An interventional study of COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP) in Pain Management, Ergonomics and Wounds and Injuries, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-28.
Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Home care workers (HCWs) are at-risk for chronic pain and associated problems, including emotional distress, opioid use and misuse, and work-related disability. To address these issues, the proposed study will adapt an established peer-led and supportive group program to address the needs of HCWs with chronic pain. The new program, named COMPASS for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP), will integrate work-based injury protections with pain education and cognitive-behavioral therapy strategies for pain self-management in order to reduce pain interference with HCWs' work and life, and advance their safety, health, and well-being.
Organizational intervention research can be all breakthrough with no follow-through. Few effective interventions developed by scientists are widely adopted in practice. To address this research-to-practice gap and address a socially important problem, the investigators will translate their established and disseminated COMPASS (COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support) intervention to address the needs of home care workers (HCWs) with chronic pain. The burden of injuries and pain is great among HCWs, which places them at-risk for emotional distress, opioid use/misuse, and work-related disability. Moreover, HCWs are predominantly low income, middle aged women. Between 1999 and 2015 middle-aged women experienced a 471% increase in prescription opioid-related overdoses. COMPASS is a peer-led and scripted group curriculum that produced many significant impacts on meaningful outcomes for HCWs in a randomized controlled trial (Cohen's d range = .45 to .84), including increased safety communication with clients and hazard correction in homes. COMPASS was subsequently adopted by the Oregon Home Care Commission, and is currently offered statewide as a paid training course to publicly funded HCWs. While these are exceptional research-to-practice impacts, the original curriculum did not directly address chronic pain, and resulted in only small non-significant reductions in pain severity. The investigators also found that HCWs with pain-related limitations at baseline made significant safety changes, but experienced less benefit from the intervention than workers without limitations. An added barrier is that protective low-tech ergonomic tools (e.g., slide boards, transfer belts) are typically not funded by insurance. The investigators' qualitative research revealed that low-wage HCWs are often forced to improvise or do without such tools. In the translation plan, existing COMPASS lessons will be adapted for HCWs with chronic pain, and new lessons from the Pain Survival Guide (co-authored by Dr. Turk, Co-I) will integrate pain education and proven cognitive-behavioral therapy pain self-management strategies. The investigators will also strengthen injury protections by including an online ergonomic assessment and voucher for HCWs to purchase tools. The translated COMPASS for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP) intervention will be evaluated with a cluster randomized waitlist control design. The primary hypothesis is that COMPASS-NP will reduce pain interference with work and life. Secondary outcomes include pain/injury prevention behaviors (e.g., ergonomic tool use), injuries, pain severity, risk for opioid misuse, and worker well-being. Regional implementation and evaluation with partners in Oregon (government), Washington (labor), and Idaho (private sector) will maximize dissemination knowledge and impact. The 5-year project will accomplish 4 aims: 1) Adapt and pilot COMPASS-NP in Oregon; 2) Determine effects of COMPASS-NP across Oregon, Washington, and Idaho; 3) Describe the translation and implementation of COMPASS-NP across partners and systems; and 4) Disseminate COMPASS-NP knowledge, tools, and toolkits.
1,192 studies on the registry are indexed under Agnosia; 508 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 78 across 1,026 interventional studies indexed under Agnosia.
Browse Agnosia studies →Oregon Health and Science University is the lead sponsor of 676 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.
Of its 49 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 36 (73%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intervention during weeks 0-10 (10 weekly group sessions). Follow-up with no treatment during weeks 11-20.
Behavioral: COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
Usual practice during weeks 0-10. Intervention during weeks 11-20 (10 weekly group sessions).
Behavioral: COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
A peer-led and supportive group program (10 weekly sessions) designed to address the needs of HCWs with chronic or elevated pain. The intervention will integrate work-based injury protections with pain education and cognitive-behavioral therapy strategies for pain self-management.
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Pain Interference with Work
Work Limitations Questionnaire (1-5; 5=worst \[limited all the time\]). Assesses limitations related to time, physical, mental-interpersonal, and outputs.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Pain Interference with Life
Brief Pain Inventory Subscale on pain interference (0-10; 10=worst \[completely interferes\]). Interference related to general activity, walking, work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Pain/Injury Prevention Actions
Assessment questions developed by authors addressing total number of safety actions taken during the prior 10 weeks (0 to 5 or more; 0=worst \[no actions taken\]). Sum of counts for five items that address new ergonomic tool use or techniques for moving objects or assisting client mobility; new ergonomic tools or techniques for housekeeping; correcting slip, trip, and fall hazards in homes; correcting "other" hazards in homes; and talking with client about improving safety.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Minor Injuries
Question developed by authors addressing the number of minor injuries (minor cuts, bruises, back/neck pain or sprains) during the previous 10 weeks (5 or more=worst \[highest possible number of reported minor injuries).
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Lost Work Time Injuries
Question developed by authors addressing the number of injuries resulting in one or more days off of work during the prior 10 weeks (0-5 or more lost work time injuries; 5 or more=worst \[highest possible reported number of injuries).
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in the Rating of Average Pain Severity
Brief Pain Inventory item addressing average pain severity, with author-selected time anchor of during the past week (0-10; 10=worst \[worst pain possible\]).
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Well-being
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-Mental Health Subscale (items 2,4, and 5 are rated 5-1; 1=worst \[poor\]; item 10 is rated 1-5 and reverse coded; before reverse coding 5=worst \[always bothered\]). Items assess quality of life, mental health and mood/thinking, satisfaction with social relationships, and emotional problems.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Daily Minutes of Physical Activity
Actigraphy sample of seven days (hip-worn) will be collected to calculate average daily minutes of physical activity (focused on combined light and moderate intensity minutes).
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Average Nightly Sleep Duration
Actigraphy sample of seven days (wrist-worn) will be collected to calculate average hours and minutes of sleep duration for the main sleep period each night.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Average Nightly Sleep Efficiency
Actigraphy sample of seven days (wrist-worn) will be collected to calculate average sleep efficiency (percent of time in bed spent asleep) for the main sleep period.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Pain Medication Use
Brief Pain Inventory item assessing frequency of pain medication use per 24 hours. Five frequency interval options range from "not every day" to "more than 6 times per day" (more than 6 is worst \[highest daily frequency\]).
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Risk of Future Opioid Misuse
Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R; for workers not currently using opioids). Item ratings of 0-4 (4=worst \[very often\]) with a total sum of 18 indicating positive for being at-risk for future opioid misuse.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Between Groups Difference in Changes in Current Opioid Misuse
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM; for workers currently using opioid medications). Ratings of 0-4 (4=worst \[very often\]) with a score of 9 or greater indicating a positive for current opioid misuse.
Time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Oregon Health and Science University