ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05459545Updated Nov 25, 2024

Real-World Evaluation of Eko Algorithms in a Point of Care Setting

An observational study in Murmur, Heart, Innocent Murmurs and Heart Murmurs, sponsored by Eko Devices, Inc.. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by Eko Devices, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
371
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to prospectively test and validate the utility of Eko artificial intelligence (AI) plus Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) murmur characterization in algorithm in a real world, point-of-care setting.

Read the detailed description

Eko has developed a platform to aid in screening for cardiac conditions using a digital stethoscope and machine-learning algorithms to detect the presence or absence of heart conditions such as heart murmurs and atrial fibrillation.

In November 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Eko a 510(k) clearance for the marketing of "Eko AI", a set of machine learning algorithms that includes atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart murmur detection. The detection of heart murmurs may aid in detecting occult and dangerous valvular heart disease (VHD). Other Eko AI outputs include bradycardia, tachycardia, noisy signal, QRS duration, and unclassified data. Eko AI has accuracy comparable to physician judgment (atrial fibrillation sensitivity of 98.9% and specificity of 96.9%, murmur sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 87.8%). Both AF and VHD can cause significant morbidity and mortality when missed or diagnosed late.

Eko has further developed the murmur detection function of Eko AI to now not only identify whether a murmur is present, but also to inform the clinician of its timing during the cardiac cycle (systole vs diastole), and whether it is innocent or structural. We are calling this product the Eko Murmur Analysis Software (EMAS) and submitted a premarket notification to FDA in December 2021.

This study sets out to understand the utility of the Eko AI plus EMAS murmur characterization algorithm in real world use. Collecting data in a point-of-care setting will demonstrate how accurately the algorithm characterizes murmurs in comparison to an AI-unassisted clinical examination. Algorithm output and clinical determination will be confirmed by echocardiographic ground truth, with the results being blinded until the end of the patient visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Murmur, Heart
  • Innocent Murmurs
  • Heart Murmurs
  • Pathologic Murmur
  • Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • machine learning
03

In context

Heart Murmurs

28 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Murmurs; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 371 is above the median of 188 across 16 observational studies indexed under Heart Murmurs.

Browse Heart Murmurs studies →

Lead sponsor

Eko Devices, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult primary care clinic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient consents to participation
  • Willing to have heart sounds recorded with an electronic stethoscope
  • Willing to undergo echocardiography
  • Willing to undergo a 12-lead electrocardiogram
  • Adults aged 65 years and older
  • History of at least one of the following: hypertension, BMI ≥ 30, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA, previous coronary surgery, or previous coronary angiography
  • No prior diagnosis of valve disease or heart murmur

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is unwilling or unable to give written informed consent
  • Patients experiencing a known or suspected acute cardiac event
  • Under the age of 65 years old
  • Prior diagnosis of valve disease or heart murmurs
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
371 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceUse of Eko CORE and Eko CORE 500 electronic stethoscope

    Auscultation of heart sounds using electronic stethoscopes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Eko's AI relative to ground truth

    Sensitivity and specificity of Eko's murmur detection algorithm relative to ground truth. Ground truth is defined as echocardiography-confirmed clinically-significant (graded "mild-to-moderate" or greater severity) VHD that is associated with a murmur, as confirmed by an expert panel.

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

  2. Sensitivity and Specificity of Eko's AI relative to PCP auscultation and ground truth

    Sensitivity and specificity of Eko's murmur detection algorithm relative to ground truth and PCP auscultation ground truth. Ground truth is defined as echocardiography-confirmed clinically-significant (graded "mild-to-moderate" or greater severity) VHD that is associated with a murmur, as confirmed by an expert panel.

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

  3. Positive and negative predictive values for AI detecting new VHD

    Positive and negative predictive values of Eko's algorithms for detecting new clinically significant valvular heart disease

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

  4. Positive and negative predictive values for PCP detecting new VHD

    Positive and negative predictive values of a PCP's outpatient visit for detecting new clinically significant valvular heart disease

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Eko's AI relative to echocardiographic ground truth.

    Sensitivity and specificity of Eko's murmur detection algorithm relative to echocardiographic ground truth.

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

  2. Performance of the machine algorithm vs. the physician

    Performance of the machine algorithm vs. the physician

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

  3. Number of cardiac tests and consultations ordered

    Number of cardiac tests and consultations ordered

    Time frame: 02/20/2022 - 05/20/2024

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Pentucket Medical Associates
    Haverhill, Massachusetts 01830, United States
  • Pentucket Medical Associates
    Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843, United States
  • Maria Medical Center
    Dunn, North Carolina 27546, United States
  • Edgewater Medical Center
    Lillington, North Carolina 27546, United States
  • Hometown Medical PLLC
    Lillington, North Carolina 27546, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All participant data will be de-identified. Data will only be shared with Eko Devices, and not shared with any other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05459545
Lead sponsor
Eko Devices, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2022
Start date
Apr 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion