CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05429099ViPMRUpdated Sep 8, 2026

Mandibular Reconstruction Preplanning (ViPMR)

An interventional study of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) and Free-Hand Surgery in Oral Cavity Cancer and Oral Cancer, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
420
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP), where 3D modeling is used to create 3D-printed surgical guides, has been shown to improve outcomes for patients who undergo mandibular reconstruction surgery, usually due to invasion of cancer from the oral cavity to the jaw. This trial will directly compare the outcomes of patients who receive VSP versus patients who receive the current standard of care, which is Free-Hand Surgery (FHS). They will be randomized into either treatment at a 1:1 ratio and bony union rates will be compared between 12-month postoperative CT scans for each treatment group. Secondary objectives include comparing other short and long-term complication rates, reconstruction accuracy, quality of life, and functional outcomes of VSP and FHS. An economic analysis of VSP will also be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Cavity Cancer
  • Oral Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oral Cavity Cancer
  • Oral Cancer
  • Mandibular Reconstruction
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • primary diagnosis requiring mandibulectomy and fibular or scapular free flap reconstructive surgery
  • are over the age of 18
  • cognitive ability and language skills that allow participation in the trial
  • provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe comorbidities including metastatic disease
  • do not have a recent (within 30 days) CT scan and are unable/unwilling to receive a head CT scan at the latest 6 days prior to surgery
  • prior history of head or neck cancer within last 5 years
  • prior history of head or neck radiation treatment at any time
  • pregnant of lactating women
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
420 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Free-Hand Surgery (FHS)

    In FHS, the site surgeon will proceed with the surgery as per their routine practice.

    Procedure: Free-Hand Surgery

  • Experimental
    Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP)

    The trial research engineer (RE), located at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH), will segment the CT data to create a 3D model for surgical planning. During the teleconference between site surgeon (SS) and RE, the RE will load the CT data and the segmented 3D model into the virtual planning environment. With the RE navigating the software, which was created in-house at VGH and used in a previous case series, the SS will determine the extent of disease and define the resection planes. After the cutting planes are created, the RE will use the software to create the reconstruction plan with either the patient-specific fibula or scapula. Once the surgeon is satisfied with the plan, the teleconference will end and the RE will create and 3D print the surgical guides for the mandible, for the fibula or scapula, as well as the 3D computed reconstruction.

    Procedure: Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP)

Interventions

  • ProcedureVirtual Surgical Planning (VSP)

    The 3D reconstruction model, not requiring sterilization, will be sent directly to the SS. Prior to surgery, the SS will prebend a titanium fixation plate to the reconstruction model. Both the surgical cutting guides and titanium plate will be sterilized prior to use in surgery. If the planned resection cannot proceed (possibly due to tumour growth), the surgical team will note the reason for abandonment and conduct a standard FHS. Intraoperatively, the SS will apply the mandibular cutting guide to make the resection, remove the resected component and apply the pre-bent plate. Next, either the fibular or scapular cutting guide is applied to harvest the transplant which is then secured to the plate. The flap is re-vascularized by joining it to blood vessels in the neck.

  • ProcedureFree-Hand Surgery

    The SS will adopt their standard procedure for the mandibular resection and reconstruction. This typically involves bending a titanium fixation plate, harvesting of the bony flap, and shaping of the segments all intraoperatively based on the SS's judgement.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bony Union

    The primary outcome is nonunion as assessed by two independent radiologists at Vancouver General Hospital, blinded to the intervention, based on the 12-month postoperative CT scan. Each apposition (between native bone-flap or between flap segments) will be assessed as nonunion, partial union, and complete union. Cases where there is disagreement between reviewers will undergo consensus review, any persisting disagreements will be reviewed by a third radiologist and classification will be based on the majority vote.

    Time frame: Assessed on CT scans 12 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Intracondylar Distance

    Comparison to assess structural reconstruction accuracy of postoperative versus preoperative cephalometrics. This will be calculated as the absolute value of postoperative intracondylar distance minus preoperative intercondylar distance (millimeters).

    Time frame: Assessed between preoperative CT (at least 6 days prior to surgery) and postoperative CT (5 days after date of surgery) scans

  2. Difference in Mandibular Angles

    Comparison to assess structural reconstruction accuracy of postoperative versus preoperative cephalometrics. This will calculated as the absolute value of postoperative mandibular angle minus preoperative mandibular angle (degrees).

    Time frame: Assessed between preoperative CT (at least 6 days prior to surgery) and postoperative CT (5 days after date of surgery) scans

  3. University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQoL)

    A questionnaire that measures quality of life which records responses on the 5-point Likert scale; minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and maximum of 5 (strongly agree).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  4. EQ-5D-5L Survey

    Another questionnaire which measures quality of life. Responses recorded as checkboxes that are ticked if applicable to the participant. Participant health is measured on a scale of 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  5. Dysphagia

    Measured through responses to the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) for assessment of dysphagia. MDADI records responses on the 5-point Likert scale; minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and maximum of 5 (strongly agree).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  6. Oral Health

    Measured through responses to the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). Responses recorded one of 5 choices with a point value assigned to each (1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = seldom, and 5 = never).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  7. Fibula harvest site complications

    Measured through responses to the Lower-Limb Tasks Questionnaire (LLTQ) if patient had fibula harvested for reconstruction. or the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire if patients had scapula harvested for reconstruction. Intends to measure donor site morbidity by assessing ease of task completion (4 = no difficulty, 3 = mild difficulty, 2 = moderate difficulty, 1 = severe difficulty, 0 = unable), as well as importance of task (4 = very important, 3 = moderately important, 2 = mildly important, 1 = not important).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  8. Scapula harvest site complications

    Measured through responses to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire if patients had scapula harvested for reconstruction. Intends to measure donor site morbidity by assessing difficulty during tasks (1 = no difficulty, 2 = mild difficulty, 3 = moderate difficulty, 4 = severe difficulty, 5 = unable).

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  9. Economic analysis

    Measured through responses to Health Utilization Questionnaire (HUQ) survey to measure impact to patients economic state as a result of their surgery. Records whether participant has experienced certain situations as no or yes (and asks frequency of these situations). Also asks for associated costs that may

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  10. Occlusal force (bite force)

    Measured through Dental PreScale System (DPS-Fujifilm Global) as an assessment of patient bite force.

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-surgery (4 visits total)

  11. Dental Implantability

    Oral surgeon on the trial will assess the feasibility of the creation of dental implants for the patient postoperatively; responses will recorded as either feasible (1) or infeasible (0).

    Time frame: Up to 100 days after the post-operative CT scan.

  12. Operative Time

    Time from first incision to the end of surgical closure as documented on the nursing record.

    Time frame: Initial Surgery

  13. Ischaemic Time

    Time from cutting off blood supply to operative region to restoring blood supply and flow as documented on the nursing record.

    Time frame: Initial Surgery

  14. Length of Stay

    Time from admission into hospital preoperatively to discharge from hospital postoperatively as documented on patient's medical chart or date of death, whichever came first.

    Time frame: From date of patient's preoperative hospital admission until the date of hospital discharge postoperatively or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 days

  15. Rate of Plate Extrusion

    Complication with plate where may partially or fully be exposed to external environment.

    Time frame: Patients will be monitored for 1 year post-operatively

  16. Rate of Flap Failure

    Complication with flap where donor bone no longer viable as reconstruction piece and replacement required. May be due to ischemic necrosis, infection, osteoradionecrosis, fracturing, etc.

    Time frame: Patients will be monitored for 1 year post-operatively

  17. Rate of Cancer Reoccurrence

    Complication where cancer that was confirmed to be removed (negative resection margins, subsequent chemoradiotherapy results, etc.) reoccurs in the mandibular region. It does not have to be the same type or continuation of previous cancer; any cancer found within mandibular region postoperatively qualifies.

    Time frame: Patients will be monitored for 1 year post-operatively

  18. Adverse Events

    Any additional complication or adverse event not covered by other secondary outcomes will be recorded from patient chart review and through a structured interview with the patients.

    Time frame: Charts and interviews reviewed at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-surgery (6 visits total)

  19. Occlusion

    Extent of oral occlusion measured during in-person clinic assessments; can be recorded as normal occlusion, malocclusion Class I, malocclusion Class II, or malocclusion Class III.

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-surgery (4 visits total)

  20. Jaw Mobility

    Assessment of jaw freedom of movement will be taken during in-person clinic assessments; recorded as measurement of maximal mouth opening (millimeters) from top lip to bottom lip.

    Time frame: Measure documented at time of baseline clinic visit and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-surgery (4 visits total)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Vancouver General Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z1M9, Canada
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Tran KL, Turkdogan S, Dinur AB, Milner TD, Wang E, Nichols A, MacNeil D, Mendez A, Jervis-Bardy J, De Almeida J, Yao C, Goldstein D, Gilbert R, Eskander A, Higgins K, Enepekides D, Gupta M, Zhang H, Au M, Nguyen S, Fels S, Hodgson A, Brasher P, Mitton C, Sabiq F, Fisher C, Yang D, Wong A, Garnis C, Poh C, Durham JS, Prisman E. A multi-centre, participant-blinded, randomized, 3-year study to compare the efficacy of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) to Freehand Surgery (FHS) on bony union and quality of life outcomes for mandibular reconstruction with fibular and scapular free flaps: study protocol for a randomized phase II/III trial. BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13505-5. PubMed 40016641 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05429099
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Eitan Prisman (Clinical Associate Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2022
Start date
Oct 15, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Eitan Prisman, MD, FRCSC
Contact
eitan.prisman@ubc.ca
6048754126
Mathew Fu
Contact
mfu08@student.ubc.ca
6048754111 ext. 22935

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion