CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05493943Updated Apr 5, 2024

P.E.M.F. Therapy of Chronic Wounds

An interventional study of Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy and Pulsed ElectroMagnetic (PEMF) therapy in Chronic Wounds, sponsored by PEMF Systems, Inc.. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-05.

Sponsored by PEMF Systems, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To measure the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) as an adjunct wound care therapy.

Read the detailed description

The goal of the three-arm trial is to employ application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) directly over chronic wounds combined with standard of care local wound therapy (SOC). Three different PEMF devices, one a low power system (LP-PEMF), another a high power system (HP-PEMF) and the third a sham device that does not emit energy (S-PEMF) will be employed as adjuncts to standard wound care. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that exposure of wounds to one of the PEMF devices leads to significantly better and faster healing than the sham system.

Research Design:

An investigator initiated, prospective, double blinded parallel three arm treatment study. Subjects are randomized to receive one of the three PEMF devices (LP-PEMF, HP-PEMF or sham device) twice daily for 15 minutes directly over a wound. Initially, 40 subjects from each treatment group will be enrolled for total of 120 subjects at VA Long Beach Healthcare System (VALB) at the interim analysis. Based on the results of that analysis, one of the treatment arms will be eliminated and a follow-up study will continue with the remaining two arms. Additional 60 to 100 subjects are to be enrolled after interim analysis and the study may expand to Greater Los Angeles Medical Center. The study is expected to last 2 years.

Participating eligible subjects will be asked to come to the VALB once a week for 14 weeks and then for 2 or 3 visits over 8 more weeks. The total number of visits including the first visit could be up to 17 visits in 5 months. The study has three phases: Screening phase (2 weeks); Treatment phase (12 weeks); and Follow-up phase (8 weeks). Subjects participation in the study may last up to 22 weeks, but subjects who heal early during the Treatment phase will have a reduced period of participation based on when their wound heals.

Methodology

Inclusion criteria include age ≥21 years; presence of venous leg ulcers (VLU), Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) or Pressure Ulcers (PU); wound size between 2 and 30 cm2; no exposed joint, tendon or bone, no tunneling or sinus tracts; wound duration ≥ 6 weeks.

Each wound will be reviewed for eligibility by assessing with duplex ultrasound, skin changes, tendon/bone/joint involvement, Ankle brachial Pressure Index (ABI), BMI, Hemoglobin A1c, Albumin and other medical history.

Female subjects who are currently breast feeding or capable of conceiving and all males capable of insemination must use an acceptable form of contraception in order to participate in the study (acceptable forms of contraception include condoms for males and contraceptive pills or IUDs for women).

Findings: None

Clinical Significance: Potentially beneficial treatment option for veterans with diabetic foot ulcer, venous leg ulcers or pressure ulcers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Wounds

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • wounds
  • chronic
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

5,056 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 861 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 52 across 3,239 interventional studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

PEMF Systems, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age must be at least 21 years old at the time of signing consent. 8.2 The index study ulcer size must be between 2.0 and 30.0 cm2 at the time of randomization. Measurements and photographs will to be taken after sharp debridement if performed at the Randomization Visit.
  • The index ulcer must have been present for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization.
  • If more than one ulcer is present on the target limb, the largest eligible ulcer should be deemed the study ulcer. Other ulcers close to the study ulcer are allowed and may be of any size. However, they should be > 2cm away from the study ulcer. Ulcers are allowed at other locations such as the on the contralateral limb. Other ulcers present besides the index study wound can be treated with different local care but cannot be treated with the PEMF device.
  • Only one site of application of the PEMF device is allowed and the PEMF device must be placed directly over the study ulcer.
  • Subjects to be enrolled into the VLU group must have had a duplex ultrasound study (if not done within six months prior the first screening visit) to document venous disease (deep system obstruction or reflux > 0.5 sec, or superficial system reflux > 0.5 sec, or have the characteristic hyperpigmentation and skin changes (lipodermatosclerosis) typical of venous disease.
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU): Subjects should have with neuropathy demonstrated by monofilament testing and have Wagner grade 1 wounds without involvement of tendon, bone, or joint.
  • Pressure Ulcer (PU): PU subject wounds must be stage 3 without deep structure involvement such as bone, tendon, or joint.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Wounds due to autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or vasculitis.
  • Exposed structures deep to the adipose layer of skin such as muscle, fascia, tendon, joint, or bone.
  • The presence of sinus tracts that have not been sufficiently marsupialized such that the wound depth cannot be assessed by gross visual inspection is an exclusion.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PEMF low power

    PEMF therapy using a device with low pulse intensity.

    Device: Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy

  • Active comparator
    PEMF medium power

    PEMF therapy using a medium pulse intensity.

    Device: Pulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy

  • Sham comparator
    PEMF Sham control

    Control arm using a sham PEMF device.

    Other: Pulsed ElectroMagnetic (PEMF) therapy

Interventions

  • DevicePulsed ElectroMagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy

    Application of PEMF using treatment coils in eproximity to the area where treatment is desired.

  • OtherPulsed ElectroMagnetic (PEMF) therapy

    Control arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to complete healing

    Complete re-epithelization of wound

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Wound closure

    Squared milimeters of wound closure

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number and type of adverse events

    Safety Endpoint

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Device effectiveness

    Compare the rate of effectiveness between performance of the two PEMF power levels by measuring percentage of wound closure

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fernandez MI, Watson PJ, Rowbotham DJ. Effect of pulsed magnetic field therapy on pain reported by human volunteers in a laboratory model of acute pain. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):266-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem129. Epub 2007 May 22. PubMed 17519258 ↗
  • Salzberg CA, Cooper-Vastola SA, Perez F, Viehbeck MG, Byrne DW. The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Apr;41(3):42-4, 46, 48 passim. PubMed 7546114 ↗
  • Sarma GR, Subrahmanyam S, Deenabandhu A, Babu CR, Madhivathanan S, Kesavaraj N. Exposure to pulsed magnetic fields in the treatment of plantar ulcers in leprosy patients--a pilot, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Indian J Lepr. 1997 Jul-Sep;69(3):241-50. PubMed 9394172 ↗
  • Bragin DE, Statom GL, Hagberg S, Nemoto EM. Increases in microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation via pulsed electromagnetic fields in the healthy rat brain. J Neurosurg. 2015 May;122(5):1239-47. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.JNS132083. Epub 2014 Oct 24. PubMed 25343187 ↗
  • Cheing GL, Li X, Huang L, Kwan RL, Cheung KK. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) promote early wound healing and myofibroblast proliferation in diabetic rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2014 Apr;35(3):161-9. doi: 10.1002/bem.21832. Epub 2014 Jan 3. PubMed 24395219 ↗
  • Hannemann PF, Mommers EH, Schots JP, Brink PR, Poeze M. The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic fields bone growth stimulation in acute fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1093-106. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2014-8. Epub 2014 Jun 4. PubMed 24895156 ↗
  • Matic M, Lazetic B, Poljacki M, Djuran V, Matic A, Gajinov Z. Influence of different types of electromagnetic fields on skin reparatory processes in experimental animals. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 May;24(3):321-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-008-0564-0. Epub 2008 Jun 7. PubMed 18536960 ↗
  • Stiller MJ, Pak GH, Shupack JL, Thaler S, Kenny C, Jondreau L. A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 1992 Aug;127(2):147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb08047.x. PubMed 1390143 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05493943
Lead sponsor
PEMF Systems, Inc.
Collaborators
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Southern California Institute for Research and Education
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 5, 2024

Study contacts

Michael Davis
Contact
JMDavis@pemfsystems.com
818-943-5414
Christine Ma, MD, MPH
Contact
Christine.Ma@va.gov
562-826-8000 ext. 1-2889
Ian Gordon, MD, PhD
principal investigator · VA Long Beach Healthcare System

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion