CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05439850Updated Feb 27, 2026

Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

A Phase 4 interventional study of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bioinductive implant in Rotator Cuff Tears and Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy, sponsored by Henry Ford Health System. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Henry Ford Health System · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized-controlled study is to compare outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a Bioinductive Implant (study group) to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (control group). The primary outcome of this study is rotator cuff repair integrity (absence of full- or partial-thickness defect) demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the study group will have higher rates of repair integrity demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.

Read the detailed description

A bioinductive patch is an implant that may foster tendon regrowth and healing following surgery. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: control and investigational. All surgical patients will have failed non-surgical/conservative options for 6 weeks. Patients in the "control group" will receive the standard surgery (arthroscopic rotator cuff repair) . Patients in the "experimental group" will receive the same surgical treatment, with the addition of the bioinductive patch. This patch will be implanted during surgery. Then, using a combination of ultrasound studies and other measures, the investigators will assess how well the patch works compared to surgery alone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tears
  • Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy

Keywords

  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Bioinductive
  • Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
  • Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
03

In context

Rotator Cuff Injuries

734 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 78 is above the median of 60 across 538 interventional studies indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries.

Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Henry Ford Health System is the lead sponsor of 293 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
  • Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
  • Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
  • Ability to read and understand English.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patient failed ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment, which included structured, in-person physical therapy or documented home therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
  • Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
  • Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
  • Small (\<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
  • Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon
  • Acute and traumatic rotator cuff tears
  • Active infection
  • Cancer
  • Autoimmune and rheumatologic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Surgical treatment alone, consisting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.

    Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair · Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound Imaging

  • Experimental
    Study Group

    Identical surgical treatment as control group plus bio-inductive patch implant. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.

    Procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair · Biological: Bioinductive implant · Diagnostic Test: Ultrasound Imaging

Interventions

  • Procedurearthroscopic rotator cuff repair

    This procedure is the standard of care for rotator cuff tears who fail conservative treatment options.

  • BiologicalBioinductive implant

    A bioinductive implant that is designed to promote healing of the torn rotator cuff tendon after surgery.

    Also known as: Bioinductive patch

  • Diagnostic testUltrasound Imaging

    An ultrasound will be performed on each patient one year postoperatively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rotator cuff repair integrity

    absence of full- or partial-thickness defect as demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.

    Time frame: Preoperative to 1 year postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. PROMs scores for upper extremity function

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity function. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 0 - 100-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 0 representing the minimum, and 100 representing the maximum function.

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

  2. PROMs scores for depression

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for depression. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher increased depression (worse).

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

  3. PROMs scores for upper extremity pain interference

    Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity pain and how it interferes with the patients daily life. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher pain interference (worse).

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

  4. Shoulder Range of Motion

    Standard range of motion values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

  5. Shoulder Strength

    Standard shoulder strength values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits. Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale will be used to measure the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale with 0 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum. Higher scores are better/normal.

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

  6. Complications

    Both intra- and postoperative complications will be collected.

    Time frame: Intraoperative to 2 years postoperative

  7. Reoperation

    Whether or not patients required another operation.

    Time frame: 2 years postoperative

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Henry Ford Health
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    • Johnny Kasto, MD · Contact · jkasto1@hfhs.org · 3132448078
    • Stephanie J Muh, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No IPD will be shared with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05439850
Lead sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
Responsible party
Stephanie Muh, MD (Deputy Service Chief, Principal Investigator, Henry Ford Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2022
Start date
Aug 16, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Johnny Kasto, MD
Contact
jkasto1@hfhs.org
313-244-8078
Stephanie J Muh, MD
Contact
Stephanie J Muh, MC
principal investigator · Henry Ford Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion