CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05556616iinnovate-2Updated Jan 29, 2026Results posted

A Study of Modakafusp Alfa in Adult Participants With Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 1 interventional study of Modakafusp alfa and Lenalidomide in Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D LLC. Terminated at 21 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.

Sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D LLC · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to strategic reasons (no safety concerns).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aims of this study are to test for any side effects from modakafusp alfa in combination therapy and to determine the recommended dose of combination therapy with modakafusp alfa. The dose of modakafusp alfa will be increased a little at a time until the highest dose that does not cause harmful side effects is found. Participants will be given modakafusp alfa through a vein.

Read the detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called modakafusp alfa (TAK-573). The study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and determine the recommended dose of modakafusp alfa in combination with lenalidomide in participants with multiple myeloma (MM), or in combination with pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, or daratumumab in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

The study consists of 3 Groups: Group 1: MM Maintenance Therapy, Group 2: RRMM Doublets, Group 3: RRMM Triplets.

The study will enroll approximately 18 participants in Group 1, 66 in Group 2, and 36 in Group 3. Participants will be assigned to one of the following treatment groups as given below:

  • Group 1 (MM Maintenance) Arm 1: Modakafusp alfa + Lenalidomide
  • Group 2 (RRMM Doublets) Arm 2: Modakafusp alfa + Pomalidomide
  • Group 2 (RRMM Doublets) Arm 3: Modakafusp alfa + Bortezomib
  • Group 2 (RRMM Doublets) Arm 4: Modakafusp alfa + Carfilzomib
  • Group 3 RRMM Triplets) Arm A: Modakafusp alfa + Pomalidomide + Bortezomib
  • Group 3 (RRMM Triplets) Arm D: Modakafusp alfa + Daratumumab + Pomalidomide

Group 2 Arm 4 is closed for enrollment.

The study will be conducted worldwide. The maximum treatment duration in this study for Group 1 is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years for minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) negative [-] participants, whichever occurs first. The maximum treatment duration in this study for Group 2 and Group 3 is until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or until any other discontinuation criterion is met, whichever occurs first. Overall time to participate in the study is approximately up to 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D LLC is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Group 1 (MM maintenance: modakafusp alfa/lenalidomide) only must have:

    1. MM based on standard IMWG diagnostic criteria.
    2. Undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for the treatment of MM within 12 months of the start of induction therapy and completed ASCT within 180 days before enrollment- (regardless of the lines of treatment).Consolidation cycles are allowed. Tandem transplant is allowed.
    3. Not started lenalidomide maintenance before enrollment. Time to initiation of maintenance therapy: participants may start maintenance therapy as early as 60 days after transplantation and up to 180 days after transplantation or consolidation.
    4. MRD positive ( after ASCT (MRD assessed at a threshold of 10\^-5 by local standard-of-care (SOC) methods or central assessment, if a prior local MRD assessment had not been performed).
    5. No prior progression after initial therapy (at any time before starting maintenance). Participants whose induction therapy was changed due to suboptimal response or toxicity will be eligible if they do not meet criteria for progression. In addition, no more than 2 regimens will be allowed before ASCT, excluding dexamethasone alone.
    6. No prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant or solid organ transplant.
    7. Recovered to Grade less than or equal to (\<=) 1 ASCT-related toxicities from the reversible effects of ASCT (except for alopecia and amenorrhea). MM based on standard IMWG diagnostic criteria.
  2. Groups 2 and 3 (RRMM doublets and RRMM triplets) must have:

    1. Measurable disease, defined as at least 1 of the following:

      • Serum M-protein >=0.5 g/dL (>=5 g/L) on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP).
      • Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours on urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP).
      • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay result with an involved FLC level >=10 mg/dL (>=100 mg/L), provided the serum FLC ratio is abnormal (per IMWG criteria).
    2. A confirmed diagnosis of MM according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria with documented disease progression in need of additional therapy as determined by the investigator.
    3. For Group 2 RRMM doublet arms only: Participants who have received at least 3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, including at least 1 proteosome inhibitor (PI), 1 immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and 1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) drug, or who are triple refractory to a PI, and IMiD, and an anti-CD38 mAb drug regardless of the number of prior line(s) of therapy.

    d. For Group 3 RRMM triplet arms only: Participants who have received 1 to 3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy including at least 1 PI and, 1 IMiD, and who are not refractory to the combination partners.

    e) For anti-CD38 arms, forced expiratory volume in 1second (FEV1) >=50% predicted by pulmonary function testing.

  3. Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 at screening
  4. Has adequate organ function at screening as determined by the laboratory values required for enrollment: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1000 per cubic millimeter (/mm\^3) (or >=1*10\^9/L); Platelets >=75,000/mm\^3 (>=75*10\^9/L); Hemoglobin >=8.0 g/dL; estimated creatinine clearance >=30 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula); Total serum bilirubin \<=2.0*Upper limit of normal (ULN); an exception for participants with Gilbert's syndrome may be granted after discussion with the sponsor; Liver transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT])/aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) \<=3.0*ULN.
  5. Has recovered from adverse reactions to prior myeloma treatment or procedures (example, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy) to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 Grade \<=1 or baseline treatment or have the toxicity established as sequela, except for sensory or motor neuropathy, which should have recovered to Grade \<=2 or baseline; ; (Grade 1 for the bortezomib arm).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Currently participating in another MM interventional study, including other clinical trials with investigational agents (including investigational vaccines or investigational medical device for disease under study) throughout the duration of this study.
  2. Received previous treatment with modakafusp alfa.
  3. Has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, Waldenström disease, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smoldering MM per IMWG criteria or standard diagnostic criteria, plasma cell leukemia, POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.
  4. Has been diagnosed with another malignancy within the previous 3 years, except treated basal cell or localized squamous skin carcinomas, localized prostate cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ, resected colorectal adenomatous polyps, breast cancer in situ, or other malignancy for which the participant is not on active anticancer therapy and that in the opinion of the local investigator, with concurrence with the principal investigator, is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence within 3 years.
  5. Has evidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement and/or meningeal involvement due to MM exhibited during screening.
  6. Has a known severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to human recombinant proteins or excipients used in the modakafusp alfa formulation or to the study combination agents, the study medications, their analogs, or excipients in the various formulations of any agent per the prescribing information.
  7. Is seropositive for hepatitis B (defined by a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]). Participants with resolved infection (that is, participants who are HBsAg negative but positive for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen and/or antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs]) must be screened using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. Those who are PCR positive will be excluded. EXCEPTION: Participants with serologic findings suggestive of HBV vaccination (anti-HBs positivity as the only serologic marker) and, a known history of prior HBV vaccination do not need to be tested for HBV DNA by PCR.
  8. Has a known history of seropositivity for HIV.
  9. Has a known history of seropositivity for hepatitis C (anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibody positive or anti-hepatitis C virus-RNA quantitation positive). Exception: Participants with a sustained virologic response with undetectable HCV RNA level at least 12 weeks after completion of antiviral therapy.
  10. For bortezomib arms: participants received a strong cytochromes P450 (CYP3A4) inducer within 5 half-lives prior to randomization.
  11. The participant has a chronic condition requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids >10 mg/dL of prednisone or equivalent, in addition to any required corticosteroids for the treatment of MM.
  12. Has a QTcF (QT interval corrected with Fridericia correction method >480 millisecond (ms) (Grade >=2).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mg

    Participants received 80 milligrams (mg) modakafusp alfa, infusion intravenously (IV), once on Day 1, once every 4 weeks (Q4W), in combination with 10 mg lenalidomide capsules orally once daily continuously on Days 1 to 28, in a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or to a maximum of 2 years for measurable/minimal residual disease-negative (MRD \[-\]) participants, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Lenalidomide

  • Experimental
    Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mg

    Participants received 80 mg modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with 2 mg pomalidomide capsules orally once daily on Days 1 to 21 in a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion was met, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Pomalidomide

  • Experimental
    Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mg

    Participants received 80 mg modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with 4 mg pomalidomide capsules orally once daily on Days 1 to 21 in a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion was met, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Carfilzomib

  • Experimental
    Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2

    Participants received 80 mg modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with 20/70 milligrams per meter square (mg/m\^2) carfilzomib IV, on Day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion was met, whichever occurred first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Bortezomib

  • Experimental
    Group 2 (RRMM Doublets) Arm 4: Modakafusp alfa + Bortezomib

    Participants were planned to receive modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with bortezomib injection subcutaneously on Days 8, 15, and 22 for the first 8 cycles and subsequently on Days 8 and 22 of a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion is met, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Pomalidomide

  • Experimental
    Group 3 (RRMM Triplets) Arm A: Modakafusp alfa + Pomalidomide + Bortezomib

    Participants were planned to receive modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with pomalidomide capsules orally once daily on Days 1 to 21 in a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle along with bortezomib injection subcutaneously on Days 8, 15 and 22 for the first 8 cycles and subsequently on Days 8 and 22 of a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion is met, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Pomalidomide

  • Experimental
    Group 3 (RRMM Triplets) Arm D: Modakafusp alfa + Daratumumab + Pomalidomide

    Participants were planned to receive modakafusp alfa, infusion IV, once on Day 1, Q4W in combination with daratumumab injection subcutaneously on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of Cycles 1 and 2, further followed by on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 3 to 6, thereafter on Day 1 on a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle along with pomalidomide capsules orally once daily on Days 1 to 21 in a 28-day (4-week) treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until any other discontinuation criterion is met, whichever occurs first.

    Drug: Modakafusp alfa · Drug: Daratumumab · Drug: Pomalidomide

Interventions

  • DrugModakafusp alfa

    Modakafusp alfa intravenous infusion.

    Also known as: TAK-573

  • DrugLenalidomide

    Lenalidomide capsules orally.

  • DrugBortezomib

    Bortezomib injection subcutaneously.

  • DrugCarfilzomib

    Carfilzomib intravenous infusion.

  • DrugDaratumumab

    Daratumumab injection subcutaneously.

  • DrugPomalidomide

    Pomalidomide capsules orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    DLT was defined by national cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.0: Grade 5 AE; Hematologic toxicity: Nonfebrile Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 consecutive days/Grade greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 14 consecutive days, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; any other Grade 4 with exceptions; Nonhematologic Grade 3 or higher toxicities unrelated to the underlying disease with exceptions.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (Cycle length is 28 days)

  2. Number of Participants With One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. A TEAE was any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from the date on which the first dose of study drug is administered to the date of first documentation of confirmed progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was determined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. PD: increase of ≥25 percent (%) from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase ≥0.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL) or urine M-component increase ≥200 milligram (mg)/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (FLC) levels increase must be greater than (\>) 10 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); bone marrow plasma cell ≥10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR: percentage of participants achieving confirmed partial response rate(PR)or better(stringent complete response\[sCR\]+complete response\[CR\]+very good partial response\[VGPR\]+PR)during study as defined by IMWG uniform response criteria and as determined by investigator.PR:\>=50%reduction of serum M-protein and\>=90% reduction in urine M-protein or less than(\<)200mg/24 hour, or\>=50%decrease in uninvolved FLC or \>=50% reduction in plasma cells. At baseline,a \>=50% decrease in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was required. Percentages were rounded off to nearest single decimal place. Due to early termination of study no participants were enrolled in Group 2 Arm 4: modakafusp alfa+bortezomib and Group 3 arms, thus they are not presented here. Also, no participants in Group 1 fulfilled criteria for Response-Evaluable Analysis Set, hence are not presented here. Given limited number of participants and low confidence interval as a consequence, those response rate provides limited information.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  3. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of confirmed PR or better (sCR+ CR+ VGPR+ PR) to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and \>=90% reduction in urine M-protein or \<200 mg/24 hour, or \>=50% decrease in uninvolved FLC or \>=50% reduction in plasma cells. At baseline, a \>=50% decrease in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  4. Groups 2 and 3: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the first dose of administration to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at the time of analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  5. Groups 2 and 3: Time to Progression (TTP)

    TTP was defined as the time from the date of the first dose until the earliest date of confirmed PD per IMWG, or death due to PD. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  6. Groups 2 and 3: Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)

    TTNT was defined as the time from the date of first dose administration to the date of the first dose initiation of the next line of antineoplastic therapy, for any reason.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  7. Groups 2 and 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a stable disease (SD) or better during the study based on the investigator's disease assessment as defined by IMWG uniform response criteria. SD was defined as no known evidence of progressive disease or new bone lesions. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  8. Groups 2 and 3: Event-free Survival (EFS)

    EFS was defined as the time from the date on which the first dose of study drug is administered to the date of the first documentation of an event that may include confirmed PD, discontinuation of a treatment for an AE (related or not related), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was determined by IMWG criteria. PD: increase of \>=25 % from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \> 10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  9. Groups 2 and 3: Time to Response (TTR)

    TTR was defined as the time from the date of the first dose administration to the date of the first documentation of objective confirmed response as defined by IMWG criteria.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  10. Group 1: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5

    Rate of MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved MRD negative status in the MRD-evaluable analysis set.

    Time frame: At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the start of treatment

  11. Groups 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity CR Status at a Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving CR Assessed by the Investigator

    Rate of MRD negativity CR status a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved MRD negative CR status in participants achieving CR. CR is defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow; in participants for whom only measurable disease is by serum FLC level, normal FLC ratio of 0.26 to 1.65 in addition to CR criteria is required.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after CR confirmation

  12. Duration of MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving MRD Negativity

    Duration of MRD negativity (10\^-5) was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of MRD\[-\] to the first documentation of MRD positivity or confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after treatment

  13. Group 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5

    Rate of MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved MRD negative status.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  14. Groups 2 and 3: Duration of MRD Negativity Status at a Sensitivity Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving MRD Negativity

    Duration of MRD negativity (10\^-5) was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of MRD\[-\] to the first documentation of MRD positivity or confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

  15. Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb)

    Time frame: Up to 16.7 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 6, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Study was terminated early by sponsor for strategic reasons. No participants were enrolled in Group 2 Arm 4: modakafusp alfa + bortezomib \& Group 3 arms. Data for endpoints related to PFS, OS, DOR, TTP, TTNT, EFS, TTR, \& MRD were not collected as planned \& hence not reported.

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at various investigative sites globally from 12 January 2023 to 04 June 2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2Group 2 (RRMM Doublets) Arm 4: Modakafusp Alfa + BortezomibGroup 3 (RRMM Triplets): Modakafusp Alfa + Pomalidomide + BortezomibGroup 3 (RRMM Triplets): Modakafusp Alfa + Daratumumab + Pomalidomide
Started3443000
Completed2122000
Not completed1321000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1000000
Withdrew: Death0021000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor0300000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined by national cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.0: Grade 5 AE; Hematologic toxicity: Nonfebrile Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 consecutive days/Grade greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 14 consecutive days, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; any other Grade 4 with exceptions; Nonhematologic Grade 3 or higher toxicities unrelated to the underlying disease with exceptions.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (Cycle length is 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
ParticipantsGroup 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0112
PrimaryNumber of Participants With One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. A TEAE was any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsGroup 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
Number of Participants With One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3343
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date on which the first dose of study drug is administered to the date of first documentation of confirmed progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was determined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. PD: increase of ≥25 percent (%) from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase ≥0.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL) or urine M-component increase ≥200 milligram (mg)/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (FLC) levels increase must be greater than (\>) 10 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); bone marrow plasma cell ≥10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants achieving confirmed partial response rate(PR)or better(stringent complete response\[sCR\]+complete response\[CR\]+very good partial response\[VGPR\]+PR)during study as defined by IMWG uniform response criteria and as determined by investigator.PR:\>=50%reduction of serum M-protein and\>=90% reduction in urine M-protein or less than(\<)200mg/24 hour, or\>=50%decrease in uninvolved FLC or \>=50% reduction in plasma cells. At baseline,a \>=50% decrease in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was required. Percentages were rounded off to nearest single decimal place. Due to early termination of study no participants were enrolled in Group 2 Arm 4: modakafusp alfa+bortezomib and Group 3 arms, thus they are not presented here. Also, no participants in Group 1 fulfilled criteria for Response-Evaluable Analysis Set, hence are not presented here. Given limited number of participants and low confidence interval as a consequence, those response rate provides limited information.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
Overall Response Rate (ORR)0 (0.00 to 60.24)50 (6.76 to 93.24)33.3 (0.84 to 90.57)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of confirmed PR or better (sCR+ CR+ VGPR+ PR) to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and \>=90% reduction in urine M-protein or \<200 mg/24 hour, or \>=50% decrease in uninvolved FLC or \>=50% reduction in plasma cells. At baseline, a \>=50% decrease in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the first dose of administration to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at the time of analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of the first dose until the earliest date of confirmed PD per IMWG, or death due to PD. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)

TTNT was defined as the time from the date of first dose administration to the date of the first dose initiation of the next line of antineoplastic therapy, for any reason.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a stable disease (SD) or better during the study based on the investigator's disease assessment as defined by IMWG uniform response criteria. SD was defined as no known evidence of progressive disease or new bone lesions. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Groups 2 and 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
percentage of participantsGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
Groups 2 and 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR)75.0 (19.41 to 99.37)50.0 (6.76 to 93.24)66.7 (9.43 to 99.16)
SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from the date on which the first dose of study drug is administered to the date of the first documentation of an event that may include confirmed PD, discontinuation of a treatment for an AE (related or not related), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was determined by IMWG criteria. PD: increase of \>=25 % from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \> 10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Time to Response (TTR)

TTR was defined as the time from the date of the first dose administration to the date of the first documentation of objective confirmed response as defined by IMWG criteria.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryGroup 1: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5

Rate of MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved MRD negative status in the MRD-evaluable analysis set.

Time frame:
At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the start of treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity CR Status at a Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving CR Assessed by the Investigator

Rate of MRD negativity CR status a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved MRD negative CR status in participants achieving CR. CR is defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow; in participants for whom only measurable disease is by serum FLC level, normal FLC ratio of 0.26 to 1.65 in addition to CR criteria is required.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years after CR confirmation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving MRD Negativity

Duration of MRD negativity (10\^-5) was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of MRD\[-\] to the first documentation of MRD positivity or confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 2 years after treatment

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryGroup 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants With MRD Negativity Status at a Threshold of 10^-5

Rate of MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10\^-5 was defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved MRD negative status.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryGroups 2 and 3: Duration of MRD Negativity Status at a Sensitivity Threshold of 10^-5 in Participants Achieving MRD Negativity

Duration of MRD negativity (10\^-5) was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of MRD\[-\] to the first documentation of MRD positivity or confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: increase of \>=25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: serum M-component increase \>=0.5 g/dL or urine M-component increase \>=200 mg/24-hour; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase must be \>10 mg/dL; bone marrow plasma cell \>=10%; definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb)
Time frame:
Up to 16.7 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 16.7 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mg0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mg0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)3/4 (75%)
Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mg2/4 (50%)1/4 (25%)4/4 (100%)
Group 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^21/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
Thrombotic microangiopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/30/40/42/3
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/30/40/41/3
Haemolytic uraemic syndromeBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/30/40/41/3
PalpitationsCardiac disorders0/30/40/41/3
Pneumonia influenzalInfections and infestations0/30/40/41/3
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders0/30/40/41/3
Renal haemorrhageRenal and urinary disorders0/30/40/41/3
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders0/30/41/40/3
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/31/40/40/3
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 76
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/32/43/43/3
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/33/43/40/3
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/33/43/43/3
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/30/41/42/3
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/30/41/42/3
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/40/42/3
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/41/42/3
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/30/40/42/3
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders0/31/40/42/3
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/30/40/40/3

Baseline characteristics

The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included all participants who had received at least 1 dose, even if incomplete, of any study drug. Due to early termination of the study no participants were enrolled in Group 2 Arm 4: modakafusp alfa + bortezomib and Group 3 arms, thus they are not presented here.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2Total
Mean62.3 ± 18.5064.3 ± 11.0071.3 ± 2.6357.3 ± 12.0664.4 ± 11.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2Total
Female20204
Male142310
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2Total
Hispanic or Latino00000
Not Hispanic or Latino224311
Unknown or Not Reported12003
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1 (NDMM): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Lenalidomide 10 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 2 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Pomalidomide 4 mgGroup 2 (RRMM Doublets): Modakafusp Alfa 80 mg + Carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m^2Total
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American11215
White21227
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported02002
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Scripps Health
    San Diego, California 92121, United States
  • The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Cancer Center At Greater Baltimore Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21153, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • NYU Langone Hospital - Long Island
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Main Campus
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Novant Health Cancer Institute
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Novant Health Cancer Institute - Forsyth Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • CHU UCL Namur site Godinne
    Yvoir, Namur 5530, Belgium
  • AZ Delta
    Roeselare, Roeselare West-Vlaanderen 8800, Belgium
  • Rambam Health Care Campus (RHCC) - Meyer Children's Hospital - Pediatric Diabetes & Obesity Clinic
    Haifa, 31999, Israel
  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Sede Madrid
    Madrid, 28027, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Dept of Oncology
    Pamplona, 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 19, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 9, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the study protocol and the statistical analysis plan. Requests will be assessed for scientific merit, product approval status, and conflicts of interest. If the request is approved, patient level data will be de-identified and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants and to protect commercially confidential information. Please visit USMedInfo@tevapharm.com to make your request.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05556616
Lead sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2022
Start date
Jan 12, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2024
Completion
Jun 4, 2024
Results posted
Aug 6, 2025
Last update
Jan 29, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion