CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05553496Updated Sep 23, 2022

Assessment of Rituximab Therapeutic Response Versus Conventional Treatment

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Rituximab and Dexamethasone in Pharmacological Action, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-23.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective interventional comparative study to compare the efficacy of Rituximab versus Conventional treatment in Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome including patients on triple immunosuppression protocols.

Read the detailed description

A prospective randomized controlled interventional study, conducted on Refractory Nephrotic syndrome patients with failed different lines of conventional treatment.

The aim of the current study is to assess the therapeutic response of Rituximab versus Conventional treatment in Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome in terms of :

  • Improvement in proteinuria.
  • Relapse frequency.

Fourty patients with Refractory Nephrotic syndrome will be enrolled in the study. All participants will be previously treated with ACEi and/or ARB, for ≥3 months prior to randomization and adequate blood pressure control. Participants will be assigned randomly into two groups with 20 Refractory Nephrotic syndrome patients in each group as follow:

  • Group (1) RTX in Refractory Nephrotic syndrome patients on conventional treatment (20 patients)
  • Group (2) Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome patients on Conventional therapy (20 patients)

The duration and severity of proteinuria are known to be surrogate markers of the progression of glomerular disease. Our approach to assess the clinical response was to evaluate estimated Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria and serum albumin after rituximab treatment. We classified the response into four stages :

  1. No proteinuria, normal serum albumin
  2. Mild proteinuria, serum albumin >30 g/l
  3. Ongoing significant proteinuria, serum albumin 20-30 g/l
  4. No change in proteinuria and serum albumin. Stages 1 and 2 will be interpreted as a good clinical response, whereas stages 3 and 4 will be interpreted as a poor clinical response.

A sample size of fourty patients with Refractory Nephrotic syndrome is selected to achieve confidence limit of 5%. At the end of the study, a number of data will be generated, such as:

  1. Quantitative data will be summarized as means and standard deviations and/or medians and ranges.
  2. Categorical data will be summarized as frequencies \& percentage.
  3. For measuring statistical differences between groups, categorical variables are analyzed using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, whereas continuous variables are compared using Student t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate.
  4. Statistical comparisons between pre- and post-treatment values are performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
  5. Univariate linear regression models are used to examine the association between baseline characteristics and response to drug treatment.
  6. All tests are performed at a significance level of 0.05.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pharmacological Action
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult ≥ 18 year old and medically stable.
  2. Treatment with an Angiotension converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or Angiotension II receptor blockade (ARB), for ≥3 months prior to randomization and adequate blood pressure control or if patient is intolerant to even a very low dose of either ACEi or ARB therapy.
  3. Proteinuria ≥3 g/24 h using the average from two 24-hour urine collections collected within 14 days of each other despite ARB for ≥3 months as described above.
  4. Estimated GFR ≥40 ml/min/1.73 m2 while taking ACEi/ARB therapy or quantified endogenous creatinine clearance ≥40 ml/min based on a 24 h urine collection.
  5. Non responsive GN patients on conventional treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Autoimmune diseases.
  2. Patients with presence of active infection or a secondary cause of IMN (e.g. hepatitis B, SLE, medications, malignancies).
  3. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus: to exclude proteinuria secondary to diabetic nephropathy.
  4. Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  5. Predisposition to drug hypersensitivity.
  6. Unstable medical condition.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    RTX in Refractory Nephrotic syndrome patients on conventional treatment

    Refratory Nephrotic syndrome participants will receive a 375 mg/m2 weekly rituximab for four doses, with retreatment every 2 months till 6 months regardless of proteinuria response in addition to triple optimized immunosuppression therapy including steroids ± Calcineurine inhibitors (CNI) (e.g: Tacrolimus), Mycophenloatemofetil (MMF) and Cyclophosphamide (CTX)

    Drug: Rituximab · Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Active comparator
    Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome patients on Conventional therapy

    Nephrotic syndrome participants will receive conventional therapy treatment only including steroids ± Tacrolimus (TAC), Cyclosporine (CsA), Mycophenloatemofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide (CTX) then if become refractory to conventional treatment will continue on the same treatment.

    Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DrugRituximab

    Group (1) RTX in Refractory Nephrotic syndrome patients on conventional treatment (20 patients)

    Also known as: Dexamethasone, Tacrolimus, Mycophenloatemofetil, Cyclophosphamide

  • DrugDexamethasone

    Group (2) Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome patients on Conventional therapy (20 patients)

    Also known as: Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Mycophenloatemofetil, Cyclophosphamide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effectiveness of either conventional therapy alone or Rituximab as an add on therapy will be assessed by measure of Remission sate of the patient.

    The primary end point is Complete or Partial remission at 6 months after randomization. Complete remission (CR) is defined as UP ≤0.3 g/24 h and serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dl while Partial remission (PR) is defined as Reduction in baseline UP of ≥50% plus final UP ≤3.5 g/24 h but \>0.3 g/24 h. The patient who will be Non-responsive to therapy is defined as Reduction in baseline UP of \<25% (includes increase in UP) after 6 months of immunosuppression and the patient who will enter in the relapsed phase is defined as development of nephrotic range proteinuria following CR or PR, i.e. \>3.5 g/24 h.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. A) Late Remissions:

    The first 6 months of the study will be considered the treatment period, while the remaining 6 months will be considered an observational period.So we will monitor the patients for CR or PR at 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization.

    Time frame: 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization.

  2. B) Relapse state:

    Relapse state of the patient will be assessed at month 12 after randomization (Urine Protein (UP) \>3.5 g/24 h after earlier CR or PR).

    Time frame: 12 months after randomization

  3. C) Response Treatment Time:

    The response time will be assessed by measuring the duration of clinical response to RTX in patients who had on going CR or PR.

    Time frame: 12 months after randomization

  4. D) End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD):

    The patients who developed ESRD will be reviewed in this study.

    Time frame: 12 months after randomization

  5. E) Renal Function:

    The effect of treatment on renal function will be assessed every 3 months by calculating the estimated GFR (eGFR) with the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

  6. F) Adverse events:

    Patients will be educated about adverse effects of the drugs and will be required to report the occurrence of any of them.

    Time frame: 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05553496
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
shaymaa omar (Head of clinical pharmacy department at Dar Al Fouad hospital, Ain Shams University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2022
Start date
Sep 25, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion