CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05434182Updated Apr 4, 2025

Intradermal Suture Versus Stapling for Groin Skin Closure in Vascular Surgery (VASC-INF Trial)

An interventional study of Intradermal Suture and Metallic Staples in Surgical Site Infection, sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-04.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2022, registered Jun 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent and fearsome complications in vascular surgery due to its high morbidity and mortality. In addition, SSI is one of the factors related to the development of prosthetic infection. Consequently, it represents a significant increase in hospital stay and healthcare costs.

A 2021 meta-analysis on groin SSI prevention strategies in arterial surgeries reported that using intradermal sutures could be associated with a lower SSI rate. The published results from a single-center retrospective study comparing SSI rates before and after implementing an SSI prevention protocol also suggest better outcomes with intradermal suturing.

This study aims to assess the SSI incidences of both skin closure techniques in vascular surgery patients undergoing femoral artery approach through a perpendicular groin skin incision.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Site Infection

Keywords

  • Femoral approach
  • Intradermal suture
  • Metallic staples
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Groin
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with chronic lower limb ischemia or aortic, iliac, or femoral aneurysm
  • With a scheduled surgery for one of the following indications:
  • Femoropopliteal Bypass
  • Femorodistal Bypass
  • Aortobifemoral Bypass
  • Axillofemoral or Axillobifemoral Bypass
  • Femorofemoral Bypass
  • Femoral Endarterectomy
  • Femoral approach for exclusion of an aortic aneurysm
  • Surgical procedure with an incision perpendicular to the inguinal fold
  • Patients who undergo both unilateral and bilateral surgical approaches *

    *Note: We will consider one patient as one intervention (i.e., bilateral approaches will be quantified as one single inguinal surgical approach). In the case of bilateral procedures, the same closure technique will be used for both sides.

  • Patients who sign the written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Background of a previous surgical intervention in the groin area.
  • Femoral approach carried out in a surgical emergency setting
  • Femoral approach performed due to a femoral pseudoaneurysm
  • A surgical procedure performed with a transverse/oblique incision to the groin
  • A patient who withdraws consent for participating in the trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intradermal Suture Group

    Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with an intradermal suture using Monosyn® (Braun®) 4/0 absorbable monofilament.

    Procedure: Intradermal Suture

  • Active comparator
    Metallic Staples

    Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with metallic stapling using Visistat® (Weck®) 35W skin stapler.

    Procedure: Metallic Staples

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntradermal Suture

    Skin closure with an intradermal suture using Monosyn® (Braun®) 4/0 absorbable monofilament.

  • ProcedureMetallic Staples

    Skin closure with metallic stapling using Visistat® (Weck®) 35W skin stapler.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI* -(superficial and/or deep) up to 28 (±2) after surgery.

    According to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Classification

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number (percentage) of patients with other surgical wound complications up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.

    Complications include but are not limited to seroma, hematoma, lymphorrhagia.

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

  2. Number (percentage) of patients who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

  3. Number (percentage) of patients with SSI who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

  4. Time of prophylactic antibiotic administration

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

  5. Types of microorganisms isolated from skin microbiological culture, subcutaneous tissue sample culture, and SSI secretion culture up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.

    Time frame: 28 (±2) days after surgery

  6. Types of antibiotic therapy used in patients with SSI

    Time frame: 84 (±7) days after surgery

  7. Plasma albumin concentration

    Time frame: Baseline visit to 28 (±2) days after surgery

  8. Body Mass Index

    Time frame: Baseline visit to 28 (±2) days after surgery

  9. Surgical incision length

    Length (in centimeters \[cm\]) of the cutaneous incision performed to gain access to the surgical site. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.

    Time frame: On the day of performing the surgical procedure

  10. Total surgery duration

    Duration (in minutes) of the surgical procedure. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.

    Time frame: On the day of performing the surgical procedure

  11. Type of hemostatic material used during surgery

    This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.

    Time frame: On the day of performing the surgical procedure

  12. Number of days between hospital admission and the surgical intervention

    The number of days gone by from hospital admission until the day the surgery is performed. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.

    Time frame: From the day of hospital admission to the day of performing the surgical procedure

  13. Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI (superficial and/or deep) up to 84 (±7) days after surgery

    According to the NHSN classification

    Time frame: 84 (±7) days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
    L'Hospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE, Guadagnoli E, Meara E, Platt R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Feb;9(2):196-203. doi: 10.3201/eid0902.020232. PubMed 12603990 ↗
  • Chakfe N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, Fourneau I, Glaudemans AWJM, Koncar I, Lindholt J, Melissano G, Saleem BR, Senneville E, Slart RHJA, Szeberin Z, Venermo M, Vermassen F, Wyss TR, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Bastos Goncalves F, Kakkos SK, Kolh P, Tulamo R, Vega de Ceniga M, Document Reviewers, von Allmen RS, van den Berg JC, Debus ES, Koelemay MJW, Linares-Palomino JP, Moneta GL, Ricco JB, Wanhainen A. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):339-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016. Epub 2020 Feb 5. No abstract available. PubMed 32035742 ↗
  • Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) Study Group. Groin wound infection after vascular exposure (GIVE) multicentre cohort study. Int Wound J. 2021 Apr;18(2):164-175. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13508. Epub 2020 Nov 25. PubMed 33236858 ↗
  • Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;20(11):725-30. doi: 10.1086/501572. PubMed 10580621 ↗
  • Gwilym BL, Dovell G, Dattani N, Ambler GK, Shalhoub J, Forsythe RO, Benson RA, Nandhra S, Preece R, Onida S, Hitchman L, Coughlin P, Saratzis A, Bosanquet DC. Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Adjuncts for the Prevention of Groin Wound Surgical Site Infection in Arterial Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;61(4):636-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.053. Epub 2021 Jan 7. PubMed 33423912 ↗
  • Nikulainen V, Helmio P, Hurme S, Hakovirta H. Intra-Dermal Absorbable Suture in the Groin Incision Associated with Less Groin Surgical Site Infections than Trans-Dermal Sutures in Vascular Surgical Patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;20(1):45-48. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.202. Epub 2018 Oct 6. PubMed 30300081 ↗
  • Parizh D, Ascher E, Raza Rizvi SA, Hingorani A, Amaturo M, Johnson E. Quality improvement initiative: Preventative Surgical Site Infection Protocol in Vascular Surgery. Vascular. 2018 Feb;26(1):47-53. doi: 10.1177/1708538117719155. Epub 2017 Jul 14. PubMed 28708024 ↗
  • Engin C, Posacioglu H, Ayik F, Apaydin AZ. Management of vascular infection in the groin. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(4):529-34. PubMed 16429897 ↗
  • Yashar JJ, Weyman AK, Burnard RJ, Yashar J. Survival and limb salvage in patients with infected arterial prostheses. Am J Surg. 1978 Apr;135(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90027-2. PubMed 637195 ↗
  • Pleger SP, Nink N, Elzien M, Kunold A, Koshty A, Boning A. Reduction of groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT): a prospective, randomised, single-institution study. Int Wound J. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12836. Epub 2017 Oct 25. PubMed 29068153 ↗
  • Antonios VS, Noel AA, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Baddour LM. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: a risk factor analysis using a case-control study. J Infect. 2006 Jul;53(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 28. PubMed 16310254 ↗
  • Oderich GS, Panneton JM. Aortic graft infection. What have we learned during the last decades? Acta Chir Belg. 2002 Feb;102(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2002.11679254. No abstract available. PubMed 11925745 ↗
  • Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Chaikof EL, Pomposelli FB, Schermerhorn ML. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.049. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23312940 ↗
  • Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Barnes ML, Saunders RS, Saha S, Havlena J, Rathouz PJ, Kent KC. Predictors of surgical site infection after hospital discharge in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):1023-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.453. Epub 2015 Jul 3. PubMed 26143662 ↗
  • Leekha S, Lahr BD, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P, Duncan AA, Orenstein R. Preoperative risk prediction of surgical site infection requiring hospitalization or reoperation in patients undergoing vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Feb 27. PubMed 26926939 ↗
  • Pounds LL, Montes-Walters M, Mayhall CG, Falk PS, Sanderson E, Hunter GC, Killewich LA. A changing pattern of infection after major vascular reconstructions. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):511-7. PubMed 16382265 ↗
  • Gurusamy KS, Toon CD, Allen VB, Davidson BR. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2. PubMed 24526375 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 21, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The sponsor will oversee the dataset. Granting access to this information will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and upon reasonable request by the interested party.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05434182
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Responsible party
Albert Gonzalez-Sagredo (Surgeon at the Vascular Surgery and Angiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2022
Start date
Mar 4, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2025
Completion
Mar 14, 2025
Last update
Apr 4, 2025

Study contacts

Elena Iborra, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge - Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion