A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, sponsored by REMD Medical Technology. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-07.
Sponsored by REMD Medical Technology · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, medication-control, superiority, multicenter clinical study trial.
This study is studying the effects and safety in treating patients from nine different centers with Benign prostatic hyperplasia, employing Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Apparatus. This device could cause cell irreversible electroporation, which leading necrosis of hyperplasia tissue cells. It also has the ability to prevent nerve,vessel, urethral and capsule unnecessary injury beside the ablation area. Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Apparatus will be used in patients who pass inclusion/exclusion criteria. Safety, quality of life, and urodynamic data analysis of each patient will be evaluated in each study patients.
Background:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequently-occurring disease in elderly males. The incidence of BPH is as high as 50% in males over 50 years old, while the incidence of BPH is as high as 80% in males over 80 years old.
Current treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia include oral drug therapy and surgical treatment. Drug therapy mainly includes:1. 5-α reductase inhibitors, such as Finasteride, which can delay or reduce the prostate volume, but it is required for 3-6 months to take effect, and patients need prolonged maintenance therapy. And it is contraindicated in patients with abnormal liver function, because the drug needs to be metabolized by the liver; 2. α receptor blockers, such as Tamsulosin and Doxazosin, which are able to relax the bladder neck, prostate and urethral smooth muscle, thereby reducing prostatic urethral resistance. It cannot reduce the size of the prostate gland, so it cannot fundamentally prevent the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia, while the effect on large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia is not obvious, and it is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency; 3 Traditional medicines, which can only be used as a supplementary drug.
Surgery is the second-line treatment of BPH, and its standard procedure is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), which is considered to be the gold standard surgical procedure due to its exact efficacy and minimally invasive nature. However, large-scale retrospective studies have shown severe complications after TURP, especially TURP syndrome, postoperative urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, etc., hence there are still many concerns about the application of this procedure. Although plasma transurethral resection of the prostate and various laser prostate surgeries have sprung up in recent years, the basic surgical operation concept is not changed and the common problems existing in the procedure cannot be completely avoided. Luckily, with the development of technology, more and more new and effective treatments have emerged for BPH.
In 2004, a new method using steep pulses to treat tumor was appeared. It showed that steep pulses could bring about Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of cell, leading to necrosis of tumor or diseased cells. And it seemed to do no harms to the nerve and Vascular epithelial cell. The device of steep pulse had already been approved by FDA in 2011.However, this device of steep pulse has disadvantages like: (1)sever muscle contraction;(2)Urethral injury; (3)Capsule injury;(4)Nerve degeneration. This new device which is called Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device, may have the potential to conquer these disadvantages.
Purpose:
Methods:
783 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 174 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 97 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →This is the only study on the registry with REMD Medical Technology as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device
Device: Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device
Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Sustained Release Capsules, 0.2mg, once a day,3 months
Drug: Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules
Applying the Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device to treat the patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Applying Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules to treat the patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Difference value in urinary Qmax between 3 months after treatment with baseline.
The Qmax was measured before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment,and baseline difference values (posttreatment-Pretreatment) were calculated. The difference value of Qmax at 3 months after treatment with baseline was used as the primary outcome.
Time frame: 0,3 months
Difference value of size of prostate between different visits
Before and 3 months after treatment, prostate size was measured by prostate magnetic resonance scanning, and the rate of change was calculated.
Time frame: 0,3 months
Difference value of Qmax between different visits
Qmax was measured before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment.
Time frame: 0,1,3 months
Difference value of IPSS score between different visits
Before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, the prostate function of the subjects was calculated according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (I PSS), and the total score and improvement score were counted, respectively.
Time frame: 0,1,3 months
Operability of host system of device
Evaluate the operability of the host system of device after surgery: satisfied, commonly, dissatisfied
Time frame: The day of surgery
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.