CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05590767Updated May 3, 2024Results posted

Pupillary Pain Index to Evaluate Interscalene Block and Postoperative Pain in Patients Underwent Shoulder Surgery

An observational study in Surgery and Shoulder Impingement, sponsored by Tri-Service General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-03.

Sponsored by Tri-Service General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
20 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

When an individual encounters nociceptive pain stimuli, the pupil dilates in a unique manner known as Pupil reflex dilation (PRD).The degree of pupillary reflex dilatation can be further quantified into an objective parameter, termed the Pupillary pain index (PPI), as a monitoring tool for the balance between nociception and antinociception in surgical patients The motivation for this study is to investigate the feasibility of using pupillometry to assess acute pain after shoulder surgery. The purpose of the study is as follows: (1) Can PDR in patients undergoing general anesthesia be used to assess the analgesic effect of interscalene block? (2) Does PPI at the end of surgical anesthesia in such patients correlate with the first numerical pain scale (NRS) during the recovery room?

Read the detailed description

When an individual encounters nociceptive pain stimuli, the pupil dilates in a unique way called pupillary reflex dilation (PRD), which can be observed both when the individual is awake or under anesthesia. The degree of pupillary reflex dilatation can be further quantified into an objective parameter called the Pupillary pain index (PPI), which serves as a monitoring tool for the balance between nociception and antinociception in surgical patients. Larson studied 32 female breast surgery patients who received general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the affected side. The results showed that the affected side of the nerve block had significantly lower pupillary reflex dilation than those without nerve block on the healthy side of the breast. The authors believed that this study confirmed the value of pupillary reflex dilation in monitoring the success rate of unilateral thoracic paravertebral nerve block during general anesthesia. In a prospective observational study of 26 patients undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia, Pupillary pain index at the end of surgical anesthesia and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during the recovery room were recorded separately, The results showed a significant correlation between the two parameters (rS = 0.62; P = 0.002). The authors concluded that the application of the measurement of pupillary reflex dilation may be useful in predicting and preventing acute postoperative pain. Shoulder rotator muscle repair is a common surgery in our hospital. Patients must receive general anesthesia, sometimes combined with scalene interscalene block (ISB), to improve postoperative acute pain ,help to perform passive shoulder rehabilitation exercises and prevent shoulder joint adhesions. Based on the above literature review, the motivation for this study was to investigate the feasibility of using pupillometry to assess acute pain after shoulder surgery. The objectives of the research project are as follows: 1. Can pupillary reflex dilation in patients undergoing general anesthesia be used to assess the analgesic effect of scalene nerve block? 2. Is the pupillary pain index (PPI) at the end of surgical anesthesia correlated with the first numerical pain scale (NRS) during the recovery room in such patients?

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgery
  • Shoulder Impingement
03

In context

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

304 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 39 observational studies indexed under Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.

Browse Shoulder Impingement Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Tri-Service General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 109 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients scheduled to undergo shoulder rotators repair surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who received general anesthesia combined with ipsilateral interscalene block
  • Patients listed as a Class I/II physical condition of the American Society ofAnesthesiologists

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 20 years of age
  • The presence of ophthalmologic (recent eye surgery or cataracts) or neurologic diseases (diabetic neuropathy,or postherpetic neuralgia) that could interfere with Pupillometer
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • shoulder rotators repair

    Patients scheduled to undergo shoulder rotators repair surgery

    Procedure: Patients scheduled to undergo shoulder rotators repair surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedurePatients scheduled to undergo shoulder rotators repair surgery

    Patients scheduled to undergo shoulder rotators repair surgery, and received combined general anesthesia and interscalene block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pupillary Pain Index (PPI )

    The primary outcome is the difference of the pupillary pain index (PPI ) between the ISB side and the control side The PPI mode applies a standardized, incremental transcutaneous electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 10-60mA, with 1-s intervals) that progressively increases in intensity until a pupil dilation of \>13% is observed. The degree of reflex dilation is quantified on a scale of 1 (very deep analgesia) to 9 (very light analgesia) and referred to as the PPI .

    Time frame: After induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference Between Intraoperative Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) and Postoperative Numerical Pain Scale (NRS)

    1. PPI: The PPI mode applies a standardized, incremental transcutaneous electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 10-60mA, with 1-s intervals) that progressively increases in intensity until a pupil dilation of \>13% is observed. The degree of reflex dilation is quantified on a scale of 1 (very deep analgesia) to 9 (very light analgesia) and referred to as the PPI. 2. NRS: the nursing staff in the post-anesthesia care unit asked the patient to rate their pain at the surgical site using the NRS, with a range of 0(no pain)-10(most severe pain).

    Time frame: From emergency of anesthesia to early Post-anesthesia period

07

Results

Posted May 3, 2024
Limitations and caveats
the pupillometer's built-in PPI mode utilizes electrical stimulation up to 60 mA to simulate nociception. Therefore, the patient must be under sedation or anesthesia during the measurement to ensure comfort and safety.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneShoulder Rotators Repair
Started40
Completed37
Not completed3
Withdrew: Protocol violation1
Withdrew: Surgery canceled1
Withdrew: Interscalene brachial block not performed1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPupillary Pain Index (PPI )

The primary outcome is the difference of the pupillary pain index (PPI ) between the ISB side and the control side The PPI mode applies a standardized, incremental transcutaneous electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 10-60mA, with 1-s intervals) that progressively increases in intensity until a pupil dilation of \>13% is observed. The degree of reflex dilation is quantified on a scale of 1 (very deep analgesia) to 9 (very light analgesia) and referred to as the PPI .

Time frame:
After induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pupillary Pain Index (PPI )
score on a scaleShoulder Rotators Repair
ISB side1.8 ± 0.2
Control side6.6 ± 0.3
SecondaryDifference Between Intraoperative Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) and Postoperative Numerical Pain Scale (NRS)

1. PPI: The PPI mode applies a standardized, incremental transcutaneous electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 10-60mA, with 1-s intervals) that progressively increases in intensity until a pupil dilation of \>13% is observed. The degree of reflex dilation is quantified on a scale of 1 (very deep analgesia) to 9 (very light analgesia) and referred to as the PPI. 2. NRS: the nursing staff in the post-anesthesia care unit asked the patient to rate their pain at the surgical site using the NRS, with a range of 0(no pain)-10(most severe pain).

Time frame:
From emergency of anesthesia to early Post-anesthesia period
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Difference Between Intraoperative Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) and Postoperative Numerical Pain Scale (NRS)
score on a scaleShoulder Rotators Repair
intraoperative PPI1.5 ± 0.2
postoperative NRS1.7 ± 1.3

Adverse events

Collected over 2 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Shoulder Rotators Repair0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

40 patients scheduled for rotator cuff surgery were recruited for this study. Of these, three did not follow the study protocol: one had canceled surgery, one did not undergo ISB, and in one case, sevoflurane was not used as the main anesthetic. For the remaining 37 patients, Three patients did not report a loss of subjective cold/pinprick sensation in the C5 and C6 dermatomes, indicating an unsuccessful block. Therefore, 34 patients were included in the final analysis.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years old)Shoulder Rotators Repair
Mean62 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Shoulder Rotators Repair
Female21
Male13
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Shoulder Rotators Repair
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Shoulder Rotators Repair
Taiwan34
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Shoulder Rotators Repair
Mean24.1 ± 2.7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital
    Taipei, 114, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 20, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05590767
Lead sponsor
Tri-Service General Hospital
Responsible party
Lu Yihsiung (Attending doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2022
Start date
Oct 27, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 17, 2023
Completion
Aug 31, 2023
Results posted
May 3, 2024
Last update
May 3, 2024

Study contacts

Yeh Chun-chang, M.D.
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion