CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05531344Updated Sep 7, 2022

Composite Steep-pulseTreatment Device Used in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device and Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, sponsored by REMD Medical Technology. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-07.

Sponsored by REMD Medical Technology · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2020, registered Sep 2022).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, medication-control, superiority, multicenter clinical study trial.

This study is studying the effects and safety in treating patients from nine different centers with Benign prostatic hyperplasia, employing Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Apparatus. This device could cause cell irreversible electroporation, which leading necrosis of hyperplasia tissue cells. It also has the ability to prevent nerve,vessel, urethral and capsule unnecessary injury beside the ablation area. Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Apparatus will be used in patients who pass inclusion/exclusion criteria. Safety, quality of life, and urodynamic data analysis of each patient will be evaluated in each study patients.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequently-occurring disease in elderly males. The incidence of BPH is as high as 50% in males over 50 years old, while the incidence of BPH is as high as 80% in males over 80 years old.

Current treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia include oral drug therapy and surgical treatment. Drug therapy mainly includes:1. 5-α reductase inhibitors, such as Finasteride, which can delay or reduce the prostate volume, but it is required for 3-6 months to take effect, and patients need prolonged maintenance therapy. And it is contraindicated in patients with abnormal liver function, because the drug needs to be metabolized by the liver; 2. α receptor blockers, such as Tamsulosin and Doxazosin, which are able to relax the bladder neck, prostate and urethral smooth muscle, thereby reducing prostatic urethral resistance. It cannot reduce the size of the prostate gland, so it cannot fundamentally prevent the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia, while the effect on large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia is not obvious, and it is contraindicated in patients with renal insufficiency; 3 Traditional medicines, which can only be used as a supplementary drug.

Surgery is the second-line treatment of BPH, and its standard procedure is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), which is considered to be the gold standard surgical procedure due to its exact efficacy and minimally invasive nature. However, large-scale retrospective studies have shown severe complications after TURP, especially TURP syndrome, postoperative urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, etc., hence there are still many concerns about the application of this procedure. Although plasma transurethral resection of the prostate and various laser prostate surgeries have sprung up in recent years, the basic surgical operation concept is not changed and the common problems existing in the procedure cannot be completely avoided. Luckily, with the development of technology, more and more new and effective treatments have emerged for BPH.

In 2004, a new method using steep pulses to treat tumor was appeared. It showed that steep pulses could bring about Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of cell, leading to necrosis of tumor or diseased cells. And it seemed to do no harms to the nerve and Vascular epithelial cell. The device of steep pulse had already been approved by FDA in 2011.However, this device of steep pulse has disadvantages like: (1)sever muscle contraction;(2)Urethral injury; (3)Capsule injury;(4)Nerve degeneration. This new device which is called Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device, may have the potential to conquer these disadvantages.

Purpose:

  1. This study will assess the efficacy of Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device in the treatment of BPH.
  2. This study will assess the safety of Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device in the treatment of BPH.

Methods:

  1. patients recruitment
  2. Irreversible Electroporation of malignant diseased Cell under Composite Steep-pulse Treatment for the patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia;
  3. Some factors such as prostate MRI, IPSS score, Qmax will be performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment.
  4. Other factors such as the routine blood test, the routine urine test, the blood biochemistry test, ect. will be performed to evaluate the safety of the treatment.
02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

  • IRE
  • Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • randomized
  • medication-control
  • superiority
  • multi-center
03

In context

Prostatic Hyperplasia

783 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 97 across 593 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Browse Prostatic Hyperplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with REMD Medical Technology as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males between 50 to 80 years old;
  2. Patients who Fully understand the treatment plan for irreversible electroporation, and accept the trial treatment and signed informed consent form;
  3. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)≥12;
  4. Patients who have no willing to perform enucleation or transurethral resection of prostate;
  5. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) >5ml/min and ≤15ml/min, voided volume ≥150ml;
  6. The volume of prostate was ≥30cm3 measured by MRI;
  7. Patients who Could perform follow-up evaluation in accordance with the trial protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a history of prostate cancer, or who confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer (needle biopsy of the prostate is required for patients indicated for needle aspiration, and if the needle result suggests benign prostatic hyperplasia, enrollment is allowed);
  2. Patients with second-degree or higher atrioventricular block and other cardiac diseases with clear contraindications to anesthesia;
  3. Patients with cardiac pacemakers and metallic replacement of pelvis or hip joints;
  4. Patients who underwent previous prostate surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia;
  5. patients who have history of soft or rigid cystoscopy or other transurethral device use within 7 days prior to Informed Consent Form signed;
  6. Any condition other than BPH that could lead to urinary symptoms or altered urinary flow rate (such as neurogenic bladder, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, bladder malignancy, acute or chronic prostatitis, acute or chronic urinary tract infection) as judged by the investigator;
  7. Patients with a previous history of epilepsy;
  8. Patients who have participated in other clinical trials within 3 months.
  9. Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score 4 or above, such as malignant hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, active cerebrovascular accident, severe anemia and other contraindications to general anesthesia;
  10. Patients who are considered to be inappropriate for participation in the trial by the investigator.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device

    Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency irreversible electroporation) Treatment Device

    Device: Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device

  • Active comparator
    Tamsulosin

    Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Sustained Release Capsules, 0.2mg, once a day,3 months

    Drug: Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules

Interventions

  • DeviceComposite Steep-pulse Treatment Device

    Applying the Composite Steep-pulse Treatment Device to treat the patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

  • DrugTamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules

    Applying Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules to treat the patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference value in urinary Qmax between 3 months after treatment with baseline.

    The Qmax was measured before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment,and baseline difference values (posttreatment-Pretreatment) were calculated. The difference value of Qmax at 3 months after treatment with baseline was used as the primary outcome.

    Time frame: 0,3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference value of size of prostate between different visits

    Before and 3 months after treatment, prostate size was measured by prostate magnetic resonance scanning, and the rate of change was calculated.

    Time frame: 0,3 months

  2. Difference value of Qmax between different visits

    Qmax was measured before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment.

    Time frame: 0,1,3 months

  3. Difference value of IPSS score between different visits

    Before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, the prostate function of the subjects was calculated according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (I PSS), and the total score and improvement score were counted, respectively.

    Time frame: 0,1,3 months

  4. Operability of host system of device

    Evaluate the operability of the host system of device after surgery: satisfied, commonly, dissatisfied

    Time frame: The day of surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Remd Medical Technology
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200000, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Major-Walker K, Morrill B, Montorsi F; CombAT Study Group. The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic enlargement: 2-year results from the CombAT study. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):616-21; discussion 621. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.084. Epub 2007 Dec 21. Erratum In: J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1191. PubMed 18082216 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05531344
Lead sponsor
REMD Medical Technology
Collaborators
RenJi Hospital, Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Shangdong Yiyuan Hospital, Tongji Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2022
Start date
Aug 20, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 8, 2022
Completion
Jul 8, 2022
Last update
Sep 7, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion