CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05523856TTOPROST/OBSUpdated Mar 12, 2025

New Treatment Modalities for Localized Prostate Cancer

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Fundacion IMIM. Active, not recruiting. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-12.

Sponsored by Fundacion IMIM · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480
Ages
50 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of four of the nowadays most established primary treatments for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and real-time brachytherapy) at short-, mid- and long-term follow-up. The primary aim is assessing the impact of treatments' side effects on patient's quality of life. As secondary objectives, biochemical disease-free survival, overall survival, and prostate cancer-specific survival will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

To compare the impact of active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and real-time brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer, in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, considering side effects and physical and mental health at short-, mid- and long-term follow-up.

Secondary Objectives:

To assess biochemical disease-free survival by treatment and risk group, at mid- and long-term follow-up.

To assess overall survival by treatment and risk group, at mid- and long-term follow-up.

To assess prostate cancer-specific survival by treatment and risk group, at mid- and long-term follow-up.

To assess perceived general health and cancer-specific quality of life by treatment and risk group, at short-, mid- and long-term follow-up.

To assess benefits and risks of the new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer, compared with the traditional ones (open radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy and intersticial pre-planned brachytherapy).

To assess utilities with direct and indirect methods.

Outline:

This is a prospective observational study of a cohort with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with either active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, or real-time brachytherapy.

Participants are consecutively recruited in 18 Spanish hospital departments (located in six autonomous communities). Patients eligible for inclusion were: age 50-75, tumor stage T1c or T2a, N0 and M0; Gleason ≤ 6 (or 3+4 if T1c); Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/mL; and to be treated with active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, or real-time brachytherapy. Patients were excluded when body mass index was >33, they had undergone neoadjuvant hormonal treatment, previous pelvic treatments, and/or had presence of serious comorbidities. The decision regarding treatment is made jointly by patients and health professionals.

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline are recorded at clinical sites and include age, PSA, Gleason score, prostate volume, risk group and use of adjuvant hormonal treatment. According to the national health guidelines, participants will be visited every 6-12 months after treatment, and at least annualy thereafter.

Quality of Life questionnaires are administered centrally by telephone interview before treatment and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment the first year, and annually thereafter. Quality of Life evaluations are gathered using computer-assisted telephone administration and include: (1) the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC), specifically designed to measure the impact of the different treatments; (2) 36-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2); (3) the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L); and (4) the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS).

The sample size calculated to detect small differences between groups (0.3 SD) on the EPIC or SF-36v2 scores was of 90 patients per treatment group, given a statistical power of at least 80% at a significance level of 5%, and loss to follow-up of 10%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Active Surveillance
  • Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
  • Real-time brachytherapy
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • PRO
  • Impact
  • Comparative effectiveness research
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 480 is above the median of 200 across 1,181 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion IMIM is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 50 and 75 years.
  • Clinical stage T1 or T2, N0/Nx and M0/Mx.
  • Gleason ≤6 or 7 (if 3+4 with T1c).
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 .
  • To be treated with active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy or real-time brachytherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index > 33.
  • Neoadjuvant hormonal treatment.
  • Previous pelvic treatments.
  • Presence of serious comorbidities.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
480 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • New Treatment Modalities Cohort

    A consecutive sample of clinically localized prostate cancer patients treated with active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, or real-time brachytherapy in 18 Spanish hospitals.

    Procedure: Active Surveillance · Procedure: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy · Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy · Radiation: Real-time brachytherapy

Interventions

  • ProcedureActive Surveillance

    It consists on monitoring the cancer with regular tests including PSA, blood test and digital rectal examination every 6 months, a magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy at the first year, and based on clinical decision thereafter. If there was a change on the results, the patient is considered for treatment.

  • ProcedureRobot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    It consists on the removal of the prostate gland and seminal vesicles with neurovascular preservation whenever anatomically and oncologically possible, with the Da Vinci procedure. Access is made through 5 or 6 small incisions, less than 1 cm. An extended pelvic lymph node dissection is performed when the risk estimation of node involvement is above the 5%. After surgery, the patient will be hospitalized for about 3 days and will probably resume his work activity between 3 and 5 weeks.

  • RadiationIntensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

    Patients in this group undergo volumetric modulated arc therapy under daily image-guided radiation therapy in the supine position. Radiation is delivered in 2-3 Gy daily fractions, 5 days per week, with a prescription dose of 60-70 Gy to the prostate.

  • RadiationReal-time brachytherapy

    Patients in this group receive I125 permanent seeds (low dose rate). The images are obtained with a transrectal ultrasound probe and are transferred to a planning system for calculating the number and position of the seeds. The prescrption dose is 145 Gy to the reference isodose (100%).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of treatments' side effects on patients' quality of life measured in terms of change in the score of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 84, 120, 180, and 240 months after treatment.

    The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) is a prostate cancer-specific questionnaire that measures urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal domains, ranging from 0 to 100. Response options for each EPIC item are on a 4-, 5-, or 6-level Likert scale. Items are grouped in summary scores for sexual, bowel, and hormonal domains, and in 2 scores for the urinary domain (incontinence and irritative/obstructive symptoms), which are transformed linearly to a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 84, 120, 180, and 240 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biochemical disease-free survival

    Number of participants who are free of biochemical relapse after a specified duration of time. Biochemical relapse is measured by PSA levels. For patients treated with radical prostatectomy, biochemical relapse criteria of the American Urological Association is applied, and for patients treated with external radiotherapy or brachytherapy, criteria of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology is followed.

    Time frame: 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 years after treatment

  2. Overall survival

    Number of participants who are alive after a specified duration of time. Vital status and data of death from any cause recorded by linkage with the National Institute of Statistics.

    Time frame: 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 years after treatment

  3. Prostate cancer-specific survival

    Number of participants who are not dead due to prostate cancer after a specified duration of time. Death due to prostate cancer according to the cause of death registered in the the National Institute of Statistics.

    Time frame: 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 years after treatment

  4. Perceived general health measured with the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2)

    The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) contains 36 items covering eight dimensions: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. For each dimension, a score ranges from 0-100 (higher score indicate better health).Physical and mental component summaries are constructed, using recommended scoring algorithms. Summary scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the US general population.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 84, 120, 180, and 240 months after treatment

  5. Quality-Adjusted Life Years measured with the EuroQol-5 Dimensions

    The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) is a generic econometric instrument that contains five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) with five levels of severity in each dimension. From the possible combinations of scales and severity levels (3125 health states), a utility index is obtained, which ranges from 1 (perfect health) to negative values, 0 being the value attributed to death.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 84, 120, 180, and 240 months after treatment

  6. Disease-specific Quality-Adjusted Life Years measured with the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale

    The Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (POPRUS) is a 10-attribute health state classification system that includes 5 broad items of health-related quality of life (pain, energy, social support, communication with doctor, and emotional well-being) and 5 prostate cancer-specific items (urinary frequency and incontinence, sexual function and desire, and bowel function. A multiattribute utility function is constructed using the patient-weighted utilities elicited with standard gamble. This utility index (PORPUS-U) ranges from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (dead).

    Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60, 84, 120, 180, and 240 months after treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zamora V, Garin O, Fumadó Ll, Bonet X, Castells M, Pont A, Gutiérrez C, Ventura M, Ferrer M. Impact of the new treatment modalities in patients with localized prostate cancer. Gac Sanit 2019; 33 Suppl C:224.
  • Sayol L, Garin O, Pont A, Guedea F, Gutiérrez C, Ventura M, Martí-Pastor M, Ferrer M. Men undergoing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer present the best short-term quality of life outcomes. Quality of Life Research 2017;26:1-142 (206.1).
  • Sayol L, Garin O, Pont A, Guedea F, Gutiérrez C, Ventura M, Ferrer M. [Patients under active surveillance with localized prostate cancer are those with the best quality of life in the short-term]. Gaceta Sanitaria 2017;31 (Espec Congr):787.
  • Zamora V, Garin O, Pardo Y, Pont A, Gutierrez C, Cabrera P, Gomez-Veiga F, Pijoan JI, Litwin MS, Ferrer M; Multicentric Spanish Group of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Mapping the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale From the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and the Short-Form Health Surveys. Value Health. 2021 Nov;24(11):1676-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Sep 8. PubMed 34711369 ↗
  • Zamora V, Garin O, Suarez JF, Gutierrez C, Guedea F, Cabrera P, Castells M, Herruzo I, Fumado L, Samper P, Ferrer C, Regis L, Pont A, Ferrer M; Multicentric Spanish Group of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Comparative effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct 29;44:100694. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100694. eCollection 2024 Jan. PubMed 38021091 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data processing complies with ethical principles and relevant national and international legislation (Reglamento General de Protección de Datos 2016/679 and Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5). The final data will only be accessible to people working on the study. No data used in the analyses and subsequent dissemination of the study results will contain any identifiable reference referring to the names of patients. Once the study is finished, the results will be communicated to the competent authorities, in accordance with local legislation. Data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a data sharing agreement that provides for: * A commitment to use the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; * A commitment to protect data through the use of appropiate information technology; * A commitment to destroy or return the data after analyses are complete.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05523856
Lead sponsor
Fundacion IMIM
Collaborators
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Hospital del Mar, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Hospital Provincial de Castellon, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Hospital de Meixoeiro, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Responsible party
Montserrat Ferrer (Medical Doctor, PhD, Fundacion IMIM) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2022
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion