ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05569772SERENAUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Semaglutide for the Treatment of Glucose Intolerance in Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes

A Phase 3 interventional study of Semaglutide Pen Injector and Semaglutide placebo in Glucose Intolerance After a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Recruiting at 13 sites in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
252
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is an important contributor to the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Women with glucose intolerance in early postpartum are a particularly high-risk group with about 50% who will develop T2DM within 5 years after the delivery. Moreover, women with a history of GDM progress more rapidly to T2DM compared to women with similarly elevated glucose levels. Early intervention after the index pregnancy is therefore crucial to prevent T2DM. With the SERENA project, the investigators aim to reduce the risk to develop T2DM with the long-acting GLP-1 agonist semaglutide in women with a recent history of GDM and glucose intolerance in early postpartum.

Read the detailed description

Patient population: Women with a recent history of gestational diabetes (GDM) and persistent glucose intolerance in early postpartum are a particularly high risk group, with about 50% developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) within 5 years after the delivery. Semaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist with multiple beneficial metabolic effects, including glucose lowering effect, weight loss and cardiovascular protective effects. The investigators hypothesize that in women with prior GDM and glucose intolerance in early postpartum, treatment with semaglutide will reduce the risk to develop T2DM on the long-term compared to placebo.

Intervention and comparison: Belgian multi-centric double blind RCT with 13 centers to compare semaglutide (once weekly) with placebo in women with a recent history of GDM and glucose intolerance [impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)] 6weeks - 12 months postpartum. Participants will be 1/1 randomized to semaglutide or placebo on a background of lifestyle measures. Semaglutide will be uptitrated to 1mg/week over a 8-week period. Participants will be followed-up for 3 years. Participants will receive a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 3-6 months after the stop of the intervention. Randomization will be stratified according to BMI at the early postpartum visit (\<25; 25-29.9 and ≥30Kg/m²).

Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the development of T2DM by 160 weeks defined by fasting plasma glucose, OGTT and/or HbA1c according to the ADA criteria. Important secondary endpoints are assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication) and include:

Glycaemic outcomes

  • Need for glucose-lowering (rescue) therapy;
  • Frequency of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c;
  • Regression to normoglycaemia. Anthropometric and body composition outcomes
  • Change in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio;
  • Proportion of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss;
  • Body fat percentage assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (Bodystat 1500®).

Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function

  • β-cell function, assessed by HOMA-B, insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IR, insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2, and the Stumvoll index;
  • Insulin sensitivity, assessed by the Matsuda index (reflecting whole body insulin sensitivity) and 1/HOMA-IR, reflecting primarily hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Cardiometabolic risk factors

  • Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome;
  • Blood pressure (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg) and heart rate;
  • Lipid profile, including low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol, ≥100 mg/dL or ≥2,6 mmol/L) and triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL or ≥1,7 mmol/L).

Patient-reported outcomes

  • Health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L;
  • Symptoms of depression (CES-D) and anxiety (short-form STAI);
  • Treatment satisfaction assessed using a study-specific questionnaire based on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire;
  • Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) and food security (short-form HFSSM).

Biomarker outcomes

  • Changes in and associations of metabolomic profiles, with cardiometabolic risk and treatment response.

Health economic outcomes

  • Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs);
  • Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide compared with placebo.
  • Health economic analyses are considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, as the study was primarily powered for the clinical endpoint of incident T2DM rather than economic outcomes.

To achieve 80% power, we plan a sample size of 252 to detect an estimated 50% reduction in the risk to develop T2DM between both groups, assuming a 30% loss to follow-up during the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glucose Intolerance After a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes

Keywords

  • gestational diabetes
  • glucose intolerance postpartum
  • prevention
  • type 2 diabetes
  • GLP-1 agonist
  • semaglutide
03

In context

Diabetes, Gestational

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes, Gestational; 203 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 252 is above the median of 110 across 564 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes, Gestational.

Browse Diabetes, Gestational studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants are women aged ≥18 years, with a history of GDM diagnosed according to the 2013 WHO criteria (at 24-32 weeks gestation or \<24 weeks for early GDM). Participants must have prediabetes diagnosed between 6 weeks and 12 months postpartum according to ADA criteria (FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L, 2-hour OGTT glucose 7.8-11.0 mmol/L and/or 39-46 mmol/mol [5.7-6.4%]).

Additional inclusion criteria include cessation of breastfeeding, no intention to become pregnant within the next year, use of effective and no use of medication affecting glucose metabolism. Written ICF is obtained prior to any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria include established diabetes, presence of autoantibodies suggestive of type 1 diabetes, normal glucose tolerance, history of pancreatitis, previous bariatric surgery or planned surgery within two years, unable to understand and speak Dutch, French or English and current pregnant or planning to become pregnant within one year after participating in the study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
252 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    semaglutide

    semaglutide SC once weekly, up titration over 2 month period to 1mg/week (0.25mg once weekly, after 4 weeks 0.5mg once weekly and after 8 weeks the maintenance dose of 1mg once weekly), treatment duration of max. 3 years

    Drug: Semaglutide Pen Injector

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    placebo SC once weekly, the same dose-escalation regimen, using matching injections, treatment duration of max. 3 years

    Drug: Semaglutide placebo

Interventions

  • maintenance dose of 1mg SC once weekly

    Also known as: Ozempic

  • DrugSemaglutide placebo

    maintenance dose of 1mg SC once weekly

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Development of T2DM

    Defined by FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c according to the ADA criteria

    Time frame: by 160 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need for glucose-lowering (rescue) therapy

    Percentage need for rescue therapy for diabetes

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  2. Frequency of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c

    Percentage of prediabetes based on FPG, OGTT, and/or HbA1c

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  3. Regression to normoglycaemia

    Percentage regression to normoglycaemia, based on fasting glycaemia, oral glucose tolerance test and/or HbA1c (ADA criteria)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  4. Change in body weight

    Change in body weight (kg)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  5. BMI

    Mean BMI (Kg/m2)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  6. Waist circumference

    Mean waist circumference (cm)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  7. Waist-to-hip ratio

    Waist/hip circumference ratio

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  8. Proportion of participants achieving ≥5% weight loss

    Percentage weight loss ≥5%

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  9. Proportion of participants achieving ≥10% weight loss

    Percentage weight loss ≥10%

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  10. Proportion of participants achieving ≥15% weight loss

    Percentage weight loss ≥15%

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  11. Body fat percentage assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (Bodystat 1500®)

    Percentage body fat measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  12. β-cell function, assessed by HOMA-B

    Beta-cell function measured by the HOMA-B index

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  13. Insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IR

    Beta-cell function measured by the by the insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-insulin resistance index

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  14. Insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2

    Beta-cell function measured by theby the insulin-secretion sensitivity-2 index

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  15. Stumvoll index

    Beta-cell function measured by the Stumvoll index

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  16. Insulin sensitivity, assessed by the Matsuda index (reflecting whole body insulin sensitivity)

    Whole body Insulin sensitivity measured by the insulin sensitivity index of Matsuda

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  17. 1/HOMA-IR, reflecting primarily hepatic insulin sensitivity

    The reciprocal of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (1/HOMA-IR)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  18. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome

    Percentage of the metabolic syndrome based on the WHO criteria

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  19. Blood pressure (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg)

    Percentage blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  20. Heart rate

    Mean heart rate

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  21. Lipid profile, including low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol, ≥100 mg/dL or ≥2,6 mmol/L)

    Percentage LDL cholesterol ≥100mg/dl or ≥2,6 mmol/L

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  22. Lipid profile, including triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL or ≥1,7 mmol/L)

    Percentage triglycerides ≥150mg/dl or ≥1,7 mmol/L

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  23. Health-related quality of life assessed by SF-36

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  24. Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health status

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  25. Symptoms of depression (CES-D)

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  26. Symptoms of anxiety (short-form STAI)

    Symptoms of anxiety assessed using the 6-item short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Total scores range from 20 to 80 after score transformation, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  27. Treatment satisfaction assessed using a study-specific questionnaire based on the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Diabetes risk perception assessed using the Diabetes Risk Perception Questionnaire, a validated questionnaire that evaluates perceived risk of developing diabetes

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  28. Sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)

    Sleep quality assessed using the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  29. Food security (short-form HFSSM)

    Food security assessed using the short-form Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Scores indicate the level of food security, with higher scores reflecting greater food insecurity

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  30. Plasma metabolite concentrations

    Changes in and associations of metabolomic profiles, with cardiometabolic risk and treatment response. Assessed using metabolomic profiling. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and every 6 months during a 3.5-year follow-up period (study visits).

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  31. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)

    Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), calculated as the area under the curve of health-related quality of life utility values over time, where higher values indicate better health outcomes

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  32. Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide compared with placebo

    Incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of semaglutide versus placebo

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

  33. Incremental healthcare costs

    Incremental healthcare costs associated with the intervention compared with control, calculated from collected healthcare resource utilization and unit cost data. Currency (e.g., EUR per participant)

    Time frame: Assessed at 160 weeks (end of treatment) and at 172-184 weeks (3-6 months after discontinuation of study medication)

07

Study locations

13 of 13 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vanlaer Y, Embo N, Bochanen N, Van Wilder N, Vereecke G, Wierckx K, Verhaegen A, Coremans P, Philips JC, Lytrivi M, Oriot P, Vandewalle S, Cuypers J, Deconinck B, Laenen A, Mathieu C, Benhalima K. Semaglutide for prevention of type 2 diabetes in women with postpartum prediabetes after gestational diabetes: protocol for a Belgian multicentre double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jul 23;16(7):e118191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118191. PubMed 42493207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data will be made available upon reasonable request after study completion, database lock, unblinding, and publication of the primary results, subject to applicable ethical, legal, and data protection requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2030, 78 months after the start.

Of 14 phase 3 interventional studies under Diabetes, Gestational, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 67. This study's planned 78 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2022
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
StartActual
Sep 14, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2030
CompletionEst.
May 2030
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05569772
Collaborators
University Hospital, Antwerp, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, General Hospital Groeninge, Vitaz, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege, Erasme University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Mouscron, Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis, AZ Turnhout, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
Start date
Sep 14, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Completion
May 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Katrien Benhalima, MD PhD
Contact
katrien.benhalima@uzleuven.be
16340614 ext. 32

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Semaglutide

Start the discussion