CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05576662STOP-PASCUpdated Sep 4, 2025Results posted

Paxlovid for Treatment of Long Covid

A Phase 2 interventional study of Nirmatrelvir and Placebo in Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Long COVID, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare whether being treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir for 15 days works better than being treated with placebo plus ritonavir to reduce severe symptoms of Long Covid.

Participants will have 5 planned visits to the study clinic over 15 weeks and will take the drug (or placebo) for the first 15 days.

This study uses the term post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), which is another name for "Long Covid."

Read the detailed description

An exploratory sub-study will investigate the correlation of physical activity and biometric parameters from digital wearable devices with the subjective symptom severity and other patient-reported outcomes in the main study. All participants with iPhone 6S Plus or newer will be offered an opportunity to opt-in to this sub-study. An Apple Watch and Bluetooth-enabled blood pressure monitor will be provided to participants and data will be collected for the duration of the main study to track participants' physiological and behavioral trends in the Paxlovid versus placebo groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
  • Long COVID
03

In context

Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome

520 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; 186 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 168 is above the median of 60 across 361 interventional studies indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome.

Browse Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Normal or near-normal kidney function
  • History of confirmed COVID-19 infection that preceded the post-COVID symptoms
  • Post-COVID-19 symptoms persisting greater than three months
  • At least 2 post-COVID symptoms of moderate or severe intensity (fatigue, brain fog, shortness of breath, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, or cardiovascular symptoms)
  • Willing to report all vaccinations
  • Women of childbearing potential or men whose partners may become pregnant must use acceptable method of contraception during the treatment period and for 28 days after the last dose of the study drug
  • Willing and able to adhere to study procedures and available for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or confirmed pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe liver disease
  • Prior use of study drug or other COVID treatment within 30 days
  • Hypersensitivity or other contraindication to any components of the study drug
  • Current or expected use of any medication dependent on or inducer of CYP3A4
  • Current or expected use of supplements or herbs (unless medically necessary) that cannot be temporarily held (period as determined necessary by investigators)
  • HIV infection with viral load >50 copies/ml
  • Suspected or confirmed active COVID infection within 30 days
  • History of COVID vaccine within 28 days prior to enrollment, or other vaccine (influenza, shingles, etc.) within 14 days of enrollment, or planned use of any vaccine until the primary endpoint has been met (10 weeks)
  • Other medical condition(s) or concomitant therapy that would compromise participant's safety or compliance with the study protocol or significantly confound interpretation of study results, as determined by study investigators
  • Current enrollment in, or discontinuation within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving any investigational drug or device
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Currently hospitalized
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
168 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir

    Participants receive nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (Paxlovid) for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15.

    Drug: Nirmatrelvir · Drug: Ritonavir

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo plus ritonavir

    Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Ritonavir

Interventions

  • DrugNirmatrelvir

    Two 150 mg tablets taken by mouth every 12 hours

  • DrugPlacebo

    Two tablets containing placebo matching nirmatrelvir taken by mouth every 12 hours

  • DrugRitonavir

    One 100 mg capsule taken by mouth every 12 hours

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Week 10 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score

    This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Week 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Day 15 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score

    This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

    Time frame: Day 15

  2. Number of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks

    Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10

  3. Number of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks

    Overall alleviation defined as both: 1. Any core symptom(s) that are none/mild (Likert 0 or 1) at baseline are none at 10 weeks, and 2. Any core symptom(s) that are moderate/severe (Likert 2 or 3) at baseline are none/mild at 10 weeks. Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10

  4. Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms of Their Most Bothersome Symptom

    This outcome was to assess the severity of the most bothersome symptom experienced by participants. Each symptom was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms) using the Core Symptoms Severity Scale.

    Time frame: Assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 15

  5. Time to Relief of the 6 Core Symptoms

    Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Up to 15 weeks

  6. Time to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom

    Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Up to 15 weeks

  7. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function T-Score

    The PROMIS-Physical Function Short Form (SF) assesses difficulty level performing activities of daily living such as doing chores, climbing stairs, walking, and running errands. The assessment consists of 4 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to better physical function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher physical function T-score indicates better physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  8. Change in PROMIS Fatigue T-Score

    The PROMIS Fatigue Score assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 7 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to more fatigue). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher fatigue T-score indicates greater fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  9. Change in PROMIS Dyspnea-Severity T-Score

    The PROMIS-Fatigue Dyspnea-Severity Short Form assesses shortness of breath and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 5 items (questions) scored on 4-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores correspond to worse symptoms). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Dyspnea-Severity T-score indicates worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  10. Change in PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities T-Score

    The PROMIS-Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form assesses brain fog and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 4 items scored on 5-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores indicate better cognitive function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Cognitive Function T-score indicates better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  11. Change in Orthostatic Vitals Test

    This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  12. Change in Heart Rate

    This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing heart rate.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  13. Change in 1-minute Sit-to-stand Test

    Number of times participant is able to go from sitting (in an armless chair) to standing in 1 minute (sit to stand cycles).

    Time frame: Baseline and week 10

  14. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score

    The PGIS reflects a participant's perception about the overall severity of their disease symptoms, rated from 1 to 6 (1 = not present; 2 = very mild; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = severe; 6 = extremely severe).

    Time frame: Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15

  15. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score

    The PGIC reflects a participant's perception about the overall efficacy of treatment and their overall status since the start of the treatment, rated from 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse).

    Time frame: Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15

  16. Summative Severity Score for All Core Symptoms

    Core Symptoms Severity Scale Scores for each of the 6 core symptoms were summed to create a summative score. Each core symptom is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). Summative score range: 0 to 18 (high scores correspond to greater severity).

    Time frame: Weeks 5, 10, and 15

  17. Percentage of Weeks 1-15 With Mild or no Symptoms

    Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

    Time frame: 15 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Started10253
Completed9849
Not completed44
Withdrew: Withdrawn by site within 15-day treatment period01
Withdrew: Requested to withdraw within 15-day treatment period01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up within 15-day treatment period20
Withdrew: Requested to withdraw after 15-day treatment period22

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Week 10 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score

This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

Time frame:
Week 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Week 10 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Fatigue - no symptoms34
Fatigue - mild symptoms2217
Fatigue - moderate symptoms4317
Fatigue - severe symptoms3111
Brain fog - no symptoms118
Brain fog - mild symptoms3424
Brain fog - moderate symptoms3512
Brain fog - severe symptoms195
Dyspnea - no symptoms4213
Dyspnea - mild symptoms3121
Dyspnea - moderate symptoms2213
Dyspnea - severe symptoms42
Body aches - no symptoms3115
Body aches - mild symptoms3217
Body aches - moderate symptoms2114
Body aches - severe symptoms153
Gastrointestinal symptoms - no symptoms3813
Gastrointestinal symptoms - mild symptoms3917
Gastrointestinal symptoms - moderate symptoms1716
Gastrointestinal symptoms - severe symptoms53
Cardiovascular symptoms - no symptoms3717
Cardiovascular symptoms - mild symptoms3511
Cardiovascular symptoms - moderate symptoms2013
Cardiovascular symptoms - severe symptoms78
Missing Core Symptoms Severity data at week 1034
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Nonparametric permutation test · p = 0.903 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Pooled treatment coefficient: 0.026Weighted average of treatment coefficients. A pooled treatment coefficient \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a pooled treatment coefficient \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Day 15 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score

This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Day 15 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Fatigue - no symptoms33
Fatigue - mild symptoms1713
Fatigue - moderate symptoms4316
Fatigue - severe symptoms3616
Brain fog - no symptoms72
Brain fog - mild symptoms3619
Brain fog - moderate symptoms3418
Brain fog - severe symptoms229
Dyspnea - no symptoms3112
Dyspnea - mild symptoms4020
Dyspnea - moderate symptoms2212
Dyspnea - severe symptoms64
Body aches - no symptoms2116
Body aches - mild symptoms3515
Body aches - moderate symptoms3113
Body aches - severe symptoms124
Gastrointestinal symptoms - no symptoms2412
Gastrointestinal symptoms - mild symptoms2714
Gastrointestinal symptoms - moderate symptoms3518
Gastrointestinal symptoms - severe symptoms134
Cardiovascular symptoms - no symptoms2913
Cardiovascular symptoms - mild symptoms3412
Cardiovascular symptoms - moderate symptoms2813
Cardiovascular symptoms - severe symptoms810
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.174 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.55 · 95% CI 0.82 to 2.94An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.548 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.21 · 95% CI 0.65 to 2.25An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.134 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.33 to 1.16An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.241 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 0.78 to 2.69An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.922 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.92An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.032 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.5 · 95% CI 0.26 to 0.94An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks

Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Number of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks3322
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.09 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.55 · 95% CI 0.27 to 1.09An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks

Overall alleviation defined as both: 1. Any core symptom(s) that are none/mild (Likert 0 or 1) at baseline are none at 10 weeks, and 2. Any core symptom(s) that are moderate/severe (Likert 2 or 3) at baseline are none/mild at 10 weeks. Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Number of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks75
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = .60 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.72 · 95% CI 0.21 to 2.44An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms of Their Most Bothersome Symptom

This outcome was to assess the severity of the most bothersome symptom experienced by participants. Each symptom was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms) using the Core Symptoms Severity Scale.

Time frame:
Assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 15
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms of Their Most Bothersome Symptom
ParticipantsNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Week 5 - no symptoms01
Week 5 - mild symptoms1712
Week 5 - moderate symptoms4118
Week 5 - severe symptoms3413
Missing symptoms data at week 5109
Week 10 - no symptoms32
Week 10 - mild symptoms2217
Week 10 - moderate symptoms3418
Week 10 - severe symptoms3911
Missing symptoms data at week 1045
Week 15 - no symptoms23
Week 15 - mild symptoms2720
Week 15 - moderate symptoms3217
Week 15 - severe symptoms377
Missing symptoms data at week 1546
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.156 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.62 · 95% CI 0.83 to 3.15An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.03 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.99 · 95% CI 1.06 to 3.72An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, odds · p = 0.01 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 2.42 · 95% CI 1.27 to 4.60An odds ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryTime to Relief of the 6 Core Symptoms

Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Up to 15 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Relief of the 6 Core Symptoms
weeksNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Fatigue15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Brain fog15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Body aches15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Cardiovascular symptoms15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Shortness of breath15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Gastrointestinal symptoms15 (15 to 15)15 (15 to 15)
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.744 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.45 to 1.77A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.259 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.67 · 95% CI 0.32 to 1.37A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.286 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.61 · 95% CI 0.65 to 3.99A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.846 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.38 to 2.24A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.410 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.56 · 95% CI 0.51 to 4.73A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.880 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.42 to 2.11A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryTime to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom

Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Up to 15 weeks
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom
weeksNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Time to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom15 (15 to 15)15 (5 to 15)
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Cox PH coefficient Wald test · p = 0.33 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.40 to 1.38A hazard ratio \< 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio \> 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function T-Score

The PROMIS-Physical Function Short Form (SF) assesses difficulty level performing activities of daily living such as doing chores, climbing stairs, walking, and running errands. The assessment consists of 4 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to better physical function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher physical function T-score indicates better physical function.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function T-Score
T-scoreNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline37.97 ± 6.2638.98 ± 8.71
Change at week 102.73 ± 6.621.32 ± 5.75
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = .66 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): 0.57 · 95% CI -1.96 to 3.10A mean difference \< 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS Fatigue T-Score

The PROMIS Fatigue Score assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 7 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to more fatigue). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher fatigue T-score indicates greater fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in PROMIS Fatigue T-Score
T-scoreNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline66.00 ± 6.4264.00 ± 6.45
Change at week 10-3.92 ± 7.88-4.05 ± 5.90
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.79 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): 0.38 · 95% CI -2.40 to 3.15A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS Dyspnea-Severity T-Score

The PROMIS-Fatigue Dyspnea-Severity Short Form assesses shortness of breath and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 5 items (questions) scored on 4-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores correspond to worse symptoms). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Dyspnea-Severity T-score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in PROMIS Dyspnea-Severity T-Score
T-scoreNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline52.18 ± 7.4952.59 ± 8.67
Change at week 10-1.96 ± 7.90-2.38 ± 6.13
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = .70 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): 0.60 · 95% CI -2.55 to 3.75A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities T-Score

The PROMIS-Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form assesses brain fog and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 4 items scored on 5-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores indicate better cognitive function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Cognitive Function T-score indicates better cognitive function.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities T-Score
T-scoreNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline35.78 ± 7.9039.09 ± 6.84
Change at week 104.84 ± 8.185.05 ± 7.56
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = .98 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): 0.03 · 95% CI -3.21 to 3.28A mean difference \< 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in Orthostatic Vitals Test

This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Orthostatic Vitals Test
mmHgNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
SBP - baseline1.79 ± 12.523.77 ± 12.15
SBP - change at week 10-2.86 ± 15.9-4.47 ± 14.1
DBP - baseline6.26 ± 8.366.43 ± 10.90
DBP - change at week 10-1.86 ± 1.9-1.51 ± 13.7
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.555 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): 1.73 · 95% CI -4.06 to 7.53A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.764 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): -0.68 · 95% CI -5.15 to 3.79A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in Heart Rate

This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing heart rate.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · bpm
Change in Heart Rate
bpmNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline6.22 ± 11.927.70 ± 8.39
Change at week 100.878 ± 14.21.4 ± 11.5
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.856 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): -0.51 · 95% CI -6.15 to 5.12A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryChange in 1-minute Sit-to-stand Test

Number of times participant is able to go from sitting (in an armless chair) to standing in 1 minute (sit to stand cycles).

Time frame:
Baseline and week 10
Reported as:
Mean · cycles
Change in 1-minute Sit-to-stand Test
cyclesNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Baseline20.48 ± 10.6920.51 ± 9.80
Change at week 102.67 ± 10.83.27 ± 7.25
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.833 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (net): -0.41 · 95% CI -4.24 to 3.42A mean difference \< 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score

The PGIS reflects a participant's perception about the overall severity of their disease symptoms, rated from 1 to 6 (1 = not present; 2 = very mild; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = severe; 6 = extremely severe).

Time frame:
Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score
score on a scaleNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Day 154.04 ± 0.983.72 ± 1.02
Week 54.01 ± 0.993.73 ± 1.02
Week 104.00 ± 1.033.79 ± 1.06
Week 153.94 ± 1.033.62 ± 1.07
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.096 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.32 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.70A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.293 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.22 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.64A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.396 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.19 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.62A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.064 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.37 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.77A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score

The PGIC reflects a participant's perception about the overall efficacy of treatment and their overall status since the start of the treatment, rated from 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse).

Time frame:
Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score
score on a scaleNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Day 153.74 ± 1.223.51 ± 1.08
Week 53.52 ± 1.293.59 ± 1.13
Week 103.38 ± 1.313.13 ± 1.03
Week 153.38 ± 1.423.09 ± 1.10
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.444 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.19 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.67A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.346 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.25 · 95% CI -0.78 to 0.28A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.738 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.10 · 95% CI -0.48 to 0.67A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.578 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.17 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.76A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondarySummative Severity Score for All Core Symptoms

Core Symptoms Severity Scale Scores for each of the 6 core symptoms were summed to create a summative score. Each core symptom is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). Summative score range: 0 to 18 (high scores correspond to greater severity).

Time frame:
Weeks 5, 10, and 15
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Summative Severity Score for All Core Symptoms
score on a scaleNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Week 58.40 ± 3.568.20 ± 3.88
Week 107.62 ± 3.757.69 ± 4.09
Week 157.90 ± 3.807.09 ± 4.15
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.758 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.19 · 95% CI -1.41 to 1.03A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.693 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.24 · 95% CI -1.46 to 0.97A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Linear · p = 0.558 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.37 · 95% CI -0.87 to 1.61A mean difference \< 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference \> 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir.
SecondaryPercentage of Weeks 1-15 With Mild or no Symptoms

Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms).

Time frame:
15 weeks
Reported as:
Median · percentage of weeks
Percentage of Weeks 1-15 With Mild or no Symptoms
percentage of weeksNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
Fatigue0.15 (0 to 0.39)0.15 (0 to 0.77)
Brain fog0.31 (0 to 0.75)0.56 (0.15 to 0.85)
Body Aches0.54 (0.10 to 0.92)0.64 (0.29 to 0.83)
Cardiovascular symptoms0.67 (0.19 to 0.92)0.46 (0 to 0.92)
Shortness of breath0.769 (0.25 to 1)0.62 (0.09 to 0.89)
Gastrointestinal symptoms0.63 (0.31 to 0.92)0.52 (0.28 to 0.90)
Statistical analysis
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.02 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.55 · 95% CI 0.33 to 0.92An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.01 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.50 · 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.34 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.74 to 2.33An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.29 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.37 · 95% CI 0.76 to 2.48An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.35 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.73 to 2.38An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.
  • Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir vs Placebo Plus Ritonavir · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.25 (Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.40 · 95% CI 0.79 to 2.47An odds ratio \< 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio \> 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir.

Adverse events

Collected over 15 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir0/102 (0%)3/102 (2.9%)100/102 (98%)
Placebo Plus Ritonavir0/53 (0%)1/53 (1.9%)48/53 (90.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders0/1021/53
Blood-loss anemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1020/53
Forearm fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1020/53
MelanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1020/53
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 34
Most frequent other events
EventNirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus Ritonavir
dysgeusiaNervous system disorders63/1024/53
diarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders51/10221/53
headacheNervous system disorders45/10213/53
fatigueGeneral disorders36/10215/53
myalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders29/10213/53
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders26/10214/53
oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders16/10213/53
dyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders25/1028/53
abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders21/10212/53
pyrexiaGeneral disorders9/10212/53

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Median44.5 (35.25 to 56)41 (31 to 45)43 (34 to 54)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Female613192
Male412263
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Hispanic or Latino12719
Not Hispanic or Latino9046136
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian11920
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American123
White7639115
More than one race516
Unknown or Not Reported8210
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
United States10253155
Index COVID-19 infection date
Index COVID-19 infection date(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Before May 2021392261
May to December 202120727
After December 2021432467
Hospitalized for index COVID-19 infection
Hospitalized for index COVID-19 infection(Participants)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Count of participants639
Time from index infection to randomization
Time from index infection to randomization(months)Nirmatrelvir Plus RitonavirPlacebo Plus RitonavirTotal
Mean17.6 ± 9.117.3 ± 9.117.5 ± 9.1

8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Geng LN, Bonilla H, Hedlin H, Jacobson KB, Tian L, Jagannathan P, Yang PC, Subramanian AK, Liang JW, Shen S, Deng Y, Shaw BJ, Botzheim B, Desai M, Pathak D, Jazayeri Y, Thai D, O'Donnell A, Mohaptra S, Leang Z, Reynolds GZM, Brooks EF, Bhatt AS, Shafer RW, Miglis MG, Quach T, Tiwari A, Banerjee A, Lopez RN, De Jesus M, Charnas LR, Utz PJ, Singh U. Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Symptoms in Adults With Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The STOP-PASC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Sep 1;184(9):1024-1034. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.2007. PubMed 38848477 ↗
  • Gunturkun F, Hedlin H, Botzheim B, Deng Y, Bonilla H, Jagannathan P, Quach TC, Kim S, Lin M, O'Riordan G, Tzeng H, Adamowicz L, Demanuele C, Cai X, Yang PC, Singh U, Geng LN. Digital Biometric Measures in Long COVID: A Secondary Analysis of the STOP-PASC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526901. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26901. PubMed 40810942 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · May 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Currently, there is no plan for data sharing.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05576662
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2022
Start date
Nov 8, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 14, 2023
Completion
Sep 12, 2023
Results posted
Sep 25, 2024
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Study contacts

Upinder Singh, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Linda Geng, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion