CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05542537NHTUpdated Jul 9, 2025

Nurturing Healthy Teachers

An interventional study of Brighter Bites (BB) Produce Distribution and Brighter Bites (BB) Nutrition Education in Nutrition, Healthy, Mental Health Wellness 1 and Diabetes Mellitus Risk, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-09.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
379
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare the impact of a fruit and vegetable access plus nutrition education intervention to a nutrition education-only control on the health, well-being, and food security of early care and education (ECE) professionals. The intervention, called Nurturing Healthy Teachers, combines strategies from two evidence-based programs - Create Healthy Futures (CHF) and Brighter Bites (BB).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the impact of the Nurturing Healthy Teachers program on food insecurity, dietary behaviors, mental health, and cardiometabolic health among early care and education (ECE) professionals who teach Pre-Kindergarten or Kindergarten. Nurturing Healthy Teachers is a novel, comprehensive program that combines strategies from two evidence-based programs - Brighter Bites (implemented by Brighter Bites 501c3 non-profit) and Create Healthy Futures (implemented by Penn State Better Kid Care).

  1. Brighter Bites (BB) is a 501c3 non-profit organization that implements an evidence-based coordinated school health program that combines access to fresh produce and nutrition education proven to improve dietary intake among preschool and elementary school teachers, low-income children, and their families. For 16 weeks in the school year, Brighter Bites teachers and families receive a weekly distribution of about 20 lbs (50 servings) of primarily donated fresh vegetables, plus weekly healthy recipe tastings, and nutrition education. The program has proven effectiveness at engaging teachers, parents, increasing healthy dietary behaviors and improving the school and home nutrition environment of low-income elementary school children in the short-term.
  2. Developed and implemented by Penn State Extension Better Kid Care (BKC), Create Healthy Futures (CHF) is a web-based nutrition education program that targets nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, mindfulness, and social support to create healthy habits among teachers. CHF also includes facilitated group meetings to reinforce information from the online modules.

The trial will be conducted in 30 elementary schools that have pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten classes that serve predominantly low-income families in Houston. Schools in the intervention arm (n=15) will receive Brighter Bites plus the complete Create Healthy Futures program including online modules and in-person meetings, and they will be drawn from schools that are already scheduled to receive Brighter Bites during the 2022-2023 school year. Schools in the control arm (n=15) will only receive passive access to the online modules of the Create Healthy Futures program, and they will be drawn from remaining schools across the district, as long as they have not participated in Brighter Bites in the previous two years. The intervention and control programs will be implemented over one school year (9months). Brighter Bites non-profit organization and Penn State Better Kid Care will implement the Nurturing Healthy Teachers program, while UTHealth School of Public Health investigators will conduct the evaluation of the program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nutrition, Healthy
  • Mental Health Wellness 1
  • Diabetes Mellitus Risk
  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • food insecurity
  • nutrition
  • healthy eating
  • wellness
  • teachers
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 379 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Teachers:

  • Employed as a pre-K or kindergarten teaching staff at the participating study schools in the 2022-2023 school year.
  • Ability to read English at the 4th grade reading level
  • Ability to complete study measures

Exclusion Criteria for Teachers:

  • Have recently (in the past 6 months) or are currently participating in an exercise or weight loss program

Inclusion Criteria for Schools:

  • Have at least 25 eligible early childhood education (ECE) professionals
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
379 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BB Produce Distribution + BB Nutrition Education + CHF Weekly Wellness Groups + CHF Web-Based Module

    BB is Brighter Bites. CHF is Create Healthy Futures.

    Behavioral: Brighter Bites (BB) Produce Distribution · Behavioral: Brighter Bites (BB) Nutrition Education · Behavioral: Create Healthy Futures (CHF) Weekly Wellness Groups · Behavioral: Create Healthy Futures (CHF) Web-Based Module

  • Active comparator
    CHF Web-Based Module

    CHF is Create Healthy Futures.

    Behavioral: Create Healthy Futures (CHF) Web-Based Module

Interventions

  • BehavioralBrighter Bites (BB) Produce Distribution

    For 16 weeks in the school year, teachers in participating program schools will receive distributions of 8-10 different types of produce items.

  • BehavioralBrighter Bites (BB) Nutrition Education

    Brighter Bites Nutrition Education will consist of recipes, food preparation and storage ideas, and tips and tools to budget and plan meals. Teachers will be trained in a nutrition education curriculum, which will be implemented in the program schools as part of the BB program.

  • BehavioralCreate Healthy Futures (CHF) Weekly Wellness Groups

    Peer-facilitators will lead virtual weekly group discussions. Penn State Better Kid Care will train the wellness facilitators.

  • BehavioralCreate Healthy Futures (CHF) Web-Based Module

    Create Healthy Futures Web-Based Module is self-paced and focuses on the following topics: 1) Introduction, 2) Challenges of the food environment, 3) Nutrition and your health, 4) Food culture reform, and 5) Providers' role in creating healthy futures. The Create Healthy Futures module utilizes several educational methods to increase interactivity and engagement, including video footage of content experts, reflection activities, downloadable handouts, and action planning. Each chapter takes approximately 30-40 minutes to complete. The program is delivered on the Better Kid Care On Demand platform, an asynchronous learning management system that provides professional development training for teachers in all 50 states and 69 countries.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Household Food Insecurity as assessed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture self-report food insecurity survey

    Household Food insecurity will be measured on an electronically administered using the 10-item self-report previously validated U.S. Department of Agriculture food insecurity survey. The survey will measure food insecurity over the past 30 days. The total score is the sum of affirmative responses to the 10 questions, with a total score range of 0-10. Scores indicate the following about extent of food insecurity: * score of zero-High food security * score of 1-2-Marginal food security * score of 3-5-Low food security * score of 6-10-Very low food security

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Household Food Insecurity as assessed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture self-report food insecurity measure

    Household Food insecurity will be measured on an electronically administered using the 10-item self-report previously validated U.S. Department of Agriculture food insecurity survey. The survey will measure food insecurity over the past 30 days. The total score is the sum of affirmative responses to the 10 questions, with a total score range of 0-10. Scores indicate the following about extent of food insecurity: * score of zero-High food security * score of 1-2-Marginal food security * score of 3-5-Low food security * score of 6-10-Very low food security

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Household Food Insecurity as assessed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture self-report food insecurity measure

    Household Food insecurity will be measured on an electronically administered using the 10-item self-report previously validated U.S. Department of Agriculture food insecurity survey. The survey will measure food insecurity over the past 30 days. The total score is the sum of affirmative responses to the 10 questions, with a total score range of 0-10. Scores indicate the following about extent of food insecurity: * score of zero-High food security * score of 1-2-Marginal food security * score of 3-5-Low food security * score of 6-10-Very low food security

    Time frame: 9 months

  4. Household Food Insecurity as assessed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture self-report food insecurity measure

    Household Food insecurity will be measured on an electronically administered using the 10-item self-report previously validated U.S. Department of Agriculture food insecurity survey. The survey will measure food insecurity over the past 30 days. The total score is the sum of affirmative responses to the 10 questions, with a total score range of 0-10. Scores indicate the following about extent of food insecurity: * score of zero-High food security * score of 1-2-Marginal food security * score of 3-5-Low food security * score of 6-10-Very low food security

    Time frame: 14 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dietary intake as assessed by self-report survey

    Dietary intake will be self-reported on an electronically administered survey using a food frequency screener. The survey items will measure the frequency of consumption of various foods including fruits, vegetables, whole grains, protein, water, beverages, desserts, processed food, and candy. Data will be reported categorically as the number of times the surveyed foods were consumed.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Dietary intake as assessed by self-report survey

    Dietary intake will be self-reported on an electronically administered survey using a food frequency screener. The survey items will measure the frequency of consumption of various foods including fruits, vegetables, whole grains, protein, water, beverages, desserts, processed food, and candy. Data will be reported categorically as the number of times the surveyed foods were consumed.

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) survey

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD) survey has a total score from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating greater anxiety.

    Time frame: baseline

  4. Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) survey

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD) survey has a total score from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating greater anxiety.

    Time frame: 9 months

  5. Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) survey

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD) survey has a total score from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating greater anxiety.

    Time frame: 14 months

  6. Anxiety impact as assessed by the impact item of the GAD-7 survey

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the GAD-7, they will be asked how difficult the anxiety-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: baseline

  7. Anxiety impact as assessed by the impact item of the GAD-7 survey

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the GAD-7, they will be asked how difficult the anxiety-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. Anxiety impact as assessed by the impact item of the GAD-7 survey

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the GAD-7, they will be asked how difficult the anxiety-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 14 months

  9. Depression as assessed by the Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has a total score of 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.

    Time frame: baseline

  10. Depression as assessed by the Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has a total score of 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.

    Time frame: 9 months

  11. Depression as assessed by the Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has a total score of 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.

    Time frame: 14 months

  12. Depression impact as assessed by the impact item of the PHQ-9

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the PHQ-9, they will be asked how difficult the depression-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: baseline

  13. Depression impact as assessed by the impact item of the PHQ-9

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the PHQ-9, they will be asked how difficult the depression-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 9 months

  14. Depression impact as assessed by the impact item of the PHQ-9

    For participants who scored 1 or above on the PHQ-9, they will be asked how difficult the depression-related issues have made it to do work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Not difficult at all; Somewhat difficult; Very difficult; Extremely difficult; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 14 months

  15. Well-being as assessed by the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has a total score or 0 -25, with a higher score indicating greater well-being.

    Time frame: baseline

  16. Well-being as assessed by the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has a total score or 0 -25, with a higher score indicating greater well-being.

    Time frame: 9 months

  17. Well-being as assessed by the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5)

    The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) has a total score or 0 -25, with a higher score indicating greater well-being.

    Time frame: 14 months

  18. General health as assessed by the general health item of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 4-item questionnaire (CDC HRQoL-4)

    Only one item on the CDC HRQoL-4 will be asked, and this is the item related to general health. Participants will be asked if they would say that in general that their health is Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor, or Prefer not to say. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Excellent; Very good; Good; Fair; Poor; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: baseline

  19. General health as assessed by the general health item of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 4-item questionnaire (CDC HRQoL-4)

    Only one item on the CDC HRQoL-4 will be asked, and this is the item related to general health. Participants will be asked if they would say that in general that their health is Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor, or Prefer not to say. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Excellent; Very good; Good; Fair; Poor; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 9 months

  20. General health as assessed by the general health item of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 4-item questionnaire (CDC HRQoL-4)

    Only one item on the CDC HRQoL-4 will be asked, and this is the item related to general health. Participants will be asked if they would say that in general that their health is Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor, or Prefer not to say. Data will be reported categorically as number of participants who answered: Excellent; Very good; Good; Fair; Poor; Prefer not to say.

    Time frame: 14 months

  21. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level as assessed by blood test

    Finger stick blood samples will be obtained from teachers in the school, and HbA1c level in the blood sample will be analyzed.

    Time frame: baseline

  22. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level as assessed by blood test

    Finger stick blood samples will be obtained from teachers in the school, and HbA1c level in the blood sample will be analyzed.

    Time frame: 9 months

  23. Blood pressure (systolic) as assessed by automated oscillometric device

    Blood pressure measurements will be taken using an automated oscillometric device.

    Time frame: baseline

  24. Blood pressure (systolic) as assessed by automated oscillometric device

    Blood pressure measurements will be taken using an automated oscillometric device.

    Time frame: 9 months

  25. Blood pressure (diastolic) as assessed by automated oscillometric device

    Blood pressure measurements will be taken using an automated oscillometric device.

    Time frame: baseline

  26. Blood pressure (diastolic) as assessed by automated oscillometric device

    Blood pressure measurements will be taken using an automated oscillometric device.

    Time frame: 9 months

  27. Skin carotenoid level as assessed by The Veggie Meter

    Skin carotenoid level will be assessed by The Veggie Meter, which is a small, portable non-invasive device that can be clipped to the finger briefly to detect skin carotenoid concentrations in ∼15-20 seconds for a single reading.

    Time frame: baseline

  28. Skin carotenoid level as assessed by The Veggie Meter

    Skin carotenoid level will be assessed by The Veggie Meter, which is a small, portable non-invasive device that can be clipped to the finger briefly to detect skin carotenoid concentrations in ∼15-20 seconds for a single reading.

    Time frame: 9 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05542537
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
Brighter Bites, Penn State Better Kid Care, University of Texas at Austin, Vitamix Foundation
Responsible party
Shreela V Sharma (Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2022
Start date
Nov 4, 2022
Primary completion
May 20, 2024
Completion
May 20, 2024
Last update
Jul 9, 2025

Study contacts

Shreela V Sharma, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion