CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05550584HOPEUpdated Sep 5, 2024

High Flow Oxygen During Operative Hysteroscopy.

An interventional study of Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE). and LMA in Endometrium; Hypertrophy, Cervix, Anesthesia and Apnea, Postanesthetic, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-05.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy represents an open circuit ventilation system that uses flows up to 70 L/min of 100% oxygen through the Optiflow THRIVETM device (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy systems, the heating and humidification of the flows facilitate tolerability by the patient, allow to reach higher and more stable inspiratory fractions of oxygen, produce a flow-dependent effect of continuous positive airway pressure and by reducing dead space, have the potential to increase alveolar volume and improve gas exchanges.

The use of HFNC is increased in anesthesia as the only airways management technique during short-term procedures under procedural sedation or general anesthesia.

Operative hysteroscopy is a short-term procedure (\<30 minutes), usually performed in a day-hospital regimen, under procedural sedation. In case of apnea and/or hypoventilation, or for long and complex hysteroscopic procedures, the patient can be ventilated through facial or laryngeal masks.

The primary objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the rate of success of ventilation using the THRIVE device to laryngeal mask ventilation during operative hysteroscopies under procedural sedation.

Secondary objectives will be the comparison of the percentage of complications in terms of inability to manage the airways, episodes of hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, post-operative nausea and vomiting, degree of dyspnea and comfort of the patient in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit between the two methods.

Read the detailed description

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy represents an open circuit ventilation system that uses flows up to 70 L/min of 100% oxygen through Optiflow THRIVETM (transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange) device (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand).

Compared to conventional low-flows oxygen therapy systems, the heating and humidification of the flow facilitate tolerability by the patient, ensure an efficient muco-ciliary function and allow to reach higher and more stable inspiratory fractions of oxygen.

The system produces a flow-dependent effect of continuous positive airway pressure of about 1 cmH20 for every 10L/min increase in oxygen flow and a reduction of the dead space, having the potential to increase the alveolar volume thus improving gas exchanges.

The resulting reduction in respiratory rate and the improvement of thoracoabdominal synchrony minimize the onset of respiratory fatigue in the patient.

Initially introduced for the treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNC oxygen therapy is increasingly used also in anesthesia as the only airways management technique during short-term procedures performed under sedation (e.g. digestive endoscopy) or under general anesthesia (such as microlaryngoscopies).

Compared to low-flows oxygen systems, the greater CO2 elimination capacity could reduce the incidence of hypoventilation and apnea episodes potentially associated with patient sedation.

Operative hysteroscopy is a brief procedure, normally lasting \<30 minutes, usually performed in a day-hospital regime under procedural analgo-sedation, with conventional ventilatory support through a face mask/laryngeal mask.

The primary objective of this study is the comparison of the rate of success in airways management via the THRIVE system versus positive pressure ventilation by I-gel laryngeal mask during 180 hysteroscopies performed under general anesthesia.

Secondary objectives are: the comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups.

Materials and methods Patient monitoring throughout the procedure will include automatic noninvasive, intermittent (every 5 minutes) blood pressure monitoring, 3-leads electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), bispettral index (BIS), transcutaneous capnography with TCM5 Radiometer monitor.

Upon arrival in the operating room, the patient will assume the lithotomic position; a peripheral venous cannula will be placed at the level of the hand or forearm and it will begin the infusion of Ringer Lactate solution 3 ml/kg/h. Omeprazole 40 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg will be administered before the procedure as standard internal practice.

In the THRIVE group, dedicated Optiflow THRIVETM nasal cannulas will be positioned for 100% high flow oxygen therapy at an initial flow of 30 L/min. After induction of anesthesia and throughout the procedure the flow of oxygen will be increased to 70 L/min.

In the control group (CONTROL) after induction of anesthesia the patient will be mechanically ventilated through an I-Gel laryngeal mask.

General anesthesia, as per normal clinical practice, will be induced and maintained by target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol (7 mcg/Kg) by Orchestra Infusion system (Fresenius Kabi) and fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg and in both groups. Propofol infusion rate will be between 3-4 mcg/ml for propofol, so to maintain a level of sedation monitored via BIS between 40-50. Paracetamol 1g, ondansetron 4 mg and ketorolac 30 mg will also be administered as per normal clinical practice.

In case of desaturation episodes, defined as a SpO2\< 94% or increases in tcCO2 above 65 mmHg, the patient will be assisted with positive pressure ventilation through a facial or laryngeal mask or oro-tracheal intubation based on clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist.

At the end of the hysteroscopy the patient will be transferred to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for 3 hours of post-procedural monitoring as required by internal protocol for day-surgery procedures. Standard monitoring will include non-invasive, intermittent (every 15 minutes) blood pressure monitoring, 3-leads electrocardiogram and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2).

One hour after the end of the procedure and before discharge from the PACU the patient will be asked to quantify the perceived degree of dyspnea with the Borg dyspnoea score and the degree of comfort using a Visual Numeric Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. In case of SpO2\<94%, additional oxygen will be administered by means of a Venturi-type face mask with FiO2 40%. Discharge from the PACU will require an Aldrete score of 9-10.

Statistics The data will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the sample will be described through descriptive statistical techniques. Continuous quantitative variables with normal distribution will be reported as mean and standard deviation; as median and interquartile range the non-normal variables.

Categorical variables and missing data will be presented as absolute values and percentage, n (%).

Continuous variables will be compared with the Student t-test in case of normal distribution or, if not, with the Mann-Whitney test for independent samples. The normality of the distribution of the variables will be verified graphically by histograms and with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Continuous variables with repeated measurements will be compared with a mixed-effect linear regression model. The type of airway management used and the timing at which the measurements will be performed will be considered as fixed effects; a random effect related to the patient will also be added.

The assumption of normality of the residues of the model will be graphically verified by histograms and Q-Q plots. The P-values will be obtained with the likelihood ratio test of the complete model with the effect in question with respect to the model without the effect. The estimates of the predictors used in the model will be reported with the relative 95% confidence intervals and P-values obtained with the Wald test.

In case of failure of the technique, defined as a transcutaneous concentration of carbon dioxide (tcCO2) > 65 mmHg and/or SpO2 \< 94% in any of the study groups, a time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) analysis will be carried out that takes into account the different duration of the procedures and therefore the different risk ranges for the possible onset of hypercapnia and / hypoxemia.

Differences between categorical data will be reported in terms of relative risk or risk differences, 95% confidence intervals and p-values based on the Χ2 test or fisher's exact test.

The significance level will be set for α \< 0.05. All analyses will be performed with the statistical software R version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria).

Continuous variables with repeated measurements will be compared with a mixed-effect linear regression model. Normality of distribution will be verified with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables will be compared with Student t - or Mann Whitney test; categorical variables with the Chi-square test.

Sample size calculation In 2021, Kim et al. compared the safety of high flow oxygen therapy to conventional low-flow oxygen support for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed under sedation reporting minimum values of peripheral saturation detected by pulse-oximeter higher in the high-flow group (99.8%) compared to low-flow oxygen therapy (95.1%).

To our knowledge, no study has compared these two methods during operative hysteroscopies under procedural sedation.

Based on literature and on the results from an internal registered pilot study in which we investigated the success rate of THRIVE as unique airway management technique in this setting, assuming a similar success rate of 95% for THRIVE and laryngeal mask ventilation, for a unilateral confidence interval of 95% and a 90% test power, we estimated a minimum sample of 82 patients per group to test a non-inferiority limit of 10%. The sample was increased to 90 patients for group to take into account any dropouts.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrium; Hypertrophy, Cervix
  • Anesthesia
  • Apnea, Postanesthetic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • High flow nasal cannula Oxygen
  • Procedural sedation
  • Apnoeic ventilation
  • Operative hysteroscopy
  • THRIVE
03

In context

Hypertrophy

656 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertrophy; 87 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 50 across 460 interventional studies indexed under Hypertrophy.

Browse Hypertrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 920 studies on the registry; 529 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy
  • ASA I-II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 30,
  • pregnancy,
  • cardiac arrhythmia,
  • high risk of aspiration,
  • neuromuscular disease,
  • patient refusal.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    THRIVE

    Ventilatory management during surgery provided by transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange.

    Device: Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE).

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Ventilatory management during surgery provided by mechanical ventilation through laringeal mask

    Device: LMA

Interventions

  • DeviceTransnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE).

    In the THRIVE group, dedicated Optiflow THRIVE nasal cannulas will be positioned for 100% high flow oxygen therapy at an initial flow of 30 L/min. After induction of anesthesia and throughout the procedure the flow of oxygen will be increased to 70 L/min.

  • DeviceLMA

    Mechanical ventilation performed by a laringeal mask

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of success of ventilation with THRIVE.

    Comparison of the rate of success in airways management with the THRIVE system versus positive pressure ventilation by laryngeal mask. The failure of the method will be defined as a CO2 value measured by transcutaneous monitor (Radiometer) \> 65 mmHg AND/OR a peripheral O2 saturation measured by pulse oximeter \< 94%.

    Time frame: Throughout the surgical procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Airway related complications.

    Comparison of percentage of patients requiring airway manipulations (nasal cannula, manual ventilation, laryngeal mask ventilation, tracheal intubation) by the anesthesiologist in the two groups

    Time frame: At the end of the surgery.

  2. Postoperative complications - 1

    Comparison of percentage of patients suffering from cough, sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia, laryngospasm, oxygen desaturation (defined as SpO2\<94%).

    Time frame: At the end of the surgery.

  3. Postoperative complications - 2

    Comparison of incidence of dyspnoea (measured with Borg dyspnoea score: 0= no dyspnoea, 10= maximal dyspnoea) in the two groups.

    Time frame: At the end of the surgery.

  4. Postoperative complications - 3

    Comparison of incidence of discomfort (measured with Visual Analogue Scale: 0= no discomfort, 10= maximal discomfort) in the two groups.

    Time frame: At the end of the surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli
    Rome, 00167, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • BARTLETT RG Jr, BRUBACH HF, SPECHT H. Demonstration of aventilatory mass flow during ventilation and apnea in man. J Appl Physiol. 1959 Jan;14(1):97-101. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1959.14.1.97. No abstract available. PubMed 13630833 ↗
  • Patel A, Nouraei SA. Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):323-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.12923. Epub 2014 Nov 10. PubMed 25388828 ↗
  • O'Cain CF, Dowling NB, Slutsky AS, Hensley MJ, Strohl KP, McFadden ER Jr, Ingram RH Jr. Airway effects of respiratory heat loss in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1980 Nov;49(5):875-80. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.49.5.875. PubMed 7429910 ↗
  • Slutsky AS, Brown R. Cardiogenic oscillations: a potential mechanism enhancing oxygenation during apneic respiration. Med Hypotheses. 1982 Apr;8(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(82)90032-9. PubMed 6808323 ↗
  • Hermez LA, Spence CJ, Payton MJ, Nouraei SAR, Patel A, Barnes TH. A physiological study to determine the mechanism of carbon dioxide clearance during apnoea when using transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE). Anaesthesia. 2019 Apr;74(4):441-449. doi: 10.1111/anae.14541. Epub 2019 Feb 15. PubMed 30767199 ↗
  • Brzek A, Dworrak T, Strauss M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Sabbah I, Dworrak B, Leischik R. The weight of pupils' schoolbags in early school age and its influence on body posture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1462-z. PubMed 28320364 ↗
  • Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13. PubMed 20406507 ↗
  • Vourc'h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, Bachoumas K, Clavieras N, Egreteau PY, Asehnoune K, Mercat A, Reignier J, Jaber S, Prat G, Roquilly A, Brule N, Villers D, Bretonniere C, Guitton C. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1538-48. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3796-z. Epub 2015 Apr 14. PubMed 25869405 ↗
  • Parke RL, Bloch A, McGuinness SP. Effect of Very-High-Flow Nasal Therapy on Airway Pressure and End-Expiratory Lung Impedance in Healthy Volunteers. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1397-403. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04028. Epub 2015 Sep 1. PubMed 26329355 ↗
  • Chikata Y, Onodera M, Oto J, Nishimura M. FIO2 in an Adult Model Simulating High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy. Respir Care. 2017 Feb;62(2):193-198. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04963. Epub 2016 Nov 22. PubMed 27879385 ↗
  • Moller W, Feng S, Domanski U, Franke KJ, Celik G, Bartenstein P, Becker S, Meyer G, Schmid O, Eickelberg O, Tatkov S, Nilius G. Nasal high flow reduces dead space. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Jan 1;122(1):191-197. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00584.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 17. PubMed 27856714 ↗
  • Gustafsson IM, Lodenius A, Tunelli J, Ullman J, Jonsson Fagerlund M. Apnoeic oxygenation in adults under general anaesthesia using Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) - a physiological study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):610-617. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex036. PubMed 28403407 ↗
  • Wong DT, Dallaire A, Singh KP, Madhusudan P, Jackson T, Singh M, Wong J, Chung F. High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Improves Safe Apnea Time in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Oct;129(4):1130-1136. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003966. PubMed 31584919 ↗
  • Mazzeffi MA, Petrick KM, Magder L, Greenwald BD, Darwin P, Goldberg EM, Bigeleisen P, Chow JH, Anders M, Boyd CM, Kaplowitz JS, Sun K, Terrin M, Rock P. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Patients Having Anesthesia for Advanced Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: HIFLOW-ENDO, a Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):743-751. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004837. PubMed 32398433 ↗
  • Shih CC, Liang PC, Chuang YH, Huang YJ, Lin PJ, Wu CY. Effects of high-flow nasal oxygen during prolonged deep sedation on postprocedural atelectasis: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Nov;37(11):1025-1031. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001324. PubMed 32890016 ↗
  • Itagaki T, Okuda N, Tsunano Y, Kohata H, Nakataki E, Onodera M, Imanaka H, Nishimura M. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula on thoraco-abdominal synchrony in adult critically ill patients. Respir Care. 2014 Jan;59(1):70-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02480. Epub 2013 Jun 4. PubMed 23737548 ↗
  • Kagan I, Hellerman-Itzhaki M, Neuman I, Glass YD, Singer P. Reflux events detected by multichannel bioimpedance smart feeding tube during high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and enteral feeding: First case report. J Crit Care. 2020 Dec;60:226-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Aug 22. PubMed 32882605 ↗
  • Coudroy R, Frat JP, Ehrmann S, Pene F, Terzi N, Decavele M, Prat G, Garret C, Contou D, Bourenne J, Gacouin A, Girault C, Dellamonica J, Malacrino D, Labro G, Quenot JP, Herbland A, Jochmans S, Devaquet J, Benzekri D, Vivier E, Nseir S, Colin G, Thevenin D, Grasselli G, Assefi M, Guerin C, Bougon D, Lherm T, Kouatchet A, Ragot S, Thille AW; REVA Network. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy alone or with non-invasive ventilation in immunocompromised patients admitted to ICU for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: the randomised multicentre controlled FLORALI-IM protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e029798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029798. PubMed 31401603 ↗
  • Mauri T, Galazzi A, Binda F, Masciopinto L, Corcione N, Carlesso E, Lazzeri M, Spinelli E, Tubiolo D, Volta CA, Adamini I, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Impact of flow and temperature on patient comfort during respiratory support by high-flow nasal cannula. Crit Care. 2018 May 9;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2039-4. PubMed 29743098 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05550584
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
Start date
Jun 17, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2022
Completion
May 1, 2023
Last update
Sep 5, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion