An interventional study of Erector spinae plane block in Pain, Chronic, sponsored by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-27.
Sponsored by Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary endpoint of this study was to identify if eretor spinae plane block (ESPB) has any effect in relieving low back pain or leg pain in lumbar radiculopathy. The secondary endpoint was to compare the number of spread level when upper or lower lumbar ESPB was performed.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a less invasive, safer, and technically easy alternative procedure to conventional neuraxial anesthetic techniques. In contrast to common neuraxial techniques such as paravertebral and epidural injections, the ESPB targets an interfascial plane which is far from the spinal cord, root, and pleura. First applied to thoracic neuropathic pain, currently ESPB is being applied to postoperative pain control and includes variable clinical situations. In the abdomen and thoracic wall, thoracic ESPB can be applied for pain control after cardiac surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and thoracotomy. Recently, favorable postoperative pain control after lumbar spinal or lower limb surgeries has been reported with lumbar ESPB. In addition, ESPB has also been used for chronic pain conditions in the upper and lower extremities. To investigate the possible mechanism of action of the ESPB, many previous studies have focused on examining the physical spread of the injected agent. Commonly, contrast dye injections in human cadavers have been utilized to assess the spread level. Physical spread level was determined using various methods including direct dissection or sectioning, computed tomography (CT), thoracoscopic inspection, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with radiocontrast injection. Apart from human cadaver studies, physical spread level has been evaluated in alive patients using a variable volume of local anesthetics mixed with radiocontrast. However, these studies are limited by the small number of included patients. Therefore, the exact spread level of injected local anesthetics remains unclear and a study on a large number of patients is still required
2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 699 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 84 is above the median of 60 across 2,160 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.
Browse Chronic Pain studies →Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Group where ESPB is performed at L2 with local anesthetic mixture 20 ml
Procedure: Erector spinae plane block
Group where ESPB is performed at L4 with local anesthetic mixture 20 ml
Procedure: Erector spinae plane block
fascial plane injection guided by fluoroscopy device
Numerical rating scale changes among 5 times period
numerical rating scale changes after ESPB among 5 times period
Time frame: baseline, 10 minutes after ESPB, 1 week after ESPB, 2 weeks after ESPB, 4 weeks after ESPB
back pain function scale changes among 2 times period
back pain function scale changes after ESPB among 2 times period
Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks after ESPB
spread level in the cranio-caudal direction
fluoroscopic contrast medium spread level in the cranio-caudal direction
Time frame: baseline, 1 minute after ESPB
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center