CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05550181iHypoPROUpdated May 6, 2023

Intraoperative Hypocapnia in PROVHILO and PROBESE

An observational study in Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Surgery and Pulmonary Complication, sponsored by NMC Specialty Hospital. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-06.

Sponsored by NMC Specialty Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,793
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of intraoperative hypocapnia, in particular the associations of intraoperative hypocapnia with patient demographics, ventilator characteristics, and perioperative complications we will perform an individual patient-level meta-analysis of two recent randomized clinical trials of intraoperative ventilation, the 'PROtective Ventilation using High versus LOw PEEP trial' (PROVHILO), and the 'Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients trial' (PROBESE).

Read the detailed description

Lung-protective intraoperative ventilation (LPV) has the potential to improve the outcome of surgery patients through a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications. Use of intraoperative ventilation strategies that use a low tidal volume could result in intraoperative hypercapnia. However, hypocapnia remains surprisingly common during intraoperative ventilation, possibly meaning that anesthesiologists continue to use high, if not too high respiratory rates or tidal volumes.

Previous studies suggested associations between intraoperative derangement of end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) and postoperative outcomes. Indeed, two studies in highly selected patient groups showed associations of intraoperative hypocapnia with prolonged length of hospital stay, in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, and in patients undergoing hysterectomy.

To gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of intraoperative hypocapnia, in particular the associations of intraoperative hypocapnia with patient demographics, ventilator characteristics, and perioperative complications we will perform an individual patient-level meta-analysis of two recent randomized clinical trials of intraoperative ventilation; PROVHILO and PROBESE.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary Complication
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Postoperative Complications
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Hypocapnia
  • Mechanical Ventilation
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,233 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 292 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,793 is above the median of 254 across 519 observational studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

NMC Specialty Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anesthesia for surgery.

Inclusion criteria

  • Planned for major (abdominal) surgery.
  • At risk for postoperative pulmonary complications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned thoracic surgery or neurosurgery.
  • Unscheduled surgery (i.e., urgent, or emergent surgeries) were excluded because these patients may have had metabolic abnormalities at the moment of surgery, i.e., metabolic acidosis, for which the anesthesiologist may have adjusted the intraoperative ventilator settings. This may have led to a 'compensatory' low etCO2.
  • Patients with etCO2 recordings are missing from the study databases.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,793 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • with hypocapnia

    We will use the intraoperatively collected etCO2 levels to classify patients as either 'with hypocapnia' or 'without hypercapnia', using the cutoff of 35 mmHg. A patient is considered 'hypocapnic' if the etCO2 was \< 35 mm Hg at any point during surgery, from start of the study till end of the study

    Behavioral: intraoperative mechanical ventilation with hypocapnia (etCO2 < 35 mm Hg)

  • without hypocapnia

    We will use the intraoperatively collected etCO2 levels to classify patients as either 'with hypocapnia' or 'without hypercapnia', using the cutoff of 35 mmHg. A patient is considered 'hypocapnic' if the etCO2 was \< 35 mm Hg at any point during surgery, from start of the study till end of the study, and classified as 'without hypocapnia' otherwise. In case of a missing value immediately before extubation, we will use the values as reported in the last hour of surgery.

Interventions

  • Behavioralintraoperative mechanical ventilation with hypocapnia (etCO2 < 35 mm Hg)

    A patient is considered 'hypocapnic' if the etCO2 was \< 35 mm Hg at any point during surgery, from start of the study till end of the study and classified as 'without hypocapnia' otherwise. In case of a missing value immediately before extubation, we will use the values as reported in the last hour of surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications

    Composite of predefined and collected postoperative pulmonary complications. Postoperative pulmonary complications included mild, moderate, and severe respiratory failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome; bronchospasm; new pulmonary infiltrate; pulmonary infection; aspiration pneumonitis; pleural effusions; atelectasis; cardiopulmonary edema; and pneumothorax.

    Time frame: Until day seven or hospital discharge, whichever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of intraoperative complications

    Defined as intraoperative hypotension, arrhythmias; or need for rescue for desaturations; or need for vasoactive drugs.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively

  2. Incidence of intensive care unit admission

    Incidence of intensive care unit admission during hospital stay

    Time frame: Until hospital discharge, death or 100 days, whichever comes first

  3. Incidence of extrapulmonary pulmonary complications

    Time frame: Until day seven or hospital discharge, whichever comes first

  4. Incidence of 7-day mortality

    Until day seven or hospital discharge, whichever comes first

    Time frame: Mortality during the first seven days of hospitalization

  5. Incidence of in-hospital mortality

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 days

  6. Incidence of major postoperative complications

    Collapsed composite of complications developing within the first seven postoperative combining severe postoperative pulmonary complications, sepsis, septic shock and/or acute kidney injury

    Time frame: Until day seven or hospital discharge, whichever comes first

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
    São Paulo, Brazil
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
    Dresden, Germany
  • IRCCS San Martino Policlinico Hospital
    Genoa, Italy
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
    Barcelona, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deng QW, Tan WC, Zhao BC, Wen SH, Shen JT, Xu M. Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):324-335. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.10.024. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PubMed 32007240 ↗
  • Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Biehl M, Binnekade JM, Canet J, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, Hedenstierna G, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Putensen C, Ranieri M, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Schmid W, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):66-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000706. PubMed 25978326 ↗
  • PROVE Network Investigators for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology; Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug 9;384(9942):495-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60416-5. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24894577 ↗
  • Akkermans A, van Waes JAR, Thompson A, Shanks A, Peelen LM, Aziz MF, Biggs DA, Paganelli WC, Wanderer JP, Helsten DL, Kheterpal S, van Klei WA, Saager L. An observational study of end-tidal carbon dioxide trends in general anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Feb;66(2):149-160. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1249-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14. PubMed 30430440 ↗
  • Dony P, Dramaix M, Boogaerts JG. Hypocapnia measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide tension during anesthesia is associated with increased 30-day mortality rate. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Dec 2. PubMed 28183549 ↗
  • Dong L, Takeda C, Yamazaki H, Kamitani T, Kimachi M, Hamada M, Fukuhara S, Mizota T, Yamamoto Y. Intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide and postoperative mortality in major abdominal surgery: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;68(11):1601-1610. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02086-z. Epub 2021 Aug 6. PubMed 34357567 ↗
  • Park JH, Lee HM, Kang CM, Kim KS, Jang CH, Hwang HK, Lee JR. Correlation of Intraoperative End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Concentration on Postoperative Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1860-1867. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05984-x. Epub 2021 Feb 16. PubMed 33591427 ↗
  • Wax DB, Lin HM, Hossain S, Porter SB. Intraoperative carbon dioxide management and outcomes. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):819-23. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833cca07. PubMed 20613537 ↗
  • Writing Committee for the PROBESE Collaborative Group of the PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet) for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology; Bluth T, Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M; PROBESE Collaborative Group; Bluth T, Bobek I, Canet JC, Cinnella G, de Baerdemaeker L, Gama de Abreu M, Gregoretti C, Hedenstierna G, Hemmes SNT, Hiesmayr M, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Laffey J, Licker MJ, Markstaller K, Matot I, Mills GH, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Putensen C, Rossaint R, Schmitt J, Schultz MJ, Senturk M, Serpa Neto A, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Vidal Melo MF, Wrigge H. Effect of Intraoperative High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With Recruitment Maneuvers vs Low PEEP on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2292-2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7505. Erratum In: JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1829-1830. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16415. PubMed 31157366 ↗
  • Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Gunay E, Jaber S, Kokulu S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Ranieri VM, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Amato MB, Costa EL, de Abreu MG, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jun;4(6):e34. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30026-1. PubMed 26947624 ↗
  • Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, Briel M, Talmor D, Mercat A, Richard JC, Carvalho CR, Brower RG. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639. PubMed 25693014 ↗
  • Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PubMed 27620287 ↗
  • van Meenen DMP, Serpa Neto A, Paulus F, Merkies C, Schouten LR, Bos LD, Horn J, Juffermans NP, Cremer OL, van der Poll T, Schultz MJ; MARS Consortium. The predictive validity for mortality of the driving pressure and the mechanical power of ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00346-8. PubMed 33336298 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 20, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The harmonized dataset will be available after the publication of the main results and under request to the steering committee

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05550181
Lead sponsor
NMC Specialty Hospital
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Responsible party
Prashant Nasa (Head of the Department, Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
Start date
Nov 29, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
May 6, 2023

Study contacts

Sabrine NT Hemmes, PhD
study chair · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
David MP van Meenen, PhD
principal investigator · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Frederique Paulus, PhD
study chair · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Marcus J Schultz, PhD
study director · Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion