An interventional study of The Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique in Lumbar Disc Herniation, sponsored by Muş Alparslan University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-02.
Sponsored by Muş Alparslan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study was to research the effect of the Lumbar Spinal Rotational Mobilization technique on radiological findings, pain, disability and joint range of motion (ROM) in patients with lumbar disc herniation
In our study, it was aimed to investigate the acute effect of Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique on radiological findings, pain, disability and range of motion in 26 patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation(LDH) by magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) and physical examination. Disc height, herniation distance and facet joint distance of the patients were measured with MRI. Pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale. Disability was measured with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Lumbar range of motion(ROM) was measured with a goniometer and tape measure. Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique was applied to the patients in 2 sessions with a one-week interval, slowly and with 30 repetitions in both directions. All assessments were repeated within 1 week after treatment. It was observed whether there was an improvement in terms of radiological, pain, disability and ROM in the patients. 2 months after the 2nd evaluation, other parameters except the radiological evaluation were reapplied and it was tried to determine whether the effect persisted.
478 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 104 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 63 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.
Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →Muş Alparslan University is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients included in the study underwent the lumbar rotational spinal mobilization technique during two sessions per week
Other: The Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique
Patients included in the study underwent the lumbar rotational spinal mobilization(LRSM) technique during two sessions per week. The LRSM technique is applied while patients are lying on their side. The uppermost hip and knee are placed in 90 degree flexion, this is to assist rotational stress, and the lower leg is placed in extension. The lower shoulder is strongly pulled; thus, the upper shoulder is positioned toward the posterior and the pelvis moves anteriorly. The clinician stands in front of the patient. They stabilize the upper shoulder with one hand, and place the palm of the other hand behind the hard part of the ilium wing, with forearm horizontal and fingers turned toward the clinician. A rotational force is applied with pressure in the horizontal direction by pulling the hand on the ilium toward the clinician. In this position, 30 slow repeated movements are performed. The same practice is performed on both sides
Assessing disc height change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Time frame: Disc height, was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Assessing disc herniation thickness change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Time frame: Disc herniation thickness was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Assessing facet joint distance change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Time frame: Facet joint distance was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Functional capacity change assessment
The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ) was used to assess disability levels and quality of life linked to low back pain of patients. The OLBPDQ was developed to assess disability linked to pain for people with acute, subacute or chronic low back pain. The OLBPDQ contains 1 item related to pain and 9 items related to daily life activities (personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleep, sexual life, social life and travel). Each item is rated on a 6-point scale ranked from the best scenario to the worst scenario. Points for each item increase by 1 for each response choice from 0 (first response choice) to 5 (final response choice). Missing values are skipped. Total points are calculated as a percentage value
Time frame: The functional capacity of patients participating in the study was assessed 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.
Pain change assessment
The pain levels felt by patients in their low back and surrounding regions was assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS). On this assessment, the patient expresses the pain levels felt by marking their position on a 10 cm scale numbered from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates unbearable pain. Cases are requested to express their pain by marking the appropriate number for their pain level on the scale and the value is recorded in cm.
Time frame: Pain assessment was recorded 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment
Evaluation of joint range of motion change
All patients participating in the study had lumbar flexion, lumbar extension, lumbar lateral flexion and lumbar rotations measured. Lumber flexion and lumbar lateral flexion were obtained by measuring the distance between the ground and middle finger tip with a tape measure. Lumber extension and lumbar rotations were measured with a goniometer
Time frame: Joint range of motion was assessed and recorded 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Intervertebral Disc Displacement→
Muş Alparslan University