CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05582174Updated Mar 18, 2026

PPI Infusion Versus Oral Acid Pump Inhibitors for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

A Phase 4 interventional study of Vonoprazan and esomeprazole in Upper GI Bleeding and Proton Pump Inhibitors, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 8 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
594
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant.It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. While many studies compared Vonoprazan against PPI in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, and gastric ulcers; thus far, there is a paucity of data on use of Vonoprazan on bleeding peptic ulcers.

We perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of oral Vonoprazan against standard high dose PPI therapy in bleeding peptic ulcers that had received successful endoscopic haemostasis We hypothesize that in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, the use of acid pump inhibitors Vonoprazan would not be inferior to standard treatment of a bolus plus high dose PPI intravenous infusion at preventing recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis.

Read the detailed description

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains an important medical emergency. While the annual incidence having decreased from about 100/100,000 adults in 1990s to 61-78/100,000 persons in 2009-2012 , 30-day mortality remains up to 11% . Despite advancement in various endoscopic haemostatic technology, peri-endoscopic management remains paramount to satisfactory outcome in acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (NVGIB), especially for peptic ulcer bleeding. Indeed, recurrent bleeding leads to prolonged hospital stay and is an independent risk factor for mortality . Current international guidelines advocate the use of high dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI), as defined as ≥80mg daily for ≥3 days, to be given intermittently or continuously after successful endoscopic haemostatic therapy . It is hypothesized that the lowering of gastric acidity by PPI can facilitate formation and stability of clot, as pepsin-induced clot lysis is inhibited when pH is above 4-5 . Studies including RCTs have shown that PPI therapy markedly reduced further bleeding (RR = 0.43,0.33-0.56), mortality (RR = 0.41, 0.22-0.79) and surgery compared (RR = 0.42, 0.25-0.71) with placebo or no treatment . When compared to other acid suppressants such as H2-blocker (H2B), studies have demonstrated superiority of PPI therapy in reducing rebleeding, but not mortality or need for further intervention . Study has shown PPI infusion can achieve intragastric pH 6 holding time ratio (HTR) for 67.8% over first 24 hour and intragastric pH 4 HTR for 90.5% of the period , while the pH 6 HTR for bolus PPI every 12 hour has been shown to be 49.0% . Despite the apparent difference in effect on intragastric pH, the optimal dose of PPI therapy is still not well defined, with data showing comparable outcome between infusion and intermittent dosing.

In recent years, Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant. It was first launched in Japan in February 2015 and has shown satisfactory effect and safety profile in treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, NSAID-associated ulcer, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) induced gastric ulcers and peptic ulcer disease, etc . A RCT has demonstrated non-inferiority of Vonoprazan when compared with lansoprazole in peptic ulcer treatment, while other studies also showed non-inferiority of Vonoprazan to PPI treatment in high risk conditions such as patient on dual-antiplatelet therapy or prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection induced gastric ulcers . It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. Studies has demonstrated that Vonoprazan 20 mg once daily achieves 63% pH4 HTR after 24 hours; and the median pH4time (intragastric pH ≥ 4 over 24h after ≥ 5 days of therapy) for Vonoprazan after 7 days of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg once daily was 60.2%, 85.2%, 90.1%, and 93.2%. . Extrapolating those results to pH4time for PPIs suggests that 10 mg of Vonoprazan once daily is approximately equivalent to 60 mg of omeprazole equivalents (OE), or 40mg of esomeprazole; and 20 mg is equivalent to 60 mg OE bid, or esomeprazole 40 mg bid .

While many studies compared Vonoprazan against PPI in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, and gastric ulcers; thus far, there is a paucity of data on use of Vonoprazan on bleeding peptic ulcers. Here, we perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of oral Vonoprazan against standard high dose PPI therapy, in the form of high dose intravenous bolus injection (80mg) followed by continuous infusion for 72 hours (8mg/h), in bleeding peptic ulcers that had received successful endoscopic haemostasis. With the hypothesis that 10mg Vonoprazan is approximately equivalent to 40mg of esomeprazole, the total volume of bolus injection and 72 hours infusion of 656mg esomeprazole is approximately equivalent to 164mg Vonoprazan. Therefore, we propose a dose of 40mg every 12hours for 72hours for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. As part of the study, we also investigate the effect of Vonoprazan on intra-gastric pH in this clinical setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper GI Bleeding
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 594 is above the median of 87 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Browse Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 487 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • - Patients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for sign and symptoms of aneamia or upper GI bleeding including haematochezia, melaena or haematemesis, and found to a non-variceal upper GI cause of bleeding (peptic ulcers, dieulafoy's lesions, Mallory Weiss tear with active bleeding or major stigmata of haemorrhage
  • Major stigmata of recent haemorrhage includes peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) ,with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) or an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb). For peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb), the clot would be lifted (by irrigation using syringe boluses or water pump device, or manipulation with a snare or alligator etc.) and ulcer base examined to look for underlying vessels. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessel should receive endoscopic haemostasis
  • Patients who had undergone endoscopic hemostatic treatment (a combination of hemoclipping therapy or contact thermocoagulation using multipolar/bipolar electrocautery probes or haemostatic forceps, with or without preinjection of diluted epinephrine. Endoscopic haemostasis is defined as no evidence of bleeding after irrigation and 3 minutes of observation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No consent
  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Patients who were pregnant or in lactation
  • Hypersensitivity to PPI or Vonoprazan or any component of the formulation
  • Patients who were found to have tumour bleeding, oesophageal varices as the cause of the NVGIB
  • NVGIB due to post therapeutic endoscopic treatment such as gastric polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection etc.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
594 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PPI infusion

    esomeprazole 80mg iv bolus followed by 8mg per hour for 72 hours

    Drug: esomeprazole

  • Experimental
    Vonoprazan

    Vonoprazan 40 mg bid orally for 72 hours, and from day 4-30 VPZ 20 mg daily

    Drug: Vonoprazan

Interventions

  • DrugVonoprazan

    Vonoprazan 40 mg bid orally for 72 hours, and from day 4-30 VPZ 20 mg daily

    Also known as: Takecab

  • Drugesomeprazole

    A high dose PPI infusion (esomeprazole 80mg iv bolus followed by 8mg per hour for 72 hours), and frorm day 4-30 oral esomeprazole daily

    Also known as: nexium

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of recurrent bleeding

    The number of recurrent bleeding that occurred after 1st endoscopic hemostasis and confirmed by endoscopy

    Time frame: within 30 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. further treatment for hemostasis

    the rate of patients that required endoscopic treatment/surgery/embolization for hemostasis

    Time frame: within 30 days after randomization

  2. Total Days of hospital stay and intensive unit stay

    hospital stays and intensive unit stays

    Time frame: within 30 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 8 sites recruiting
  • Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
    • Side Liu, PhD · Contact · 86 13902212459
    • Xiaobei Luo, PhD · Contact · 86 17688881428
    Recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
    • Hui Yang, PhD · Contact · 86 15915822551
    • Yangzhi Xu, PhD · Contact · 86 13632392962
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
    • Beiping Zhang, PhD · Contact · 86 13602762766
    • Sufen Wei, PhD · Contact · 86 13825081143
    Not yet recruiting
  • Shenzhen Pingshan District People's Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
    • Xiaofeng Wang, MD · Contact · 86 13724310636
    • Zhiwei Yao · Contact · 86 18118747115
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
    • Li Xiang, PhD · Contact · 86 18025482496
    • Chunlin Chen, MD · Contact · 86 13688849579
    Not yet recruiting
  • Yangjiang People's Hospital of Guangdong Medical University
    Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
    • Rongguo Du, MD · Contact · 86 13432558666
    • Dongyun Chen, MD · Contact · 86 13680625011
    Not yet recruiting
  • Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University)
    Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
    • Xiaohong Xu, PhD · Contact · 86 13798199161
    • Zhenjiang Wang, MD · Contact · 86 15363971671
    Not yet recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05582174
Lead sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Responsible party
James Yun-wong Lau, MD (professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 17, 2022
Start date
May 18, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 2, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 3, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

xiaobei luo, PhD
Contact
luoxiaobei63@126.com
86 17688881428
bingyee suen, Bachelor
Contact
bingyeesuen@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
35052640
Side Liu, PhD
study director · Southern Medical University, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion