An interventional study of Classic Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Modified Peyton's Four-Step Approach in Educational Problems, sponsored by Indonesia University. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-22.
Sponsored by Indonesia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills are basic skills which have to be learnt by medical student and have to be practiced directly. However, during COVID-19 pandemic, offline training was difficult to be conducted and new specific learning method has not established yet. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of modified Peyton's four-step approach, which can be implemented through online training, compared to the classic Peyton's four-step approach in learning endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills.
Indonesia University is the lead sponsor of 448 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drop out Criteria:
Students followed offline training session of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills
Other: Classic Peyton's Four-Step Approach
Students followed online training session of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills
Other: Modified Peyton's Four-Step Approach
Instructor demonstrated endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills directly to the preclinical students, followed by direct hands-on practice using manequin, ended with giving feedback to the students
Video tutorial of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation were given to the students without explanation, followed by video tutorial making using manequin (without instructor) by the students which will be uploaded to Youtube
Global rating
numeric score
Time frame: by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training
Actual mark
numeric score
Time frame: by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training
Satisfaction score
using Likert scale
Time frame: by the end of Basic Clinical Skill module, approximately 1-3 months after training
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Indonesia University