An interventional study of Intubation in Hoarseness of Voice and Sore-throat, sponsored by Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-08.
Sponsored by Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening
The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of postoperative sore throat after intubation with two different types of laryngoscopes.
Postoperative sore throat is a well known complication after endotracheal intubation. One of the major contributing factors is trauma associated with laryngoscopy. With decreased force applied to visualise cords, video laryngoscopes should decrease the incidence of postoperative sore throat. In this study we compared the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat when laryngoscopy was done using c-mac video laryngoscope D-blade( group V) versus Macintosh laryngoscope (Group M). Method: Fifty four American society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 1\&2 patients between age 18-60 years , undergoing laproscopic surgeries of short duration were included in this study and laryngoscopy was done with Macintosh laryngoscope in M group and with C MAC video laryngoscope D blade in V group. Patients were followed up 2hours, 6hours, 12hours and 24hours in postoperative period to see postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice .
52 studies on the registry are indexed under Hoarseness; 9 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 108 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Hoarseness.
Browse Hoarseness studies →Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Group Intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope is labelled as M group
Procedure: Intubation
Group Intubated with C-Mac video laryngoscope is labelled as V group
Procedure: Intubation
Study groups Intubated with Macintosh or cmac video laryngoscopes
The incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat measured
The incidence and severity of Postoperative sore throat is measured after surgery at 2hours, 6hours, 12hours and 24 hours based on a scaling system as described below * No sore throat at any time since the operation Grade 0 * Minimal - patient answered in the affirmative when asked about sore throat - Grade1 * Moderate - patient complained of sore throat on his/her own - Grade 2 * Severe - patient is in obvious distress-Grade 3
Time frame: Upto 24 hours after surgery
The incidence and severity of Hoarseness of voice
The incidence and severity of Postoperative hoarseness of voice measured at 2hours, 6hours, 12hours and 24hours post surgery by scaling system as described below * No complaint of hoarseness at any time since the operation - Grade 0 * Minimal - minimal change in quality of speech. Patient answers in the affirmative only when enquired about - Grade 1 * Moderate - moderate change in quality of speech of which the patient complains on his/her own - Grade 2 * Severe - gross change in the quality of voice perceived by the observer - Grade 3
Time frame: Upto 24 hours after surgery
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 24 months.
Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Hoarseness, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 24. This study's 24 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College