CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05508126Updated Oct 15, 2024

Multi-parametric MRI and Dual-energy CT in Patients of Gastric Cancer

An observational study in Gastric Cancer Stage, sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2021; still recruiting 4 years 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
222
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is of major importance for guiding therapeutic decision-making, preventing both under- and over-treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of the Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in gastric cancer.

Read the detailed description

Gastric cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The therapeutic approach to gastric cancer is strongly dependent on preoperative stage. The crucial role of gastric cancer imaging lies in implementing individualized treatment regimens according to various stages of tumor.

CT scanning has been recommended as the first-line image modality for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer by the 8th AJCC staging manual. However, for traditional CT, the accuracy of staging is highly variable and the sensitivity of early gastric cancer detection is relatively low. Recently, DECT has been increasingly used in clinical practice due to its powerful post-processing technique. A recent small sample study showed that monoenergetic images at 40 KeV improved lesion depiction and higher T stage accuracy for gastric cancer. Therefore, this study chose DECT instead of traditional CT to explore the diagnostic performance in preoperative staging.

Historically, the role of MRI in gastric cancer has been limited, and the guidelines have not yet recommended MRI as a first-line examination scheme. But with the continuous technical improvements for abdominal imaging (e.g. breath-hold sequences and high Resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence), mpMRI has become a promising imaging technology. In addition, given the advantages of non-radiation, non-invasiveness, and excellent soft tissue contrast, mpMRI may be more suitable for neoadjuvant therapy patients who require multiple evaluations.

Patients with gastric cancer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy will be prospectively included in this study. Patients undergo both mpMRI and DECT at baseline to stage the primary tumor, regional lymph nodes, and to rule out distant sites of disease. The interval between mpMRI and DECT examinations should not exceed 7 days. All patients will be treated according to standard practice in our institution. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy will undergo mpMRI and DECT scan again for restaging. The postoperative pathology results of these two examination methods were prospectively collected, and their efficacy was calculated according to the reference standard. After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up periodically.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer Stage

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Computed Tomography
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

2,851 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 864 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 222 is below the median of 274 across 670 observational studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 543 studies on the registry; 301 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients diagnosed with gastric cancer by endoscopically biopsy will be considered for inclusion in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients with preoperative pathologically confirmed GC by endoscopy and preoperative imaging data (DECT/mpMRI) were included.
  • No contraindications for CT/MRI examination
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of previous therapy.
  • Patients with recurrent gastric cancer
  • Patients with a history of severe allergy to contrast agents
  • Patients with imaging artefacts affect the evaluation
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
222 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Primary staging group I

    All patients will be treated according to standard practice. Patients in group I are patients that will be stratified for radical gastrectomy or endoscopic resection. Group I will undergo only a primary staging. All patients will take DECT and mpMRI examination within 1 week before surgery.

    Diagnostic Test: DECT examination · Diagnostic Test: mpMRI examination

  • Restaging group II

    Patients in group II are patients that will be stratified for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group II will undergo a primary staging (DECT and mpMRI) and 1-2 times restaging (DECT and mpMRI).

    Diagnostic Test: DECT examination · Diagnostic Test: mpMRI examination

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDECT examination

    DECT examinations will be performed using a 192-slice CT scanner (SOMATOM, Force, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany).

  • Diagnostic testmpMRI examination

    The examinations were conducted on a 3-T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance of DECT and mpMRI in tumor staging assessment

    Accuracy for both imaging techniques in the prediction of tumor staging.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Diagnostic performance of DECT and mpMRI in tumor restaging assessment

    Accuracy for both imaging techniques in the prediction of tumor restaging.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. The kappa value

    Inter-rater reliability of the DECT and mpMRI in tumor assessment

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Predictive value of DECT and mpMRI after the neoadjuvant treatment for pathologic response

    Pathological tumour regression grading (Mandard criterion): from 1 to 5 grading.

    Time frame: 4 years

  3. Disease free survival (DFS)

    Survival analysis: Radiologic data predicting DFS.

    Time frame: 4 years

  4. Overall survival (OS)

    Survival analysis: Radiologic data predicting OS.

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Likert scales 1-5

    Qualitative image analysis of mpMRI in a supine and prone position

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. The signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR)

    Quantitative image analysis of mpMRI in a supine and prone position.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Contrast-to-noise Ratio (CNR)

    Quantitative image analysis of mpMRI in a supine and prone position.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Yu-Dong Zhang
    Nanjing, 210029, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhen Y, Xie Q, Liu L. Diagnostic Value of Spiral CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning in Gastric Cancer and Precancerous Lesions. Scanning. 2022 May 23;2022:3627385. doi: 10.1155/2022/3627385. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35795615 ↗
  • Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Arcidiacono PG, Nicoletti R, Albarello L, Ambrosi A, Salerno A, Esposito A, Petrone MC, Chiari D, Staudacher C, Del Maschio A, De Cobelli F. Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography. Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):216-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0468-1. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25614468 ↗
  • Borggreve AS, Goense L, Brenkman HJF, Mook S, Meijer GJ, Wessels FJ, Verheij M, Jansen EPM, van Hillegersberg R, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP. Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI. Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20181044. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181044. Epub 2019 Mar 5. PubMed 30789792 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05508126
Lead sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2022
Start date
Nov 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion