ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05574647IP7-PACIFICUpdated Jul 24, 2025

Imperial Prostate 7 - Prostate Assessment Using Comparative Interventions - Fast Mri and Image-fusion for Cancer

An interventional study of bpMRI and Image-Fusion targeted and systematic Biopsy in Prostate Cancer, Adenocarcinoma and Prostatic Neoplasms, sponsored by Imperial College London. Recruiting at 15 sites in United Kingdom. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

To evaluate the role of biparametric MRI and image-fusion targeted biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer.

To determine whether biparametric MRI (bpMRI) could be recommended as an alternative to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancers in patients at risk.

To determine whether image-fusion targeted biopsy is better than visual-registration (cognitive) targeted biopsy at detecting clinically significant prostate cancers in patients requiring prostate biopsy due to a suspicious MRI.

Read the detailed description

Background and study aims:

The aim of this study is to improve the way prostate cancer is diagnosed by looking at two different types of MRI scans and two different types of prostate biopsy (tissue samples). A large study such as this is required to help the NHS decide how to diagnose prostate cancer in the future. If a person is suspected of having prostate cancer, then they are referred by their GP. At the hospital clinic, the participant will then have an MRI scan. If this scan shows that cancer might be present, then the doctor will usually suggest that the patient has a biopsy. There are two ways of doing a prostate MRI. One takes 30-40 minutes and requires a contrast injection called gadolinium (like a dye). This is called long MRI and is most commonly used in the NHS. Gadolinium is safe as it rarely causes any bad reaction but using it means that the scan takes more time. Another type of MRI takes 15-20 minutes and does not use gadolinium contrast. This is called a short MRI. Many studies over the last 5 years have shown that the long and short MRIs are similar in their accuracy in diagnosing important prostate cancer. These studies have not been of high quality or large enough to change NHS practice. Patients with suspicious areas on the MRI are usually advised to have a prostate biopsy. This involves taking tissue samples using a needle. The samples are then looked at under the microscope by a pathologist to see if cancer cells are present. There are two ways of doing a prostate biopsy. One is where the person doing the biopsy decides where to put the biopsy needle by looking at the MRI scans that have been already taken on a computer screen. The needle is guided to the prostate using live ultrasound scans that are shown on a different screen near the patient. The biopsy operator makes a judgement about where to place the biopsy needles. This is called visual registration. Tissue samples from other areas of the prostate that look normal on the MRI scans are also taken to ensure cancer is not missed. The other type of biopsy is called image fusion. During image fusion biopsy, the biopsy operator uses the MRI scans that have been taken beforehand but laid on top of the live ultrasound images during the biopsy. This uses software and takes a few minutes longer to perform. Once the MRI images and ultrasound images are 'fused', the actual biopsies are taken as normal. Studies over the last 5 years have shown mixed results. Some have shown that image fusion biopsy is no better than visual registration biopsy, whilst a few have shown it might make a difference in improving cancer detection. As a result, it is not known for certain which way is better. A large study is needed to show whether the investigators need to do image fusion or not, in order for the NHS to decide whether or not to use it in all hospitals doing prostate biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatic Diseases
  • Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • bpMRI
  • mpMRI
  • Prostate biopsy
  • Multi-parametric MRI
  • Biparametric MRI
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,600 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 843 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Randomisation 1

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or above (no upper limit)
  • Patients with a prostate (either cis-male gender or trans-female gender with no prior androgen deprivation hormone use at all).
  • Referred to hospital and advised to undergo a prostate MRI because of an abnormal digital rectal examination (regardless of PSA level) and/or an elevated PSA (within 6 months of screening visit) PSA >/=3.0ng/ml for age 50-69 years PSA >/=5.0ng/ml for age >/=70 years If family or ethnic risk for prostate cancer, PSA >/=2.5ng/ml for age 45-49 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PSA >50ng/ml
  • Prior prostate MRI or prostate in the two years prior to screening visit
  • Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • to MRI or gadolinium contrast
  • Previous hip replacement to both hips
  • Contraindication to performing a biopsy guided by a transrectal ultrasound probe

Randomisation 2

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Visible suspicious finding on mpMRI or bpMRI from randomisation 1 requiring a targeted biopsy (MRI score 3, 4, 5 on either Likert or PIRADS schema)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • As above for randomisation 1
  • Patient refusal for biopsy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard: mpMRI

    Participants will undergo mpMRI. Blinding will not be possible. Once the MRI report is issued, the local clinical team will make a decision about advising whether a biopsy is necessary or not.

  • Active comparator
    Intervention 1: bpMRI

    Participants will undergo bpMRI. Blinding will not be possible. Once the MRI report is issued, the local clinical team will make a decision about advising whether a biopsy is necessary or not.

    Diagnostic Test: bpMRI

  • No intervention
    Standard: Visual estimation targeted and systematic biopsy

    Randomisation 2 will only be relevant if participants are advised by their clinical team to have a biopsy based on their MRI and other clinical factors. Participants advised to have a biopsy will undergo a visual estimation targeted biopsy

  • Active comparator
    Intervention 2: Image-fusion targeted and systematic biopsy

    Randomisation 2 will only be relevant if participants are advised by their clinical team to have a biopsy based on their MRI and other clinical factors. Participants advised to have a biopsy will undergo an image fusion targeted biopsy.

    Diagnostic Test: Image-Fusion targeted and systematic Biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testbpMRI

    biparametric MRI takes 30-40 minutes and requires a contrast injection called gadolinium (like a dye). This is also called long MRI and is most commonly used in the NHS.

    Also known as: biparametric MRI

  • Diagnostic testImage-Fusion targeted and systematic Biopsy

    During image fusion targeted biopsy, the biopsy operator uses the MRI scans that were taken beforehand but laid on top of the live ultrasound images during the biopsy. This uses software and takes a few minutes longer to perform. Once the MRI images and ultrasound images are 'fused', the actual biopsies are taken as normal.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Randomisation 1: Proportion of clinically significant cancers detected in the randomised population of patients at risk.

    Proportion of clinically significant cancers, defined as any amount of Gleason ≥3+4 (ISUP Grade Group ≥2) on biopsy, detected in the randomised population of patients at risk.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  2. Randomisation 2: Proportion of clinically significant cancers detected in the randomised population of patients biopsied for a suspicious MRI.

    Proportion of clinically significant cancers, defined as any amount of Gleason ≥3+4 (ISUP Grade Group ≥2) on biopsy, detected in the randomised population of patients biopsied for a suspicious MRI.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. MRI related adverse events

    MRI related adverse events measured using documentation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  2. MRI related serious adverse events

    MRI related serious adverse events measured using documentation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  3. Biopsy related adverse events

    biopsy-related adverse events measured using documentation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  4. Biopsy related serious adverse events

    biopsy-related serious adverse events measured using documentation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  5. The proportion of patients advised to undergo a needle biopsy after MRI

    The proportion of patients advised to undergo a needle biopsy. The researchers will document common reasons for patients who are advised to undergo a biopsy or advised against a needle biopsy and still choose to have a biopsy.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  6. The proportion of patients advised to undergo a prostrate biopsy after MRI

    The proportion of patients undergoing a prostate biopsy after MRI. The researchers will document common reasons for patients who are advised to undergo prostrate biopsy after MRI.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  7. The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostates cancers on needle biopsy

    The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostates cancers defined as any Gleason 3+3=6 on needle biopsy carried out after MRI.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  8. The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers on prostate biopsy carried out after MRI

    The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers using other histological thresholds on prostate biopsy carried out after MRI. The researchers will evaluate these proportions by MRI score at patient and lesion level (on a scale of 1 to 5) and by the presence or absence of clinical risk parameters.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  9. The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers with targeted biopsy using four targeted cores

    The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers using all histological thresholds on targeted biopsy using four targeted cores

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  10. The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers with targeted biopsy using six targeted cores

    The proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancers using all histological thresholds on targeted biopsy using six targeted cores

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  11. Detection rates for each randomised group of known prognostic risk categories

    Detection rates for each randomised group of known prognostic risk categories. These are D' Amico, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG).

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  12. Use Likert MRI scoring system to analyse the proportion of patients biopsied

    A comparison of the two MRI scoring systems, Likert and PIRADS (the latest version as defined in MRI Reporting SOP), in terms of the proportion of patients biopsied and subsequently diagnosed with clinically significant and clinically insignificant prostate cancer, using each of the histological thresholds, on a prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  13. Use Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) MRI scoring system to analyse the proportion of patients biopsied

    A comparison of the two MRI scoring systems, Likert and PIRADS (the latest version as defined in MRI Reporting SOP), in terms of the proportion of patients biopsied and subsequently diagnosed with clinically significant and clinically insignificant prostate cancer, using each of the histological thresholds, on a prostate biopsy.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  14. Characteristics of cancer in targeted systematic biopsies

    Characteristics of cancer in targeted versus systematic biopsies by MRI score, PSA, PSA density, age, ethnicity, family history and history of prior prostate biopsy with a multivariable evaluation to determine whether patients might avoid systematic sampling in the future.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  15. Characteristics of cancer in targeted biopsies

    Characteristics of cancer in targeted versus systematic biopsies by MRI score, PSA, PSA density, age, ethnicity, family history and history of prior prostate biopsy with a multivariable evaluation to determine whether patients might avoid systematic sampling in the future.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  16. External validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis (RAPID) Risk Score (MRI+)

    External validation of the Imperial RAPID Risk Score (MRI+) within each randomised group of the IP7-PACIFIC study, external validation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  17. External validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis (RAPID) Risk Score in (Systematic+)

    External validation of Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis(RAPID) Risk Score (Systematic+) within each randomised group of the IP7-PACIFIC study, external validation

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  18. Impact of prostate biopsy in first randomised group (bpMRI) on patient-reported outcomes

    Impact of prostate biopsy in each randomised group on patient-reported outcomes using a survey that includes EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  19. Impact of prostate biopsy in second randomised group (mpMRI)on patient-reported outcomes

    Impact of prostate biopsy in each randomised group on patient-reported outcomes using a survey that includes EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  20. Impact of prostate biopsy in first randomised group (bpMRI) on patient-reported experience measures

    Impact of prostate biopsy in each randomised group on patient-reported experience measures using version of the Prospective cohort study (Prostate Biopsy Effects: ProBE) questionnaire.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  21. Impact of prostate biopsy in second randomised group (mpMRI) on patient-reported experience measures

    Impact of prostate biopsy in each randomised group on patient-reported experience measures using version of the Prospective cohort study (Prostate Biopsy Effects: ProBE) questionnaire.

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

  22. Analysis of biopsy rate in cancer detection (by all histological thresholds) during the time of study

    Analysis of biopsy rates in cancer detection (by all histological thresholds) in the randomised group will be conducted by centre using centre size. MRI scanner type (1.5 Tesla vs. 3.0 Tesla), type of biopsy route used (transrectal vs trans perineal), number of systematic biopsies taken (limited systematic vs extended systematic biopsy), type of analgesia/anaesthetic (local anaesthetic, sedation or general anaesthetic) as additional stratification factors

    Time frame: maximum 12 weeks following enrolment

07

Study locations

14 of 15 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mayor N, Light A, Rawlins F, Cullen E, Klimowska-Nassar N, Sasikaran T, Jadav P, Sokhi H, Smith A, Walls D, Oldroyd R, Price D, Robinson C, Lane E, Rockall A, Heer R, Vale L, Padhani AR, Winkler M, Shah TT, Gabe R, Ahmed HU. Prostate Assessment using Comparative Interventions - Fast MRI and Image-fusion for Cancer (IP7-PACIFIC): A prospective, multi-centre, dual sequential randomised controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Aug;155:107983. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107983. Epub 2025 Jun 6. PubMed 40484273 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2025, 35 months after the start.

Of 1,098 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 86. This study's planned 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,155 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 84.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 3, 2022
First posted
Oct 10, 2022
StartActual
Nov 2, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05574647
Collaborators
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2022
Start date
Nov 2, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Study contacts

Hashim Ahmed
Contact
hashim.ahmed@imperial.ac.uk
0203 311 1673
Thiagarajah Sasikaran
Contact
t.sasikaran@imperial.ac.uk
0207 594 6017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion