ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05538455Updated Aug 30, 2023

Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases

An interventional study of PC4L solutions in Neurodegenerative Diseases, Parkinson Disease and Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by Casa di Cura Privata del Policlinico SpA. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-30.

Sponsored by Casa di Cura Privata del Policlinico SpA · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
558
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 67 studies in Neurodegenerative Diseases with a site in Italy — 15 open to participants now, 22 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Neurodegenerative Diseases · Italy.

Enrollment
8th of 45
558 · median 139
Started
2022
with 4 others
No phase
16 of 67
4 open now
Registered
35th of 67
by date

Among the 67 studies in Neurodegenerative Diseases with a site in Italy, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 45 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2022, is one of 16 with no phase, and was the 35th registered.

Neurodegenerative Diseases

436 studies on the registry are indexed under Neurodegenerative Diseases; 143 are open to participants now.

Browse Neurodegenerative Diseases studies →

Open to participants now

15 of the 67 studies in Neurodegenerative Diseases with a site in Italy are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

10 more — sign in →

All 15 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Italy have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Italy →

Who these studies take

Of the 101 Neurodegenerative Diseases studies recruiting now, 52 (51%) set no upper age limit and 11 (11%) stop at 75 or younger; 20 take children under 18; 49 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 65 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 67 studies in Neurodegenerative Diseases with a site in Italy, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Elderly People (ProCare4Life, PC4L) project was created to finalize a digital platform with integrated sensors , for monitoring the health status of the elderly subjects with neurodegenerative diseases and comorbidities.

In fact, an integrated care platform - able to establish correlations between comorbidities, investigate the intake of different drugs, mitigate potential health risks, study the social variables and promote unified therapeutic procedures or social services - could help patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals and social health workers to monitor various diseases parameters.

The main contribution of the PC4L project is to propose an integrated, scalable and interactive care system that can be easily adapted to the reality of various chronic diseases, care institutions and end-user needs, for the benefit of all the actors involved. The main expected results are to improve patients' quality of life, enable an active life and better disease management, support professionals in decision making, facilitate efficient communication between all stakeholders and ensure reliable and secure access to data at the within Europe.

Read the detailed description

There is an urgent need to increase the efficiency and sustainability of health and social care systems across Europe, as there is a growing trend in public spending, which is expected to reach 14% of GDP by 2030. The main causes are the aging of the population, and the increase of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, asthma, mental and physical disorders and neurodegenerative conditions. Comorbidities and the confluence of various chronic diseases is increasingly common in the elderly, which increases the need to develop models and tools to improve integrated health systems.

Population aging has also led to major reforms in long-term care policies and systems in many European countries, increasing the need for alternatives. This implies the need for help with housework or other practical errands, transportation by doctors or social visits, social companionship, emotional guidance, or help in organizing professional care. In most European countries, much of the care people over 60 receive is informal care.

Among the most common chronic diseases in the elderly population, neurocognitive deterioration in the stages of dementia associated with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's are the most disabling. Today, more than 10 million Europeans live with neurocognitive disorders in stages of dementia.

This situation can be improved through the creation of an integrated care platform, able to establish correlations between co-morbidities, investigate the use of the intake of different drugs, mitigate potential health risks, study the social variables involved and promote unified therapeutic procedures or social services. This solution could help patients, health professionals and social health workers to monitor various diseases, also considering the social context. In addition, people with chronic diseases face difficulties in their daily life and need specialized care services and care. This situation imposes high burdens on the public budget, which require particular attention to adequately address the sustainability of the social and health system in Europe.

The main contribution of the PC4L project is to propose an integrated, scalable and interactive care system that can be easily adapted to the reality of various chronic diseases, care institutions and end-user needs, for the benefit of all the actors involved (e.g. patients, caregivers and health experts). The main expected results are to improve patients' quality of life, enable an active life and better disease management, support professionals in decision making, facilitate efficient communication between all stakeholders and ensure reliable and secure access to data at the within Europe.This study is part of the European multicenter project Horizon 2020, called Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Elderly People (ProCare4Life, PC4L), which involves several European partners and was created with the aim of finalizing a digital platform with integrated sensors, aimed at home monitoring of health status and treatment of the elderly patient with Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.The PC4L Project was funded by the European Community Horizon 2020 innovation and research program (grant agreement No 875221), for the development of an international research project aimed at exploring the potential of assistive technologies in monitoring the behavior of elderly subjects. The project involves in fact the elderly population suffering from chronic neurological diseases and other comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and arthritis. This project also aims to provide home support to the caregivers of subjects affected by these diseases.

PC4L-Pilot3 represents the third and last large-scale pilot study within the project, where the first one was aimed to explore feasibility and usability of the solution, and the second one investigated the characteristics of the metrics generated by the PC4L platform in real-life conditions.

In this pilot study, six clinical centers are involved, in five different European countries (Italy, Spain, Portugal, Romania, Germany), operating in the neurological context both at hospital and home care, as well as daycare centers.

An interventional, multicenter, randomized controlled trial will be conducted. The duration of the study per patient at home will be 3 months. Participants admitted to rehabilitation and daycare centers will use the PC4L platform for the entire duration of their stay in the center (not exceeding the 3 months).

Patients will be randomized into two groups: experimental group, which will use the PC4L platform for the duration envisaged by the study and will receive notifications and recommendations from the system; and the control group, which will follow the recommendations in paper form for the period envisaged by the study. Caregivers and health professionals will also be involved.

In-person assessments will take place at baseline and at the end of the study (3-month follow-up or at discharge from the rehabilitation/daycare program).

Demographic and clinical data (age, gender, level of education, professional activity, social support, previous use of technology) will be assesed at baseline. In-person assessments thorugh clinical evaluation will take place at baseline and at the end of the study (3-month follow-up or at discharge from the rehabilitation/daycare program). Clinical assessments are the following:

MDS Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS); Falls Self-Efficacy Scale (FES-I); Berg Balance test; Pittsburgh Sleep quality index score: State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI); presence of festination, dysphasia, wandering episodes (last month); EuroQol5D3L; Barthel Index; patient satisfaction and empowerment (PACIC, SAPS); non-programmed medical resources used (last month); Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) ; adverse events reporting; System Usability Scale (SUS) ; end-of-study survey (Global satisfaction with a 5-point Likert scale; What do you like most/least? Suggestions); end-of-study open questions (Which type of recommendations have you been using? How did you find the recommendations? how it helped in improving your wellbeing? What did you like the most/least?).

The PROCare4Life ecosystem consists of:

  • Wearable sensors - to be used by the patient for monitoring disease-related parameters, in passive and interactive paradigms (e.g., simple bio-measurements as heart rate, complex bio-measurements as motor behavior, passive measurement if initiated automatically, interactive measurement if initiated by patient). The wearable sensor used is the smartwatch Fitbit Versa 2. Patients will use the sensor in the dominant arm.
  • Fixed sensors (binary sensors) placed on strategic places and rooms in the home environment for assessing motor behaviors and the interaction with the environment (e.g. number of times the patient visits the bathroom, number of times the patient leaves the house). The selected location sensors are the "Xiaomi Aqara Door and Window Sensor (MCCGQ11LM)".
  • PROCare4Life app for mobile smartphones to process data directly from smartphone (Samsung A20 or other similar model) IMU sensors and GPS and directly from users (e.g., anthropometric data and symptoms / complaints to be provided directly by the patient or by caregiver or social/healthcare professionals, via questionnaires). In particular, the data collected will be: anthropometric data and symptoms, and data related to medication uptake, to be provided directly by the patient or by caregiver, via short questionnaires and annotations. Data related to motor behaviors through GPS and inertial sensors.
  • A local computer- to collect data from the patients via the sensorial ecosystem which includes several fixed and dynamic sensors such as wearables, binary sensors and/or cameras. (wearable and fixed sensors, and cameras).
  • PROCare4Life integrated care platform (accessible via Internet browsers) to provide an electronic health record/personal information sheet (fed with data provided by the PROCare4Life ecosystem) and complex interface for personalized interaction/communication between the patients and healthcare professionals.
  • Tablet or computer to collect data from the patients related to the cognitive abilities, with the use of the cognitive games application that includes six different games about the short-term memory, the visual recognition, understanding, semantic memory, vocabulary, mathematics, among others. This application collects not only the results of the games, but also information related to the user interaction with the application.
03

Conditions studied

  • Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Parkinson Disease
  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Quality of Life
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's (Hoehn and Yahr between II and IV) or another parkinsonian syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, or another dementia
  • 65 years of age or more
  • Willingness to participate in the study
  • Able and willing to provide or have a legal representative responsible for the signature

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of fever and / or acute infection such as COVID19 / flu
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
558 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group, use of PC4L solutions

    Participants who will use the PC4L solutions for the estabilished period of time, in the selected scenario (home, neurorehabilitation and daycare centers), and will receive recommendations in the PC4L app

    Device: PC4L solutions

  • No intervention
    Control group, no use of PC4L solutions

    Participants who will be monitored for the estabilished period of time, in the selected scenario (home, neurorehabilitation and daycare centers), and will only receive written recommendations

Interventions

  • DevicePC4L solutions

    Two different versions of the PC4L system will be tested. A fully equipped version and a cloud-based system that requires only a smartphone and a wearable sensor (Fitbit Versa 2). 25% of participants will use the full system, the remaining 75% will use the cloud-based system. As part of the decision support system, the PC4L platform includes a recommendation component. This component collects information from different sources available (directly from sensors, cognitive games, questionnaires, and the multimodal fusion engine), and under clinical and professional guidance, after evaluating the potential improvement or worsening of patients' conditions, issues personalized recommendations to address identified problems. The recommendations relate to the following areas: physical activities; sleep; cognitive; nutrition. These recommendations will generally be sent to the PC4L application on the patients' smartphone, where they will appear as pop-up notifications.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EuroQol5D3L

    Improvement of the quality of life in the 'experimental' group of patients who use the PC4L platform for a period of three months, compared to the control group, equal to 10% according to the scale EuroQol5D3L: the primary outcome of the study will be the difference in quality of life between groups, measured by the EuroQol5D3L scale at the end of the study. Sample size calculation was based on a previous study (Fan X, et al. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life between People with Parkinson's Disease and Non-Parkinson's: Using Data Drawn from the '100 for Parkinson's' Smartphone-Based Prospective Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018) that compared the quality of life of two groups of patients. It was estimated that a total of 558 patients, 279 per study group, will be necessary to achieve an improvement of 10% in EuroQol5D3L, with 95% power.

    Time frame: up to three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)

    Change in the score of MDS-UPDRS measured at baseline and at the end of the study. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  2. CLINICAL DEMENTIA RATING SCALE (CDRS)

    Change in the score of CDRS measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 0-5, where higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  3. Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)

    Change in the score of FES-I measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 16-64, where higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  4. Pittsburgh Sleep quality index (PSQI)

    Change in the score of PSQI measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 0-21, where higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  5. State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI)

    Change in the score of STAI measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 20-80, where higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  6. Barthel Index (BI)

    Change in the score of BI measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 0-100, where higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  7. Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC)

    Change in the score of PACIC measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 0-5, where higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  8. Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS)

    Change in the score of SAPS measured at baseline and at the end of the study. It yields a single score on a scale of 0-28, where higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  9. Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G)

    Change in the score of CIRS-G measured at baseline and at the end of the study . It yields a single score on a scale of 0-56, where higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

  10. System Usability Scale (SUS)

    SUS is used to measure how easy or difficult the proposed system is to use. We will compare the usability of two different versions of the PC4L system (fully equipped and cloud-based solution). It yields a single score on a scale of 0-100, where higher scores mean better outcome.

    Time frame: up to three months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Casa di Cura del Policlinico
    Milan, MI 20144, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Broese van Groenou MI, De Boer A. Providing informal care in a changing society. Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(3):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0370-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15. PubMed 27610055 ↗
  • Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985 Mar-Apr;100(2):126-31. PubMed 3920711 ↗
  • Chastin SF, Baker K, Jones D, Burn D, Granat MH, Rochester L. The pattern of habitual sedentary behavior is different in advanced Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Oct 15;25(13):2114-20. doi: 10.1002/mds.23146. PubMed 20721926 ↗
  • Crizzle AM, Newhouse IJ. Is physical exercise beneficial for persons with Parkinson's disease? Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Sep;16(5):422-5. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000244612.55550.7d. PubMed 17016120 ↗
  • da Silva PG, Domingues DD, de Carvalho LA, Allodi S, Correa CL. Neurotrophic factors in Parkinson's disease are regulated by exercise: Evidence-based practice. J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr 15;363:5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 10. PubMed 27000212 ↗
  • Fan X, Wang D, Hellman B, Janssen MF, Bakker G, Coghlan R, Hursey A, Matthews H, Whetstone I. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life between People with Parkinson's Disease and Non-Parkinson's: Using Data Drawn from the '100 for Parkinson's' Smartphone-Based Prospective Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 13;15(11):2538. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112538. PubMed 30428518 ↗
  • Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, Hall K, Hasegawa K, Hendrie H, Huang Y, Jorm A, Mathers C, Menezes PR, Rimmer E, Scazufca M; Alzheimer's Disease International. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2112-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0. PubMed 16360788 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Parkinson's Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson's disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):939-953. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3. Epub 2018 Oct 1. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00382-3. PubMed 30287051 ↗
  • Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jan;9(1):58-65. doi: 10.1038/nrn2298. PubMed 18094706 ↗
  • Hou L, Chen W, Liu X, Qiao D, Zhou FM. Exercise-Induced Neuroprotection of the Nigrostriatal Dopamine System in Parkinson's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Nov 3;9:358. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00358. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29163139 ↗
  • Clarke A. Qualitative research: data analysis techniques. Prof Nurse. 1999 May;14(8):531-3. PubMed 10532026 ↗
  • Kwakkel G, de Goede CJ, van Wegen EE. Impact of physical therapy for Parkinson's disease: a critical review of the literature. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13 Suppl 3:S478-87. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(08)70053-1. PubMed 18267287 ↗
  • Lauze M, Daneault JF, Duval C. The Effects of Physical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Review. J Parkinsons Dis. 2016 Oct 19;6(4):685-698. doi: 10.3233/JPD-160790. PubMed 27567884 ↗
  • Lorenz K, Freddolino PP, Comas-Herrera A, Knapp M, Damant J. Technology-based tools and services for people with dementia and carers: Mapping technology onto the dementia care pathway. Dementia (London). 2019 Feb;18(2):725-741. doi: 10.1177/1471301217691617. Epub 2017 Feb 8. PubMed 28178858 ↗
  • Melin J, Bonn SE, Pendrill L, Trolle Lagerros Y. A Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction With Mobile Health Apps: Development Using Rasch Measurement Theory. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 26;8(5):e15909. doi: 10.2196/15909. PubMed 32452817 ↗
  • Petzinger GM, Fisher BE, McEwen S, Beeler JA, Walsh JP, Jakowec MW. Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jul;12(7):716-26. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70123-6. PubMed 23769598 ↗
  • Keus SH, Bloem BR, Hendriks EJ, Bredero-Cohen AB, Munneke M; Practice Recommendations Development Group. Evidence-based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research. Mov Disord. 2007 Mar 15;22(4):451-60; quiz 600. doi: 10.1002/mds.21244. PubMed 17133526 ↗
  • Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):655-60. doi: 10.1079/pns2004399. PubMed 15831139 ↗
  • Block VA, Pitsch E, Tahir P, Cree BA, Allen DD, Gelfand JM. Remote Physical Activity Monitoring in Neurological Disease: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154335. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27124611 ↗
  • Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. PubMed 16534088 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 7 months.

Of 75 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neurodegenerative Diseases, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 57. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 82 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 67.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2022
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
StartActual
Sep 30, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 30, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05538455
Lead sponsor
Casa di Cura Privata del Policlinico SpA
Collaborators
Asociación Parkinson Madrid, Universität Münster, Wohlfahrtswerk für Baden-Württemberg, Campus Neurológico Sénior, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Spitalul Universitar de Urgență București, International Foundation for Integrated Care, Kineticos
Responsible party
Elda Judica (Principal Investigator, Casa di Cura Privata del Policlinico SpA) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2022
Start date
Sep 30, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2023
Completion
Apr 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion