and Intravenous Infusion in Electrolyte Imbalance, Volume Overload and Hyperosmolality, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Recruiting at 2 sites in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-25.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to overcome the limited evidence on enteral fluid administration in intensive care medicine and to generate data for further hypothesis generation in an exploratory setting. This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, open-label study to compare the current standard of practice, the intravenous fluid administration, with a more physiological approach, the enteral fluid administration, in critically ill patients.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: The effectiveness and safety of enteral fluid administration in critically ill patients remains unclear. Existing evidence regarding this topic is scarce, but suggests that enteral fluid administration is a safe route of administration. To our knowledge no randomized controlled trial has been conducted investigating this topic.

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study is to gather evidence on the impact of enteral fluid replacement on clinical, laboratory and outcome parameters in intensive care patients in order to plan a subsequent larger randomized controlled trial. Clinical outcomes indices evaluated are regurgitation, thirst, serum sodium, mortality, length of mechanical ventilation arterial pressure, urinary volume, body weight, edema, intra-abdominal pressure), changes in bioimpedance spectroscopy-derived markers, fluid overload, renal function tests, liver function tests and SOFA-Scores.

Methods: The trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel group, open-label study. Patients are going to be recruited and randomized at 3 separate internal medicine intensive care units in Vienna, Austria. A total of 64 patients will be recruited and randomized to receive enteral fluid administration via nasogastric tube or intravenous administration only. Daily visits and evaluation of clinical and radiological fluid status is performed by the attending physician. Regular study visits with Bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements (BIS) to evaluate fluid status are going to be performed

Results and conclusions: The ERI study will provide data on potential outcome parameters to plan a subsequent larger randomized control trial for patients receiving enteral fluid therapy in intensive care medicine.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial is performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It subscribes to the principles outlined in the most recent version of the International Conference on Harmonization on Good Clinical Practice. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK number 1790/2020). The study has also been registered in a public clinical trial database (EudraCT Identifier Number 2018-002447-29, clinicaltrialsregister.eu).

02

Conditions studied

  • Electrolyte Imbalance
  • Volume Overload
  • Hyperosmolality

Keywords

  • Fluid Therapy
  • Critical Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pilot Project
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,076 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient intubated within the last 72h

    • Age >18 years
    • Expected required fluid volume may not exceed 4 mL/kg/h (permanently, during at least 24 hours).
    • Negative pregnancy test in female patients of childbearing potential
    • Informed consent. For patients that are temporarily unable to consent a
    • subsequent informed consent must be provided.

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of severe gastrointestinal disease defined as

    • Gastrointestinal Failure with > 3 symptoms (see below) or
    • Lactate >3mmol/L when mesenterial ischemia is a probable cause
    • Clinical signs of intra-abdominal hypertension and an increase of intra-abdominal pressure of >20 mmHg.
    • Patients who cannot receive early enteral nutrition due to conditions such as prone positioning in consequence of conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome
    • Pregnancy
    • Abdominal surgery in the last 3 months (unless all involved physicians, study investigators and caretaking doctors agree that the surgical event does not constitute a limitation for enteral fluid administration)
    • Postoperative patients with consecutive admission to ICU
    • Extracorporeal Kidney-Replacement Therapy before intubation
    • At the discretion of the Investigator

Symptoms of Gastrointestinal Failure:

  • Absent bowel sounds
  • Bowel distension
  • Vomiting/regurgitation volume >500 ml
  • GI bleeding
  • Diarrhoea (liquid stool >3 times a day)
  • Distended stomach on ultrasound examination.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Intravenous Fluid Arm

    In Group 1 (Standard of practice/intravenous fluid group) no enteral administration of fluid other than enteral nutrition is going to be allowed. Intravenous fluid administration is going to be administered at the discretion of the physician in charge and "Elomel isoton" is going to be the fluid of choice.

    Drug: Intravenous Infusion

  • Active comparator
    Enteral Fluid Arm

    In Group 2 (Test practice/enteral fluid group) enteral fluid administration is going to be the primary mode of administration. Intravenous fluid administration can be performed by physicians at their own discretion. Primary enteral fluid administered is going to be tap water, intravenous fluid of choice is going to be "Elomel isoton".

    Drug: Enteral Dose Form

Interventions

  • DrugEnteral Dose Form

    In this intervention arm, fluid substitution is primarily done via enteral administration. The used substance for enteral fluid administered is going to be tap water. Intravenous fluid of choice is going to be "Elomel isoton".

  • DrugIntravenous Infusion

    In this intervention arm, fluid substitution is primarily done via intravenous administration. The used substance for intravenous fluid administered is going to be "Elomel isoton".

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Regurgitation

    Incidence and extent of regurgitation via the stomach/jejunal probe

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation.

  2. Sodium/Osmolality

    Differences of serum sodium and serum osmolality

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation.

  3. Thirst

    Thirst on a zero to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS; worst = 10)

    Time frame: On the last study visit (day of extubation)

  4. Days on ventilation

    Days on ventilation

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation.

  5. 30-day mortality

    30-day mortality

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation until 30 days after intubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kidney Failure

    Incidence and extent of kidney failure as well as kidney function

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation.

  2. SOFA-Score

    Differences of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores of patients. This score includes PaO2 \[mmHg\], FiO2 \[%\], mechanical ventilation \[Yes/No\], Platelets \[/µL\], Glascow Coma Scale, Bilirubin \[mg/dL\], Mean arterial pressure OR administration of vasoactive agents required and creatinine \[mg/dL\]. The score ranges from 0=best to 24=worst.

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation

  3. BCM

    Differences in fluid volume status including Bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements (BIS) using Body Composition Monitor (BCM)

    Time frame: From the moment of intubation to extubation

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05595395
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Collaborators
Klinik Favoriten
Responsible party
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Manfred Hecking, MD PhD (Principal Investigator, Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2022
Start date
Feb 13, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 25, 2023

Study contacts

Manfred Hecking, MD, PhD
Contact
manfred.hecking@meduniwien.ac.at
0043-699-10580831
Univ. Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Contact
postakhi3m@akhwien.at
0043 1 40400-62090
Manfred Hecking, M.D.
principal investigator · Medical University of Vienna, Department of Nephrology and Dialysis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion