ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05558449Updated Mar 6, 2024

Impact of Virtual Reality Hypno-sedation on Functional Recovery and Anxiety in Foot Surgery With Regional Anesthesia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Hypnosedation and Midazolam injection in Foot Deformities, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity and Valgus; Hallux, sponsored by University of Liege. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-06.

Sponsored by University of Liege · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of a virtual reality hypnosedation (VRH)protocol reduces preoperative anxiety and increases patient comfort before, during, and after outpatient foot surgery.

Read the detailed description

This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the implementation of a virtual reality hypnosedation (VRH) protocol reduces preoperative anxiety and increases patient comfort before, during, and after outpatient foot surgery. The investigators hope to demonstrate a reduction in anxiety, improved postoperative experience and functional recovery according to currently validated scores measuring preoperative and postoperative recovery, anxiety and stress, and experience during a regional anesthesia technique.

The investigators expect that VRH will be more effective than VR alone and conventional pharmacological sedation in reducing preoperative anxiety and in improving experience and functional recovery. If the hypothesis is correct, the investigators could propose to integrate this protocol as a first line in the ambulatory management of elective foot surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Foot Deformities
  • Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
  • Valgus; Hallux
  • Analgesia
03

In context

Foot Deformities

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Foot Deformities; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 60 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Foot Deformities.

Browse Foot Deformities studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Liege is the lead sponsor of 251 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major patients, classified as ASA 1-2-3, admitted for foot surgery (metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis or hallux valgus cure), under peripheral locoregional anesthesia (sciatic nerve block at popliteal level).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant women
  • patients with peripheral neuropathy or other severe neurological pathology
  • allergy or to local anesthetics or benzodiazepines
  • chronic renal failure or severe hepatic failure
  • major hemostasis disorders
  • severe vision or hearing problems that would render the VR and VRH device useless or unusable, and patient contraindication or refusal to use the VRH headset, such as claustrophobia or kinesiophobia.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    VR

    Patients in the VR group (19 patients) will receive VR alone without hypnosedation. The VR headset will be used on these patients without an external voice or device allowing hypnosis. The VR module used will be "Silva", i.e. a scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons.

    Device: Virtual reality

  • Experimental
    VRH

    The patients in the VRH group (19 patients) will benefit from a hypnosedation session with a VRH headset during the local anesthesia technique and during the surgery (approximately 60 minutes). The VRH module used will be "Silva", i.e. the same scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons with a voice accompanying the hypnosis session.

    Device: Hypnosedation

  • Active comparator
    C

    Patients in group C (control group, 19 patients) will receive only midazolam-based pharmacological sedation. This will be administered with intermittent boluses of 1 mg until patient comfort and sedation on the Richmond analgo-sedation scale (RASS) of -3 (response to verbal stimulus) is achieved.

    Drug: Midazolam injection

Interventions

  • DeviceHypnosedation

    Hypnosedation session with a virtual reality headset during the regional anesthesia technique and during the surgery (approximately 60 minutes). The VRH module used will be "Silva", i.e. the same scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons with a voice accompanying the hypnosis session.

  • Midazolam intravenous injection 1 mg until RASS -3

  • DeviceVirtual reality

    Only virtual reality without a hypnosedation session. The virtual reality headset will be used on these patients without external voice or hypnosis device. The virtual reality module used will be "Silva", i.e. a scenario of a walk in the forest through the 4 seasons.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. (Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthesie LocoRegionale) EVAN-LR

    The primary endpoint will be the EVAN-LR score as a measure of intraoperative experience. EVAN-LR: a 0-100 scale, with 100 indicating the best possible level of satisfaction and 0 the worst.

    Time frame: 4 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety

    Numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 to 10) for pre- and postoperative anxiety

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the end of the surgery

  2. Quality of Recovery- 15 items (QoR-15)

    Assessment of the QoR-15 score on postoperative functional recovery and the variation in time between the day before surgery, the day after and 3 days after surgery

    Time frame: 1 day before, 1 and 3 day after surgery

  3. Length of surgery

    Length of surgery procedure in minutes

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the end of the surgery

  4. Complications

    The occurrence of complications related to the techniques used

    Time frame: 6 hours after surgery

  5. VRH complications

    The occurrence of side effects related to virtual reality (nausea, paradoxical anxiety, dizziness, etc.)

    Time frame: 6 hours after surgery

  6. Time perception

    Perception of the duration of the surgery during the VRH.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the end of the surgery

  7. Surgeon satisfaction

    Surgeon satisfaction on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the end of the surgery

  8. Dissociation

    The Numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) dissociation for the assessment of dissociation during the surgery

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the end of the surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Liège
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2022 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 10 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 22, 2022
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
StartActual
Nov 28, 2022
Primary completionActual
Oct 16, 2023
CompletionActual
Oct 16, 2023
Last update
Mar 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05558449
Responsible party
Michele Carella (Head of Clinic, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, University of Liege) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2022
Start date
Nov 28, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2023
Completion
Oct 16, 2023
Last update
Mar 6, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion