ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05518552L&PtracinLBPUpdated Aug 26, 2022

Effects of Manual Lumbar and Prone Traction in Patients With Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Manual lumbar traction and Prone traction in Non-specific Low Back Pain, sponsored by Obafemi Awolowo University. Completed at 1 site in Nigeria. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-26.

Primary conditionLow Back PainRegistry: PainReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pain — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Low Back Pain
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Low Back Pain, a narrower term within Pain.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Obafemi Awolowo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2019, registered Aug 2022).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study determined the effects of manual Lumbar traction and prone traction on some clinical variables of patients with long standing low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Traction therapy has been used in the management of low back pain (LBP) especially None Specific Low Back Pain. There are several recommendations on how lumbar traction should be performed, but the type of technique to be applied differs among the sources. Prone traction adapted from inversion therapy which is a form of gravitational traction has been reported to be effective in ameliorating disabilities of patients with low back pain as well reduce pain intensity. Manual lumbar traction is performed by the therapist, pulling at the patient's ankles and has been reported to be effective in relieving pain and reducing disability of patient with None Specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP). Documented evidences on the efficacy of traction in non-specific low back pain are still inconclusive. While manual lumbar traction seems more commonly used, probably owing to its positional advantage, its relative effectiveness compared with manual prone traction is still unknown, hence this study. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of manual lumbar traction and prone traction on pain intensity, disability, spinal range of motion and quality of life in patients with None Specific Low Back Pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-specific Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Manual Lumbar Traction
  • Prone Traction
  • Pain Intensity
  • Low back pain
  • Disability
03

In context

Low Back Pain Reclassified

2,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 579 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Obafemi Awolowo University is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Low Back Pain, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pain. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants diagnosed with Non-Specific Low Back Pain of not less than 3 months duration who were referred by a physician.
  • Participants between the ages of 40 years and older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain patients with specific pathology, such as systemic inflammatory diseases, pregnancy, fractures of the spine, tumors, infections.
  • Participants with pathology affecting the trunk or upper and lower extremities
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    manual Lumbar Traction

    The subjects consist of 25 patients with chronic low back pain. They underwent a manual lumbar traction with Physiotherapist pulling the patients while lying prone on a couch

    Other: Manual lumbar traction

  • Experimental
    Prone traction

    This group consist of patients with non specific chronic low back pain that were put on prone traction.

    Other: Prone traction

Interventions

  • OtherManual lumbar traction

    Patient in the group were treated with manual traction

  • OtherProne traction

    Patient in the group were placed on prone traction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue scale

    It measure pain intensity: 0 which is no pain to 10 which is excruciating pain

    Time frame: Change is being assessed at the Baseline, 3rd week and 6th week of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Roland Morris low back pain Disability questionnaire

    It measures the disability of the patients from 0, no disability to 24 which is the greatest disability

    Time frame: Change is being assessed at the Baseline, 3rd week and 6th week of treatment

  2. Goniometer

    It measures spinal flexibility in "degree". The flexibility may start from 0 degree and the maximum depends on the flexibility of each participants

    Time frame: Change is being assessed at the Baseline, 3rd week and 6th week of treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Obafemi Awolowo University
    Ile Ife, Osun 220005, Nigeria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van den Brandt PA. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;57(3):268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.005. PubMed 15066687 ↗
  • Ozaktay AC, Cavanaugh JM, Asik I, DeLeo JA, Weinstein JN. Dorsal root sensitivity to interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor in rats. Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11(5):467-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0430-x. Epub 2002 Jun 4. PubMed 12384756 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data are kept with the principal investigator. Whosoever is interested can contact him for information

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 10 months.

Of 1,231 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 26. This study's 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,286 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 23, 2022
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
StartActual
Jan 25, 2019
Primary completionActual
Dec 18, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 12, 2022
Last update
Aug 26, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05518552
Lead sponsor
Obafemi Awolowo University
Responsible party
Adesola Ojo Ojoawo (Principal Investigator, Obafemi Awolowo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
Start date
Jan 25, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2019
Completion
Feb 12, 2022
Last update
Aug 26, 2022

Study contacts

Adesola O Ojoawo, PhD
principal investigator · Obafemi Awolowo University Ile Ife

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion