ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05555602Updated Sep 27, 2022

Observation of the Comfort and Efficacy of CO2 Laser Combined With Cryo 6 for Burn or Linear Scars.

An interventional study of Cold-air cooling in Cryotherapy Effect, Burn Scar and Scar; Previous Cesarean Section, sponsored by Kaiyang Lv, MD-PhD. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-27.

Sponsored by Kaiyang Lv, MD-PhD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the effect of 10,600 nm CO2 laser combined with Zimmer Cryo 6 forced cold air device on the comfort and efficacy of patients with burn scars or post-operative linear scars, and to provide a safer, more effective and more satisfactory program for clinical treatment of burn scars or post-operative linear scars.

Read the detailed description

Objective: To investigate the effect of 10,600 nm CO2 laser combined with the cold-air cooling device Zimmer Cryo 6 on the comfort and efficacy of patients with burn scars or post-operative linear scars, and to provide a safer, more effective and more satisfactory program for clinical treatment of burn scars or post-operative linear scars.

Secondary objective: To investigate the adverse effects of the cold-air cooling device Zimmer Cryo 6 in combination with the 10,600 nm CO2 fractional laser treatment for patients with burn scars or post-operative linear scars.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cryotherapy Effect
  • Burn Scar
  • Scar; Previous Cesarean Section

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cicatrix

317 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 40 across 260 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Kaiyang Lv, MD-PhD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 14-60 years;
  2. The patient agreed to participate in the experiment and signed the informed consent by himself/herself or his/her legal representative;
  3. The clinical diagnosis was burn scar or post-operative linear scar, and the total area was more than 5 cm2.
  4. No other treatment such as laser or chemical exfoliation was performed on the lesion within the recent half year.
  5. Skin lesions were free of bleeding, ulceration, infection and other conditions affecting the visual field of laser treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with an active or established sun tan;
  2. Patients with history of allergic reaction to to topical anesthesia;
  3. Patients with history of keloid scarring, abnormal wound healing and/or prone to bruising;
  4. Skin malignant tumors or precancerous lesions;
  5. Patients with diabetes, heart disease, epilepsy, connective tissue disease, etc.;
  6. Pregnant or breastfeeding patients;
  7. Patients with recent skin infections (such as viral and bacterial infections);
  8. Patients who are using other methods to treat similar diseases;
  9. Patients who had taken isotretinoin within the past year;
  10. History of cryoglobulinaemia;
  11. History of cold agglutinin disease and cold haemolysis;
  12. History of cold urticaria;
  13. Parts of the body with impaired circulation;
  14. Raynaud's disease;
  15. Parts of the body with impaired sensitivity;
  16. Trophic disorders;
  17. Hypersensitivity to cold;
  18. Patients with mental illness;
  19. Other ineligible patients.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group: CO2 fractional laser alone

    This group of patients is the treatment control group. During the treatment period, the cold-air cooling device Cryo 6 will be placed next to the laser equipment but not started. The air outlet position is about 3 to 7 centimeters away from the skin, and it will move slowly and synchronously according to the laser position. The skin temperature will be synchronously monitored and recorded by hand-held infrared thermometry. After the operation, the investigators use hospital's routine aftercare procedures, and continue to use hand-held infrared thermometry to synchronously monitor the skin temperature.

  • Experimental
    Combination group: CO2 fractional laser combined with Cryo 6

    During the CO2 fractional laser treatment, cool the skin with cold-air cooling device Cryo 6. Set the wind to level 5, and the maximum time to 30 minutes. The air outlet position is about 3 to 7 centimeters away from the skin, and it will move slowly and synchronously according to the laser position. The skin temperature will be synchronously monitored by hand-held infrared thermometry and maintained at 0°C to 5°C. After the operation, the investigators use hospital's routine aftercare procedures and cooling with Cryo 6 on the skin synchronously. The wind level can be selected by patients themselves from level 3 to 7, and the time can be set for 5 minutes. Put the air outlet about 3 to 7 centimeters away from the skin, and move it slowly and dynamically in this area of skin to monitor and record the skin temperature synchronously.

    Device: Cold-air cooling

Interventions

  • DeviceCold-air cooling

    Cryo 6 works with a compressor system like those in refrigerators and uses ambient air to generate a permanent stream of cold air with a maximum flow to 1000 L/min and a temperature as low as -30°C, depending on the cooling delivery system and the desired cooling level (range 1-9).

    Also known as: Zimmer MedizinSysteme Cryo 6

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a numbered version of the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) in which the patient can select one number that best describes the pain. Scale from minimum "0" to maximum "10" for total 11 integers. "0" represents no pain, and "10" represents worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Skin temperature

    The skin temperature will be monitored and recorded by hand-held infrared thermometry.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after treatment

  2. Number of treatment interruptions

    The physician calculates the number of interruptions that the patient calls off during treatment.

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Scar area

    Analyze the scar pattern using Antera 3D software for Scar area (cm2).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after the 1st treatment, 1 month after the 2nd treatment, 1 month after the 3rd treatment

  2. Scar color

    Analyze the scar pattern using Antera 3D software for scar color (CIE L\*a\*B\*).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after the 1st treatment, 1 month after the 2nd treatment, 1 month after the 3rd treatment

  3. Scar volume

    Analyze the scar pattern using Antera 3D software for scar volume (cm3).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after the 1st treatment, 1 month after the 2nd treatment, 1 month after the 3rd treatment

  4. Scar melamin

    Analyze the scar pattern using Antera 3D software for scar melanin.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after the 1st treatment, 1 month after the 2nd treatment, 1 month after the 3rd treatment

  5. Scar erythema

    Analyze the scar pattern using Antera 3D software for scar erythema.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after the 1st treatment, 1 month after the 2nd treatment, 1 month after the 3rd treatment

  6. Satisfaction evaluation

    The patients were rated as very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, fair, satisfied, and very satisfied with the improvement of scars.

    Time frame: 1 month after the 1st and the 3rd treatments.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200092, China
    • Kai-Yang Lv, MD-PhD · Contact · lvkaiyang@hotmail.com · +8613816983691
    • Yo-Yu Tseng, M.Sc · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tian H, Wang L, Xie W, Shen C, Guo G, Liu J, Han C, Ren L, Liang Y, Tang Y, Wang Y, Yin M, Zhang J, Huang Y. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of severe burn patients: results of a retrospective multicenter study in China, 2011-2015. Burns Trauma. 2018 May 23;6:14. doi: 10.1186/s41038-018-0118-z. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29850643 ↗
  • Waibel J, Beer K. Ablative fractional laser resurfacing for the treatment of a third-degree burn. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Mar;8(3):294-7. PubMed 19271380 ↗
  • Kwan JM, Wyatt M, Uebelhoer NS, Pyo J, Shumaker PR. Functional improvement after ablative fractional laser treatment of a scar contracture. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10):986-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.07.007. No abstract available. PubMed 22024331 ↗
  • Kineston D, Kwan JM, Uebelhoer NS, Shumaker PR. Use of a fractional ablative 10.6-mum carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of a morphea-related contracture. Arch Dermatol. 2011 Oct;147(10):1148-50. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.247. No abstract available. PubMed 22006130 ↗
  • Haedersdal M. Fractional ablative CO(2) laser resurfacing improves a thermal burn scar. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1340-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03215.x. Epub 2009 Mar 4. No abstract available. PubMed 19309424 ↗
  • Bowen RE. A novel approach to ablative fractional treatment of mature thermal burn scars. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010 Apr;9(4):389-92. PubMed 20514799 ↗
  • Tierney EP, Hanke CW. The effect of cold-air anesthesia during fractionated carbon-dioxide laser treatment: Prospective study and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Sep;67(3):436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.01.026. Epub 2012 Jun 12. PubMed 22695102 ↗
  • Altshuler GB, Zenzie HH, Erofeev AV, Smirnov MZ, Anderson RR, Dierickx C. Contact cooling of the skin. Phys Med Biol. 1999 Apr;44(4):1003-23. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/4/014. PubMed 10232811 ↗
  • Chess C, Chess Q. Cool laser optics treatment of large telangiectasia of the lower extremities. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993 Jan;19(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb03331.x. PubMed 8454790 ↗
  • Gilchrest BA, Rosen S, Noe JM. Chilling port wine stains improves the response to argon laser therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982 Feb;69(2):278-83. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198202000-00017. PubMed 7054797 ↗
  • Kelly KM, Nelson JS, Lask GP, Geronemus RG, Bernstein LJ. Cryogen spray cooling in combination with nonablative laser treatment of facial rhytides. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Jun;135(6):691-4. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.6.691. PubMed 10376697 ↗
  • Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14. PubMed 24605197 ↗
  • Matias AR, Ferreira M, Costa P, Neto P. Skin colour, skin redness and melanin biometric measurements: comparison study between Antera((R)) 3D, Mexameter((R)) and Colorimeter((R)). Skin Res Technol. 2015 Aug;21(3):346-62. doi: 10.1111/srt.12199. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PubMed 25645051 ↗
  • Handford C, Buxton P, Russell K, Imray CE, McIntosh SE, Freer L, Cochran A, Imray CH. Frostbite: a practical approach to hospital management. Extrem Physiol Med. 2014 Apr 22;3:7. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-3-7. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24764516 ↗
  • McIntosh SE, Opacic M, Freer L, Grissom CK, Auerbach PS, Rodway GW, Cochran A, Giesbrecht GG, McDevitt M, Imray CH, Johnson EL, Dow J, Hackett PH; Wilderness Medical Society. Wilderness Medical Society practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of frostbite: 2014 update. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Dec;25(4 Suppl):S43-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.09.001. PubMed 25498262 ↗
  • Raulin C, Grema H. Single-pass carbon dioxide laser skin resurfacing combined with cold-air cooling: efficacy and patient satisfaction of a prospective side-by-side study. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Nov;140(11):1333-6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.11.1333. PubMed 15545541 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2023, 19 months after the start.

Of 74 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cicatrix, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 88 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2021
First posted
Sep 27, 2022
StartActual
Nov 23, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 2023
Last update
Sep 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05555602
Lead sponsor
Kaiyang Lv, MD-PhD
Collaborators
Zimmer Medical Devices (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Kaiyang Lv, MD-PhD (Associate Chief Physician, Associate Professor, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2022
Start date
Nov 23, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 27, 2022

Study contacts

Kai-Yang Lv, MD-PhD
Contact
lvkaiyang@hotmail.com
+8613816983691
Yo-Yu Tseng, M.Sc
principal investigator · Zimmer Medical Devices (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion