ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05484570Updated May 27, 2026

Natural History Study for DNA Repair Disorders

An observational study in DNA Repair Disorder, Cockayne Syndrome and Xeroderma Pigmentosum, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Months and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-27.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
6 Months and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a single-center, single-arm, non-interventional natural history study to evaluate the longitudinal clinical course, functional outcome measures, and candidate biomarkers for individuals with DNA repair disorders, including Cockayne syndrome (CS), xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), and trichothiodystrophy (TTD).

Read the detailed description

This will be a single-center, single-arm, non-interventional natural history study to evaluate the longitudinal clinical course, functional outcome measures, and candidate biomarkers for individuals with DNA repair disorders, including Cockayne syndrome (CS), xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), and trichothiodystrophy (TTD). Our hypothesis is that a reliable and reproducible baseline natural history course can be established for DNA repair disorders using the Early Childhood Assessment of Balance (ECAB) as a primary endpoint and other measures as secondary and exploratory endpoints that may be used in future therapeutic clinical trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • DNA Repair Disorder
  • Cockayne Syndrome
  • Xeroderma Pigmentosum
  • Trichothiodystrophy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,217 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Of its 136 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 95 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Any person 6 months or older who is either diagnosed with a DNA repair disorder, or has a family member who is diagnosed with a DNA repair disorder

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome (CS), xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), or trichothiodystrophy (TTD), based on genetic testing and/or key clinical characteristics l characteristics
  • Has one or more of the following neurodevelopmental or neurological complications
  • Gross motor delay (non-ambulatory or started walking after age 18 months)
  • Language delay (non-verbal or started talking after 18 months)
  • Altered muscle tone (hypertonia, dystonia, hypotonia)
  • Gait difficulties, including stiff gait, short stride, frequent falls, use of orthotics, use of walker
  • Tremors
  • Microcephaly
  • Is a family member of an individual with the above condition
  • No restrictions regarding current ambulatory status
  • Minimum age for enrollment eligibility will be 6 months due to fragility of neonates with severe forms of DNA repair disorders and limitations of motor assessment scales in infants younger than 6 months. There will be no maximum age for enrollment eligibility.
  • No restrictions regarding gender, race, or ethnicity.
  • Voluntary written consent from the participant if adult capable of consenting or parent/guardian if minor or not capable of consenting
  • Written consent of Legally Authorized Representative if enrolling adult lacks capacity to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior history of systemic gene or cell-based therapy
  • Current participation in an interventional clinical trial
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Diagnosed

    Patients who are diagnosed with a DNA Repair Disorder

    Other: Interval History · Other: Physical Examination · Other: ECAB Assessment · Other: Gait Assessment · Other: Specimen Sample Collection

  • Control

    Healthy family members of enrolled diagnosed participants.

    Other: ECAB Assessment · Other: Gait Assessment · Other: Specimen Sample Collection

Interventions

  • OtherInterval History

    The study coordinator or another team member will review standard health questions relevant to DNA repair disorders. The control group will not undergo an interval history. These questions will include: 1. How the participant's appetite and general weight trajectory has been since the last assessment 2. Any episodes of unexplained bleeding or bruising 3. Any jaundice 4. General level of alertness and interaction with family and others 5. Any changes in cognitive function such as speech, following commands, comprehension 6. Any changes in motor function, including the development of tremors and stiffness in movements

  • OtherPhysical Examination

    A board-certified neurologist (the principal investigator) will perform a general physical examination and a neurological examination and complete a standard CRF to document relevant findings. The control group will not undergo a physical examination.

  • OtherECAB Assessment

    An Early Clinical Assessment of Balance (ECAB) will be performed by the physical therapist. Part I can be assessed in all affected individuals, and Part II requires ambulation. For non-ambulatory individuals, only Part I will be applied. The items in the ECAB are summarized as follows: Part I. Head and trunk postural control (maximum 36 points) Head righting - lateral (right and left) Head righting - extension Head righting - flexion Rotation in trunk (right and left) Equilibrium reactions in sitting (right and left) Protective extension - side Protection extension - backward Part II. Sitting and standing postural control (maximum 64 points) Sitting with back unsupported but feet supported on floor or on a stool Sitting to standing Standing unsupported with eyes closed Standing unsupported with feet together Turns 360 degrees Placing alternate foot on the step while standing unsupported

  • OtherGait Assessment

    For ambulatory participants, the physical therapist will also assess standardized gait outcome measures, including: 1. Gait Speed: may be measured over a 10 meter distance, assessing both "comfortable" walking speed and "fast" walking speed 2. 10-meter walk/run: timed assessment at fastest gait attainable. This assessment would be omitted for those participants who are determined to have a high fall risk. 3. Timed Up and Go (TUG): time to stand from a chair, walk 3 meters, go around a cone, and return to the chair (with or without an assistive device) 4. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI): assesses 8 balance challenges while walking

  • OtherSpecimen Sample Collection

    Total blood volumes collected at each visit will be limited to 5mL/kg body weight, with a maximum of 18mL. Saliva samples may be obtained if research is taking place where blood samples cannot be drawn or transferred.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Longitudinal stability of cerebellar and gait function on neurological examination

    The longitudinal stability of cerebellar and gait function will be assessed by the presence or absence of tremors (absence = 1, presence = 0), dysmetria (absence = 1, presence = 0), dysdiadochokinesia (absence = 1, presence = 0) and Gowers sign (absence = 1, presence = 0). The scores will be added to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 4, with 4 representing the best performance.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Longitudinal stability of motor function using gait speed measurement

    Longitudinal stability of motor function in study participants as assessed by gait speed measured over a 10 meter distance

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Longitudinal stability of motor function using 10 meter walk/run test

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Longitudinal stability of motor function using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Longitudinal stability of motor function using the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)

    Time frame: 3 years

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory

    We have selected the following 4 biomarkers to be measured in serum samples at each study visit: 1. Neurofilament light (NfL) 2. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) 3. Total tau (t-tau) 4. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCHL1) We have selected the following 4 biomarkers to be measured in serum samples at each study visit: 1. Neurofilament light (NfL)40-42 2. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)43 3. Total tau (t-tau)44 4. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCHL1)45 To determine whether a serum biomarker can track disease status and progression and serve as a secondary outcome measure. To determine genetic diagnoses for those who are genetically undiagnosed, and to use transcriptomic analyses to seek additional biomarker candidates.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Minnesota- Twin Cities
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This study will be conducted in accordance with the following publication and data sharing policies and regulations: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy, which ensures that the public has access to the published results of NIH funded research. It requires scientists to submit final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts that arise from NIH funds to the digital archive PubMed Central upon acceptance for publication. This study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. As such, this trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. In addition, every attempt will be made to publish results in peer-reviewed journals.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 50 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2022
First posted
Aug 2, 2022
StartActual
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
May 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05484570
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2022
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 27, 2026

Study contacts

Seth Stafki
Contact
neurogenetics@umn.edu
Peter Kang, MD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion