ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05586789Updated Jul 27, 2023

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranquilon Tablets in Patients With Anxiety in Neurasthenia and Adjustment Disorders

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ranquilon and Placebo in Anxiety, Neurasthenia and Adjustment Disorders, sponsored by Valenta Pharm JSC. Completed at 10 sites in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-27.

Primary conditionAdjustment DisordersRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Adjustment Disorders
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Adjustment Disorders.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Valenta Pharm JSC · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Ranquilon, 1 mg tablets, at a dose of 6 mg/day compared to placebo for the treatment of patients with anxiety in neurasthenia and adjustment disorder.

An additional study objective was to evaluate the safety of Ranquilon, 1 mg tablets, at a dose of 6 mg/day compared to placebo in patients with anxiety in neurasthenia and adjustment disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Neurasthenia
  • Adjustment Disorders

Browse trials for

03

In context

Adjustment Disorders Reclassified

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Adjustment Disorders; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 100 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Adjustment Disorders.

Browse Adjustment Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Valenta Pharm JSC is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Compared within Adjustment Disorders, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women between the ages of 18 and 70
  2. Presence of written consent to participate in the study in accordance with applicable law
  3. Patients with anxiety and diagnoses based on ICD-10 criteria: neurasthenia (F48.0) or adjustment disorder (F43.2)
  4. HARS anxiety scores of 18-24
  5. Severity of asthenia on the Asthenia Self Assessment Scale (MFI-20) of more than 50 points
  6. Hamilton Depression Assessment Scale (HAMD-17) score \< 6
  7. CGI-s scale score of at least 4
  8. Negative pregnancy test for women of preserved
  9. Consent to use effective for the duration of the study and 30 days after completion (for women of unresolved reproductive potential and men)
  10. Ability to understand the requirements for study participants, to give written consent to participate in the study (including the use and communication of patient health information relevant to the study) and to comply with the procedures of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known intolerance to the active ingredient and/or in the study drug/placebo of the study drug
  2. Known presence of lactase deficiency, lactose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or galactose intolerance
  3. Patients who require concomitant therapy prohibited in this study (MAO inhibitors, antidepressants, neuroleptics, anxiolytics and sedatives (including herbal), sleeping pills when used on a continuous basis), or have taken these drugs within the last month
  4. Established or suspected alcohol/drug use at the time of screening or randomization, and/or a history of alcohol, drug or drug dependence
  5. Presence of cancer, including a history of cancer (with the exception of a cured tumor with sustained remission for more than 5 years)
  6. Presence of tuberculosis, including a history of tuberculosis
  7. The presence of , chronic viral /C, syphilis (including a history), or a positive test for HIV, hepatitis B/C, syphilis at screening
  8. Patients with a diagnosis established on the basis of ICD-10 criteria: other anxiety disorders (F41)
  9. Schizophrenia, schizoaffective, affective and panic disorders
  10. Acute psychosis (endogenous-procedural, organic or somatogenic), including history
  11. Organic lesions of the central nervous system of traumatic and alcoholic genesis
  12. Postencephalitic syndrome
  13. Brain tumors, including in the anamnesis
  14. Degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), in particular, multiple sclerosis
  15. Depression, including a history of depression
  16. Generalized anxiety disorder, including a history
  17. Suicidal thoughts or ideas; a history of suicide attempts
  18. Epilepsy, seizures, including a history of seizures
  19. Diabetes mellitus at the stage of decompensation
  20. Established diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage 3A or higher, or (GFR) calculated by the formula = 59 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less
  21. Established diagnosis of hepatic failure of any severity, or elevated , AST or total , urea >3 times the values
  22. Conditions after major surgical interventions, if less than six months have elapsed since the intervention
  23. Chronic heart failure (NYHA) functional class III-IV
  24. Severe, decompensated, or unstable disease (any disease or condition that threatens the patient's life or worsens the patient's prognosis, or makes it impossible to perform a clinical trial in the patient)
  25. Pregnant women, women breastfeeding, or women planning to become pregnant during the study and 30 days after study participation ends
  26. Refusal by the patient to use approved or to completely abstain from sexual intercourse during the entire period of study participation, beginning at Visit 0, and for 30 days after completion of study participation
  27. Patient's current or planned participation in psychological or psychotherapeutic interventions designed to treat an anxiety disorder during the course of the clinical trial
  28. Participation in any other clinical trial within 90 days prior to the screening period
  29. Lack of willingness to cooperate on the part of the patient
  30. Other reasons that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent the patient from participating in the study or pose an unreasonable risk to the patient

Withdrawal Criteria:

  1. Patient's desire to stop participating in the study (withdrawal of ) Each patient has the right to stop participating in the study at any time without giving a reason. Withdrawal from the study will not affect the medical care provided to the patient in the future.
  2. A decision by the research physician that the patient should be excluded is in the patient's own best interest
  3. Patient refuses to cooperate with the investigator or is undisciplined
  4. Causes/occurrence of situations during the study that threaten patient safety (e.g., reactions, SAE, etc.)
  5. Inclusion of a patient in the study with inclusion/inclusion criteria not met (prior to randomization)
  6. Significant violation of the treatment regimen A significant violation is defined as a) skipping study drug/placebo for 2 consecutive full days or more, or b) taking, in total, \< 80% or >120% of the full course (full course = 168 pills)
  7. Positive pregnancy test
  8. Confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19
  9. Occurrence in the course of the study of other reasons that prevent the study according to the protocol
  10. Death of a patient
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ranquilon

    Study drug Ranquilon, tablets, 1 mg, 2 tablets 3 times a day (daily dose - 6 mg/day), daily, for 28 days

    Drug: Ranquilon

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo, tablets, 2 tablets 3 times a day, daily, for 28 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugRanquilon

    Two 1 mg tablets 3 times per day for 28 days

    Also known as: GB-115, 6-phenylhexanoyl)glycyl-L-tryptophan amide

  • DrugPlacebo

    Two tablets 3 times per day for 28 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in patient status on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS): Percentage of patients with a significant, i.e., 50% or greater reduction from baseline, in HARS anxiety levels on Day 29 ± 1

    HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale. Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations. The sum of the scores may range from 0 to 56, with scores 0 to 7 corresponding to the absence of anxiety, 8 to 17 to the presence of symptoms of anxiety disorder, 18 to 24 to moderate severity of anxiety disorder, and 25 to 56 to severe severity of anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Day 29 ± 1 of the study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with a significant, i.e., 50% or greater reduction in HARS anxiety level on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2)

    HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale. Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations. The sum of the scores may range from 0 to 56, with scores 0 to 7 corresponding to the absence of anxiety, 8 to 17 to the presence of symptoms of anxiety disorder, 18 to 24 to moderate severity of anxiety disorder, and 25 to 56 to severe severity of anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 of the study

  2. Change in HARS anxiety level on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baseline

    HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale. Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations. The sum of the scores may range from 0 to 56, with scores 0 to 7 corresponding to the absence of anxiety, 8 to 17 to the presence of symptoms of anxiety disorder, 18 to 24 to moderate severity of anxiety disorder, and 25 to 56 to severe severity of anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  3. Proportion of patients with HARS anxiety scores reduced to 17 or less on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)

    HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale. Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations. The sum of the scores may range from 0 to 56, with scores 0 to 7 corresponding to the absence of anxiety, 8 to 17 to the presence of symptoms of anxiety disorder, 18 to 24 to moderate severity of anxiety disorder, and 25 to 56 to severe severity of anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  4. Time to decrease the HARS anxiety level to a score of 17 or less

    HARS scale includes 14 items, each of which is rated on the Likken scale. Of these, 13 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety in daily life, 14 items relate to the manifestation of anxiety during examinations. The sum of the scores may range from 0 to 56, with scores 0 to 7 corresponding to the absence of anxiety, 8 to 17 to the presence of symptoms of anxiety disorder, 18 to 24 to moderate severity of anxiety disorder, and 25 to 56 to severe severity of anxiety disorder.

    Time frame: Screening, Day 15 ± 1, Day 29 ± 1 of the study, the end of the study (Day 44 ± 1) or an early termination visit, whichever came first

  5. Proportion of patients with significant and marked improvement as assessed by the physician (Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i) score 1 or 2) at Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  6. Proportion of patients with a CGI-s score of 1 or 2 as assessed by the physician (healthy or borderline disorder) on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  7. Time to significant or marked improvement - achieving a score of 1 or 2 on the CGI-i scale

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 15 ± 1, Day 29 ± 1 of the study, or an early termination visit, whichever came first

  8. Time to decrease in severity of condition to 2 points or to 1 point or CGI-s scale

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 15 ± 1, Day 29 ± 1 of the study, the end of the study (Day 44 ± 1) or an early termination visit, whichever came first

  9. Absolute value of the patient's CGI-i score by Days 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  10. Change in patient severity on the CGI-s scale by Days 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baseline

    The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) includes two subscales: one for severity of symptoms and one for progression of symptoms with treatment. The first subscale is called Clinical Global Impression - severity (CGI-s) and the second subscale is Clinical Global Impression - improvement (CGI-i). CGI-s includes scores from 0 (healthy) to 7 (very severe); CGI-i includes scores from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked deterioration)

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  11. Change in the Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) total score on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baseline

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1 of the study

  12. Time to decrease the MFI-20 cumulative score to 30 points or less

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Screening, Day 15 ± 1, Day 29 ± 1 of the study, or an early termination visit, whichever came first

  13. Time to decrease the MFI-20 cumulative score by 25% and 50% from baseline

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Screening, Day 15 ± 1, Day 29 ± 1 of the study, or an early termination visit, whichever came first

  14. Proportion of patients with a 25% reduction in MFI-20 total score on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) from baseline

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1

  15. Proportion of patients with a 50% reduction in MFI-20 total score on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) from baseline

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1

  16. Proportion of patients with a decrease in their MFI-20 cumulative score to 30 on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3)

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) provides a subjective quantitative assessment of the overall severity of asthenia and its various aspects. This scale consists of 20 items reflecting the main components of asthenic syndrome, such as: general asthenia, physical asthenia, mental asthenia, decreased activity and decreased motivation. The patient was given an opportunity to rate the mentioned items to his/her condition on a five-point scale. The score of the scale is the sum of the points of its individual constituent items and can vary in the range from 5 to 25 points. Normally, the total number of points should not exceed 30. If the total score on one of the subscales was higher than 12, this could be a preliminary ground for classifying the condition as an asthenic syndrome

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1

  17. Change in Spielberger personality anxiety level on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baseline

    The Spielberger Questionnaire includes a series of statements describing personal and situational anxiety, the answers to which are scored from 1 (least severe or prolonged) to 4 (most severe or prolonged). The patient reads the statements and independently chooses the most appropriate frequency for each statement. When analyzing the results of the self-assessment, you should keep in mind that the overall total for each of the subscales may range from 20 to 80 points. The higher the total score, the higher the level of anxiety (situational or personal).

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1

  18. Change in situational anxiety levels on the Spielberger questionnaire on Day 15 ± 1 (Visit 2) and Day 29 ± 1 (Visit 3) compared to baseline

    The Spielberger Questionnaire includes a series of statements describing personal and situational anxiety, the answers to which are scored from 1 (least severe or prolonged) to 4 (most severe or prolonged). The patient reads the statements and independently chooses the most appropriate frequency for each statement. When analyzing the results of the self-assessment, you should keep in mind that the overall total for each of the subscales may range from 20 to 80 points. The higher the total score, the higher the level of anxiety (situational or personal).

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 1 and Day 29 ± 1

  19. Safety and Tolerability: adverse event (AE) rate

    Number and frequency of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs)

    Time frame: From the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 44 ± 1 for each participant

  20. Safety and Tolerability: AEs associated with the study drug

    Number and frequency of AEs or SAEs associated with the study drug

    Time frame: From the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 44 ± 1 for each participant

  21. Safety and Tolerability: treatment discontinuation

    Percentage of patients who discontinued treatment due to the occurrence of AEs/SAEs

    Time frame: From the date of screening (and signing informed consent form) to the end of the study or to an early termination visit, whichever came first, assessed up to day 44 ± 1 for each participant

  22. Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - systolic blood pressure (SBP)

    SBP, mmHg

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  23. Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - diastolic blood pressure (DBP)

    DBP, mmHg

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  24. Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - respiratory rate (RR)

    RR, breaths per minute

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  25. Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - heart rate (HR)

    HR, beats per minute

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  26. Safety and Tolerability: vital signs - body temperature

    Body temperature, centigrade scale

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  27. Safety and Tolerability: physical examination results

    Physical examination will follow the general rules of internal medicine: general examination, examination of mucous membranes and skin, including palpation of lymph nodes, evaluation of the musculoskeletal system, palpation, percussion, and auscultation of the main organ systems (cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, and urinary systems) will be performed sequentially

    Time frame: Screening, day 1, day 15, day 29, and day 44 of the study or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  28. Safety and Tolerability: 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) - heart rate

    12-lead ECG (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1-V6) taken while lying down: heart rate (beats per minute)

    Time frame: Screening, day 29, or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  29. Safety and Tolerability: 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) - PQ interval

    12-lead ECG (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1-V6) taken while lying down: PQ interval (ms)

    Time frame: Screening, day 29, or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  30. Safety and Tolerability: 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) - QRS complex

    12-lead ECG (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1-V6) taken while lying down: QRS complex (ms)

    Time frame: Screening, day 29, or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  31. Safety and Tolerability: 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) - corrected QT interval (QTc)

    12-lead ECG (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1-V6) taken while lying down: QTc (ms)

    Time frame: Screening, day 29, or on the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  32. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - hemoglobin

    Hemoglobin, g/dL

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  33. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - hematocrit

    Hematocrit, %

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  34. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - red blood cells

    Red blood cells, 10\^6/uL

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  35. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - white blood cells

    White blood cells, 10\^3/uL

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  36. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - platelets

    Platelets, 10\^3/uL

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  37. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mm per hour

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  38. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - lymphocytes

    Lymphocytes, %

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  39. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - eosinophils

    Eosinophils, %

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  40. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - monocytes

    Monocytes, %

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  41. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - basophils

    Basophils, %

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  42. Safety and Tolerability: complete blood count - neutrophils

    Neutrophils, % (segmented and stab)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  43. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - total cholesterol

    Total cholesterol in blood serum, mmol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  44. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - total protein

    Total protein in blood serum, g/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  45. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - glucose

    Glucose in blood serum, mmol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  46. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - creatinine

    Creatinine in blood serum, umol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  47. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - alanine transaminase (ALT)

    ALT in blood serum, U/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  48. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - aspartate transaminase (AST)

    AST in blood serum, U/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  49. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - total bilirubin

    Total bilirubin in blood serum, umol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  50. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - direct bilirubin

    Direct bilirubin in blood serum, umol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  51. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - alkaline phosphatase (ALP)

    ALP in blood serum, U/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  52. Safety and Tolerability: blood test results - urea

    Urea in blood serum, mmol/L

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  53. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - color

    Color of the urine (yellow, brown, etc.)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  54. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - transparency

    Transparency of the urine (transparent/cloudy)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  55. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - specific gravity

    Specific gravity of the urine

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  56. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - pH

    pH of the urine

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  57. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - glucose

    Glucose in the urine (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  58. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - protein

    Protein in the urine (g/L)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  59. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - ketones

    Ketones in the urine (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

  60. Safety and Tolerability: urinalysis - urobilinogen

    Urobilinogen in the urine (umol/L)

    Time frame: Screening, Day 29 or the early termination visit, whichever came first, within 44 days of study participation

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Engels Psychiatric Hospital State Health Care Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Saratov Region
    Engels, 413090, Russian Federation
  • State Budgetary Health Institution of Nizhny Novgorod Oblast "Clinical Psychiatric Hospital No. 1 of Nizhny Novgorod. Nizhny Novgorod"
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603155, Russian Federation
  • Professors' Clinic LLC.
    Perm, 614070, Russian Federation
  • Limited Liability Company "Research Center Eco-Security"
    Saint Petersburg, 191119, Russian Federation
  • EosMED JSC
    Saint Petersburg, 194000, Russian Federation
  • Limited Liability Company "Energy of Health"
    Saint Petersburg, 194156, Russian Federation
  • LLC "Aurora MedFort"
    Saint Petersburg, 194156, Russian Federation
  • Limited Liability Company "Research Center Eco-Safety"
    Saint Petersburg, 196143, Russian Federation
  • Limited Liability Company "Meili"
    Saint Petersburg, 199406, Russian Federation
  • Saratov City Psychoneurological Dispensary
    Saratov, 410038, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in Nov 2022, 1 month.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 14, 2022
First posted
Oct 19, 2022
StartActual
Oct 12, 2022
Primary completionActual
Nov 22, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 3, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05586789
Lead sponsor
Valenta Pharm JSC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 19, 2022
Start date
Oct 12, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 22, 2022
Completion
Jan 3, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion