CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05441735Updated May 3, 2023

The Effectiveness of Digital Care-plan for Improving Long-term Care 2.0 Service Activation Proportion

An interventional study of APP in Digital Care-plan, Long-term Care and Activation Proportion, sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-03.

Sponsored by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2022, registered Jun 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Digital tools can potentially improve the public's reception to and understanding of long-term care information, which will be significantly helpful for long-term care workers and effectively increase the coverage provided by long-term care services. The results of this study could be used to further explore the feasibility of service digitization in the field of long-term care, as well as the integration of technology and professional knowledge to facilitate access to long-term care resources in a modern setting.

Read the detailed description

Background The number of care recipients served by the 10-Year Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 has grown by approximately 44% since its implementation in 2017. However, only about 228,000 individuals were evaluated by care centers from January to November 2018. This indicates that long-term care services had achieved a service coverage of 29.8% for January-November 2018, serving less than 30% of the individuals who need long-term care. Research on the reasons for not using such services has revealed that the public has limited access to and understanding of information relating to long-term care resources, making it difficult for people draw the connection between their needs and long-term care services.

Aim The study will involve the development of an app-based digital care program, in the hope of enhancing the public's access to and understanding of long-term care information and expanding the coverage realized by long-term care.

Method The study is a two-group randomized controlled trial with an expected sample of 76 participants, and the app-based digital care program will serve as the intervention tool in this study. The experimental group will have access to information on the Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 through the app-based digital care program, while the control group will only have access to information on the Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 through conventional paper-based media. Data collection is then conducted using a pre- and post-test approach and through the administration of a structured questionnaire. The data collected include the participants' willingness to use long-term care services, their attitudes toward long-term care services, and their service use behavior. For the experimental group, an additional survey was also conducted to assess their satisfaction with the use the app-based digital care program to access information, with the aim of examining the effectiveness of the program when used by new Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 cases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Digital Care-plan
  • Long-term Care
  • Activation Proportion
  • Case Management, APP(Application)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 119 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Those who meet the eligibility requirements for long-term care services:
  • Those who are over 65 years old.
  • Those who have no primary caregiver and who have clear consciousness and cognition, who can converse in Mandarin and Taiwanese, who can fill in the questionnaire, or who can
  • The researcher read out word for word, filled in after oral answer, and agreed to participate in this researcher.

Primary Caregiver:

  • Those who mainly assist the disabled in activities of daily living and provide the most common daily activities for the family
  • The caregivers in terms of motor function, or those who are identified as the main caregivers by the disabled, can fill in the questionnaire, or the researchers can read them out verbatim, and fill in the answers after their oral answers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who are not eligible for long-term care services.
  • Those who have used the long-term photo 2.0 service.
  • Those who cannot operate 3C products or surf the Internet.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental group

    will have access to information on the Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 through the app-based digital care program, while the

    Combination Product: APP

  • No intervention
    control group

    will only have access to information on the Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 through conventional paper-based media.

Interventions

  • Combination productAPP

    APP as an instructional tool for visiting health education

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. using a pre- and post-test approach and through the administration of a structured questionnaire.

    This research tool looks forward to understanding long-term care service users, their willingness to use long-term care 2.0 services, There are 18 questions in total, including the following topics: 1. Basic attribute information. 2. Willingness to activate the service: The higher the score, the higher the willingness to enable the service, with a total score of 25 points. 3. Attitudes in service use: The higher the score, the closer to a reasonable and appropriate attitude, the higher the score (5 points), and the lower the score (1 point), the total score is 35 points. 4. Service usage behavior: The answer is based on a five-point Likert Scale (1-5 points). The higher the score, the higher the understandiThe total score is 55 points.

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction with the use of the app digital care plan (visual analog scale)

    Mainly for the experimental group after using the App digital care program for 8 weeks, in order to understand the satisfaction of the case and the main caregiver on the interactive use of the App, a visual analog scale (visual analogy scale) composed of a parallel total length of 20 cm. analog scale), the score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing overall dissatisfaction with the app's digital care plan, and 100 indicating overall satisfaction with the app's digital care plan. A line, and the corresponding score represents the satisfaction with the digital care plan after using the app for eight weeks.

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chang Hui Ping
    Taipei, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05441735
Lead sponsor
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Responsible party
CHANG HUI PING (Principal Investigator, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2022
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2022
Completion
Jan 18, 2023
Last update
May 3, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion