ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05501470PROFE-SenUpdated Jun 26, 2026

Probiotic For the Improvement of Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women in Senegal

A Phase 2 interventional study of Probiotic and Placebo in Environmental Enteric Dysfunction, sponsored by Institut Pasteur de Dakar. Completed at 1 site in Senegal. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.

Sponsored by Institut Pasteur de Dakar · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting.

Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.

This trial will explore the conceptual framework, that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.

Read the detailed description

Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 years of age were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development5 , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting. Indeed, EED is believed to be responsible for 40% of childhood stunting. Disruption in intestinal barrier function affects gut immune homeostasis, nutrient flows, and consequently dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota consists of 100 trillion bacteria which interact with epithelial cells, the mucus layer and the mucosal immune system that balances tolerance and effector functions. Thus the gut microbiome has an important role in shaping the responsiveness of the gut immune system. The mucus barrier and the normal gut microbiota limit enteropathogen colonisation. Influx of bacteria from the lumen to the systemic circulation represents microbial translocation and initiation of systemic of inflammatory process through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) present on Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs). Three fundamental processes drive the epithelial damage which is so important in EED: infection, undernutrition, and immune dysfunction. Multiple clinical trials show that efforts to correct malnutrition through conventional therapies and improving hygiene and sanitation do not overcome growth deficits by more than about 10%. There is increasing interest in the use of probiotics which may allow pathogen decolonization, improve barrier function and restore overall gut homeostasis. Such therapies are at early stage of trials but may have potential in addressing the global burden of EED, by improving barrier function and gut pathophysiology.

Colonization of gut by enteropathogens is common in children with EED. These include ETEC, Campylobacter, Shigella and Salmonella species. Consistent data from Bangladesh and Zambia show that children with refractory stunting carry over four pathogens on average, whilst controls carry less than two. There is also clear evidence of altered composition of the microbiota in children with EED.

Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.

To date the focus of research on childhood stunting has been on the young child. It is increasingly appreciated, however, that stunting often begins in utero and the focus has shifted to women's health and pregnancy. For example, the Lancet 2021 Series on maternal and child undernutrition states that "Investments to reduce undernutrition in women are important not only for women's own health but also for the health and nutrition of their children". Results from rural Bangladesh reveal poor gestational weight gain that ultimately leads to intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and ultimately stunting and wasting. Furthermore, another study recently completed in slum settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh demonstrated a high prevalence of EED among undernourished women. Intestinal histopathology was abnormal in more than 80% of women. We postulate that growth retardation in utero is a consequence of EED in the mother during pregnancy and lactation. This leads to systemic inflammation, which leads to disadvantageous partitioning of nutrients, and reduced nutrient availability.

This trial will explore the conceptual framework that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.

The primary objective of this trial is to determine if a probiotic, Vivomixx, can reduce inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy in the target countries.

The secondary objectives of this trial are:

To determine if Vivomixx can reduce enteropathogen colonisation To determine if Vivomixx can impact the structure and function of the microbiome To determine if Vivomixx can reduce permeability. To determine if Vivomixx can impact the host metabolome in pregnant woman To evaluate variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories.

02

Conditions studied

  • Environmental Enteric Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Gut health
  • gut microbiota
  • Senegal
  • probiotics
  • Vivomixx
  • VSL3
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institut Pasteur de Dakar is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women over the age of 18, living in Guediawaye district, Senegal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • have had diarrhea, defined as the passage of three or more loose stools per 24 hours, in the preceding 14 days

      • have taken antibiotics or probiotics in the preceding 14 days
      • have taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the preceding 14 days
      • have any illness which in the opinion of the investigator will complicate assessment of safety or efficacy
      • have any gastrointestinal to ingestion of a capsule (known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, stricture, fistula, gastroparesis, or any swallowing disorder.)
      • have a plan to leave the study area within the follow-up period

but may be enrolled if/when these disqualifiers have expired.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Probiotic

    Participant in the treatment arm will receive a daily dose of the probiotic for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Probiotic · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participant in the control arm will receive a daily dose of a placebo for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo · Device: CapScan®

Interventions

  • Probiotic

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

  • DeviceCapScan®

    The only non-standard sample collection instrument is the CapScan® device. The CapScan Collection Capsule ("Capsule") is a non-invasive device that collects gastrointestinal samples along the GI tract that are then analyzed outside the body. Samples collected by the Capsule will be expressed, then undergo DNA sequencing and mass spectrometric analysis to determine the identity and function of the bacterial and host cells in the different regions of the GI tract and compared to similar analyses conducted on concomitantly collected stool samples.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy

    Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group.

    Time frame: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in enteropathogen colonisation

    Change in colonisation with specific enteropathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, ETEC, EPEC, EAEC, rotavirus, norovirus, Giardia and Cryptosporidium), by qPCR, between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, in Vivomixx compared to placebo groups

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56

  2. Impact on the structure and function of the microbiome

    Change in microbiome at community and composition level (as measured by whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, post versus pre-intervention), in the intervention and placebo groups

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56

  3. Change in permeability

    Change in LR ratio in Vivomixx compared to placebo groups

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56

  4. Impact of the host metabolome in pregnant woman

    Change in metabolome, measured by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in faecal and CAPSCAN samples before and after intervention

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56

  5. Rate of weight gain in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy

    Weight gain velocity in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy

    Time frame: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56

  6. Variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories

    Measurements of variability, including standard deviations and kappa values; Preliminary work across all sites using identical kits and harmonised SOPs

    Time frame: Beginning of recruitment in the first study site - end of recruitment in the last study site (approximately 12 months)

Other outcomes

  1. CapScan success rate in delivering an assessment of the microbiome

    Recovery of useful data from CapScan; completion of whole gut microbiome profiles

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 56

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre de santé de Wakhinane
    Guédiawaye, Dakar, Senegal
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be available within 24 months of study completion.

Access criteria: Data access requests will be reviewed by the Trial Management Group. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2024 to primary completion in Jul 2024, 1 month.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2022
First posted
Aug 15, 2022
StartActual
Jun 6, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jul 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Jan 30, 2026
Last update
Jun 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05501470
Lead sponsor
Institut Pasteur de Dakar
Collaborators
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Aga Khan University, University of Zambia, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 15, 2022
Start date
Jun 6, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 30, 2026
Last update
Jun 26, 2026

Study contacts

Yakhya Dieye, PhD
principal investigator · Institut Pasteur de Dakar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Probiotic

Start the discussion